ENG-122 – English Composition II- Advance Your Academic Writing Skills

Introduction:

The ENG-122 English Composition II course builds on foundational writing skills, emphasizing research, analysis, and persuasive communication. Students learn to develop strong arguments, integrate credible sources, and enhance their academic writing style. For personalized writing support, visit Owlisdom’s English Homework Help.

ENG 122 1-2 Discussion: Moment of Critical Thinking in Real Life

Instructions for ENG 122 1-2 Discussion

1-2 Discussion: Moment of Critical Thinking in Real Life

First, introduce yourself to the class. Include your major and anything you would like to share about yourself. Then address the prompt below in a few paragraphs.

Remember to remain thoughtful and respectful towards your peers and instructor in your discussion posts and replies.

Create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts.

For your initial post, address the following:

• Consider a time in your life when you had to look at something a little closer to make sense of it.
• This moment might focus on a document (like the grocery list example in the previous video), a longer piece of writing, a piece of art, a billboard, and so on.
• Use rich description and detail to describe the moment.

Explain your method of examining the moment and what you discovered as a result.

For your response posts, address the following:

• What is your reaction to the way your classmates made sense of something in their lives?
• Would you have done the same thing, or would you have approached it differently? Why, or why not?

Remember, this assignment is graded on the quality of your initial post and at least two response posts to your classmates. If you refer to any module resources, be sure to include an attribution (or citation) to the resource.

To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric.

Introduction to ENG 122 1-2 Discussion

Welcome to the ENG 122 English Composition! This is the first discussion post for this course. ENG 122 1-2 Discussion: Moment of Critical Thinking in Real Life post revolves around your understanding of moments of critical thinking in real life. I will provide brief and descriptive guidelines to solve the 1-2 Discussion posts and a dummy solution for each section. This Owlisdom How-To Guide will equip you with guidelines to tackle all the queries related to the ENG 122 1-2 Discussion: Moment of Critical Thinking in Real Life. Let us begin with the guide.

First, introduce yourself to the class. Include your major and anything you would like to share about yourself.

Introduction

In ENG 122 1-2 Discussion: Moment of Critical Thinking in Real Life. First, we will give a brief introduction of ourselves to start engaging with the class.

• Begin by introducing yourself in a few sentences. 
• Mention your major and any hobbies or interests you feel comfortable sharing with the class.

Example

Hi everyone! I am Alex. I am studying English Composition and have a deep passion for storytelling and poetry. I enjoy hiking through nature and reading classic novels in my free time. I am excited to share ideas and learn from all of you in this class!

Consider when you had to look at something a little closer to make sense of it. This moment might focus on a document (like the grocery list example in the previous video), a longer piece of writing, a piece of art, a billboard, and so on.

Selecting Your Moment

The next step of ENG 122 1-2 Discussion: Moment of Critical Thinking in Real Life is to select a moment in our lives that would help us explore the discussion.

• Think of a time when you had to take a second look at something to understand it fully.

• This could be anything from a text to a personal experience. Make sure this moment has enough depth to explore in your essay.

Example

Once, I encountered a modern art installation that was nothing more than a canvas painted blue. Initially, it seemed too simple, almost lazy. However, prompted by curiosity, I delved deeper into the artist’s statement and discovered it was a commentary on loneliness and the ocean’s vastness. This moment of reconsideration transformed my initial dismissal into a profound appreciation for the artist’s ability to convey complex emotions through minimalistic means. It taught me the importance of looking beyond the surface in art, life, and literature, revealing deeper meanings and connections.

Use rich description and detail to describe the moment.

Describing Your Moment

For this section of the ENG 122 1-2 Discussion: Moment of Critical Thinking in Real Life, we will describe the moment we chose in the previous section.

• Use descriptive language to detail your chosen moment. 
• Focus on the sights, sounds, and other sensory details that made the moment stand out.

Example

Standing before the vast, singularly blue canvas, the gallery around me faded into a hush. The painting, an expanse of deep azure, seemed to pulse with a life of its own, evoking the endless ocean depths. The room’s silence mirrored the artwork’s isolation, enveloping me in a sea of contemplation. As I leaned closer, the texture of the brush strokes became visible, each a wave cresting and falling. The cool, monochromatic color scheme washed over me, creating a serene melancholy. In that moment, the artwork transcended its simplicity, becoming a window into the artist’s soul and a mirror reflecting the universal experience of solitude.

Explain your method of examining the moment and what you discovered.

Analyzing Your Moment

In this section of ENG 122 1-2 Discussion: Moment of Critical Thinking in Real Life, we will analyze the moment.

• Discuss how you went about examining the moment. 
• Did you ask questions, research, or reflect on it? 
• Then, describe what you learned from this closer examination. 
• Encourage a reflective tone, urging the student to consider how this moment changed their perspective or understanding.

Example

In my quest to understand the blue canvas, I began with introspection, questioning what emotions it stirred within me. Then, I sought out the artist’s statement and read critiques to gain multiple perspectives. This research illuminated the artwork’s intention to evoke the vastness of the sea and the solitude it symbolizes. Through this process, I learned the power of minimalism in art to convey profound messages. The experience reshaped my approach to art and literature, teaching me the importance of delving beneath the surface to uncover more profound meanings. It was a reminder that proper understanding requires patience, openness, and a willingness to engage with the work on its terms.

What is your reaction to how our classmates made sense of something in their lives? Would you have done the same thing, or would you have approached it differently? Why, or why not?

Writing Responses to Peers

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the Discussion posts of ENG 122.

• When responding to classmates, express your initial reaction to their experience or analysis. 
• Briefly explain your reasoning and whether you would have approached the situation similarly or differently. 
• Keep your tone respectful and constructive, aiming to add value to the discussion rather than agree or disagree.

Response 01

Reading about how you connected the dots between the items on the grocery list and personal milestones was eye-opening. It never occurred to me to view such a common task through a lens of deep personal significance. Your post made me ponder the hidden stories behind everyday routines. If I were in your shoes, I might have considered how each item reflects our changing needs and priorities over time. It is fascinating how mundane details can reveal so much about our journey through life.

Response 02

According to the ENG 122 1-2 Discussion: Moment of Critical Thinking in Real Life instructions, we must write two response posts. I have provided one response post example. I am sure you can write your responses using this example. 

Closing

This guide focuses on structuring and approaching your ENG 122 1-2 Discussion: Moment of Critical Thinking in Real Life. Remember, the depth of your reflection and the quality of your engagement with peers’ contributions will enrich your essay and discussions. I hope you ace the ENG 122 1-2 Discussion post. Good luck!

ENG 122 2-5 Assignment: Importance of Analysis

Instructions for ENG 122 2-5 Assignment

Overview

This week, you learned about active reading and analysis by looking more closely at a selected reading. In doing so, you uncovered ideas that may have been difficult to identify during your literal reading of the text.

Prompt

To prepare for this assignment, please re-read your selected article and your notes from Module One.

Note: Remember to cite any works you use in your assignment. You will not be graded on the citations; the purpose is just to make certain you are practicing using citations.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

• Discuss the context of your selected article, the author’s purpose, and the style and tone. What have you learned from this early analysis?
• How will a closer analysis of the author’s claim and the writing structure help you to learn more about your selected reading?
• Now that you have discussed the author’s purpose for writing the selected reading, do you think the author’s writing effectively achieves their purpose? What led you to this conclusion?

In total, the reflection should be three fully developed paragraphs (5–8 sentences each) in length (consider one section per question). Remember to refer to the rubric below to make sure you are fulfilling the requirements for this assignment.

Guidelines for Submission

Save your work in a Word document and include a page with references. It must be written in MLA or APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.

Introduction to ENG 122 2-5 Assignment

This Assignment post revolves around your understanding of the Importance of Analysis in English Composition. I will provide brief and descriptive guidelines to solve the ENG 122 2-5 Assignment: Importance of Analysis and a dummy solution for each section. This Owlisdom How-To Guide will equip you with guidelines to tackle all the queries related to the ENG 122 2-5 Assignment. Let us begin with the guide.

Discuss the context of your selected article, the author’s purpose, and the style and tone. What have you learned from this early analysis?

Active Reading and Analysis

To start the ENG 122 2-5 Assignment: Importance of Analysis, we will discuss the context and purpose of the article. I am choosing Error Analysis of English Composition (Neupane, 2023) for this assignment.

• Active Reading: Emphasize engaging with the text by questioning, annotating, and summarizing as you read. Explain how this helps uncover deeper meanings.
• Analysis Process: Describe how analyzing a text involves examining its elements (like theme, tone, and structure) to understand the author’s intentions and the text’s implications.

Example

1. N. Neupane’s study, “Error Analysis of Written English Composition: A Case of Basic Level Students” (Tribhuvan Journal, 2023), investigates common errors in English compositions by elementary learners. The research aims to uncover mistake patterns to refine educational methods. Utilizing a thorough review of student writings, Neupane categorizes errors and their prevalence. This study enhances the understanding of how targeted teaching strategies can address and correct these errors. It underscores the importance of specific feedback in improving English language proficiency among beginners.

How will a closer analysis of the author’s claim and the writing structure help you to learn more about your selected reading?

Preparation for the Assignment

In ENG 122 2-5 Assignment: Importance of Analysis, we will analyze the article’s structure to understand it better.

• Re-reading: Suggest choosing an article that sparks interest and is relevant to the course. Stress the importance of re-reading to catch nuances missed initially.
• Article Selection: Encourage selecting an article that will contribute meaningfully to the course discussion. Offer criteria for selection, such as relevance, challenge, and interest.
• Citing Works: Provide a simple guide on citing sources, even if it is not graded. Mention that practicing citations is crucial for academic integrity.

Example

A closer examination of Neupane’s (2023) study on English composition errors among basic learners reveals the importance of error pattern identification for improving teaching methods. Revisiting the article enhances understanding of the structural approach to categorizing linguistic mistakes, which is crucial for educational strategy development. This article, relevant and challenging, enriches course discussions on language acquisition. Engaging deeply with the content through structured analysis highlights the value of precise feedback in language teaching. Citing such studies emphasizes academic integrity and the significance of research-based teaching practices.

Now that you have discussed the author’s purpose for writing the selected reading, do you think the author’s writing effectively achieves their purpose? What led you to this conclusion?

Reflection on the Selected Article

We will discuss whether the writing is effective for this section of ENG 122 2-5 Assignment: Importance of Analysis.

• Structure and Content: Outline the structure for the reflection, dividing it into three paragraphs corresponding to the instructions. Guide them to develop each section with clear, concise sentences addressing the instructions.
• Personal Insight: Encourage students to include personal insights and connections to the text. Stress the importance of backing up claims with examples from the article.

Example

Neupane’s (2023) investigation into error analysis in English composition successfully achieves its aim by providing a detailed exploration of common errors among basic learners, enhancing teaching strategies. The study’s clear categorization of errors, backed by specific examples, directly aligns with its purpose of refining language education. Reflecting on this, my personal learning experiences echo the significance of targeted feedback highlighted in the study, reinforcing its practical value in language teaching. Neupane’s structured approach and practical insights enrich educators’ understanding and emphasize the importance of research-based methods in teaching English. This article effectively bridges the gap between academic research and classroom application, underscoring the critical role of error analysis in educational advancement.

Closing

This ENG 122 2-5 Assignment: Importance of Analysis guide should help you approach the assignment with a structured and insightful mindset, enabling you to dive deeper into the text and articulate your reflections effectively.

In the next module of ENG 122, we will explore the 3-2 Assignment: Writing Plan.

References

Neupane, R. N. (2023). Error Analysis of Written English Composition: A Case of Basic Level Students. Tribhuvan Journal, 1(1), 101–109.

ENG 122 3-2 Assignment: Writing Plan

Instructions for ENG 122 3-2 Assignment

Overview

To complete this assignment, do an active reading of your selected reading using the reviewed analysis techniques. Be sure to take notes. Next, you will make a plan for writing your critical analysis essay, which will guide you through the first steps of drafting the critical analysis essay due in Module 7.

As you work on the Writing Plan, remember to refer to the assignment guidelines and rubric below to make certain you fulfill each aspect of the assignment.

Prompt

For this Writing Plan, you will analyze your selected reading and state an opinion or evaluation about the author’s claim. You will then use evidence or key points from the selected reading to back up your evaluation.

Note: Remember to cite any works you use in your assignment. You will not be graded on the citations; the purpose is just to make certain you are practicing using citations.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

• What is the author’s claim in the selected reading? In other words, what do you believe the author wants their audience to learn or understand better once they have finished reading?
• Have you identified key points that the author uses to support their claim in the selected reading? If so, include them here. 
• Describe the author’s target audience: what group or groups of people is the author trying to reach with their message?
• What choices does the author make within their writing to connect with this target audience?
• Explain your evaluation of the author’s claim: Is the claim strong or weak? What evidence or key points from the writing best support the author’s claim? If you found the claim to be weak, explain why the evidence or key points provided did not effectively support the author’s claim.

Guidelines for Submission

Save your work in a Word document and include a page with references. It must be written in MLA or APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.

Introduction to ENG 122 3-2 Assignment

This How-To Guide revolves around your understanding of the 3-2 Assignment Writing Plan. I will provide brief and descriptive guidelines to solve the ENG 122 3-2 Assignment: Writing Plan and a dummy solution for each section. This Owlisdom How-To Guide will equip you with guidelines to tackle all the queries related to the 3-2 Assignment. Let us begin with the guide.

Selecting a Reading

As I have already selected Error Analysis of Written English Composition (Neupane, 2023) in the 2-5 Assignment as my reading article, I will be providing a solution according to this article. 

What is the author’s claim in the selected reading? In other words, what do you believe the author wants their audience to learn or understand better after reading?

Analyzing the Author’s Claim

In this ENG 122 3-2 Assignment: Writing Plan section, we will discuss the author’s claim and the selected audience.

• Identifying: Read the introduction and conclusion carefully to understand the author’s main argument. What is the author trying to convey?
• Understanding: Consider why the author feels this message is important for the audience.

Example

In R. N. Neupane’s study, “Error Analysis of Written English Composition: A Case of Basic Level Students” (2023), the author’s primary claim is the crucial role of identifying and understanding common errors in enhancing English language teaching methodologies for basic learners. Neupane underscores the significance of this analysis for educators to develop targeted teaching strategies to elevate students’ language proficiency. The emphasis on error analysis is a pivotal tool for educators, suggesting that a detailed understanding of errors can lead to more effective instruction and learning outcomes.

Have you identified key points that the author uses to support their claim in the selected reading? If so, include them here.

Identifying Key Points

We will discuss the key points in the next section of ENG 122 3-2 Assignment: Writing Plan. 

• Finding Evidence: As you read, identify the key points or evidence the author uses to support their claim. Use the margins to note these points.
• Note-taking: Organize your notes by themes or arguments for easy reference during writing.

Example

Neupane’s article leverages several key points to support the argument for the importance of error analysis in teaching English to basic learners. Firstly, classifying errors into grammatical, syntactical, and semantic categories highlights the areas needing focused instruction. Secondly, the correlation between specific error types and students’ learning challenges provides insight into targeted teaching strategies. Lastly, Neupane emphasizes the positive impact of feedback on student corrections, showing that understanding errors can significantly improve language acquisition. These points collectively argue for a nuanced approach to teaching English grounded in error analysis.

Describe the author’s target audience: what group or groups of people is the author trying to reach with their message? What choices does the author make within their writing to connect with this target audience?

Understanding the Target Audience

In this section of ENG 122 3-2 Assignment: Writing Plan, we will analyze how the author targeted the audience for effective reach of the message of the selected article.

• Determining: Who is this article written for? Consider the language, examples, and references used.
• Analyzing: How does the author’s choice of content and style aim to engage this audience?

Example

1. N. Neupane targets educators, linguists, and curriculum developers engaged in English language teaching at the basic level in “Error Analysis of Written English Composition: A Case of Basic Level Students” (2023). Using detailed error categorizations and examples from student compositions, Neupane strategically connects with this audience, offering practical insights and strategies for addressing common language errors. The choice of academic yet accessible language and the focus on actionable teaching methodologies are designed to resonate with professionals seeking to enhance their pedagogical approaches, emphasizing a direct application to classroom settings.

Explain your evaluation of the author’s claim: Is the claim strong or weak? What evidence or key points from the writing best support the author’s claim? If you found the claim weak, explain why the evidence or key points did not effectively support the author’s claim.

Evaluating the Author’s Writing Choices

For this ENG 122 3-2 Assignment: Writing Plan, we will evaluate the author’s claim and analyze the key points.

• Examining: Look at the author’s use of language, structure, and examples. How do these choices connect with the target audience?
• Assessing: Decide if these techniques effectively support the author’s claim and engage the audience.

Example

Neupane’s claim in the article “Error Analysis of Written English Composition: A Case of Basic Level Students” is compelling and strongly supported by systematic error categorization and the positive outcomes of feedback on student corrections. The use of clear, academic language and structured examples directly appeals to the intended audience of educators and linguists, providing them with practical insights. The evidence, particularly the detailed analysis of error types and their implications for teaching, solidifies the argument for the importance of error analysis in enhancing English language teaching methodologies, making the claim robust and convincing.

Closing

This ENG 122 3-2 Assignment: Writing Plan guide should equip you with the tools to write a nuanced and well-supported critical analysis essay. Remember, the goal is to engage deeply with the text and provide a clear, evidence-backed evaluation of the author’s argument.

In the next module of ENG 122, we will explore the 4-3 Assignment on Identifying your Thesis Statement.

References

Neupane, R. N. (2023). Error Analysis of Written English Composition: A Case of Basic Level Students. Tribhuvan Journal, 1(1), 101–109.

ENG 122 4-3 Assignment: Identifying your Thesis Statement

Instructions for ENG 122 4-3 Assignment

Overview

For this assignment, you are going to work on a thesis statement. A thesis statement is a sentence that states the topic and purpose of a paper. A good thesis statement will direct the structure of your final essay and will allow your reader to understand the ideas you will discuss within your paper. Therefore, it should be one sentence, succinct, and well thought out, and it should summarize your reaction to the selected reading and your supporting points.

Prompt

For this assignment, you will compose a thesis statement that summarizes your argument for the article you selected to work on throughout the course. Use the framework below to help you construct your thesis statement: 

Main Claim:

The article’s main claim of [insert a summary of the author’s main claim here]__________________ is _[insert your evaluation of the argument here]__________________ 

Supporting Key Points: ( list your support for your evaluation of the author’s main claim) 

because ______________, ______________________, and ______________________.

The main claim should summarize your reaction to your selected reading and your supporting points. Remember that a strong thesis statement should contain a main claim and three supporting points to back up the main claim.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

• Identify a main claim that relates to the selected work.
• Identify three relevant key points in support of your claim.

Guidelines for Submission

Save your work in a Word document and include a page with references. It must be written in MLA or APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.

Introduction to ENG 122 4-3 Assignment 

Creating a strong thesis statement is essential for guiding the direction and structure of your essay. This Owlisdom guide of ENG 122 4-3 Assignment: Identifying your Thesis Statement will help us craft a compelling thesis statement based on the article we have been working with throughout the course. We chose to work with the article Error Analysis of Written English Composition (Neupane, 2023).

Identify a main claim that relates to the selected work.

Understanding the Main Claim

To start the ENG 122 4-3 Assignment: Identifying your Thesis Statement, we will first understand the main claim of the article we chose.

• Main Claim: Reflect on the author’s primary argument within the selected article. Summarize this main claim in your own words, ensuring it accurately represents the article’s argument.
• Your Reaction: Determine your stance on the author’s claim. Is it strong, weak, convincing, or lacking evidence? This will form the basis of your thesis statement.

Example

The main claim of Neupane’s article, “Error Analysis of Written English Composition: A Case of Basic Level Students,” posits that understanding and addressing the common errors in English composition at the basic level significantly enhances learning outcomes. Evaluating this claim, I find it robust and convincingly supported by systematic error analysis and empirical evidence. Neupane’s argument is compelling, highlighting the critical role of error analysis in improving English language teaching methodologies.

Identify three relevant key points in support of your claim.

Identifying Supporting Key Points

The next part is to identify the vital supporting key points of the article.

• Selecting Key Points: Choose three arguments or evidence from the article that most strongly support your evaluation of the author’s claim. These should be specific points that you can cite to back up your stance.
• Relevance: Ensure each key point directly supports your stance on the main claim. They should be compelling and directly related to your reaction to the article.

Example

The article substantiates its claim with three key points: first, the categorization of errors into grammatical, syntactical, and semantic, pinpointing areas for focused instruction; second, the demonstration of how specific error types correlate with students’ learning challenges; third, evidence showing the effectiveness of targeted feedback in student error correction. These points underpin the argument that meticulous error analysis is vital for enhancing the efficacy of English language teaching at the basic level.

Main Claim: The article’s main claim of [insert a summary of the author’s main claim here] __________________ is _[insert your evaluation of the argument here]__________________ 

Supporting Key Points: (list your support for your evaluation of the author’s main claim) 

because ______________, ______________________, and ______________________.

Composing the Thesis Statement

To compose our final thesis statement, we will fill out the given template with the data and information we assessed in the previous sections of ENG 122 4-3 Assignment: Identifying your Thesis Statement.

• Combination: Integrate your reaction to the main claim and three supporting points into one coherent sentence. This sentence should clearly state your stance on the article’s argument and briefly mention the supporting points.
• Concise: Keep your thesis statement to one sentence. It should be concise yet comprehensive enough to cover your main claim and the reasons behind your stance.

Example

The article’s main claim that understanding and addressing common errors in English composition significantly enhances basic learners’ outcomes is compelling and robust because the systematic categorization of errors backs it, the correlation between specific errors and learning challenges, and the proven effectiveness of targeted feedback in improving student learning.

Closing

Remember, a well-crafted thesis statement sets the direction for your essay and engages your readers by clearly outlining what to expect in your discussion. Following these steps will ensure you develop a strong foundation for your argument. I hope you smash the ENG 122 4-3 Assignment: Identifying your Thesis Statement.

In the next module of ENG 122, we will explore the 4-6 Assignments on Quoting, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing.

ENG 122 4-6 Assignment: Quoting, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing

Instructions for ENG 122 4-6 Assignment

Overview

When you use sources in your paper, you will need to either quote, paraphrase, or summarize the information. Summaries are used for longer passages; they provide a brief overview of the source, using new and unique phrasing.

Prompt

Using 3 to 4 sentences, summarize the document you have selected from the library guide.

Note: Remember to cite any works you use in your assignment. You will not be graded on the citations; the purpose is just to make certain you are practicing using citations.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

• Summarize the source in three to four sentences.
• Clearly reference the author’s ideas using your own words.

Guidelines for Submission

Save your work in a Word document and include a page with references. It must be written in MLA or APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.

Introduction to ENG 122 4-6 Assignment

Creating a brief document summary is a crucial skill in academic writing. It allows you to convey the essence of the source material in your own words, providing a clear and concise overview for your reader. This Owlisdom How-To Guide will give brief and clear guidelines to solve ENG 122 4-6 Assignment: Quoting, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing.

Summarize the source in three to four sentences.

Identifying Key Points

In ENG 122 4-6 Assignment: Quoting, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing, first, we need to summarize the source in no more than 4 sentences to write the summary.

• Core Ideas: Identify the primary argument or thesis of the document. What are the supporting points or evidence that the author uses?
• Selection: Choose the most compelling points to understand the document’s purpose.

Example

R.N. Neupane’s study, “Error Analysis of Written English Composition: A Case of Basic Level Students,” argues that identifying and addressing common errors in students’ written English can significantly improve their language acquisition. The author categorizes these errors into grammatical, syntactical, and semantic, providing a framework for targeted teaching interventions. By analyzing specific case studies, Neupane demonstrates how systematic feedback on these errors improves students’ writing skills. This research underlines the importance of error analysis in developing effective English language teaching strategies at the basic educational level.

Reference the author’s ideas using your own words.

Writing the Summary

Next, for ENG 122 4-6 Assignment: Quoting, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing, we will refer to the author’s ideas in our own words.

• Own Words: Paraphrase the author’s ideas in your own words. This demonstrates your understanding and avoids plagiarism.
• Concise: Aim for a brief overview. In three to four sentences, introduce the main argument of the document, touch upon key supporting points, and conclude with the document’s overall significance or conclusion.

Example

Neupane’s research highlights the critical role of recognizing and rectifying frequent mistakes in basic students’ English compositions in bolstering their grasp of the language. He divides these errors into grammatical, syntactical, and semantic categories to tailor more precise teaching methods. Through detailed case studies, the study showcases the positive impact of constructive feedback on enhancing students’ writing abilities. Essentially, Neupane’s work advocates for the integral part that error analysis serves in crafting successful English language education strategies for beginners, emphasizing its necessity for educational progress.

Closing

By following these steps, you can effectively summarize a document, providing a concise overview that captures the essence of the source. While showcasing your understanding of the material, you can easily ace the ENG 122 4-6 Assignment: Quoting, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing.

ENG 122 5-2 Assignment: First Draft of CRITICAL ANALYSIS Essay

Instructions for ENG 122 5-2 Assignment

Overview

The ability to communicate a message through writing is essential in any career. Effective writing shapes and informs the opinions of its readers. The writing process can be intimidating; however, the more you work with it, the more comfortable the process becomes.

Prompt

For this project, you will build upon the outline of the essay you have developed while incorporating your instructor’s feedback. Use the prompt questions below to help you develop your draft. You will pull out quotes and paraphrases from your selected reading and write summaries that you will use to support your analysis.

When you are done responding to the prompts below, you will have the first draft of your critical analysis essay. In the following module, you will complete a revision activity to further improve this draft.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

1. Introduction

The introduction of your essay is where readers will learn what your essay is about. Do not give all your information away here. Instead, give readers a sample of what is to come and what you will be supporting with evidence in the body of the essay. Do not forget to review your outline to make sure you briefly cover all of the key points you identified. If your claim and key points have changed since then, it is okay! For your new ideas, seek feedback from your instructor or writing resources available through SNHU.

1. Provide an overview of the work you have analyzed, briefly describing the main points and your reaction to the author’s claim.
2. Compose a thesis that you will support with evidence throughout the essay. This statement will give direction to your essay and should be well thought out.

1. Body

The body is your opportunity to support your evaluation of the author’s argument. Ensure that your thoughts and evidence are clear and easy to read and understand.

1. Be sure to write organized paragraphs that clearly state their main idea and move logically from one to the other.
2. Your body paragraphs should support your thesis by combining thoughts and ideas with evidence or key points from the selected reading. There is no such thing as a right or wrong evaluation; the key is how well your analysis is supported and the quality of the evidence used.

III. Conclusion

Think of the conclusion paragraph as a review of your analysis. Use this section to restate your evaluation and remind readers of your supporting evidence. Think of this paragraph as your last chance to prove your point.

1. Briefly summarize the main points that helped form your analysis. This section should consist of a brief review of your main ideas.
2. Draw conclusions based on your evidence.

• Use evidence that you have found to wrap up the essay in a meaningful way that relates to your audience.

Guidelines for Submission

Your analysis essay must be 3–4 pages (plus references) and must be written in MLA or APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.

Introduction to ENG 122 5-2 Assignment

This How-To Guide revolves around your understanding of Critical Analysis and writing the essay draft. I will provide brief and descriptive guidelines to solve the ENG 122 5-2 Assignment: First Draft of Critical Analysis Essay post and a dummy solution for each section. This How-To Owlisdom Guide will equip you with guidelines to tackle all the queries related to the 5-2 Assignment. Let us begin with the guidelines.

Provide an overview of the work you have analyzed, briefly describing the main points and your reaction to the author’s claim. Compose a thesis that you will support with evidence throughout the essay. This statement will guide your essay and should be well thought out.

Introduction

To start the ENG 122 5-2 Assignment: First Draft of Critical Analysis Essay, we will provide a brief introduction to our essay.

• Purpose of the Introduction: The introduction sets the stage for your essay. It should intrigue your readers, giving them a glimpse of what to expect without revealing every detail.
• Outline Review: Revisit your essay outline to ensure you include all identified key points briefly. Adjustments based on new insights or feedback are encouraged.
• Thesis Statement: Craft a concise thesis that encapsulates your reaction to the work analyzed and outlines the evidence you’ll use. This statement will navigate the direction of your entire essay.

Example

In exploring the intricacies of error analysis in written English compositions by basic-level students, Neupane’s (2023) study offers profound insights into how systematic identification and correction of errors can dramatically improve language learning outcomes. The research highlights the categorisation of errors and the impact of targeted feedback, stirring a realisation of the overlooked potential in error analysis for enhancing teaching methodologies. This essay will argue that Neupane’s emphasis on error analysis is pivotal and transformative for English language teaching, supported by evidence of improved student performance and engagement. The thesis critically examines Neupane’s methods and conclusions, asserting their significance in refining educational practices in English composition.

Be sure to write organized paragraphs that clearly state their main idea and move logically from one to the other. Your body paragraphs should support your thesis by combining thoughts and ideas with evidence or key points from the selected reading. There is no such thing as a right or wrong evaluation; the key is how well your analysis is supported and the quality of the evidence used.

Body

Next, for ENG 122 5-2 Assignment: First Draft of Critical Analysis Essay, we will compose the Body of the essay.

• Structuring Body Paragraphs: Each paragraph should introduce a main idea that supports your thesis, followed by evidence from your selected reading. Ensure clarity and logical flow between paragraphs.
• Presenting Your Analysis: Combine your thoughts and insights with quotations, paraphrases, or summaries from the reading. Remember, the strength of your argument depends on the relevance and solidity of your evidence.
• Supporting Your Thesis: There’s no right or wrong evaluation; it is only how persuasively your analysis is supported. Focus on presenting quality evidence that robustly backs up your thesis.

Example

Neupane’s (2023) investigation into error analysis in English composition for basic learners unveils the foundational significance of identifying and rectifying linguistic mistakes to enhance language acquisition. By meticulously categorising errors into grammatical, syntactical, and semantic groups, Neupane sets a structured framework for educators, aiming at targeted teaching strategies that directly address students’ weak spots. This classification supports the core of my thesis about the importance of a detailed understanding of errors for teaching effectiveness and showcases a systematic approach to improving language proficiency. The evidence provided by Neupane, highlighting the marked improvement in students’ compositions after receiving personalised feedback, emphasises the positive impact of such educational tactics.

Moreover, Neupane’s research transcends the realm of student improvement, advocating for incorporating error analysis into the broader spectrum of teaching methodologies. This suggests a shift towards a more customised pedagogical approach, where educators align their strategies with the specific learning challenges identified through error analysis. The transformation suggested by Neupane in teaching practices, supported by empirical evidence of student progress, aligns with the thesis that error analysis is indispensable not only for student development but also for the evolution of English language teaching. Neupane’s work solidifies the argument for error analysis as a pivotal element in crafting effective educational environments and methodologies, demonstrating its critical role in enhancing student learning outcomes and refining teaching strategies.

Briefly summarise the main points that helped form your analysis. This section should consist of a brief review of your main ideas. Draw conclusions based on your evidence. Use evidence that you have found to wrap up the essay in a meaningful way that relates to your audience.

Conclusion

For the last section of the ENG 122 5-2 Assignment: First Draft of Critical Analysis Essay, we will summarise our analysis and briefly discuss the key takeaways.

• Summarising Your Analysis: The conclusion summarises your critical analysis. Restate your evaluation and remind the reader of the key evidence that supports it.
• Main Points Review: Review the main ideas that shaped your analysis, ensuring a coherent summary reflecting your argument’s core.
• Drawing Conclusion: Your final thoughts should tie back to your thesis, drawing meaningful conclusions based on the evidence you’ve presented. Aim to leave a lasting impression that underscores the significance of your analysis relative to the audience.

Example

Neupane’s (2023) study effectively demonstrates how error analysis in English compositions at a basic level significantly advances language learning. Through the systematic categorisation of errors and the strategic use of targeted feedback, Neupane illustrates a clear path toward enhancing student proficiency and pedagogical effectiveness. This analysis confirms that a deep understanding of error patterns is crucial for educational success in language teaching. The compelling evidence of improved student outcomes underscores the necessity of integrating error analysis into teaching methodologies. Conclusively, Neupane’s work not only substantiates the importance of error analysis for student development but also advocates for its adoption as a cornerstone of effective English language education, offering a profound insight that resonates with educators and students alike.

Closing

Following these guidelines, you can write an amazing essay draft of your critical analysis. I hope you ace the ENG 122 5-2 Assignment: First Draft of Critical Analysis Essay. Good luck!

ENG 122 6-3 Discussion: Large-Scale and Small-Scale Revisions

Instructions of ENG 122 6-3 Discussion: Large-Scale and Small-Scale Revisions

6-3 Discussion: Large-Scale and Small-Scale Revisions

Given the information from the video on revisions, consider the following prompts.

Remember to remain thoughtful and respectful towards your peers and instructor in your discussion post and replies.

Create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts.

For your initial post, address the following:

1. Describe the importance of revisiting your ideas and discuss how you would use feedback to improve your work
2. Discuss how you would apply one of the revisions from the large-scale category to your work
3. Discuss how you would apply one of the revisions from the small-scale category to your work

For your response posts, address the following:

1. Identify a peer’s post that discusses a large-scale strategy different than your own. Then discuss how you might apply that strategy to your work.
2. Identify a peer’s post that discusses a small-scale strategy different than your own. Then discuss how you might apply that strategy to your work.

Remember, this assignment is graded on the quality of your initial post and at least two response posts to your classmates. If you refer to any module resources, be sure to include attribution (or citation) to the resource.

To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric.

Introduction to ENG 122 6-3 Discussion

The ENG 122 6-3 Discussion revolves around your understanding of Large-Scale and Small-Scale Revisions. I will provide brief and descriptive guidelines to solve the ENG 122 6-3 Discussion: Large-Scale and Small-Scale Revisions post and a dummy solution for each section. This Owlisdom How-To Guide will equip you with guidelines to tackle all the queries related to the 6-3 Discussion post. Let us begin with the guide.

Describe the importance of revisiting your ideas and discuss how you would use feedback to improve your work.

Importance of Revisiting Ideas

To start the ENG 122 6-3 Discussion: Large-Scale and Small-Scale Revisions, we will reflect on the insights of the video. We will also discuss the importance of feedback.

• Reflect on the video’s insights about revising your ideas. Highlight the value of reassessment and how it can bring clarity, depth, and refinement to your work. Consider this a vital step toward enhancing your initial concepts.

Example

Reflecting on the video’s insights, it’s clear that revisiting and revising one’s ideas is crucial for intellectual growth and improving the quality of work. This reassessment adds clarity and depth and refines and polishes the initial concepts, making them more compelling and coherent. I would use feedback as a constructive tool to view my work from new perspectives, identifying areas for improvement and integrating suggestions to strengthen my arguments and enhance the overall effectiveness of my writing.

Discuss how you would apply one of the revisions from the large-scale category to your work.

Applying Large-Scale Revisions

Next, in ENG 122 6-3 Discussion: Large-Scale and Small-Scale Revisions, we will discuss the revisions from the large-scale category.

• Choose a large-scale revision strategy from the video, such as restructuring your essay or rethinking your thesis. Describe how you would implement this strategy to improve your work substantially.

Example

Opting for a large-scale revision strategy, I would focus on restructuring my essay to ensure a more logical flow of ideas and arguments. This approach would involve critically evaluating the current organisation of my paper and identifying sections that might benefit from rearrangement. For instance, I might discover that specific points would be more effective if introduced earlier in the essay or that my supporting evidence needs to be more closely aligned with my thesis statement. By reorganising the structure, I aim to enhance the coherence and persuasiveness of my argument, making it easier for readers to follow and engage with my analysis.

Discuss how you would apply one of the revisions from the small-scale category to your work.

Applying Small-Scale Revisions

For this section of ENG 122 6-3 Discussion: Large-Scale and Small-Scale Revisions, we will discuss the small-scale revisions.

• Select a small-scale revision technique, like refining word choice or correcting grammatical errors. Explain how attending to these details can significantly elevate the quality of your writing.

Example

I would apply the small-scale revision technique of refining word choice to elevate my writing. This process involves scrutinising each sentence to replace vague or overused words with precise vocabulary that conveys my ideas more effectively. For example, instead of using generic terms such as “good” or “bad,” I’d seek out specific adjectives that accurately describe the nuances of my argument. This meticulous attention to diction clarifies my points and enriches the reader’s experience, making the essay more engaging and persuasive. Enhanced word choice adds depth to the text, showcasing a polished and thoughtful piece of writing.

Identify a peer’s post that discusses a large-scale strategy different from your own. Then, discuss how you might apply that strategy to your work. Identify a peer’s post that discusses a small-scale strategy different from your own. Then, discuss how you might apply that strategy to your work.

Peer Responses

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the ENG 122 discussion posts. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the following points in mind.

• Identify a classmate’s discussion on a large-scale revision strategy different from yours. Briefly describe how their approach could benefit your work, offering a fresh perspective on restructuring or deepening your analysis.
• Find a peer exploring a small-scale revision tactic you did not choose. Summarise how incorporating this method could enhance your writing’s clarity or readability, acknowledging the importance of meticulous editing.

Response 01

Hey Sam, great post! I noticed you discussed integrating more evidence to support the thesis as your large-scale strategy. This approach could enrich my essay by providing a stronger empirical foundation for my arguments. Also, your focus on varying sentence structure for small-scale revisions caught my eye. Implementing this in my work could enhance the rhythm and flow, making the reading experience more dynamic and engaging.

Response 02

I have addressed the given instructions in one response. Following these instructions, you can quickly write your peer responses to the ENG 122 6-3 Discussion: Large-Scale and Small-Scale Revisions without a hassle.

Closing

This How-To Guide will allow you to solve the ENG 122 6-3 Discussion: Large-Scale and Small-Scale Revisions professionally. In the next module of ENG 122, we will explore the 7-2 Project One on Critical Analysis Essay.

ENG 122 7-2 Project One: Critical Analysis Essay

Instructions for ENG 122 7-2 Project One

Assignment

Course Outcomes

In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:

• Identify main ideas, supporting evidence, and conclusions through critical analysis to utilize these components in one’s own writing
• Integrate appropriate and qualified evidence into one’s own composition through effective research

Overview

The project for this course is the creation of a critical analysis essay. Writing is a craft that allows people to express themselves in various ways. The ability to articulate a message through writing is essential in any career. The writing process can be very intimidating; however, the more you work with it, the more comfortable the process becomes.

You developed a thesis about the information presented in the article you selected, and now, you will support that thesis through a critical analysis essay.

Directions

In this project, you will follow the writing process to revise your critical analysis essay draft from previous assignments. Once your thesis is established, you will use evidence from the reading to support it throughout your essay.

There is no right or wrong thesis—it is how you support your thesis that makes your essay effective. To thoroughly revise the work, be sure to refer to your instructor’s feedback. Finally, proofread your final draft and correct any errors you may find. This assignment will be submitted in Brightspace.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

1. Introduction: This paragraph is where readers will have a chance to get an idea of what your essay will be about. Do not give all your information away here. Instead, give readers a sample of what is to come and what points you will be supporting with evidence in the essay’s body.
   1. Provide an overview of the work you have analyzed by briefly describing the main points and your thoughts about the writing.
   2. Compose a thesis that you will support with evidence throughout the essay. This statement will give direction to your essay and should be well thought out.
2. Body: The body is your opportunity to describe and support your thesis in-depth. Ensure that your thoughts and evidence are clear and organized in a way that is easy for readers to follow and understand.
   1. Be sure to write organized paragraphs that clearly state their main idea and move logically from one to the other.
   2. Your body paragraphs should support your thesis by combining thoughts and ideas with evidence. There is no such thing as a right or wrong evaluation; the key is how well your thesis is supported and the quality of the evidence used.
3. Conclusion: Think of the conclusion as a review of your analysis. Use this section to restate your thesis and remind readers of your supporting evidence. Think of this paragraph as the last chance to prove your point.
   1. Briefly summarize the main points that helped form your analysis. This section should consist of a brief review of your main ideas.
   2. Draw conclusions based on your evidence.
      1. Use evidence that you have found to wrap up the essay in a meaningful way that relates to your audience.

What to Submit

Submit your project as a 3- to 4-page Microsoft Word document (plus a cover page and references) with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Use at least three sources from your selected reading. Follow APA or MLA citation guidelines when citing sources both throughout and at the end of your paper. 

Introduction to ENG 122 7-2 Project One

The 7-2 Project One revolves around critically analyzing the essay we drafted in ENG 122 5-2 Assignment. I will provide brief and descriptive guidelines to solve the ENG 122 7-2 Project One: Critical Analysis Essay and a dummy solution for each section. This Owlisdom How-To Guide will equip you with guidelines to tackle all the queries related to the ENG 122 7-2 Project One. Let us begin with the guide.

Provide an overview of the work you have analyzed by briefly describing the main points and your thoughts about the writing. Compose a thesis that you will support with evidence throughout the essay. This statement will guide your essay and should be well thought out.

Introduction

To start ENG 122 7-2 Project One: Critical Analysis Essay, we will provide a brief introduction to our essay.

• Start with a hook to grab the reader’s attention. Briefly introduce the article you analyzed, including its main points and your initial thoughts. This sets the stage for your analysis without revealing all the details upfront.
• End your introduction with a well-crafted thesis statement. This should encapsulate your main argument or critique of the article and outline the points you’ll support with evidence. It serves as a roadmap for your essay.

Example

In the enlightening study by Neupane (2023), the intricacies of error analysis in the English compositions of basic learners are meticulously unveiled, showcasing the pivotal role of identifying and rectifying linguistic mistakes for enhancing language acquisition. Through a detailed categorization of errors into grammatical, syntactical, and semantic types, Neupane argues for targeted feedback’s transformative power on student learning outcomes. Initially skeptical, I found myself convinced by the compelling evidence and thoughtful methodology presented. Thus, my thesis posits that Neupane’s advocacy for a systematic approach to error analysis not only substantiates its necessity in educational settings but also significantly elevates the efficacy of English language teaching, a stance I will support with critical analysis and evidence from the text.

Be sure to write organized paragraphs that clearly state their main idea and move logically from one to the other. Your body paragraphs should support your thesis by combining thoughts and ideas with evidence. There is no such thing as a right or wrong evaluation; the key is how well your thesis is supported and the quality of the evidence used.

Body

Next, for the ENG 122 7-2 Project One: Critical Analysis Essay, we will compose the essay’s body.

• Begin each paragraph with a clear topic sentence related to your thesis. This ensures your essay remains focused and all parts contribute to your overall argument.
• Use evidence from the article to support your thesis, including quotes, paraphrases, and summaries. Discuss how this evidence backs up your points. Make sure to analyze and critique the evidence rather than present it.
• Ensure your ideas are organized logically, making your argument easy to follow. Transition smoothly between paragraphs to maintain flow and coherence.

Example

Neupane’s (2023) meticulous categorization of errors in student compositions underpins the thesis that systematic error analysis is fundamental to enhancing English language education. By delineating errors into grammatical, syntactical, and semantic categories, Neupane provides a blueprint for educators to tailor their instruction, ensuring targeted interventions. This structured approach validates the necessity of error analysis and demonstrates its direct impact on improving student outcomes. This critical point strengthens the argument for its adoption in educational practices.

Furthermore, the study presents compelling evidence of the effectiveness of targeted feedback, highlighting significant improvements in students’ subsequent compositions. As Neupane illustrates, this feedback mechanism is pivotal for student development, offering personalized guidance that addresses specific errors. Such an approach resonates deeply with the thesis, affirming that the strategic application of error analysis and feedback can significantly refine teaching methodologies and foster a conducive learning environment for language acquisition.

Briefly summarise the main points that helped form your analysis. This section should consist of a brief review of your main ideas. Draw conclusions based on your evidence. Use evidence that you have found to wrap up the essay in a meaningful way that relates to your audience.

Conclusion

For the last section of the ENG 122 7-2 Project One: Critical Analysis Essay, we will summarise our analysis and briefly discuss the key takeaways.

• Begin your conclusion by restating your thesis in a new way. This reminds readers of your main argument and the lens through which you’ve analyzed the article.

• Briefly recap the main points that support your thesis, highlighting how they contribute to your overall argument. This reinforces the strength of your analysis.
• Drawing Conclusions
• End with a strong closing statement reflecting your argument’s or analysis’s implications. Suggest broader conclusions from your essay, making a final appeal to your readers’ understanding or emotions.

Example

Neupane’s (2023) exploration into error analysis fundamentally shifts the pedagogical approach to English language teaching, underscoring the thesis that systematic error identification and targeted feedback are essential for educational advancement. This analysis is bolstered by Neupane’s categorization of errors and the demonstrable success of personalized feedback in student improvement. The evidence presented supports the thesis and advocates for a nuanced teaching strategy that prioritises understanding over rote learning. In conclusion, adopting Neupane’s methodologies can significantly enhance the effectiveness of language education, urging educators to embrace a more analytical and responsive approach to teaching that resonates with the evolving needs of learners.

Closing

Following these guidelines, you can master writing a critical analysis essay. By following the above instructions, I hope you ace the ENG 122 7-2 Project One: Critical Analysis Essay. Good luck!

In the next module of ENG 122, we will explore the 8-1 Discussion on Persuasive Writing.

References

Neupane, R. N. (2023). Error Analysis of Written English Composition: A Case of Basic Level Students. Tribhuvan Journal, 1(1), 101–109.

ENG 122 8-1 discussion persuasive writing

Instructions for ENG 122 8-1 discussion persuasive writing

Discussion Topic

In this course, you worked on analyzing another writer’s choices. In your final essay, you also made your own writing choices to convey your analysis and findings to your audience. In your next composition course, ENG 123, you will build on these analytical skills to make your own writing choices. In ENG 123, you will learn how to make persuasive writing choices.

Persuasion is the act of communicating to get your audience to agree with your point of view. Appeals to logic, reason, and credibility are most appropriate for persuasive writing in organizations, though appeals to emotion may be effective in limited circumstances. Persuasive Argument is writing that is designed to convince an audience to adopt the writer’s point of view rather than to strictly inform or express a feeling.

Remember to remain thoughtful and respectful towards your peers and instructor in your discussion post and replies.

Create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts.

For your initial post, address the following:

1. Describe what you think are the elements of an effective argument.
2. Indicate how you think you might use specific writing styles or choices you learned about this term to create effective arguments.

For your response posts, address the following:

1. Offer ideas on how the writing styles or choices your peer has presented might be strengthened in a persuasive writing context.
2. Offer additional persuasive writing styles or choices your peer might consider. Please explain them in your response.

Remember, this assignment is graded on the quality of your initial post and at least two response posts to your classmates.

To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric.

Introduction to ENG 122 8-1 Discussion

This discussion post revolves around your understanding of persuasive writing. I will provide brief and descriptive guidelines to solve the ENG 122 8-1 discussion, persuasive writing, and a dummy solution for each section. This How-To Owlisdom Guide will equip you with guidelines to tackle all the queries related to the 8-1 Discussion post. Let us begin with the guide.

Describe what you think are the elements of a compelling argument.

Elements of an Effective Argument

To start ENG 122 8-1 discussion, persuasive writing, we will discuss the elements of a compelling argument.

• Clarity: Your argument should be clear and straightforward, making it easy for your audience to understand your point of view.
• Evidence: Support your argument with logical reasoning and credible evidence. This can include statistics, quotes from experts, or real-life examples.
• Structure: Organize your argument logically. Start with an introduction presenting your thesis, then body paragraphs offering support, and conclude with a summary reinforcing your main points.
• Engagement: Address counterarguments to show you’ve considered multiple viewpoints. This strengthens your position and shows respect for your audience’s intelligence.

Example

A compelling argument hinges on several key elements. First and foremost, clarity is paramount; the argument must be presented straightforwardly, ensuring the audience grasps the intended message without confusion. Supporting the argument with solid evidence, such as statistics, expert testimony, or tangible examples, further validates the claim, lending it weight and credibility. Moreover, a coherent structure that logically flows from introduction to conclusion aids in building a persuasive narrative, guiding the audience through the argument seamlessly. Lastly, engaging with counterarguments is crucial; acknowledging and addressing opposing views demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the issue and reinforces the argument’s strength. These components combined create a compelling argument that resonates with and convinces the audience of the writer’s perspective.

Indicate how you might use specific writing styles or choices you learned about this term to create compelling arguments.

Utilizing Writing Styles for Arguments

Next, in ENG 122 8-1 discussion on persuasive writing, we will discuss how to utilise different writing styles for arguments.

• Reflect on the writing styles or choices you’ve learned this term, such as persuasive techniques, rhetorical devices, or the importance of tone. 
• Consider how these can be applied to enhance the persuasiveness of your arguments, such as using a formal tone to establish credibility or rhetorical questions to engage the reader.

Example

Building on the foundation of clear, structured arguments, the writing styles and choices I’ve learned this term greatly enhance persuasiveness. For instance, the strategic use of rhetorical devices, such as ethos, pathos, and logos, has shown me the power of appealing to the audience’s sense of ethics, emotion, and logic, respectively. Employing a formal tone throughout my arguments establishes credibility, signalling to the reader that the discussion is grounded in severe and well-considered analysis. Additionally, posing rhetorical questions can effectively engage readers, prompting them to think deeply about the issue and drawing them into a more interactive engagement with the argument. These techniques strengthen the persuasive element of my writing and ensure that my arguments resonate more profoundly with the audience, building a convincing case that is hard to refute.

Offer ideas on how the writing styles or choices your peer has presented might be strengthened in a persuasive writing context. Offer additional persuasive writing styles or choices your peer might consider. Please explain them in your response.

Peer Responses

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the ENG 122 discussion posts. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the following points in mind.

• When responding to a peer, offer constructive feedback on how they might enhance their chosen writing style or technique for a persuasive context. For example, suggest ways to make their evidence more compelling or effectively address counterarguments.
• Recommend other persuasive writing techniques or styles your peer might consider.

Response 01

Hey Max, nice post! You have laid out some excellent points on crafting a compelling argument, particularly highlighting the importance of clarity, structure, and the effective use of evidence. To further strengthen your persuasive writing, consider incorporating storytelling elements. Stories can emotionally connect with the audience and make your points more memorable. Also, varying sentence lengths can create a rhythm that enhances readability and impact. Short sentences can emphasise key points, while longer ones can be used to elaborate on complex ideas, adding dynamism to your writing that keeps the reader engaged. These additions could enhance the persuasiveness of your arguments by making them not only logical but also more relatable and engaging.

Response 02

I have addressed the given instructions in one response. Following these instructions, you can quickly write your peer responses to ENG 122 8-1 discussion persuasive writing without a hassle.

Closing

This ENG 122 8-1 discussion persuasive writing guide will equip you with the foundational steps to develop well-structured and compelling arguments in your writing. By focusing on clarity, evidence, and strategic writing choices, you can effectively persuade your audience and make your points resonate more profoundly. 

In the next module of ENG 122, we will explore the 8-2 Project Two on Feedback and Revision Reflection.

ENG 122 8-2 Project Two: Feedback and Revision Reflection

Instructions for ENG 122 8-2 Project Two

Course Outcomes

In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:

• Discuss stylistically appropriate writing strategies for various audiences, subjects, and purposes
• Interpret the writing process as a means for generating ideas, drafting, and revising for improving the quality and effectiveness of one’s own writing.

Overview

In this assignment, you will review some of the valuable writing skills you have learned in the course. You will also be asked to consider how you might take those skills forward into future writing situations.

Directions

For this reflection assignment, you will consider the choices you made about your approach to writing based on your understanding of revision and the feedback provided by your instructor. Address the criteria below in complete paragraphs. Start each paragraph with a main idea and support it with details. Ensure that you proofread your final draft and correct any errors you may find. This assignment will be submitted in Brightspace.

Specifically, the following rubric criteria must be addressed.

1. Feedback and Revision Reflection: Use this reflection to look back on the work you have done and the feedback you have been given throughout this course. Think about how you might use what you have learned when writing in the future.
   1. Think about your experiences with revision in this course. What approaches to revision worked well for you?
   2. What revision strategy will you take with you to your next course? Explain your reasoning.
   3. How did the feedback you were given influence the way you will approach the writing process in the future?
2. Audience: Use this part of your reflection to consider how you might apply what you have learned about writing to an audience in the future.
   1. What choices did you make in your writing to speak to your audience in your essay?
   2. What potential audiences do you think you will be writing for in the future?
   3. What questions will you ask about your audiences in the future to help you connect your writing with them?

What to Submit

Submit your project as a 1- to 2-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. If sources are used, follow APA or MLA citation guidelines when citing sources both throughout and at the end of your paper. While you will not be graded on the quality of your citations in this assignment, you may receive guidance from your instructor on how to properly cite sources.

Introduction to ENG 122 8-1 Project Two

This How-To Guide revolves around ENG 122 Project Two. I will provide brief and descriptive guidelines to solve the ENG 122 8-2 Project Two: Feedback and Revision Reflection, and a dummy solution for each section. This Owlisdom How-To Guide will equip you with guidelines to tackle all the queries related to Project Two of ENG 122. Let us begin with the guide.

Think about your experiences with revision in this course. What approaches to revision worked well for you? What revision strategy will you use for your next course? Explain your reasoning. How did the feedback you were given influence how you will approach the writing process?

Feedback and Revision Reflection

To start ENG 122 8-2 Project Two: Feedback and Revision Reflection, we will discuss our experiences in this course. We will also discuss our expectations for the next course.

• Reflecting on Revision: Consider your experiences with revision during the course. Identify which revision strategies improved the clarity, organization, or persuasive power of your writing.
• Choosing a Revision Strategy for Future Use: Select one revision strategy that you found particularly effective and plan to use in future writing assignments. Describe why this strategy resonates with you. It could be because it helped clarify your arguments or made your writing process more efficient.
• Influence of Feedback: Reflect on how the feedback has shaped your writing approach. Consider specific pieces of feedback that changed your perspective on writing or introduced new strategies. Discuss how this will affect your writing process, such as being more open to constructive criticism.

Example

Throughout this course, revising for coherence and structure significantly enhanced my writing, making my arguments more logical and easier to follow. The strategy of reading my work aloud was particularly effective, as it helped me catch inconsistencies and awkward phrasing I might have missed otherwise. This technique improved the flow of my essays and deepened my engagement with my writing, a practice I intend to carry forward into my next course. Feedback was crucial in this process, encouraging me to be more critical of my work and open to change. Constructive criticism from my instructor and peers highlighted areas I hadn’t considered for improvement, such as the need for stronger thesis statements and more varied sentence structures. This feedback has fundamentally altered how I approach writing, instilling in me a more iterative and reflective writing process that I believe will enhance the quality of my future work.

What choices did you make in your writing to speak to your audience in your essay? What potential audiences do you think you will be writing for? What questions will you ask about your audiences in the future to help you connect your writing with them?

Audience

Next, in ENG 122 8-2 Project Two: Feedback and Revision Reflection. We will discuss different aspects of dealing with current and future audiences.

• Writing for Your Audience: Consider the adjustments you made to your writing to connect with your intended audience in this course. Maybe you used specific examples or adjusted your tone to better resonate with them. Describe these choices and their impact.
• Future Audiences: Anticipate the potential audiences you might write for in the future, whether in academic, professional, or personal contexts. Reflect on how understanding the audience’s needs and expectations can shape your writing.
• Questions for Future Audiences: Identify questions you will ask about future audiences to tailor your writing to their needs. These could include inquiries about their knowledge level, interests, or what they hope to gain from your writing. Understanding your audience ensures your message is received as intended.

Example

In crafting my essays, I consciously adjusted my tone and language to match the academic audience of this course, incorporating formal vocabulary and structured arguments to convey my points effectively. This approach ensured my writing was taken seriously and demonstrated my understanding of the subject matter. Looking ahead, I anticipate writing for a diverse range of audiences, from academic peers and instructors to professionals in my future career field. To connect with these varied audiences, I plan to ask several key questions before starting any writing project: What is their level of expertise on the topic? What are their main interests or concerns related to this subject? And most importantly, what do they hope to learn or achieve by reading my work? By considering these questions, I aim to create content that is not only relevant and engaging for my audience but also meets their specific needs and expectations.

Closing

This reflection is a culmination of your learning and a blueprint for your growth as a writer. By thoughtfully considering how you will carry these skills forward, you’re setting the stage for continued success in all your future writing endeavors. Following the guidelines, you can solve ENG 122 8-2 Project Two: Feedback and Revision Reflection like a pro. Good luck!