owlisdom logo
counterbanner
Need help with your assignments? Get Five Pages FREE & let Owlisdom take your stress away
Spots left
Excellent Grades Expert Help Zero Risk
Claim $75 Discount
Promo Code : FREE5OWL Place Order AI & Plagiarism Free

BUSN 501 Week 3 PAPER: Article Review

Here you can read our FREE Guide on BUSN 501 Week 3 Paper: Article Review and its solution as well. 

Instructions of BUSN 501 Week 3 Paper

Assignment Instructions

Instructions: Select two appropriate articles for review to complete the assignment. Write a review using the instructions below. This paper should be a minimum of 1000 words. Write in APA format. Include cover page, body with in-text citations, & reference list.

Select two Articles

Locate two peer-reviewed articles (related to ethics) published within the last 3 years in a peer-reviewed journal from the online library, then present an assessment comprising of a precise and critical evaluation. Do not summarize the article. First synthesize the position of the authors. Then, evaluate the information presented in the article. Evaluate the information presented in the article for truth.

Is there bias or faulty reasoning? You must support claims of both fact and faulty reasoning.

What are both authors saying on the same topic? Do they agree or is there conflicting information?

Draw conclusions

This assignment has many benefits. First, it requires a search of indexing and abstracting databases from the online library to find an article that meets the specified criteria (must be related to ethics). It also emphasizes what a scholarly article is; to discern between scholarly and non-scholarly writing; to condense someone else’s lengthy argument into a concise report; to think critically about what has been read by assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the research; and, thus, to become participants in the discussions regarding the topic at hand.

FYI: Wikipedia is not an acceptable resource for academic writing. Please use the university library for reference. Articles must be peer-reviewed

Step-By-Step Guide BUSN 501 Week 3 Paper: Article Review

Introduction to BUSN 50 Week 3 Paper

This How-To BUSN 501 Guide aims to assist you in critically reviewing two peer-reviewed articles on ethics. The goal is to summarize, deeply analyze, synthesize the content, critically evaluate it for biases or faulty reasoning, and draw informed conclusions. The BUSN 501 Week 3 Paper: Article Review will enhance your ability to discern scholarly writings and actively engage in academic discussions on ethics.

Locate two peer-reviewed articles (related to ethics) published within the last three years in a peer-reviewed journal from the online library, then present an assessment comprising a precise and critical evaluation.

Selecting Appropriate Articles

To start the BUSN 501 Week 3 Paper: Article Review, we will select two peer-reviewed articles related to Ethics.

I am selecting:

  • Ethics in Research and Publications (2023)
  • Ethical Issues in Research: Perceptions of Researchers, Research Ethics Board Members and Research Ethics Experts (2023)
  • Choose two articles on ethics published within the last three years from peer-reviewed journals. 
  • Ensure these articles provide substantial material for synthesis and critical evaluation.

Example

I selected two recent articles on ethics from peer-reviewed journals: one discussing ethical considerations in automated decision-making systems (2023) and another exploring ethical dilemmas in healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic (2023). These articles, published within the last three years, provide a rich basis for synthesis and critical evaluation, addressing timely ethical issues in distinct contexts.

First, synthesize the position of the authors.

Synthesizing the Authors’ Positions

Next, we will discuss the synthesis of Authors’ Positions.

  • Read both articles thoroughly to understand the main arguments or positions of the authors. 
  • Synthesize these ideas in your own words, explaining each article’s core thesis and supporting arguments.

Example

Article 1: Ethical Considerations in Automated Decision-Making Systems

The core thesis of this article is the ethical implications of relying on artificial intelligence (AI) in decision-making processes. The author argues that while AI can enhance efficiency, it raises significant moral concerns, including bias, transparency, and accountability. Supporting arguments focus on the need for ethical frameworks that ensure AI technologies uphold human dignity and fairness.

Article 2: Ethical Dilemmas in Healthcare During COVID-19

This article examines the ethical challenges faced by healthcare professionals during the pandemic, emphasizing the decision-making process under resource constraints. The primary argument is that moral principles such as fairness, equity, and respect for persons must guide actions during crises. The discussion highlights real-world scenarios where healthcare workers had to make tough choices about resource allocation and patient care.

Then, evaluate the information presented in the article. Evaluate the information presented in the article for truth.

Evaluating the Content of the Articles

For this section, we will evaluate the content of the selected articles.

  • Critically assess each article to identify any biases the authors may have. 
  • Evaluate the logical flow of arguments to spot any faulty reasoning. 
  • Use external sources or your reasoning to support claims about biases or errors.
  • Analyze and compare the perspectives of both authors on the same issue. 
  • Discuss whether they agree, contradict, or complement each other’s viewpoints.

Example

Both articles maintain a scholarly tone with well-supported arguments. However, the first article could be critiqued for a potential bias toward technological determinism, assuming that AI developments inevitably lead to ethical conflicts without considering how these technologies might be shaped to align with moral norms.

The articles address ethics in different domains—technology and healthcare—providing a complementary view of how ethical principles are challenged in varied situations (Floridi, 2023). Both agree on the importance of ethical frameworks but apply them to distinct problems: one in AI and the other in a healthcare crisis.

Key Takeaways

We will summarize the key takeaways of the BUSN 501 Week 3 Paper: Article Review.

  • Based on your synthesis and evaluations, conclude the overall validity and reliability of the arguments presented. 
  • Reflect on how these articles contribute to the field of ethics.
  • Summarize the skills and knowledge you have gained through this assignment. 
  • Emphasize the importance of critical thinking and ethical considerations in academic research and writing.

Example

The arguments presented in both articles are robust and well-founded, drawing extensively on existing literature and real-life examples. They contribute significantly to the field of ethics by highlighting ongoing challenges and the necessity of ethical considerations in decision-making processes. These articles enrich the discourse on ethics by illustrating how principles apply to emerging technology and crises. They advocate for proactive ethical scrutiny and the development of adaptable ethical guidelines to address current and future challenges.

This paper has enhanced my ability to analyze scholarly articles and synthesize complex arguments critically. It underscored the critical importance of ethics in research and decision-making, a lesson applicable in both academic pursuits and professional life. The exercise reaffirmed the crucial role of critical thinking in navigating ethical dilemmas. It emphasized that robust ethical considerations are essential for academic integrity and the broader societal impact of research and professional practices. This review taught me to appreciate the complexity of moral decision-making and the need for thoughtful, informed perspectives in all professional fields.

Closing

This How-To Owlisdom Guide will enhance your ability to engage with complex academic texts and develop your critical thinking and evaluative skills. Through the BUSN 501 Week 3 Paper: Article Review, you become a more discerning reader and thoughtful participant in educational discussions, particularly in ethics. Remember, the essence of scholarly work is not just in understanding arguments but in critically appraising and contributing to them.

References

Drolet, M.-J., Rose-Derouin, E., Leblanc, J.-C., Ruest, M., & Williams-Jones, B. (2023). Ethical Issues in Research: Perceptions of Researchers, Research Ethics Board Members and Research Ethics Experts. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(2), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-022-09455-3 

Floridi, L. (2023). The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Principles, challenges, and opportunities.

Kambhampati, S. B. S., Menon, J., & Maini, L. (2023). Ethics in Research and Publications. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 57(11), 1722–1734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-023-00971-x

Loved This Guide

Share on Social Media:

Click Below to see the
Sample Solution

People Also Read

Scroll to Top