Here you can read Our FREE Ultimate Guide on ENG 101 Module 5 Assignment: Project 1 Feedback and Revision and see its solution.
Instructions of ENG 101 Module 5 Assignment
Overview and Purpose
Estimated Time: 2 hours
Process Step: Feedback
Learning Outcomes: Practice giving and receiving feedback within the writing community, including evaluating and acting on feedback from different sources; Learn to negotiate and integrate ideas that differ from and/or challenge the writer’s ideas
Instructional Materials: Before beginning, review the following.
Note: This assignment has two deadlines: one for posting your draft for your peers to review, and another for completing your two assigned peer reviews.
Instructions
Step 1: Submit Your Draft
First, you will submit your completed draft of your Project 1 rhetorical analysis here for peer review. (This is the same draft, including the self-assessment paragraph, that you submitted for instructor review.) You must submit your draft in both places.
Step 2: Locate Your Assigned Peers to Review
The morning after the deadline for this assignment, Canvas will automatically assign you two peers to review. You can find your assigned peers through this assignment page, in your to-do list, and/or in your Canvas notifications (depending on your settings). If you need help finding your assigned peers, refer to the Writers’ Studio Peer Review GuideLinks to an external site. resource.
Note: If you do not submit your draft for peer review by the deadline, you may not be included in the automatic peer review assignments. If this happens, please reach out to your instructor right away so they can manually assign you peers to review.
Step 3: Review Your Peers’ Drafts
Once you have located your assigned peers, read through their drafts. Be attentive as you read each draft, keeping in mind the goal of peer review is to help your peer see ways to revise their work.
Step 4: Complete Your Peer Reviews Using the Built-In Rubric
Once you have reviewed a peer’s draft, use the built-in rubric to give feedback to your peer. In each rubric category, do the following three things:
Tell your peer one thing they did well in the rubric category.
Tell your peer one thing they could improve on in the rubric category.
Leave a piece of actionable advice. For example, if you felt your peer’s conclusion should be improved, tell them specifically what they could add/change that would make the conclusion stronger. It is not enough to just tell them something needs improvement.
Note that you must fill in the built-in rubric for each peer to complete your peer reviews. Your reviews should not be e-comments or text in the “Comments” area of this assignment. You can give feedback in both of those areas if you wish, but only what is included in the built-in rubric will be scored. If you need help finding and using the embedded rubric, refer to the Writers’ Studio Peer Review GuideLinks to an external site. resource.
Here are some other tips to keep in mind as you complete your peer reviews.
Do not click “Save” or “Save Comments” until you have completed your review, as this might submit your incomplete review. If this happens, reach out to your instructor. They may be able to reset your review.
You may want to compose your reviews in an outside document (such as a Word file or Google Doc) first, rather than typing them directly into the rubric as you go. This way, you have your reviews saved if you run into any technical issues.
Do not attach a separate file or leave your feedback in the “Comments” area. Use the embedded rubric only to complete your peer reviews.
If you see a comment stating that you need to “leave at least one comment” for your review to be finished, you can ignore that comment. The only thing you need to do is fill in the rubric.
Submission Requirements
Submit your Project 1 draft in this assignment for peer review.
Complete reviews of two of your peers’ drafts using the built-in peer review rubric.
*Note: the Canvas Student app does not support peer review. Please use a current web browser to complete peer reviews in Canvas. Chrome or Firefox is recommended by Canvas.
Step-By-Step Guide ENG 101 Module 5 Assignment: Project 1 Feedback and Revision
Introduction to ENG 101 Module 5 Assignment
The ENG 101 Module 5 Assignment: Project 1 Feedback and Revision focuses on the essential practice of giving and receiving feedback within the writing community. You will submit your draft for peer review, review your peers’ drafts, and provide constructive feedback using a built-in rubric. This How-To ENG 101 Guide will help refine your work and improve your ability to evaluate and integrate diverse ideas.
Submit Your Draft
For the ENG 101 Module 5 Assignment: Project 1 Feedback and Revision, we will submit the completed draft of our Project 1 rhetorical analysis for peer review. This includes the self-assessment paragraph.
Also, we will ensure to submit our draft in both the instructor review and peer review sections on Canvas.
- Log into Canvas and navigate to the assignment page.
- Upload your draft, including the self-assessment, for peer review.
- Confirm submission in both required sections.
Locate Your Assigned Peers to Review
- Assignment Notification: Canvas will automatically assign you two peers to review the morning after the deadline.
- Finding Peers: Check the assignment page, your to-do list, and Canvas notifications to locate your assigned peers.
- The morning after the submission deadline, log into Canvas.
- Navigate to the assignment page to find your assigned peers.
- If you cannot find your peers, refer to the Writers’ Studio Peer Review Guide or contact your instructor.
Review Your Peers’ Drafts
Next, we will carefully read through each assigned peer’s draft.
- Purpose: Focus on identifying areas for improvement and providing constructive feedback.
- Open each assigned peer’s draft.
- Read the entire draft attentively.
- Take notes on strengths and areas for improvement.
Peer Reviews
Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the ENG 101 Module 5 Assignment: Project 1 Feedback and Revision. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the below points in mind.
- One area for improvement.
- Actionable advice for improvement.
- Access the rubric on Canvas for each peer’s draft.
- Fill out each rubric category with specific feedback.
- Provide actionable advice to help your peers improve their drafts.
Example
Response 01
Hi Sara, great post! Your draft on analyzing TOMS Shoes’ rhetorical strategies is comprehensive and insightful. You effectively highlight how TOMS uses ethos, pathos, logos, and kairos to engage its audience and promote ethical consumerism. The integration of transparent impact reports, emotional storytelling, straightforward business model explanations, and timely campaigns is well-articulated. The visuals complement your analysis, enhancing the overall impact.
However, the analysis could benefit from more specific examples and direct quotes from TOMS’ marketing materials to further substantiate your points. Additionally, consider refining the thesis statement to make it more succinct and impactful. Overall, your draft provides a thorough exploration of TOMS’ communication strategies.
Response 02
We are supposed to write two peer responses. I have addressed the given instructions in one response. Following these instructions, you can write your peer responses to Module 5 Assignment without a hassle.
Tips
- Complete the Rubric: Ensure all feedback is entered into the built-in rubric.
- Avoid Saving Incomplete Reviews: Do not click “Save” until your review is complete.
- Compose Externally: Consider drafting your feedback in a separate document first.
- No Separate Files: Do not attach files or leave feedback in the “Comments” area.
- Ignore Comment Warnings: You only need to fill in the rubric.
Closing
The ENG 101 Module 5 Assignment: Project 1 Feedback and Revision helps you develop critical skills in giving and receiving feedback within a writing community. By submitting your draft, reviewing peers’ drafts, and providing detailed feedback using the rubric, you enhance your ability to evaluate writing and integrate diverse ideas. The key takeaway is the importance of constructive feedback in improving writing quality and fostering collaborative learning.
