Here you can read our FREE Ultimate Guide on BUSN 1001 Week 6 Discussion: Constructing Logical Arguments in Research and see its solution.
Instructions of BUSN 1001 Week 6 Discussion: Constructing Logical Arguments in Research
W6: Construct arguments related to logistical problems by writing supportive argumentative essays
Explain the importance of constructing a logical position or argument for research. Do you feel that one is harder or more complicated than another? Support your position.
Week 6 Argumentative Essay
Instructions
Paper – Find an article about a current event in your discipline and write a supportive argumentative essay. The essay should be at least 1000 words in length and written in APA format. Include a cover page an Reference list.
Prepare an argumentative essay in which you take a position of a topic (current even related to your discipline). Begin by choosing a topic and establish your claim regarding this topic. Consider some good reasons or evidence that might support your claim. Also consider opposing views. What is your response to these opposing views?
Outline for Argumentative Essay:
Introduction Paragraph with Thesis Statement – the introduction should be fully developed containing background information on the topic. The thesis statement should appear at the end of the introductory paragraph.
Clear Transitions between all paragraphs – transitions hold the essay together. They inform the reader of what to expect n the next paragraph.
Body – fully developed set of paragraphs that provide evidence and support of the thesis. In the body the writer should include a warrant or reason that the evidence provided supports the thesis. Try to choose at least three VERY strong arguments that support your thesis (claim). Then back your argument up with relevant, timely, specific, and, accurate evidence. Use facts and statistics leave out your opinions, yet include opinions of experts on this topic. Avoid words like ‘I think”, and “I believe”. Do not over use emotion and demonstrate lack of bias.
Also in the body (1-2 paragraphs) it is important to consider other points of view or opposing views. The writer should views that are not in support of the thesis, yet refute that this point of view is out of date, irrelevant, or not well informed.
Conclusion– The conclusion should be tied back to the thesis statement. It is important not to introduce any new information in the conclusion. The conclusion is a synthesis of the information in the essay and a statement of why the topic is important.
Step-By-Step Guide on BUSN 1001 Week 6 Discussion: Constructing Logical Arguments in Research
Introduction to BUSN I001 Week 6 Discussion
Welcome to BUSN 1001 Week 6 Discussion: Constructing Logical Arguments in Research! This week focuses on constructing logical positions or arguments for research. Developing well-founded arguments is crucial for presenting persuasive and credible research findings. This Owlisdom How-To guide will help you navigate the Week 6 discussion, ensuring you address all necessary components thoughtfully and thoroughly.
Explain the importance of constructing a logical position or argument for research.
Importance of Constructing a Logical Position or Argument
As mentioned in the BUSN 1001 Week 6 Discussion: Constructing Logical Arguments in Research instructions, I must start by understanding and explaining the importance that an argument or logical status holds in research.
- Define what a logical position or argument is.
- Discuss why constructing a logical argument is crucial in research.
- Highlight the role of logical arguments in persuading and informing others.
- Explain how logical arguments contribute to the credibility and validity of research.
Example
Constructing a logical position or argument is essential in research because it ensures that the conclusions drawn are based on solid evidence and sound reasoning. A logical argument connects premises to a conclusion in a coherent and consistent manner, making it easier for others to understand and accept the findings. Logical arguments are crucial for persuading and informing stakeholders, peers, and the broader academic community. They contribute to the credibility and validity of research, ensuring that the results are reliable and trustworthy.
In research, constructing a logical argument involves systematically gathering and analysing evidence, identifying patterns and relationships, and drawing conclusions that are supported by the data. This process helps to minimise biases and errors, leading to more accurate and meaningful results.
Do you feel that one is harder or more complicated than another?
Types of Arguments
Next, in the BUSN 1001 Week 6 Discussion: Constructing Logical Arguments in Research instructions, I will discuss types of arguments and then explain which one is more complicated than the other.
- Compare different types of arguments (e.g., inductive vs. deductive).
- Discuss which type of argument you find more challenging and why.
- Provide examples to illustrate your points.
- Reflect on the benefits and limitations of each type of argument.
Example
There are different types of arguments, such as inductive and deductive arguments. Inductive arguments move from specific observations to general conclusions, while deductive arguments move from general principles to specific conclusions. I find inductive arguments more challenging because they require identifying patterns and drawing generalisations from a limited set of observations. This can be difficult when the data is complex or ambiguous.
For example, in a market research project, using an inductive approach, I had to analyse customer feedback to identify trends and preferences. The challenge was to ensure that the conclusions drawn were representative and not biased by a small sample size. In contrast, deductive arguments, which start with a general theory and test it with specific data, can be more straightforward but require strong theoretical foundations.
Provide an example to support your position.
Examples to Support Your Position
Finally, in the next section of the BUSN 1001 Week 6 Discussion: Constructing Logical Arguments in Research instructions, I will explain and defend my response using the examples from the sources.
- Use specific examples from academic or professional experiences.
- Illustrate how constructing logical arguments improved your research outcomes.
- Highlight any lessons learned from developing arguments.
- Explain how these lessons can be applied to future research.
Example
In my professional experience, constructing logical arguments has been crucial in developing effective business strategies. For instance, when proposing a new marketing campaign, I used evidence from previous campaigns and market research to build a logical argument for the expected success of the new initiative. This approach helped gain stakeholder buy-in and ensured that the campaign was well-supported by data.
Similarly, during my academic studies, I wrote a research paper on the impact of social media on consumer behaviour. By constructing a logical argument based on empirical evidence and theoretical frameworks, I was able to present a compelling case for the influence of social media on purchasing decisions. This experience reinforced the importance of logical arguments in producing credible and persuasive research.
Please respond to more than two other students. Responses should be a minimum of 100 words and include direct questions.
Responding to Peers
Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of BUSN 1001 Week 6 Discussion: Constructing Logical Arguments in Research. We need to provide responses to at least two other learners’ posts. I will provide an example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the below points in mind.
- Read at least two of your peers’ posts and provide a meaningful response.
- Offer additional insights, ask questions, or suggest alternative perspectives.
- Ensure your response is respectful, constructive, and supported by relevant sources where appropriate.
Example
Response 1
Hi Jason, your explanation of the importance of constructing logical arguments was very insightful. I particularly liked your emphasis on how logical arguments contribute to the credibility of research. Have you encountered any challenges in constructing logical arguments in your studies or work? Great job!
Response 2
Hi Angela, I found your discussion on the different types of arguments very compelling. Your examples from professional experience highlighted the practical application of these elements. Do you have any strategies for constructing strong inductive arguments in research? I’d love to hear your thoughts. Excellent work!
