Our ultimate free detailed guide on the NURS-6002 3-1 Discussion: Using the Walden Library.
Instructions of NURS-6002 3-1 Discussion
USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY
Where can you find evidence to inform your thoughts and scholarly writing? Throughout your degree program, you will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights. As you search the research literature, it is important to use resources that are peer-reviewed and from scholarly journals. You may already have some favorite online resources and databases that you use or have found useful in the past. For this Discussion, you explore databases available through the Walden Library.
Note: Unless otherwise noted, initial postings to Discussions are due on or before Day 3, and response postings are due on or before Day 6. You are required to participate in the Discussion on at least three different days (a different day for main post and each response). It is important to adhere to the weekly time frame to allow others ample time to respond to your posting. In addition, you are expected to respond to questions directed toward your own initial posting in a timely manner.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
To Prepare:
- Review the information presented in the Learning Resources for using the Walden Library, searching the databases, and evaluating online resources.
- Begin searching for a peer-reviewed article that pertains to your practice area and interests you.
BY DAY 3
Post the following:
Using proper APA formatting, cite the peer-reviewed article you selected that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you and identify the database that you used to search for the article. Explain any difficulties you experienced while searching for this article. Would this database be useful to your colleagues? Explain why or why not. Would you recommend this database? Explain why or why not.
BY DAY 6
Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by offering suggestions/strategies for working with this database from your own experience, or offering ideas for using alternative resources.
STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE 3-1 DISCUSSION
INTRODUCTION TO NURS-6002 3-1 Discussion: Using the Walden Library
This Owlisdom, NURS-6002 3-1 Discussion: Using the Walden Library involves using the Walden assignment Library to find and cite a peer-reviewed article relevant to your practice area. The goal is to enhance your research skills, enabling you to effectively locate and evaluate scholarly resources that can inform your academic and professional work.
Using proper APA formatting, cite the peer-reviewed article you selected that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you, and identify the database that you used to search for the article.
SEARCHING FOR A PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE
- Use specific keywords related to your practice area to search for articles.
- Apply advanced search filters to narrow down the results to the most relevant and recent peer-reviewed articles.
- Format the citation according to APA guidelines.
- Ensure all necessary details (authors, year, title, journal, volume, issue, pages, DOI) are included.
Example
For my research on patient-centered care, I selected an article from the PLOS ONE journal titled “An Integrative Model of Patient-Centeredness – A Systematic Review and Concept Analysis,” published in 2021. This article was accessed through the Walden Library using the database PLOS ONE. Here’s the citation in proper APA format:
Rathert, C., Wyrwich, M. D., & Boren, S. A. (2021). An Integrative Model of Patient-Centeredness – A Systematic Review and Concept Analysis. PLOS ONE, 16(1), e0245798. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245798
Explain any difficulties you experienced while searching for this article. Would this database be useful to your colleagues? Explain why or why not.
DESCRIBING THE SEARCH PROCESS
- Describe the challenges faced while searching for the article.
- Explain the strategies used to refine the search and locate the relevant article.
- Mention any advanced search features or filters that were particularly helpful.
Example
While searching for this article, I faced several challenges, primarily in filtering through the extensive amount of literature available on patient-centered care. The necessity for specificity in isolating relevant and insightful articles demanded the use of advanced search filters and meticulous keyword selection. This process, while time-consuming, underscored the importance of precision in academic research.
Would you recommend this database? Explain why or why not.
EVALUATING THE DATABASE
- Discuss the advantages of the database, such as ease of access, comprehensiveness, and quality of articles.
- Explain the database would be useful to your colleagues and why.
- Provide reasons for recommending or not recommending the database.
Example
I highly recommend the PLOS ONE database to colleagues, particularly for its open-access policy, which facilitates unrestricted access to a comprehensive range of peer-reviewed articles. This database is especially beneficial for those seeking the latest studies across various disciplines, including detailed analyses and comprehensive reviews in healthcare. Its broad scope and accessibility make it a valuable resource for both academic research and practical application in healthcare settings. The ease of access and the quality of the articles contribute significantly to effective and efficient literature searches, which are essential for supporting scholarly writing and professional practice in nursing and healthcare.
REFERENCES
Rathert, C., Wyrwich, M. D., & Boren, S. A. (2021). An Integrative Model of Patient-Centeredness – A Systematic Review and Concept Analysis. PLOS ONE, 16(1), e0245798.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245798
Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by offering suggestions/strategies for working with this database from your own experience or offering ideas for using alternative resources.
RESPONSES
- Respond to at least two posts by offering suggestions or strategies for working with the database.
- Provide NURS-6002 3-1 Discussion examples from your own experience or suggest alternative resources that might be useful.
Example
Hello Samuel,
It is great to see you using the PLOS ONE database! Based on my experience, to make the most out of this resource, I suggest using the database’s tagging and keyword system to keep track of emerging trends and relevant research in your area of interest. This can significantly streamline your search process. Additionally, combining keywords with Boolean operators like AND, OR, and NOT can refine your searches even further, allowing you to focus on articles that are most pertinent to your research question. This strategy not only enhances efficiency but also improves the relevance of search results, making your literature review more robust and comprehensive.
Hi Aly,
I read your post about your experiences with PLOS ONE and am interested. If you’re looking to expand your resources, consider exploring Google Scholar alongside PLOS ONE. Google Scholar offers a broad range of scholarly articles from various disciplines and can be particularly useful for interdisciplinary topics. By using its “cited by” feature, you can trace the development of research ideas and discover newer articles that have cited your original article of interest. This can provide additional perspectives and context to your topic, enriching your research and understanding of the subject matter.
CLOSING
By following Nurs-6002 3-1 Discussion of these guidelines, students can effectively utilize the Walden Library to find and evaluate peer-reviewed articles. This process not only enhances research skills but also supports scholarly writing and professional practice in healthcare. Engaging with colleagues further enriches the learning experience, providing diverse perspectives and strategies for effective research. In the next module of NURS-6002, we will explore 3-2 Research Analysis.
