owlisdom logo
counterbanner
Need help with your assignments? Get Five Pages FREE & let Owlisdom take your stress away
Spots left
Excellent Grades Expert Help Zero Risk
Claim $75 Discount
Promo Code : FREE5OWL Place Order AI & Plagiarism Free

NURS 6053 MODULE TWO ASSIGNMENT: DEVELOPING ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES AND PRACTICES

Here you can read our FREE Guide on NURS 6053 Module Two Assignment: Developing Organizational Policies And Practices and see its solution.

Instructions of NURS 6053 Module Two Assignment

DEVELOPING ORGANIZATIONAL POLICIES AND PRACTICES

Competing needs arise within any organization as employees seek to meet their targets and leaders seek to meet company goals. As a leader, successful management of these goals requires establishing priorities and allocating resources accordingly.

Within a healthcare setting, the needs of the workforce, resources, and patients are often in conflict. Mandatory overtime, implementation of staffing ratios, use of unlicensed assisting personnel, and employer reductions of education benefits are examples of practices that might lead to conflicting needs in practice.

Leaders can contribute to both the problem and the solution through policies, action, and inaction. In this Assignment, you will further develop the white paper you began work on in Module 1 by addressing competing needs within your organization.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources. 

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

  • Review the national healthcare issue/stressor you examined in your Assignment for Module 1, and review the analysis of the healthcare issue/stressor you selected.
  • Identify and review two evidence-based scholarly resources that focus on proposed policies/practices to apply to your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
  • Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post regarding competing needs.

The Assignment (1-2 pages):

Developing Organizational Policies and Practices

Add a section to the 2-3 page paper you submitted in Module 1. The new section should address the following in 1-2 pages:

  • Identify and describe at least two competing needs impacting your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
  • Describe a relevant policy or practice in your organization that may influence your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
  • Critique the policy for ethical considerations, and explain the policy’s strengths and challenges in promoting ethics.
  • Recommend one or more policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients, while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies. Be specific and provide examples.
  • Cite evidence that informs the healthcare issue/stressor and/or the policies, and provide two scholarly resources in support of your policy or practice recommendations.
  • Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 7 days to provide you with quality feedback.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 3

Submit your revised paper.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area. 

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK3Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NURS_6053_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_6053_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdd a section to the 2-3 page paper you submitted in Module 1. For this assignment, in 1-2 pages, address the following: · Identify and describe at least two competing needs impacting your selected healthcare issue/stressor.


25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly identifies and describes at least two competing needs impacting the healthcare issue/stressor selected.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response identifies and describes at least two competing needs impacting the healthcare issue/stressor selected.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes two competing needs impacting the healthcare issue/stressor selected.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes one competing need impacting the healthcare issue/stressor selected or response is missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Describe a relevant policy or practice in your organization that may influence your selected healthcare issue/stressor. · Critique the policy for ethical considerations and explain the policy’s strengths and challenges in promoting ethics.


30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes a relevant policy or practice in the organization that may influence the healthcare issue/stressor selected. …The response accurately and thoroughly critiques the policy for ethical considerations and explains in detail the policy’s strengths and challenges in promoting ethics.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

The response accurately describes a relevant policy or practice in the organization that may influence the healthcare issue/stressor selected. …The response accurately critiques the policy for ethical considerations and explains the policy’s strengths and challenges in promoting ethics.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

The response is vague or inaccurate in describing a relevant policy or practice in the organization that may influence the healthcare issue/stressor selected. …The response vaguely or inaccurately critiques the policy for ethical considerations and explains the policy’s strengths and challenges in promoting ethics.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is vague and inaccurate in describing a relevant policy or practice in an organization that may influence the healthcare issue/stressor selected or response is missing. …The response vaguely and inaccurately critiques the policy for ethical considerations and vaguely and inaccurately explains the policy’s strengths and challenges in promoting ethics or response is missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Recommend one or more policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies. Be specific and provide examples.


25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response provides one or more accurate, clear, and thorough recommendations for policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies. …Specific and accurate examples are provided.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response provides one or more recommendations for policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies. …Specific examples are provided.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response vaguely or inaccurately provides one recommendation for policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies. …One example is provided.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response vaguely and inaccurately provides one recommendation for policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients; response vaguely addresses any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies or response is missing. …Examples are missing.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResource Synthesis


5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 1 course-specific resource.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Using proper in-text citations, the response minimally integrates outside and course-specific resources.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

The response does not integrate outside and course-specific resources or no in-text citations are used.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.


5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. …A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time. …Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. …No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.


5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.


5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

 

Step-By-Step Guide NURS 6053 Module Two Assignment: Developing Organizational Policies And Practices

Introduction to NURS 6053 Module Two Assignment

The NURS 6053 Module Two Assignment: Developing Organizational Policies And Practices evaluates the impact of workforce, resources, and patient needs on healthcare delivery and proposes policy or practice changes to balance these needs ethically. Through this guide, students will learn how to assess existing policies critically and recommend improvements supported by scholarly evidence. This How-To NURS 6053 Guide provides comprehensive instructions for students tasked with analyzing and addressing competing needs within a healthcare setting.

Identifying and Describing Competing Needs

To start the NURS 6053 Module Two Assignment: Developing Organizational Policies And Practices, we will review the current healthcare setting and pinpoint areas where workforce needs, resources, and patient care requirements clash.

  • Consider staffing ratios, mandatory overtime, and resource allocation.
  • Provide a clear and concise description of at least two competing needs.
  • Use specific examples to illustrate how these needs impact the healthcare issue or stressor.

Example

Addressing Competing Needs in Healthcare

In the dynamic healthcare landscape, competing needs often emerge as a significant challenge, impacting care delivery, resource management, and workforce satisfaction. This paper will explore these competing needs within a healthcare setting, focusing on staffing ratios, mandatory overtime, and resource allocation. We will also examine relevant organizational policies, critique them for ethical considerations, and recommend policy changes that balance these needs while promoting ethical practices. Evidence from scholarly resources will support the analysis and recommendations.

Identifying and Describing Competing Needs

In healthcare, two prominent competing needs are staffing ratios and mandatory overtime. Staffing ratios refer to the number of patients assigned to a nurse during a shift. High patient-to-nurse ratios can lead to burnout, decreased job satisfaction, and compromised patient care quality. For example, a nurse handling too many patients might miss critical signs of patient deterioration, leading to adverse outcomes. This need conflicts with mandatory overtime policies, which require nurses to work beyond their scheduled hours to cover staffing shortages. While mandatory overtime ensures patient coverage, it exacerbates nurse fatigue and burnout, ultimately affecting patient care quality and workforce retention.

Describe a policy or practice in your organization that may influence your selected healthcare issue/stressor.

Describing Relevant Policies or Practices

Next, we will identify existing policies or practices within our organization that relate to the competing needs.

  • Look for policies on staffing, overtime, resource allocation, and employee benefits.
  • Explain how the identified policy or practice impacts the selected healthcare issue or stressor.
  • Discuss the role of leadership in shaping these policies.

Example

An existing policy within our organization that influences these competing needs is the staffing ratio policy, which mandates a specific patient-to-nurse ratio. This policy aims to ensure adequate patient coverage and safety. However, due to chronic staffing shortages, the organization often enforces mandatory overtime to meet this ratio, creating a cycle of nurse burnout and turnover. Leadership is critical in shaping these policies, prioritizing patient coverage over workforce well-being. This practice impacts healthcare by increasing nurse stress levels and reducing overall job satisfaction, leading to higher turnover rates and compromised patient care.

Critique the policy for ethical considerations and explain the policy’s strengths and challenges in promoting ethics.

Critiquing the Policy for Ethical Considerations

For this section of the NURS 6053 Module Two Assignment: Developing Organizational Policies And Practices, we will analyze the policy ethically, considering principles such as fairness, justice, and benevolence.

  • Evaluate how well the policy aligns with ethical standards in healthcare.
  • Instructions for Evaluating Policy Strengths and Challenges
  • Highlight the strengths of the policy in promoting ethical practices.
  • Identify challenges or ethical shortcomings and provide examples.

Example

Ethically, the staffing ratio policy presents several challenges. While it aligns with the principle of beneficence by aiming to ensure patient safety, it often falls short in promoting justice and fairness for the nursing staff. The mandatory overtime component places undue stress on nurses, violating the ethical standard of nonmaleficence, which emphasizes “no harm.” The policy’s strength lies in its intention to maintain patient safety. However, its implementation through mandatory overtime creates ethical shortcomings by compromising nurse well-being. For instance, nurses working extended hours may experience physical and mental fatigue, leading to errors and decreased quality of care.

Recommend one or more policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies. Be specific and provide examples.

Recommending Policy or Practice Changes

Now, we will propose changes that address the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients.

  • Ensure that recommendations are specific, feasible, and ethically sound.
  • Provide detailed examples of how the proposed changes will improve the balance of competing needs.
  • Address any ethical issues identified in the current policy.

Example

To balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients while addressing the ethical shortcomings, the following policy changes are recommended:

Implementing Flexible Staffing Solutions: Introducing part-time and per-diem positions can help alleviate staffing shortages without over-relying on mandatory overtime. For example, part-time nurses can fill gaps during peak hours, reducing the need for full-time staff to work overtime.

Enhancing Workforce Support Programs: Developing support programs focused on nurse well-being, such as mental health resources and stress management workshops, can help mitigate the negative impacts of mandatory overtime. These programs should be integrated into the organizational culture to promote a healthy work environment.

Adopting Technology for Efficient Resource Management: Leveraging technology to optimize shift scheduling and patient assignments can improve efficiency and reduce the workload on individual nurses. For instance, automated scheduling systems can ensure fair distribution of shifts, minimizing the need for mandatory overtime.

These changes are specific, feasible, and ethically sound, addressing the current policy’s operational and ethical challenges. The organization can improve nurse satisfaction, reduce turnover, and maintain high-quality patient care by implementing these recommendations.

Supporting these recommendations, evidence from scholarly resources underscores the importance of balanced staffing policies. According to a study by Aiken et al. (2018), lower patient-to-nurse ratios are associated with better patient outcomes and higher nurse job satisfaction. Additionally, research by Dall’Ora et al. (2019) highlights the adverse effects of mandatory overtime on nurse health and patient care quality, advocating for alternative staffing strategies.

Cite evidence that informs the healthcare issue/stressor and the policies, and provide two scholarly resources supporting your policy or practice recommendations.

Citing Evidence and Scholarly Resources

For the last segment of the NURS 6053 Module Two Assignment: Developing Organizational Policies And Practices, we will use reputable academic databases to find scholarly articles related to your healthcare issue and policies.

  • Ensure that the sources are recent and relevant.
  • Cite at least two scholarly resources to support your policy or practice recommendations.
  • Integrate evidence seamlessly into your analysis and recommendations.

Closing

The NURS 6053 Module Two Assignment: Developing Organizational Policies And Practices thoroughly analyzes competing needs within a healthcare setting and evaluates existing policies from an ethical perspective. By identifying and describing competing needs, critiquing policies, and proposing well-supported recommendations, students will develop a nuanced understanding of the complexities of healthcare management. The critical takeaway is balancing workforce, resource, and patient needs while adhering to ethical standards to improve healthcare outcomes.

Loved This Guide

Share on Social Media:

Click Below to see the
Sample Solution

People Also Read

Scroll to Top