owlisdom logo
counterbanner
Need help with your assignments? Get Five Pages FREE & let Owlisdom take your stress away
Spots left
Excellent Grades Expert Help Zero Risk
Claim $75 Discount
Promo Code : FREE5OWL Place Order AI & Plagiarism Free

MGMT 415 Module 3 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Assignment

Here you can read our FREE Guide on MGMT 415 Module 3 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Assignment and see its solution.

Instructions of MGMT 415 Module 3 Assignment

Readings and Videos for Module 3

Use the readings and videos to help you prepare for the assignments in this module. This week’s lesson material will help you illustrate how healthcare quality indicators are demonstrated in a healthcare setting, interpret recommended healthcare quality practices to determine potential implementation strategies, identify sources of healthcare errors, and describe tools and models used to improve healthcare quality.

Read:

Johns Hopkins Center for Evidence-Based Practice Evidence-Based Practice ExemplarsLinks to an external site.

Healthcare Quality Book: Vision, Strategy, and Tools TextbookLinks to an external site. pp. 18-19 and 62-65

View:

Allied Health: Evidence-Based Practice – 3 min https://youtu.be/j5sU5H-IBSg 

“Translating Evidence into Practice – The Johns Hopkins Nursing Experience” by Kathleen White for OP – 23 min https://youtu.be/_oAVz2dQAi8 


These viewing questions will help you pay attention to key concepts as you watch the video.

“PDSA Cycles: From CLABSIs to Cucumbers” – 6 min. https://youtu.be/8Q7qnNpTWxM

Evidence-Based Practice Assignment

Start Assignment

  • Due Friday by 11:59pm
  • Points 35
  • Submitting a file upload

Watch the video entitled “Translating Evidence into Practice – The Johns Hopkins Nursing Experience” by Kathleen White. (There are viewing questions to help you follow along with the video. The questions are for your own benefit, you do not need to submit your answers.)  After you have watched the video, do your own exploration of the evidence-based projects that have resulted from this initiative.

Assignment Directions

Go to the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice websiteLinks to an external site..  Select a project and respond to the following prompts: 

  • List the title of the project.
  • Summarize what the project team learned from examining the evidence.
  • Explain how the findings relate to one or more of the six aims of healthcare quality improvement (we learned about the six aims in Module 1).
  • Restate the project team’s practice recommendations in your own words.
  • Propose additional ideas for how the evidence could be put into practice, supporting your ideas with logical reasoning.

Rubric

Evidence Based Practice Assignment Rubric

Evidence Based Practice Assignment Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMGMT415_01.00 Illustrate how healthcare quality indicators are demonstrated in a healthcare setting

threshold: 8.5 pts


10 pts

Student makes accurate connections between healthcare practices and quality indicators, revealing complex linkages to enhance meaning.

8.5 pts

Student makes accurate connections between healthcare practices and quality indicators, listing associations between concepts.

7 pts

Student makes inaccurate connections between healthcare practices and quality indicators.

0 pts

Student does not make connections between healthcare practices and quality indicators.

10 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMGMT415_7.00 Interpret recommended healthcare quality practices to propose implementation strategies

threshold: 8.5 pts


10 pts

Student analyzes healthcare quality practices and offers implementation strategies supported by justification.

8.5 pts

Student analyzes healthcare quality practices and offers implementation strategies but lacks justification.

7 pts

Student describes healthcare quality practices but does not offer implementation strategies.

0 pts

Student does not describe healthcare quality practices and does not offer implementation strategies.

10 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSkill: Written Quality

threshold: 8.5 pts


10 pts

The submission contain few or no writing errors. Formulation of the submission elicites or creates a deeper understanding for others.

8.5 pts

The submission contained some writing errors. Formulation of the submission raises new points of understanding for the reader with a few distracting inaccuracies or ambiguities.

7 pts

The submission contained many errors. Formulation of the submission causes confusion for the reader.

0 pts

The submission contained many errors, and it included irrelevant information. Formulation of the submission causes misunderstanding for the reader.

10 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSkill: Timeliness

threshold: 5.0 pts


5 pts

All components of the activity were turned in on time.

3.5 pts

Some components of the activity were turned in on time.

0 pts

No components of the assignment were turned in on time.

5 pts

 

PDSA Proposal

Start Assignment

  • Due Friday by 11:59pm
  • Points 45
  • Submitting a file upload

In the “PDSA Cycles: From CLABSIs to Cucumbers” video for this module, Dr. Goldmann gives the example of using a Plan – Do – Study – Act (PDSA) cycle to improve his vegetable garden. He recommends trying PDSA in your personal life so that the process feels familiar when you need to apply the model in healthcare.

We are going to take Dr. Goldmann’s advice! First, you will propose a PDSA project in this module. Then, you will carry out the PDSA cycle over the course of the next few modules. Finally, you will report your results at the end of the course. 

Directions

Students will be using a Google Template to complete this assignment. The steps have linked guides for students to use as needed.

Criteria

Complete all items in the assigned section of the template. See the rubric for the grading criteria. 

Rubric

PDSA Proposal Assignment Rubric

PDSA Proposal Assignment Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMGMT415_01.00 Illustrate how healthcare quality indicators are demonstrated in a healthcare setting

threshold: 8.5 pts


10 pts

Student makes accurate connections between healthcare practices and quality indicators, revealing complex linkages to enhance meaning.

8.5 pts

Student makes accurate connections between healthcare practices and quality indicators, listing associations between concepts.

7 pts

Student makes inaccurate connections between healthcare practices and quality indicators.

0 pts

Student does not make connections between healthcare practices and quality indicators.

10 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMGMT415_3.00 Identify sources of errors

threshold: 8.5 pts


10 pts

Student discusses complex links between errors and their causes.

8.5 pts

Student discusses basic links between errors and their causes.

7 pts

Student incorrectly discusses basic links between errors and their causes.

0 pts

Student is unable to identify links between errors and their causes.

10 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMGMT415_4.00 Describe tools and models used to improve healthcare quality

threshold: 8.5 pts


10 pts

Student skillfully interprets or applies dimensions of healthcare quality tools/models.

8.5 pts

Student adequately interprets or applies dimensions of healthcare quality tools/models.

7 pts

Student vaguely interprets or applies dimensions of healthcare quality tools/models.

0 pts

Student misinterprets or misapplies dimensions of healthcare quality tools/models.

10 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSkill: Written Quality

threshold: 8.5 pts


10 pts

The submission contain few or no writing errors. Formulation of the submission elicites or creates a deeper understanding for others.

8.5 pts

The submission contained some writing errors. Formulation of the submission raises new points of understanding for the reader with a few distracting inaccuracies or ambiguities.

7 pts

The submission contained many errors. Formulation of the submission causes confusion for the reader.

0 pts

The submission contained many errors, and it included irrelevant information. Formulation of the submission causes misunderstanding for the reader.

10 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSkill: Timeliness

threshold: 5.0 pts


5 pts

All components of the activity were turned in on time.

3.5 pts

Some components of the activity were turned in on time.

0 pts

No components of the assignment were turned in on time.

5 pts

Total Points: 45

Step-By-Step Guide MGMT 415 Module 3 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Assignment

Introduction to MGTM 415 Module Three Assignment

The MGMT 415 Module 3 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Assignment involves critically analyzing a project from the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice initiative. You will explore a selected project, summarize its findings, relate those findings to healthcare quality improvement aims, restate practice recommendations, and propose additional ideas for evidence implementation. This How-To MGMT 415 Guide provides a step-by-step approach to completing each part of the assignment successfully.

List the title of the project.

Selecting and Listing the Project

We will select and list the project title to start the MGMT 415 Module 3 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Assignment.

  • Visit the Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice website.
  • Navigate the available projects and select one that interests you or aligns with your academic focus.
  • list the title of the selected project.
  • Ensure the title is accurately represented as it appears on the website.

Example

Title: “Reducing Hospital-Acquired Infections Through Hand Hygiene Compliance”

The project “Reducing Hospital-Acquired Infections Through Hand Hygiene Compliance” aimed to address the persistent issue of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), significantly impacting patient safety and healthcare costs. The project team focused on improving hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers as a primary strategy to reduce HAIs.

Through a comprehensive review of the evidence, the project team found that enhancing hand hygiene practices could dramatically decrease the incidence of HAIs. They conducted an extensive literature review, analyzed data from multiple healthcare settings, and utilized observational studies to understand the factors influencing hand hygiene compliance. The key findings indicated that consistent hand hygiene practices led to a substantial reduction in infection rates.

Moreover, the team discovered that education and regular training sessions were crucial in maintaining high compliance rates. They noted that visual reminders and easy access to hand-sanitizing stations played significant roles. The project underscored the importance of creating a safety culture where all healthcare workers adhere to hand hygiene protocols.

Summarize what the project team learned from examining the evidence.

Summarizing the Project Team’s Learnings

Next, we will summarize the project team learning.

  • Thoroughly read the project description, objectives, methodology, and results.
  • Focus on key findings and insights gained by the project team.
  • Provide a concise summary of what the project team learned from examining the evidence.
  • Highlight significant outcomes, patterns, and conclusions drawn from the project.

Please explain how the findings relate to one or more of the six aims of healthcare quality improvement (we learned about the six aims in Module 1).

Explaining the Findings of the Six Aims of Healthcare Quality Improvement

For this section of MGMT 415 Module 3 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Assignment, we will explain the findings of the Six Aims of Healthcare Quality Improvement that we explored in Module One of this course.

  • Recall the six aims of healthcare quality improvement: safe, effective, patient-centered, timely, efficient, and equitable care.
  • Reflect on how these aims guide overall healthcare quality.
  • Identify the six aims addressed by the project’s findings.
  • Explain how the evidence supports or advances these aims, providing specific examples from the project.

Example

Explaining the Findings of the Six Aims of Healthcare Quality Improvement

The findings from the hand hygiene project align with several of the six aims of healthcare quality improvement.

Safe Care

The primary aim of reducing HAIs is to enhance patient safety directly. The evidence shows that improved hand hygiene practices significantly lower the risk of infections, thereby protecting patients from preventable harm.

Effective Care

Adequate care is achieved by implementing evidence-based practices. The project’s reliance on proven strategies for hand hygiene ensures that the interventions are based on solid scientific evidence, leading to better health outcomes.

Patient-Centered Care

Patient-centered care is reflected in the project’s emphasis on reducing HAIs that directly affect patient well-being and satisfaction. By prioritizing patient safety and comfort, the project aligns with this aim.

Timely Care

The project contributes to timely care by reducing the incidence of HAIs. Patients experience fewer complications, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery times, enhancing the overall efficiency of healthcare delivery.

Efficient Care

Reducing HAIs improves efficiency, reducing healthcare costs and resource utilization. Preventing infections minimizes the need for additional treatments, medications, and extended hospital stays.

Equitable Care

The project ensures equitable care by implementing standardized hand hygiene practices across all healthcare settings, benefiting all patients regardless of their background or condition.

Restate the project team’s practice recommendations in your own words.

Restating Practice Recommendations

Here, we will discuss the team’s practice recommendations in our words.

  • Carefully review the practice recommendations made by the project team.
  • Note the core elements and intended outcomes of these recommendations.
  • Paraphrase the recommendations clearly and succinctly.
  • Ensure you capture the essence of the recommendations while using your language.

Example

Restating Practice Recommendations

The project team recommended several vital practices to improve hand hygiene compliance:

Regular Training and Education

Healthcare workers should undergo continuous education and training sessions to stay updated on hand hygiene protocols and the importance of compliance.

Visual Reminders and Signage

Placing visual reminders, such as posters and signs, in strategic locations within healthcare facilities can reinforce the importance of hand hygiene and prompt compliance.

Access to Hand Hygiene Supplies

Ensuring that hand sanitizing stations and soap dispensers are easily accessible and adequately stocked is crucial for maintaining high compliance rates.

Monitoring and Feedback

Implementing a system for monitoring hand hygiene practices and providing regular feedback to healthcare workers can help sustain compliance and address any lapses promptly.

Propose additional ideas for implementing the evidence, supporting your ideas logically.

Proposing Additional Ideas for Implementing Evidence

Next, we will propose additional ideas for implementing evidence.

  • Evaluate the current strategies for putting evidence into practice as outlined in the project.
  • Identify any gaps or areas for improvement.
  • Suggest additional methods or tools that could enhance evidence implementation.
  • Support your ideas with logical reasoning, considering feasibility, potential impact, and alignment with healthcare quality aims.

Example

Proposing Additional Ideas for Implementing Evidence

The following additional strategies can be considered further to enhance the implementation of evidence-based hand hygiene practices.

Technological Solutions

Integrating technology, such as electronic monitoring systems, can provide real-time feedback on hand hygiene compliance. These systems can track when healthcare workers sanitize their hands and offer reminders for missed compliance.

Incentive Programs

Introducing incentive programs that reward healthcare workers for consistent hand hygiene compliance can motivate adherence. Recognizing and rewarding departments or individuals with high compliance rates can foster a culture of safety.

Engaging Patients and Families

Educating patients and their families about the importance of hand hygiene and encouraging them to remind healthcare workers can create an additional layer of accountability and support.

Leadership Commitment

Strong leadership commitment to hand hygiene practices can set the tone for the organization. Leaders should model proper hand hygiene and promote its importance through policies and communication.

By implementing these strategies, healthcare facilities can further improve hand hygiene compliance, thereby reducing the incidence of hospital-acquired infections and enhancing overall patient safety and care quality.

Closing

In completing the MGMT 415 Module 3 Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Assignment, you will gain a deeper understanding of evidence-based practice and its application in healthcare quality improvement. Key takeaways include the ability to analyze evidence critically, relate findings to established quality aims, and propose innovative strategies for practice improvement. By following this How-To Owlisdom Guide, you will effectively contribute to the ongoing efforts to enhance healthcare outcomes through evidence-based initiatives.

Loved This Guide

Share on Social Media:

Click Below to see the
Sample Solution

People Also Read

Scroll to Top