Here is the free Guide on NURS-FPX 4020 Assessment 2: Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan and its solution.
Instructions of NURS-FPX 4020 Assessment 2: Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan
Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan
For this assessment, you can use a supplied template to conduct a root-cause analysis. The completed assessment will be a scholarly paper focusing on a quality or safety issue in a health care setting of your choice as well as a safety improvement plan.
Collapse All
Introduction
As patient safety concerns continue to be addressed in the health care settings, nurses can play an active role in implementing safety improvement measures and plans. Often root-cause analyses are conducted and safety improvement plans are created to address sentinel or adverse events such as medication errors, patient falls, wrong-site surgery events, and hospital-acquired infections. Performing a root-cause analysis offers a systematic approach for identifying causes of problems, including process and system-check failures. Once the causes of failures have been determined, a safety improvement plan can be developed to prevent recurrences. The baccalaureate nurse’s role as a leader is to create safety improvement plans as well as disseminate vital information to staff nurses and other health care professionals to protect patients and improve outcomes.
As you prepare for this assessment, it would be an excellent choice to complete the Quality and Safety Improvement Plan Knowledge Base activity and to review the various assessment resources, all of which will help you build your knowledge of key concepts and terms related to quality and safety improvement. The terms and concepts will be helpful as you prepare your Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan. Activities are not graded and demonstrate course engagement.
Professional Context
Nursing practice is governed by health care policies and procedures as well as state and national regulations developed to prevent problems. It is critical for nurses to participate in gathering and analyzing data to determine causes of patient safety issues, in solving problems, and in implementing quality improvements.
Scenario
For this assessment, use the specific safety concern identified in your previous assessment as the subject of a root-cause analysis and safety improvement plan.
Instructions
The purpose of this assessment is to demonstrate your understanding of and ability to analyze the root cause of a specific safety concern in a health care setting. You will create a plan to improve the safety of patients related to the safety quality issue presented in your Assessment Supplement PDF in Assessment 1. Based on the results of your analysis, using the literature and professional best practices as well as the existing resources at your chosen health care setting, provide a rationale for your plan.
Use the Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan [DOCX] Download Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan [DOCX]template to help you to stay organized and concise. This will guide you step-by-step through the root cause analysis process.
Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
Analyze the root cause of a specific patient safety issue in an organization.
Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address the safety issue.
Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan to address a specific patient safety issue.
Identify organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve your plan.
Communicate in writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.
Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like but keep in mind that your Assessment 2 will focus on the quality issue you selected in Assessment 1.
Additional Requirements
Length of submission: Use the provided Root-Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan template to create a 4–6 page root cause analysis and safety improvement plan pertaining to a specific patient safety issue.
Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
APA formatting: Format references and citations according to current APA style.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.
Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address the safety issue.
Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan to address a specific patient safety issue.
Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.
Analyze the root cause of a specific patient safety issue in an organization.
Competency 3: Identify organizational interventions to promote patient safety.
Identify organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve your plan.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar or punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
Resources
Use the resources linked below to help complete this assessment.
Collapse All
Evidence-Based Practice
The following readings may help you in completing this assessment’s activities:
Assessment 2: Evidence-Based Practice reading list.
Quality and Safety
The following readings may help you in completing this assessment’s activities:
Assessment 2: Quality and Safety reading list.
Root-Cause Analysis
The following readings may help you in completing this assessment’s activities:
Assessment 2: Root-Cause Analysis reading list.
Sentinel Events
The following readings may help you in completing this assessment’s activities:
Assessment 2: Sentinel Events reading list.
Safety and Sentinel Event Case Studies
The following readings may help you in completing this assessment’s activities:
Assessment 2: Safety and Sentinel Event Case Studies reading list.
Program Resources
Capella Writing Center
Access the various resources in the Capella Writing Center to help you better understand and improve your writing.
APA Style and Format
Capella University follows the style and formatting guidelines in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, known informally as the APA manual. Refer to the Writing Center’s APA Module for tips on proper use of APA style and format.
Capella University Library
BSN Program Library Research Guide.
The library research guide will be useful in guiding you through the Capella University Library, offering tips for searching the literature and other references for your assessments.
Activity
Click the linked title below, Quality and Safety Improvement Plan Knowledge Base, to complete this formative activity, which will help you check and build your knowledge of key concepts and terms related to quality and safety improvement. These terms and concepts will be useful as you prepare your Root Cause Analysis and Improvement Plan. This is for your own practice and self-assessment.
This tool needs to be loaded in a new browser window
Step-By-Step Guide NURS-FPX 4020 Assessment 2: Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan
Introduction to NURS 4020 Assessment Two
The NURS-FPX 4020 Assessment 2: Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan is designed to help you understand and analyze the root cause of a specific patient safety issue within a healthcare setting. By conducting a root-cause analysis, applying evidence-based strategies, and developing a feasible safety improvement plan, you will demonstrate your ability to improve patient safety and quality of care. This How-To NURS-FPX 4020 Guide provides step-by-step instructions on completing each part of the assignment, ensuring a clear, logical, and professional approach.
Analyze the root cause of a specific patient safety issue in an organization.
Conducting a Root-Cause Analysis
We will conduct a root-cause analysis to start the NURS-FPX 4020 Assessment 2: Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan.
- Identify the Problem: Clearly define the specific patient safety issue you focus on (e.g., medication errors, patient falls).
- Gather Data: Collect data related to the issue from your healthcare setting. This may include incident reports, patient records, and staff interviews.
- Analyze the Data: Use tools such as fishbone diagrams or the 5 Whys technique to systematically identify the root causes of the problem.
- Identify Contributing Factors: Determine the process and system failures contributing to the safety issue.
Example
The sentinel event under review, as described by Olson (2023), involves several critical incidents in Minnesota hospitals, leading to 21 preventable deaths and 178 serious injuries. This root cause analysis seeks to understand the factors contributing to these events, which included surgical errors, medication mishandling, and insufficient responses to patient conditions. Hospital administrators and quality assurance personnel identified these issues through adverse event reporting systems and internal audits. The events primarily impacted patients who received incorrect or delayed care, resulting in severe health complications and deaths, along with emotional distress. Additionally, healthcare providers faced scrutiny, prompting procedural reevaluations and potential legal implications.
Analysis of the Event and Relevant Findings
The sentinel events detailed by Olson (2023), involving a series of critical incidents in Minnesota hospitals, underscore the importance of identifying various underlying factors. These incidents led to severe outcomes, including preventable deaths and injuries, due to a range of errors, such as surgical mistakes, medication mishandling, and lapses in patient care.
Intended Procedure
Standard healthcare protocols for various procedures were either improperly followed or overlooked in these cases. This includes protocols for medication administration, surgical procedures, and general patient care guidelines.
Environmental Factors
As Olson (2023) noted, the healthcare environment was strained by high patient volumes and staff shortages, exacerbated by the pandemic. These conditions created a challenging operational environment, increasing the risk of errors.
Equipment and Resource Influence
Xie et al. (2021) highlight the impact of resource limitations, particularly staffing shortages, on patient safety. In these Minnesota incidents, inadequate staffing likely contributed to errors across multiple areas, including surgery and patient monitoring, due to rushed procedures and lack of oversight.
Human Error Contribution
Various human errors contributed to these incidents, ranging from misinterpretation of medication labels and surgical plans to incorrect execution of medical procedures. Factors like fatigue, stress, or heavy workloads among healthcare staff could have influenced these errors.
Communication Factors
Wu and colleagues (2023) emphasize the importance of effective communication within healthcare environments. The reported adverse events in the Minnesota hospital episodes were likely caused by communication breakdowns among medical staff, including nurses, surgeons, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals.
Root Causes Identified
Olson (2023) highlighted incidents in Minnesota hospitals where there was a pervasive failure to follow healthcare protocols, affecting various services such as medication administration, surgical procedures, and patient care. Staffing and resource shortages were key contributors to these incidents, as Olson (2023) and Xie et al. (2021) emphasized. These deficits increased risks and compromised patient care. Wu et al. (2023) identified inadequate communication within healthcare teams as a major factor. This breakdown led to errors in medication administration, surgical procedures, and care management, worsening the effects of the existing strains on the healthcare system.
Apply evidence-based and best-practice strategies to address the safety issue.
Applying Evidence-Based and Best-Practice Strategies
Next, we will apply evidence-based strategies.
- Research Best Practices: Review the literature and professional guidelines for the specific safety issue. Identify evidence-based strategies that have been proven effective.
- Evaluate Applicability: Assess how these strategies can be adapted to your healthcare setting. Consider the feasibility and potential impact of each strategy.
Example
Implementing evidence-based strategies to address drug mismanagement, surgical errors, and patient care deficiencies is essential, especially considering the serious errors identified in Minnesota hospitals by Olson (2023). These strategies should be grounded in current research and best practices from healthcare policies, recognizing the complex nature of these issues and providing a framework for mitigation and prevention.
Factors Leading to Safety Issues
Medication Errors. As identified in the root cause analysis, interruptions during medication administration significantly influenced medication errors. Strategies such as increasing staffing levels, reducing workloads, and enhancing communication channels should be implemented to minimize these errors. This approach aligns with the findings of Wu et al. (2023) and Olson (2023), which emphasize the importance of a stable environment for medication delivery.
Patient Falls. The PRONTO trial by Bucknall et al. (2022) underscores the importance of early detection and response to clinical deterioration to prevent incidents like patient falls. Nursing interventions are crucial in identifying at-risk patients through regular vital sign monitoring and adherence to clinical practice guidelines.
Wrong-Site Surgery. Gertz et al. (2022) highlight that issues related to workload and staffing levels contribute to wrong-site surgeries. Implementing standardized presurgical procedures and checklists can mitigate these issues. This ensures consistency and accuracy in surgical practices, reducing the likelihood of such critical errors.
Hospital-Acquired Infections. Ullah et al. (2022) emphasize the significant workload involved in monitoring patients and responding to signs of deterioration, which is crucial in preventing hospital-acquired infections. Hirschhorn et al. (2021) support that streamlining this process with electronic vital sign systems can significantly reduce infection risks.
Addressing Safety Issues through Best Practices
To reduce medication errors, creating a ‘no-interruption’ zone during medication preparation and utilizing electronic medication administration records (EMARs) can significantly decrease mistakes. Educating patients and their families about medication safety, as suggested by Wu et al. (2023), is also vital. Considine et al. (2021) recommend comprehensive Rapid Response Systems (RRS) in the Emergency Department and ongoing staff training and simulation exercises to minimize medication errors and enhance patient safety.
Improving environmental safety through non-slip flooring, assistive technology, and adequate lighting is essential. Including patients and their families in fall prevention strategies and providing continuous staff training on fall prevention and risk assessment are crucial steps.
The World Health Organization advises using a systematic surgical safety checklist to reduce the incidence of wrong-site surgery significantly. Preoperative conferences and involving patients in labeling the surgical site can also enhance safety.
Adhering strictly to infection control practices, such as personal protective equipment and regular hand washing, is essential to prevent hospital-acquired infections. Maintaining environmental cleanliness and educating staff on infection control are also critical. Ullah et al. (2022) propose that transitioning from hand-written to digital tracking of vital signs could reduce nurses’ workloads, allowing for more attentive patient care and lowering the incidence of hospital-acquired infections.
Create a feasible, evidence-based safety improvement plan to address a specific patient safety issue.
Creating a Safety Improvement Plan
Here, we will create a safety improvement plan.
- Set Goals: Define clear, measurable goals for your improvement plan. These should be specific to the identified safety issue.
- Develop Interventions: Based on your root-cause analysis and research, outline the interventions you will implement to address the root causes.
- Create an Implementation Plan: Detail the steps, timeline, and responsible parties for implementing each intervention.
- Monitor and Evaluate: Plan for ongoing monitoring and evaluation to measure the effectiveness of your interventions.
Example
A comprehensive improvement plan is proposed in response to the significant occurrences of medication errors, surgical errors, and patient care deficiencies in Minnesota hospitals. This plan is based on root cause analysis and is supported by recent research and best practices in healthcare.
Actions, New Processes, or Policies
We standardized Surgical Protocols and Checklists. The strategy recommends implementing standardized surgical protocols and checklists to prevent wrong-site and other surgical errors, as Gertz et al. (2022) highlighted.
Staff Training and Professional Development. The plan includes ongoing training programs for nurses and healthcare workers, focusing on early recognition of patient deterioration, adherence to clinical guidelines, and effective communication skills, in line with the recommendations of Bucknall et al. (2022).
Enhancement of Communication Protocols. Drawing from Olson (2023), the plan advocates for establishing clear and effective communication channels among healthcare professionals. This includes leveraging technology to ensure the timely sharing of critical test results and patient information.
Adoption of Technology for Patient Monitoring. Inspired by Ullah et al.’s (2022) findings, the strategy suggests integrating electronic monitoring systems for patient vital signs. This will reduce nurses’ manual workload and enable more accurate and timely responses to patient needs.
Goals or Desired Outcomes
Reduction in Specific Patient Safety Events. Significantly minimize medication errors, surgical mistakes, and patient care lapses, particularly focusing on wrong-site surgeries and medication mismanagement.
It enhanced Staff Competency in Patient Safety. Improve the medical staff’s ability to recognize and address patient safety issues, especially in surgery and drug administration.
It strengthened the Patient Safety Culture. In line with Wu et al. (2023), the plan aims to increase patient and family involvement in the care process, fostering a patient-centered care and safety culture.
Rough Timeline for Development and Implementation
Initial Phase (0-3 Months). Develop standardized surgical and medication protocols. Begin comprehensive staff training. Implement communication and electronic monitoring systems.
Intermediate Phase (4-6 Months). Pilot new protocols in selected departments. Continue staff training and evaluate the effectiveness of communication. Integrate electronic monitoring in key areas.
Final Phase (7-12 Months). Implement standardized protocols throughout the facility. Expand electronic monitoring to all departments. Maintain ongoing staff development and feedback mechanisms.
Evaluation and Adjustment (Post-12 Months). Regularly assess the new systems to reduce errors. Make adjustments based on feedback and outcomes.
This plan is built on scholarly evidence and practical strategies. It targets the root causes of identified patient safety issues. Its implementation is expected to significantly enhance patient safety and quality of care in healthcare.
Identify organizational resources that could be leveraged to improve your plan.
Identifying Organizational Resources
We will explore the organizational resources for this NURS-FPX 4020 Assessment 2: Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan section.
- Assess Resources: Identify existing resources within your organization that can support your safety improvement plan. This may include staff training programs, technology, and financial resources.
- Leverage Support: Determine how to utilize these resources to enhance your plan’s success. Engage key stakeholders and secure the necessary support.
Example
Existing Organizational Resources
Leveraging existing organizational resources is crucial for successfully implementing the safety improvement plan addressing critical incidents in Minnesota hospitals. This ensures the efficient use of available assets and facilitates the integration of new strategies.
Human Resources
Nursing Staff. Experienced nurses play a vital role in frontline healthcare, ensuring patient safety. Their expertise is crucial in mentoring new nurses, particularly in key practices such as medication administration and patient monitoring, fostering a strong safety culture.
Patient Safety Officers oversee safety protocols, especially in surgical settings, and coordinate strategies to address identified safety issues.
Interdisciplinary Teams. Collaboration among physicians, pharmacists, nurses, and other healthcare professionals ensures that complex care scenarios are managed with diverse expertise, essential for a comprehensive approach to patient safety.
Technological Resources
Electronic Health Records (EHR). EHRs are essential for ensuring the accuracy of surgical procedures, controlling medication errors, and monitoring patient data.
Patient Monitoring Systems. These technologies significantly reduce the likelihood of patient care errors and are crucial for the early detection of patient deterioration.
Educational and Training Materials
Online Learning Platforms. These platforms facilitate efficient staff training on new safety protocols and procedures related to medication management and surgical safety.
Simulation Training Tools. Simulation training provides hands-on experience managing patient safety scenarios, particularly in surgical settings.
Policy and Governance Frameworks
Safety Policies and Guidelines. Safety policies must be regularly updated and revised to align with the latest advancements in patient safety best practices.
Quality Improvement Committees. These committees are essential for guiding the execution of the safety improvement strategy, ensuring its alignment with the organization’s overarching goals.
Demonstration of Proficiency
Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.
Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.
Competency 3: Identify organizational interventions to promote patient safety.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.
These competencies are designed to guide you through completing the assessment. They provide a framework to ensure that your work is thorough, evidence-based, and professionally communicated
Closing
Completing the NURS-FPX 4020 Assessment 2: Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan will enhance your ability to identify and address patient safety issues through systematic analysis and strategic planning. Following this How-To Owlisdom Guide, you can create a comprehensive safety improvement plan that leverages organizational resources and adheres to best practices. The NURS-FPX 4020 Assessment 2: Root-Cause Analysis and Safety Improvement Plan demonstrates your proficiency in quality care and patient safety. It prepares you to take on leadership roles in healthcare settings, contributing to improved patient outcomes and safer care environments.
