Here you can read our free guide on the HIS 100 5-1 Discussion: Uncovering Bias and Missing Narratives and their Solution.
Instructions of HIS 100 5-1 Discussion
Thus far, you have learned how historical contexts, perspectives, and biases influence the interpretation and "telling" of historical narratives. For this discussion, reflect on what you have learned about your research question and the historical event and current event you chose. To ensure an interesting discussion, you are encouraged to think creatively about your initial posts and extend the points made by your peers. It is also important to review the module resources and read the prompts in their entirety before participating in the discussion. You should include examples and other supporting evidence from the module resources in your posts. Discussing challenges that face our world often means investigating opinions and ideas different from your own. Remember to remain thoughtful and respectful towards your peers and instructor in your discussion post and replies.
Create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts.
For your initial post, address the following:
1. Discuss the brainstorming process you used to identify bias in your primary and secondary sources. How did you do it? Describe the strategies that were successful for you.
2. Consider the challenges you encountered identifying the narratives about your historical event. What methods did you use to identify the absent voices in the historical narratives?
3. What perspectives do you think are missing from the narrative about your historical event? Be sure to cite evidence from your sources to justify your points.
For your response posts, address the following:
1. How might you use your peers' strategies to uncover another absent perspective related to your historical event or expose a historical narrative bias? If you think you cannot apply your peers' strategies to your own event or narrative, explain why. Remember, this assignment is graded on the quality of your initial post and at least two response posts to your classmates. If you refer to any module resources, be sure to include an attribution (or citation) for the resource.
To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric.
Step-By-Step Guide to HIS 100 5-1 Discussion: Uncovering Bias and Missing Narratives
Introduction To HIS 100 5-1 Discussion
This Owlisdom How-To Guide will provide a descriptive and detailed overview of the HIS 100 5-1 Discussion: Uncovering Bias and Missing Narratives. Before diving into the details of this discussion, it is crucial to grasp what we are asked to do. 5-1 Discussion involves examining how historical contexts, perspectives, and biases shape the understanding and storytelling of historical events. We delve into these aspects critically by comparing historical and current events.
Reminder: All the assignments and tasks of HIS 100 are linked.
Discuss the brainstorming process you used to identify bias in your primary and secondary sources. How did you do it? Describe the strategies that were successful for you.
Identifying Bias in Sources
Let us delve into this section of HIS 100 5-1 Discussion: Uncovering Bias and missing narratives, explaining how to identify biases in sources we found for the previously done activities.
- Start Simple: Begin with what you know about the topic, jot down your initial thoughts, and question everything.
- Seek Multiple Sources: Look for various sources (books, articles, documentaries) for a broad view.
- Compare Narratives: See how different sources present the same event. Discrepancies can reveal bias.
- Check the Source’s Background: Understand who wrote the information and their potential motives.
- Look for What’s Not Said: Sometimes, what is omitted can reveal more about bias than what is included.
Consider the challenges you encountered identifying the narratives about your historical event. What methods did you use to determine the absent voices in historical narratives? What perspectives need to be added to the narrative about your historical event?
Challenges in Historical Narratives
In HIS 100 5-1 Discussion: Uncovering Bias and missing narratives. Let us explore the challenges we faced while researching historical narratives.
- Research Marginalized Groups: These voices are often overlooked. Look for sources focusing on underrepresented perspectives.
- Ask Critical Questions: Whose story isn’t being told? Why might that be?
- Think Outside the Box: Consider completely absent perspectives. Could a different social class, gender, or ethnic group offer a new angle?
- Use Evidence to Support: When you identify a missing perspective, back it up with evidence from your research.
How might you use your peers’ strategies to uncover another absent perspective related to your historical event or expose a historical narrative bias? If you think you cannot apply your peers’ approach to your event or narrative, explain why.
Engaging in Discussion
It is essential to engage with and answer peers’ queries. But sometimes, we must learn to address questions more clearly and professionally. Some HIS 100 5-1 Discussion: Uncovering Bias and missing narratives posts may ask for peers’ responses. By following the guidelines below, you can quickly answer any question.
- Be Creative: Start with a robust and engaging point. Use what you’ve learned to craft an original post that invites discussion.
- Include Examples: Use your research to support your arguments.
- Extend the Conversation: Build on your peers’ ideas, offer new insights, or pose thoughtful questions.
- Be Respectful and Thoughtful: Remember, the goal is to learn from each other, even when opinions differ.
Response 01
Your approach to uncovering the overlooked voices in the narrative of the Great Depression’s impact on the U.S. banking system is quite enlightening. It got me thinking about the narratives of urban workers versus rural farmers during this period (Boyd, 2002). While your focus on marginalized groups highlights significant disparities, I would like to know if we could extend this to include the experiences of urban workers who faced bank failures differently than rural communities. These workers relied on banks for savings and daily transactions and credit for small businesses, which might provide another layer of insight into the banking system’s restructuring. This perspective could reveal more about the socio-economic impacts across different urban and rural communities, offering a broader understanding of the Depression’s long-term effects.
References
Boyd, R. L. (2002). Urban unemployment, the rural labor market, and southern blacks in farm labor during the Great Depression: A research note. The Social Science Journal, 39(2), 295–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0362-3319(02)00170-2
Response 02
According to the instructions of HIS 100 5-1 Discussion: Uncovering Bias and Missing Narratives, we are supposed to write two or more peer responses. I have addressed the given instructions in one response. Following these instructions, you can quickly and professionally write your peer responses to 5-1 Discussion: Uncovering Bias and Missing Narratives.
Closing
Following these guidelines, you can fulfill the discussion post’s requirements and gain a deeper understanding, enriching your perspective on uncovering bias and missing narratives in historical research. I hope you nail this HIS 100 5-1 Discussion: Uncovering Bias and Missing Narratives. Good luck!
You can also read our HIS 100 next module, 5-2 Activity of Historical Interpretations of Past and Present.
