You Can Read our FREE Guide on IDS 100 6-1 Discussion: Your Topic and the Lenses and its solution as well.
Instructions of IDS-100 6-1 Discussion
Discussion
In this discussion, you will be exploring your topic in relation to two of the lenses of the liberal arts we have evaluated. This will be an important exercise as you prepare for a more thorough analysis of the lenses in your project.
Create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts.
For your initial post, address the following:
- Restate your topic. Describe the two lenses you have chosen for your analysis.
- What connections can you draw from what you have learned about your topic in relation to two of the lenses?
For your response posts, address the following:
- How do you think your peer’s post differs from yours?
- What contribution can you make to your peer’s post, possibly adding a third lens to their analysis?
- What similarities and differences can you note between your peer’s post and yours?
To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric.
Step-By-Step Guide IDS 100 6-1 Discussion: Your Topic and the Lenses
Introduction to IDS 100 6-1 Discussion
In the IDS 100 6-1 Discussion: Your Topic and the Lenses, we will delve into the topic we chose for this course through the lens of the liberal arts. By selecting two lenses for analysis, we will explore connections between our topic and broader intellectual frameworks, preparing for a comprehensive project. As mentioned in IDS 100 3-2 Project Draft: Introduction and Proposal, I chose “Climate Change” for this project.Restate your topic. Describe the two lenses you have chosen for your analysis.
Restate Your Topic and Describe the Chosen Lenses
To start the IDS 100 6-1 Discussion: Your Topic and the Lenses, we will discuss our selected topic and describe the two lenses we chose for analysis.- Clearly state your topic, climate change, to provide context for your analysis.
- Describe the two lenses you have chosen from the liberal arts framework.
- Explain how each lens offers a unique perspective on climate change, highlighting their relevance to your analysis.
Example
My selected topic is climate change. For analysis, I have chosen social and natural science lenses. Social science offers insights into human behavior, societal impacts, and policy responses to climate change (Shrivastava et al., 2020). Natural science provides an understanding of environmental processes, greenhouse gas emissions, and climate patterns (Oreggioni et al., 2021). Each lens brings a unique perspective: social science explores human interactions with climate change, while natural science delves into its ecological dimensions. Together, they offer a comprehensive understanding of climate change dynamics, encompassing human and environmental factors.
What connections can you draw from what you have learned about your topic about two of the lenses?
Draw Connections from Learned Material
Next, we will explore the connections between what we learned from the topic and the two chosen lenses.- Reflect on your knowledge of climate change concerning each chosen lens.
- Identify connections between your topic’s lenses and key concepts, themes, or challenges.
- Analyse how each lens enhances your understanding of climate change and its implications.
Example
Examining climate change through social and natural science lenses uncovers intertwined themes and profound insights. Social science elucidates the diverse societal responses, including policies and communal initiatives, that mould climate change discourse and mitigation endeavours (Shrivastava et al., 2020). Conversely, natural science deepens comprehension of the environmental mechanisms propelling climate change, encompassing greenhouse gas emissions and temperature fluctuations (Oreggioni et al., 2021). Integrating these lenses yields a comprehensive view of climate change dynamics, underscoring the symbiotic relationship between human behaviours and environmental influences. This interdisciplinary approach enriches understanding of climate change intricacies and informs the development of potential solutions and adaptive strategies to address its multifaceted challenges.
How do you think your peer’s post differs from yours? What contribution can you make to your peer’s post, possibly adding a third lens to their analysis? What similarities and differences can you note between your peer’s post and yours?
Peer Responses
Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the IDS 100 discussion posts. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the below points in mind.- Compare and contrast your analysis with your peer’s post, noting differences in lens selection and perspectives.
- Offer constructive feedback to your peer by suggesting a third lens to expand their analysis.
- Highlight similarities and differences between your peer’s post and your own, fostering dialogue and mutual learning.
Example
Response 01 Your post offers a comprehensive analysis of climate change through social and natural science lenses, providing valuable insights into human and environmental dimensions. In contrast, my analysis explores climate change from social science and humanities perspectives, emphasising societal responses and cultural interpretations. To enrich your analysis, consider incorporating the lens of history, examining historical contexts and patterns of climate change discourse and policy. Despite our differing lens selection, both posts highlight the interdisciplinary nature of climate change analysis, fostering a holistic understanding.
