OCOM205 Study Guide: Discussions, Professional Communication Skills, and Real-World Applications

Introduction

This guide walks you through your first discussion prompt—introduce yourself, share goals, and describe an example of effective communication. It also offers tips for engaging with classmates meaningfully. For help with writing and structuring your content, see Owlisdom’s Environmental Science Assignment Help service.

COM 205 Week 1 Discussion: Effective Communication

Instructions for COM 205 Week 1 Discussion

Week 1 Discussion: Effective Communication

4444 unread replies.7676 replies.

Due: Post your initial response by Wednesday at 11:59 pm Pacific Time.

Respond to at least two of your fellow students’ posts by Sunday at 11:59 pm Pacific Time.

Effective Communication

Before starting with our Week 1 Discussion topic, please introduce yourself to the class, and carefully respond to the questions below: 

• What name do you like to be called?
• What do you look forward to learning about most in this class?
• How is this class relevant to your professional future?

Then, in five to seven sentences, describe a time when you have effectively communicated. Cite areas of your textbook that justify your effectiveness rating. 

Response Posts: In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. In your response to your peers, you might offer some additional insight into their example of effective communication.

Introduction to COM 205 Week 1 Discussion

Welcome to the COM 205 Week 1 Discussion: Effective Communication! This first discussion post revolves around your understanding of building your network. I will provide brief and descriptive guidelines to solve the Week 1 Discussion post and a dummy solution for each section. This How-To Owlisdom Guide will equip you with guidelines to tackle all the queries related to the COM 205 Week 1 Discussion: Effective Communication. Let us begin with the guide.

Please introduce yourself to the class and carefully respond to the questions below: What name do you like to be called? What do you look forward to learning about most in this class? How is this class relevant to your professional future?

Introduction to the Class

As mentioned in the COM 205 Week 1 Discussion: Effective Communication instructions, we must start this task by briefly introducing ourselves. Then, briefly discuss what your expectations are from this course.

• Start with a warm greeting to your classmates and instructor. Briefly share the name you prefer to be called. Keep it friendly and professional.
• Mention what aspects of the course you’re most excited to learn about. This could be a specific topic or skill you’re looking to develop. It’s an excellent way to find common interests with peers.
• Explain how the class will benefit your career or professional development. Be specific but concise, linking course content to your future goals.

Example

Hello everyone! I am excited to join this class and learn together. You can call me Alex. I am particularly looking forward to enhancing my public speaking and persuasive communication skills, which are crucial in any professional setting. I see this class as a stepping stone to becoming a more confident and effective communicator, which is essential for my aspiration to move into a leadership role.

Then, describe a time you communicated effectively in five to seven sentences. Cite areas of your textbook that justify your effectiveness rating.

Describing Effective Communication

Then, in the next section of COM 205 Week 1 Discussion: Effective Communication, we will discuss when we used the methods of Effective Communication. Do not forget to cite areas of your textbook that justify your communication effectiveness.

• Think of a time when you communicated effectively. This could be a presentation, a group project, or any situation where your communication had a positive impact.
• Begin by setting the scene, then describe what you did, how others responded, and the outcome. Focus on your communication style and methods.
• Refer to concepts or theories from your textbook that align with your communication approach. This will demonstrate your understanding of the course material and how it applies to real-life scenarios.

Example

During a group project last semester, my team faced significant challenges aligning our ideas for the final presentation. Recognizing the importance of clear and open communication, I initiated a structured meeting where everyone could voice their concerns and suggestions. I employed active listening, a concept emphasized in Chapter 4 of our textbook, which stresses the significance of effectively understanding and responding to the speaker’s messages. I ensured everyone felt heard by summarizing each team member’s input and seeking clarification, fostering a collaborative environment. Furthermore, I applied the principles of nonverbal communication from Chapter 6, maintaining eye contact and an open posture to convey sincerity and engagement. This approach facilitated a more cohesive team dynamic, leading to a well-coordinated presentation that was well-received by our peers and instructor. The successful outcome of our project underscored the textbook’s assertion that effective communication is pivotal in navigating and resolving conflicts within teams, enhancing both the process and the final product.

In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. In your response to your peers, you might offer additional insight into their example of effective communication.

Responding to Peers

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of COM 205. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the following points in mind.

• Take the time to read through at least two of your peers’ introductions and examples of effective communication. Understanding their perspectives will help you craft more thoughtful responses.
• Write a response that acknowledges what your peer shared. Highlight what you found interesting or impressive about their communication example.
• If possible, add a piece of advice, a question, or an additional insight related to their experience. Keep it brief and constructive, aiming to add value to the discussion.

Example

Response 01

Hey Sam, great post! I admired reading about your leadership and your strategic approach to managing your project. The way you organized weekly check-ins and utilized a shared digital workspace is an excellent example of applying effective communication to facilitate teamwork, as emphasized in our textbook. It is impressive how these efforts led your team to complete the project ahead of schedule! Your example has given me some ideas for improving communication within my teams.

Response 02

According to the instructions, we are asked to write two responses. I have added a sample response. You can write your peer responses by keeping the sample in mind.

Closing

This How-To Guide aims to help you navigate the COM 205 Week 1 Discussion: Effective Communication effectively, making meaningful contributions and fostering a supportive learning environment. Remember, effective communication is about conveying information, listening, and engaging constructively with others. Good luck with your Week 1 Discussion.

COM 205 Week 2 Discussion: Communication and Technology

Instructions for COM-205 Week 2 Discussion

Overview

Communicating effectively requires the ability to tell the difference between fact and opinion. If you identify your opinions when communicating, it sends a clearer message. When opinions are stated as facts, misunderstandings can occur. This assignment measures your ability to differentiate between fact and opinion. It also provides an opportunity for you to explain how distinguishing fact from fiction aids in communicating effectively.

Assignment Details:

Perform the following tasks:

• Complete the reading assignment and the interactive lecture before attempting this assignment.
• To complete the assignment:
  • Research the definition of fact and opinion.
  • Research 20 statements on the worksheet to determine either an “F” or an “O”, in the blank in front of each statement, using the following guidelines:
    • Mark an “F” if you believe the statement is communicating a Fact
    • Mark an “O” if you believe the statement is communicating an Opinion

• Describe, in 2 or 3 well-developed sentences, how being able to distinguish fact from opinion helps you to communicate more effectively.

• Your responses must have correct spelling and grammar.
• Check your assignment against unintended plagiarism.
• Use the proper naming convention when saving your assignment:
  • COM205_wk2_assn_jsmith_mmddyyy
• Submit the Week 2 Assignment

Download the assignment details Download the assignment details to complete this assignment.

Recap

In the previous Week One Discussion, we shared the time you communicated effectively. Then, in five to seven sentences, we cited areas of the textbook that justify the effectiveness rating. This week, we will discuss the impact of technology on our communication.

Introduction to COM 205

The COM 205 Week 2 Discussion: Communication and Technology explores the profound impact of technology on communication methods. It questions whether digital platforms have altered how we interact and examines the benefits and drawbacks of modern communication tools like email, text messaging, and social media. Furthermore, it delves into how these technologies have influenced traditional face-to-face communication skills.

Has technology changed the way we communicate? If so, how?

How Technology Has Changed Communication

To start COM 205 Week 2 Discussion: Communication and Technology, we will briefly discuss the impact of technology on communication.

• Discuss the overall impact of technology on communication.
• Please provide examples of new communication technologies and how they have transformed interactions in personal and professional contexts.

Example

Technology has significantly altered communication, introducing instantaneous, diverse, and accessible modalities. Innovations such as smartphones, social media, and video conferencing have transformed interactions, making maintaining connections across vast distances possible. Professionally, tools like Slack and Microsoft Teams have revolutionised workplace communication, fostering collaboration and information sharing irrespective of geographical boundaries.

What are some advantages and disadvantages of email, text, social media, etc.?

Advantages & Disadvantages of Digital Communication

Next, to support our stance, we will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of digital communication.

• Highlight the convenience and formality that email brings to professional communication.
• Discuss the speed and ease of informal communication through texting.
• Explain how social media platforms have enabled global connections and real-time information sharing.

• Point out issues like miscommunication due to a lack of tone and the overwhelming volume of emails that can lead to information overload.
• Mention the potential for misinterpretation and the informal nature that might undermine professional decorum.
• Discuss the risks of misinformation, privacy concerns, and the superficial connections that may form.

Example

Advantages

• Email: Email enhances professional communication by providing a platform for formal exchanges and documentation, which is crucial for business operations.

• Text Messaging: Texting offers unmatched speed and convenience, facilitating immediate and on-the-go conversations.

• Social media: Platforms like Facebook and LinkedIn have bridged global distances, enabling real-time information exchange and networking across continents.

Disadvantages

• Email: The lack of tone in emails can lead to misunderstandings, and the high volume of messages often results in information overload.
• Text Messaging: Its informal nature can be inappropriate in professional settings and prone to misinterpretation due to brevity.
• Social media: These platforms can quickly spread misinformation, raise privacy issues, and encourage superficial interactions over meaningful relationships.

How has technology affected face-to-face communication skills?

Impact of Technology on Face-to-Face Communication Skills

In this section of Discussion 2, we will explore the impact of technology on face-to-face communication skills.

• Analyse how reliance on digital communication tools might affect our ability to engage in direct, personal interactions.
• Include studies or statistics that reflect changes in face-to-face communication skills over time.

Example

The prevalence of digital communication tools has impacted face-to-face communication skills, often diminishing the capacity for deep, personal interactions. Studies indicate a decline in empathetic skills among younger generations who prefer texting to speaking. Furthermore, the convenience of digital communication might discourage the development of non-verbal cues critical to in-person exchanges, such as body language and eye contact, which are essential for effective interpersonal communication.

In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. You might offer additional insights on their example in your response to your peers.

Peer Responses

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the COM 205 Discussion Posts. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the following points in mind.

• Offer thoughtful insights or contrasting viewpoints to enrich the discussion.
• Keep responses concise, focusing on one or two key points contributing to the ongoing dialogue.

Response 01

Great post, Alan! You have outlined how technology shapes communication methods, advancing and complicating interactions. I would add that while digital tools facilitate global connectivity, they sometimes reduce the quality of our interactions, emphasising quantity over quality. This shift could potentially erode deeper emotional connections typically forged through face-to-face interactions, highlighting a crucial area for developing better digital communication etiquette.

Response 02

We are supposed to write two peer responses. I have addressed the given instructions in one response. Following these instructions, you can quickly write your peer responses to the Week 2 Discussion without any difficulty.

Closing

The COM 205 Week 2 Discussion: Communication and Technology highlights how technology has reshaped our communication landscape and prompts us to reflect on the balance between digital and face-to-face interactions. By examining the pros and cons of various communication methods, students are encouraged to consider using these tools to enhance their personal and professional lives.

Precap

In the following Week 2 Assignment, we will discuss the importance of knowing the difference between Fact and Opinion. To understand this difference, we will do an interactive activity.

COM 205 Week 2 Assignment: Fact or Opinion

Instructions for COM-205 Week 2 Assignment

Overview

Due: Post your initial response by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Time.

Respond to at least two of your fellow students’ posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Time.

Communication and Technology

 Has technology changed the way we communicate? if so, how? What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of communicating via email, text, social media, etc.? How has technology affected face-to-face communication skills?

Response Posts: In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. In your response to your peers, you might offer some additional insights on their example.

Select Reply to join the discussion. For grading details, select the three dots above [] to see the rubric.

Recap

In the last week 2 discussion post, we discussed the impact of Technology on communication skills. The following were the key areas we explored:

• How technology changed communication means
• Advantages and disadvantages of digital communication
• Impact of technology on face-to-face communication

In the Week 2 Assignment, we will explore the difference between an Opinion and a Fact.

Introduction to COM 205 Assignment 2

The COM 205 Week 2 Assignment: Fact or Opinion focuses on the critical skill of distinguishing between fact and opinion, a fundamental aspect of effective communication. Identifying whether a statement presents factual information or an individual’s viewpoint can enhance clarity and reduce misunderstandings in your interactions. This How-To COM 205 guide helps sharpen your analytical skills and emphasizes the importance of precise communication in various contexts.

Research the definition of fact and opinion.

Researching the Definition of Fact and Opinion

To commence with the COM 205 Week 2 Assignment: Fact or Opinion, we will understand the difference between a fact and an opinion.

• Start by consulting reliable sources such as academic books, peer-reviewed journals, or educational websites to understand the precise definitions of “fact” and “opinion.”
• Summarize these definitions in your own words to solidify your understanding and prepare for the analysis of statements.

Research 20 statements on the worksheet to determine either an “F” or an “O” in the blank in front of each statement, using the following guidelines:

• Mark an “F” if you believe the statement is communicating a Fact

• Mark an “O” if you believe the statement is communicating an Opinion

Analyzing Statements to Classify as Fact or Opinion

Next, we will be provided with a template for the activity. I will be using the SNHU template as an example. In this activity, we must read the statements carefully and mark “F” or “O” if the statement presents a fact or an opinion.

• Review each of the 20 statements provided in the worksheet. Read each statement carefully and decide if it represents a fact or an opinion.
• Mark each statement with an “F” for a fact if it presents objective, verifiable information. Mark it with an “O” for opinion if it reflects personal beliefs, feelings, or judgments.

Describe, in 2 or 3 well-developed sentences, how distinguishing fact from opinion helps you communicate more effectively.

Reflecting on the Importance of Distinguishing Facts from Opinion

For the last section of COM 205 Week 2 Assignment: Fact or Opinion, we will briefly reflect on how being able to tell facts from opinions helps us communicate more effectively.

• After completing the classification, write 2 or 3 well-developed sentences on how this skill can improve communication. Consider scenarios in academic, personal, or professional settings where clear communication is essential.
• Discuss how recognizing differences helps avoid confusion and fosters more effective debates or discussions.

Closing

Understanding the distinction between facts and opinions is crucial for anyone looking to communicate clearly and effectively. The COM 205 Week 2 Assignment: Fact or Opinion enhances your analytical skills and prepares you to engage more thoughtfully in discussions. By appreciating the value of this differentiation, you can contribute to more informed and respectful conversations in all areas of life.

Precap

In the upcoming week’s discussion, we will explore the difference between verbal and non-verbal communication. We will also discuss the event where we used different types of non-verbal communication. 

COM 205 Week 3 Discussion: Verbal vs. Non-Verbal Communication

Instructions for COM 205 Week 3 Discussion

Discussion

5151 unread replies.7676 replies.

Due: Post your initial response by Wednesday at 11:59 pm Pacific Time.

Respond to at least two of your fellow students’ posts by Sunday at 11:59 pm Pacific Time.

Verbal vs. Non-verbal Communication

Communication is the process of transferring a message, which can happen with or without words. Describe a recent scenario where you communicated non-verbally using proxemics (distance), kinesics (body language), haptics (touches), appearance, or eye contact, etc. How was this type of communication as effective (or more effective) as verbal?

Response Posts: In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. In your responses to your peers, consider elaborating on the difficulties presented by intercultural communications and what consequences might result from a misunderstood communication.

Select Reply to join the discussion. For grading details, select the three dots above [] to see the rubric.

Recap

In the COM 205 Week 2 Assignment, we focused on the key points:

• Definition of fact and opinion.
• Distinguishing facts from opinions helps in communicating.
• Interactive activity.

In COM 205 Week 3, we will focus on Verbal and Non-Verbal communication.

Introduction to COM 205 Week 3 Discussion

The COM 205 Week 3 Discussion: Verbal vs. Non-Verbal Communication explores the rich landscape of non-verbal communication, highlighting its critical role in conveying messages without words. You will describe a personal experience where non-verbal cues like body language, physical distance, touch, appearance, or eye contact played a key role in communicating. This How-To Owlisdom Guide will deepen your understanding of how these elements can sometimes surpass verbal communication effectiveness.

Describe a recent scenario where you communicated non-verbally using proxemics (distance), kinesics (body language), haptics (touches), appearance, eye contact, etc.

Non-Verbal Communication Scenario

To start COM 205 Week 3 Discussion: Verbal vs. Non-Verbal Communication, we will describe a life event scenario where we used nonverbal communication. 

• Choose a recent scenario where non-verbal communication was predominant. Reflect on situations where you relied more on actions than words to convey a message.

Types of Non-Verbal Communication

• Proxemics: Describe how physical distance affected the interaction.
• Kinesics: Discuss specific body language that conveyed your message.
• Haptic: Reflect on any use of touch and its impact on communication.
• Appearance: Mention how your or others’ appearance influenced perceptions.
• Eye Contact: Explain the role of eye contact in your interaction.

Example

In today’s digital world, non-verbal communication remains a powerful component of interpersonal interactions, capable of conveying emotions and intentions where words might fail. This assignment will delve into a personal experience where non-verbal cues—specifically body language and eye contact—played a pivotal role in communication during a team meeting, highlighting their effectiveness compared to verbal exchanges. During a recent project meeting, I used proxemics and kinesics extensively to express approval and concern. As the team discussed various issues, I leaned forward slightly, reducing the physical distance to show engagement and agreement, a practice common in many Western cultures to signify attention and approval. Conversely, my furrowed brows and occasional head shakes communicated caution and scepticism when discussing potential risks. These body movements provided immediate, clear feedback to the team, which could be understood regardless of the ambient noise in the room.

Effectiveness of Non-Verbal Communication

• Compare this experience to a similar one where verbal communication was used.
• Assess whether the non-verbal methods were as effective or more effective than verbal communication. 
• Provide reasons for your evaluation, possibly considering clarity, emotional expression, and the receiver’s response.

Example

In this scenario, non-verbal communication proved highly effective, perhaps even more so than verbal communication could have been. The immediate visual feedback of body language, like nodding and eye contact, facilitated a quicker consensus without interrupting verbal affirmations. It allowed for a smoother flow of discussion, where each member could gauge the reactions and feelings of others instantly. This form of communication was particularly effective in a group setting where verbal interruptions might have disrupted the flow and coherence of presented ideas.

In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. In your responses to your peers, consider elaborating on the difficulties presented by intercultural communications and what consequences might result from misunderstood communication.

Peer Response

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the COM 205 discussion posts. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the following points in mind.

• Read at least two of your peers’ posts and provide meaningful feedback. Discuss any common challenges in non-verbal communication, especially in intercultural contexts.
• Consider the potential misunderstandings arising from non-verbal cues differing across cultures.

Response 01

Great post, Jessica! Your insights into the use of non-verbal cues like body language and eye contact are enlightening, especially your emphasis on their effectiveness in a noisy environment. Considering how these non-verbal methods might be interpreted differently in various cultural contexts is intriguing. For instance, direct eye contact that signifies engagement in Western cultures could be perceived as inappropriate or aggressive in some Asian cultures. Misunderstandings like these could lead to miscommunication and conflict in diverse teams, underlining the importance of cultural sensitivity in non-verbal interactions.

Response 02

We are supposed to write two peer responses. I have addressed the given instructions in one response. Following these instructions, you can quickly write your peer responses to the COM 205 Week 3 Discussion: Verbal vs. Non-Verbal Communication without a hassle.

Closing

Non-verbal communication is essential to our daily interactions, often conveying more than words can express. The COM 205 Week 3 Discussion: Verbal vs. Non-Verbal Communication helps you recognise and analyse the subtleties of non-verbal cues, enhancing your ability to communicate effectively in diverse situations. You gain insights into the nuances that govern silent communication across different contexts through thoughtful examination and peer discussion.

Precap

For the upcoming ECO 205 Week 4 Discussion, we will be focusing on two-way communication. We will discuss the art of Listening and Critical Thinking.

COM 205 Week 4 Discussion: Listening and Critical Thinking

Instructions for COM 205 WEEK 4 Discussion

Overview

4949 unread replies.6969 replies.

Respond to at least two of your fellow students’ posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Time.

Listening and Critical Thinking

Communication is a two-way process, and to be an effective communicator, you also need to know how to receive and interpret communications. What are a few of the active listening techniques you use in your daily interactions? How do you know if the person or groups that you communicate with has received the purpose of your message?

Response Posts: In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. In your response to your peers, you might offer some additional insights on their examples.

Select Reply to join the discussion. For grading details, select the three dots above [] to see the rubric.

Recap

In the previous week’s discussion, we explored ways and types of nonverbal communication.

We also discussed a life experience where we used non-verbal communication techniques.

Introduction to COM 205 Week 4 Discussion

The COM 205 Week 4 Discussion: Listening and Critical Thinking delves into the vital listening and critical thinking skills, essential components of effective communication. Understanding how to receive and interpret messages is as important as conveying them. By following this How-To Owlisdom Guide, you will explore active listening techniques that enhance understanding in daily interactions and methods to verify the effectiveness of your communication with others.

What are a few of the active listening techniques you use in your daily interactions?

Identifying Active Listening Techniques

To solve the COM 205 Week 4 Discussion: Listening and Critical Thinking, we will discuss how we use active listening daily.

• Reflect on the active listening techniques you use regularly. 
• Consider techniques such as nodding, maintaining eye contact, paraphrasing, and asking clarifying questions to show engagement and understanding.
• Describe each technique briefly and explain how it helps you understand better and connect with the speaker in your daily interactions.

Example

I employ several active listening techniques that significantly enhance communication effectiveness in my daily interactions. Firstly, I practice the art of mirroring, where I subtly mimic the speaker’s body language. This shows engagement and builds a rapport that encourages openness and honesty in conversations. Additionally, I make a conscious effort to maintain eye contact, which signals to the speaker that they have my full attention, fostering a deeper connection and understanding.

Another crucial technique is paraphrasing what the speaker has said. By restating their words in my language, I confirm my understanding of their message and clarify any potential misunderstandings immediately. This approach is instrumental in complex discussions where precise comprehension is necessary. I also ask open-ended questions to invite elaboration, which provides a clearer picture of the speaker’s thoughts and feelings. This deepens my understanding and shows the speaker that I value their perspective, enhancing communication.

How do you know if the person or groups that you communicate with has received the purpose of your message?

Assessing Communication Effectiveness

Next, we will discuss the effectiveness of the communication type, i.e., verbal vs. non-verbal communication.

• Discuss how you gauge whether your message has been understood as intended. This might include observing the listener’s verbal and non-verbal responses or asking for feedback to confirm understanding.
• Explain the importance of feedback loops in communication, such as follow-up questions or summaries by the listener, which can signify whether the message’s purpose was effectively communicated.

Example

To assess whether my communication has been effective and the intended message has been received, I observe the listener’s responses both verbally and through their body language. If the listener asks relevant questions or provides feedback that aligns with the message’s purpose, it indicates a successful transmission of ideas. Additionally, non-verbal cues such as nodding, maintaining eye contact, or expressions of emotion are reliable indicators of effective communication. In professional settings, I also look for actionable responses after meetings or presentations, such as task initiation or follow-up queries, which further validate that my message was understood and taken seriously.

Mastering these active listening techniques and continuously assessing communication effectiveness is pivotal in ensuring my interactions are heard and understood. This rigorous approach enhances my capability as a communicator. It empowers the individuals I interact with, creating a dynamic of mutual respect and understanding that is essential for any successful personal or professional relationship.

In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. You might offer additional insights on their examples in your response to your peers.

Peer Responses

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the COM 205 discussion posts. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the following points in mind.

• Provide constructive feedback or additional insights to enhance their understanding of active listening or improve their communication assessments.

Response 01

Excellent post, Sam! Your use of mirroring and eye contact as active listening techniques is impressive, as these methods establish rapport and engagement. Perhaps incorporating summaries periodically during conversations could enhance clarity, ensuring all parties are aligned before moving forward. This might add another layer to your effective communication strategy, fostering greater understanding and collaboration.

Response 02

According to the COM 205 Week 4 Discussion: Listening and Critical Thinking instructions, we are supposed to write two peer responses. I have addressed the given instructions in one response. Following these instructions, you can quickly write your peer responses to the Week 4 Discussion without hassle.

Closing

Mastering listening and critical thinking significantly bolsters communication efficiency. Following this How-To Owlisdom Guide ensures you fully comprehend the messages received, fostering more meaningful and productive interactions. Assessing the effectiveness of your communication allows for adjustments and improvements, ensuring your messages are delivered and understood as intended. The COM 205 Week 4 Discussion: Listening and Critical Thinking assignment encourages you to refine these skills vital for personal and professional growth.

COM 205 Week 4 Assignment: Emotional Intelligence

Instructions for COM 205 Week 4

Overview

The interaction and interpersonal relationships between friends, business colleagues, or even strangers depend on their emotional intelligence. For this assignment, you are the chairperson of a college scholarship committee. The Financial Aid Office has been given two scholarships by a private donor. These scholarships are for $2,500 each for four years. Each scholarship stipulates that it is to be given to an entering freshman, that it will be renewed each year as long as the student maintains a 2.5 grade average, and that a committee of students at the university will choose the recipient. Your task is to decide which two applicants will be awarded the scholarships.

Assignment Details: 

Perform the following tasks:

• Complete the reading assignment and the interactive lecture before attempting this assignment.
• To complete the assignment:
  • Read the following descriptive notes regarding the ten applicants.
  • Select two from the list for which you will award the scholarships.
  • Write a 350-500-word summary to explain the reasons for your choices. Relate how your emotional intelligence affects your communication.
    • Be sure to use the lecture, readings, and other research to support your answer.
    • Use the plagiarism tool to check your summary against unintended plagiarism.
    • Spell check your summary.
• Use the proper naming convention when saving your assignment:
  • COM205_wk4_assn_jsmith_mmddyyy
• Submit your assignment.

Recap

Previously, we discussed Listening and Critical Thinking. We discussed some active listening techniques you use in your daily interactions.

Introduction to COM 205 Week 4 Assignment 

The COM 205 Week 4 Assignment: Emotional Intelligence involves selecting two entering first-year students to receive scholarships based on their applications and other qualitative data. As the college scholarship committee chairperson, your decisions will impact the financial aid recipients and reflect your emotional intelligence and its role in interpersonal communication. This task requires careful reading, critical thinking, and reflective writing to articulate your choices effectively.

Reading Applicant Descriptions

We will read the scholarship applications thoroughly to initiate the COM 205 Week 4 Assignment: Emotional Intelligence.

• Review Each Applicant Thoroughly
• Read the descriptive notes for each of the ten applicants.
• Consider each applicant’s background, achievements, and potential as described in the notes.

Example

I thoroughly reviewed the descriptions for each of the ten applicants for this assignment. Each applicant presented unique backgrounds, achievements, and future aspirations. Based on the details given, I mainly focused on understanding their circumstances and the potential impact of the scholarship on their lives.

Selection Process

The selection process will determine the criteria based on scholarship stipulations (e.g., maintaining a 2.5 GPA).

• Include personal attributes that align with the donor’s vision and the college’s values.
• Importance of Emotional Intelligence in the Decision-Making Process:
• Assess how your understanding of emotional intelligence helps in evaluating the applicants.
• Use emotional intelligence to anticipate which candidates will most likely succeed and benefit from the scholarship.

Example

After careful consideration, I chose the following two candidates:

• Candidate 1: Ellen McBride

• Candidate 2: Ezekiel Nkomo

Both candidates demonstrate qualities that align with the scholarship’s purpose and the donors’ vision. My emotional intelligence played a crucial role in this decision-making process, allowing me to empathise with the applicants’ situations and anticipate their potential success in their chosen fields.

Writing the Summary

For this COM 205 Week 4 Assignment: Emotional Intelligence segment, we will write a summary to discuss each selected application.

• Begin with an introduction stating the purpose of the summary.
• Discuss each selected applicant and the rationale behind each choice.

Example

In this summary, I will discuss why I selected Ellen McBride and Ezekiel Nkomo for the scholarship awards, illustrating how my emotional intelligence influenced my decision-making and communication.

Discussion of Selected Applicants

Ellen McBride stands out not only for her academic excellence but also for her leadership and resilience. She has shown exceptional organisational and interpersonal skills as the valedictorian and a sports team captain. Ellen’s uncertain primary suggests a willingness to explore and find her passion, indicating a high potential for growth and success in various fields.

Ezekiel Nkomo, a brilliant student from Nigeria, shows remarkable dedication to his studies, particularly chemistry. His goal to develop fertilisers to boost rice yields demonstrates his commitment to addressing significant agricultural challenges in his community. Supporting Ezekiel helps an individual and potentially solves broader socio-economic issues in his home country.

Emotional Intelligence and Communication

My emotional intelligence allowed me to appreciate the depth of each candidate’s personal and academic circumstances, guiding me to communicate my decisions with empathy and clarity. Understanding and managing my emotions helped me to maintain an objective yet compassionate approach during the selection process.

Summarise Key Takeaways

To write the conclusion of the COM 205 Assignment, we will discuss how this exercise has helped us enhance our understanding of emotional intelligence.

• Reflect on how exercise has enhanced your understanding of emotional intelligence in professional settings.
• Conclude with remarks on the potential impact of your decisions on the recipients’ academic and personal growth.

Example

This exercise has significantly enhanced my understanding of the practical applications of emotional intelligence in decision-making and communication within a professional setting. By selecting Ellen McBride and Ezekiel Nkomo, I believe the scholarship will be impactful, supporting their educational pursuits and enabling them to make substantial contributions to their communities. This process reaffirmed the importance of emotional awareness and adaptability in achieving fair and effective outcomes.

Closing

Completing this assignment effectively will demonstrate your ability to apply emotional intelligence in practical scenarios and enhance your communication skills in a professional context. The insights gained through this exercise will be invaluable in future roles where decision-making and interpersonal relationships are crucial.

COM 205 Week 5 Discussion: Intercultural Communication

Instructions for COM 205 Week 5 Discussion

Overview

Intercultural Communication

Beyond language differences, what do you believe is the most significant barrier to communicating across cultures in a face-to-face environment? Explain. How is communication with an individual from another culture made more difficult when it occurs in the virtual environment rather than face-to-face? How can you ensure the receiver understands the meaning of your message? Or vice versa?

Response Posts: In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. In your responses to your peers, discuss areas where there may be a difference of opinion. Do you find your peers’ techniques to be valid? What might contribute to the differences in non-verbal techniques?

Select Reply to join the discussion. For grading details, select the three dots above [] to see the rubric.

Recap

Previously, we discussed active listening techniques and explored how we use them daily. We also enlightened the effectiveness of the communication type, i.e., verbal vs. non-verbal communication.

Introduction to COM 205 Week 5 Discussion

The COM 205 Week 5 Discussion: Intercultural Communication delves into the complexities of intercultural communication, emphasising language differences and other significant barriers that impact exchanges across diverse cultures. This How-To COM 205 Guide explores the additional challenges virtual environments pose and discusses strategies to ensure mutual understanding in communication.

Beyond language differences, what do you believe is the most significant barrier to communicating across cultures in a face-to-face environment? Explain.

Identifying Significant Barriers to Intercultural Communication

To start the COM 205 Week 5 Discussion: Intercultural Communication, we will explore the significant barriers to intercultural communication.

• Reflect on and identify non-linguistic barriers that you believe significantly impact face-to-face intercultural communication, such as cultural norms, values, etiquette, or non-verbal cues.
• Explain how these factors can lead to misunderstandings or miscommunications when interacting with individuals from different cultural backgrounds.

Example

One of the most significant barriers to effective intercultural communication in face-to-face environments is the variation in cultural norms and non-verbal cues. These include differences in gestures, personal space, eye contact, and expressions of respect or agreement, which are not universally understood across cultures. For instance, a nod in some cultures indicates agreement; in others, it can simply mean acknowledgment without agreement. Misinterpretations of these cues can lead to misunderstandings and potentially offensive interactions. Moreover, differing cultural values and etiquette, such as the manner of greeting or the appropriateness of specific topics of conversation, can further complicate communication. These cultural disparities can lead to perceptions of rudeness or disinterest, even when none is intended. Understanding these nuances is crucial to navigating intercultural interactions successfully.

How is communication with an individual from another culture made more problematic when it occurs in a virtual environment rather than face-to-face?

Challenges of Virtual Intercultural Communication

Next, we will discuss the challenges of virtual intercultural communication. 

• Discuss how communicating with someone from another culture can be more challenging when it occurs virtually instead of face-to-face. 
• Consider aspects like the absence of non-verbal cues, time zone differences, and technological limitations.
• Provide examples of how these factors distort the intended message or its reception.

Example

Communicating with individuals from different cultural backgrounds in a virtual environment introduces unique challenges that are less prevalent in face-to-face settings. The absence of non-verbal cues, which provide significant context in personal interactions, is a major hurdle. For example, subtle expressions of confusion or disagreement that might be easily caught and addressed in person can go unnoticed over video or email. Additionally, virtual communication often involves dealing with time zone differences and technological limitations, such as poor internet connectivity, which can disrupt the flow of conversation and lead to miscommunications. For instance, a delayed response in a chat might be perceived as disinterest or disagreement when, in fact, it might be caused by a poor connection. These factors can distort the intended message and make mutual understanding difficult.

How can you ensure the receiver understands the meaning of your message? Or vice versa?

Ensuring Message Clarity in Intercultural Exchanges

For this section of the COM 205 Week 5 Discussion: Intercultural Communication, we will discuss ensuring that the receiver clearly understands the message during intercultural communication.

• Outline methods to ensure that the receiver understands the meaning of your message clearly in intercultural communications. 
• Suggestions might include using clear and straightforward language, confirming understanding through feedback, and being aware of cultural sensitivities.
• Discuss the importance of active listening and asking clarifying questions to ensure that you have correctly understood the messages conveyed by others.

Example

Ensuring that the receiver understands the meaning of your message in intercultural communications involves several deliberate practices. Primarily, using clear, straightforward language free of colloquialisms and idiomatic expressions helps prevent misunderstandings. Additionally, actively seeking feedback to confirm understanding can be vital. This can be achieved by asking the receiver to paraphrase the received message or providing summaries of key points during the conversation. Being acutely aware of cultural sensitivities and avoiding potential areas of cultural conflict or misunderstanding also plays a crucial role. Furthermore, the importance of active listening cannot be overstated—paying close attention to the speaker, acknowledging their message, and asking clarifying questions if anything is unclear ensures that both parties are on the same page. These strategies collectively foster more precise, more effective intercultural communication, allowing for deeper understanding and more successful interactions.

In your responses to your peers, discuss areas where there may be a difference of opinion. Do you find your peers’ techniques to be valid? What might contribute to the differences in non-verbal techniques?

Peer Responses

We have to engage with at least two peers’ posts by responding to them. We will offer constructive feedback or alternative perspectives, where we may differ in opinions regarding non-verbal communication techniques.

• Evaluate the validity of their approaches and suggest any improvements or share insights based on your own experiences and research.

Response 01

Hey Max, nice post! You have highlighted critical challenges in intercultural communication effectively. I especially agree with recognising non-verbal cues, which vary widely across cultures. Perhaps exploring how cultural contexts shape these non-verbal communications could further enrich our understanding.

Response 02

According to the COM 205 Week 5 Discussion: Intercultural Communication instructions, we are supposed to write two peer responses. I have addressed the given instructions in one response. Following these instructions, you can write your peer responses.

Closing

Mastering intercultural communication is crucial in our increasingly globalised world. This assignment highlights the importance of recognising and overcoming cultural barriers, particularly in virtual settings, to enhance understanding and cooperation across cultures. By actively engaging with these challenges and employing effective communication strategies, you can significantly improve your intercultural communication skills, fostering more meaningful and productive interactions.

Precap

In the upcoming week, we will discuss Interpersonal Relationships in detail. We will explain how the level of our emotional intelligence shapes our interpersonal relationships.

COM 205 Week 6 Discussion: Interpersonal Relationships

Instructions for COM 205 Week 6

Discussion

3838 unread replies.6060 replies.

Due: Post your initial response by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Time.

Respond to at least two of your fellow students’ posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Time.

Interpersonal Relationships

Communicating with people close to you is not always as easy as it may seem. We all have different personalities and react differently to words and actions. Explain how your interpersonal relationships are shaped by the level of your emotional intelligence. What strategies can you use to improve your emotional intelligence?

Response Posts: In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. In your response to your peers, you might offer some additional insights about their examples.

Select Reply to join the discussion. For grading details, select the three dots above [] to see the rubric.

Recap 

Last week, we discussed identifying significant barriers to intercultural communication by exploring the challenges of virtual intercultural communication. We also discussed ways of ensuring message clarity in intercultural exchanges.

Introduction to COM 205 Week 6 Discussion

The COM 205 Week 6 Discussion: Interpersonal Relationships focuses on the complexities of communicating effectively with close contacts, recognizing the influence of emotional intelligence (EI) on these interactions. As we navigate our personal and professional lives, understanding and managing our emotions, as well as recognizing the feelings of others, play pivotal roles in building and sustaining healthy relationships.

Explain how the level of your emotional intelligence shapes your interpersonal relationships.

Influence of Emotional Intelligence on Interpersonal Relationships

For the first section of COM 205 Week 6 Discussion: Interpersonal Relationships, we will discuss the impact of Emotional Intelligence on interpersonal relationships.

• Reflect on how your ability to perceive, use, understand, and manage emotions has shaped your interactions with others. Consider specific instances where high or low EI influenced a relationship’s outcome.
• Explain the role of empathy, self-awareness, and emotional regulation in your daily communications, particularly in resolving conflicts or enhancing connections.

Example

Emotional intelligence (EI) significantly influences my ability to forge and maintain interpersonal relationships. My capacity to perceive and understand both my emotions and those of others has frequently steered interactions toward more positive outcomes. For example, recognizing a colleague’s frustration during a project allowed me to approach the situation with empathy rather than defensiveness, fostering a collaborative resolution. This ability to manage emotional climates has proved essential in maintaining professional and personal relationships.

Empathy, a core component of EI, allows me to comprehend others’ feelings and perspectives deeply, enhancing my communication effectiveness, especially in conflict situations. Self-awareness helps me recognize my emotional triggers and biases, which is crucial in managing reactions and adapting communication strategies accordingly. Emotional regulation enables me to maintain stability in challenging interactions, preventing escalation and promoting a reasoned approach to conflict resolution. These aspects of EI are not just beneficial; they are critical in cultivating healthy, enduring relationships.

What strategies can you use to improve your emotional intelligence?

Strategies to Improve Emotional Intelligence

Next, we will discuss different strategies to improve our emotional intelligence.

• Identify practical strategies for enhancing your EI. Begin with self-assessment tools to gain insights into your emotional strengths and weaknesses.
• Commit to practicing mindfulness and active listening to better understand and regulate your emotions and reactions. Engage in reflective practices like journaling to explore and process your emotional experiences.
• Suggest engaging in empathy exercises, such as viewing situations from another person’s perspective, which can help improve your responses and interactions.

Example

Improving emotional intelligence is a continuous process that involves a deep commitment to personal growth and understanding. Utilizing self-assessment tools has been a fundamental first step in identifying my emotional strengths and areas for improvement. These tools help pinpoint specific emotional competencies I need to develop further, such as empathy or emotional regulation.

Practicing mindfulness has allowed me to be present and engaged in interactions, which enhances my ability to perceive subtle emotional cues in others. This awareness is crucial for effective emotional regulation. Additionally, active listening supports this by ensuring that I fully comprehend the emotional content of communications before responding, thereby avoiding misunderstandings and strengthening connections.

Journaling has been an invaluable reflective practice that helps me process past interactions and understand the emotions involved, providing insights into how my emotions influence my responses. Finally, empathy exercises, such as putting myself in another’s shoes, have enriched my perspective-taking abilities. By understanding others’ viewpoints, I can respond more appropriately and sensitively, which significantly improves my interpersonal interactions. These strategies collectively contribute to a heightened emotional intelligence that not only benefits personal relationships but also professional interactions, leading to more fulfilling and effective communication.

In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. In your response to your peers, you might offer some additional insights about their examples.

Peer Responses

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the COM 205 discussion posts. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the following points in mind.

• Read through at least two of your peers’ posts. Offer thoughtful feedback that adds value to their discussion, possibly by sharing additional strategies to enhance EI or by providing alternative perspectives on the impact of EI on relationships.
• Aim to foster a constructive dialogue that encourages deeper understanding and mutual learning.

Response 01

Hey Sam, great post! You have beautifully articulated how emotional intelligence shapes effective interactions, especially emphasizing empathy and self-awareness. Adding to your strategies, you might explore role-playing exercises to further enhance your EI by simulating various emotional scenarios. This practice could offer practical insights into managing emotions in real-time, complementing your current approaches.

Response 02

We are supposed to write two peer responses. I have addressed the given instructions in one response. Following these instructions, you can write your peer responses to the Week 6 Discussion without a hassle.

Closing

Emotional intelligence is a cornerstone of effective interpersonal communication. By enhancing your EI, you not only improve your relationships but also increase your professional effectiveness. The COM 205 Week 6 Discussion: Interpersonal Relationships helps you identify areas for growth in your emotional capabilities and encourages you to implement practical measures to cultivate a more emotionally intelligent approach to your interactions. Through this How-To Owlisdom Guide, you’ll gain a deeper appreciation for the role of emotions in communication and relationship-building.

COM 205 WEEK 6 ASSIGNMENT: Speech Project – Part I

Instructions for COM 205 Week 6 Assignment

Overview

In this assignment, you will choose a topic for a persuasive speech that you will deliver in Week 12. You will research and write a summary of two sources of information on your chosen topic.

Assignment Details:

Perform the following tasks:

• Complete the reading assignment and the interactive lecture before attempting this assignment
• Complete the worksheet:
  • Consider something in which you feel strongly. This could be a political issue, a pet peeve, a social justice issue, or something you can persuade others to believe.
  • Compose your topic in five words or fewer (this becomes the title of your speech).
  • Research the topic and find two sources of information you can use in your persuasive speech.
  • Write a summary of these sources in less than 200 words and cite them appropriately.
  • Spell and grammar check your summary.
• Use the proper naming convention when saving your assignment:
  • COM205_wk6_assn_jsmith_mmddyyy
• Submit your assignment for peer review by Sunday.
• Once a peer review has been assigned, you can view a notification in your Dashboard To Do sidebar.
• Conduct a peer review and provide constructive feedback. Your peer review is due on Wednesday (in Week 8).

Recap

The previous week, we discussed Intercultural Communication. We discussed how communication with an individual from another culture is more problematic when it occurs in a virtual environment rather than face-to-face.

Introduction to COM 205 Week 6 Assignment

The COM 205 Week 6 Assignment: Speech Project – Part I challenges you to craft a persuasive speech on a topic you feel passionately about. You will explore this topic deeply, select reliable sources to bolster your arguments, and summarize your findings effectively. By following this How-To COM 205 Guide, you will have developed a compelling, persuasive speech and honed your research and analytical skills.

Initial Preparations

To start the COM 205 Week 6 Assignment: Speech Project – Part I, we will complete the Required Reading, attend the Interactive Lecture, and follow the instructions.

• Ensure you fully understand the foundational concepts that will aid in topic selection and argument development.
• Engage actively to clarify any doubts before proceeding with your speech preparation.

Choosing Your Topic

I chose Racial Inequality.

• Reflect on issues or subjects that evoke strong emotions or opinions. 
• Consider current events, longstanding issues, or personal experiences as potential topics.
• Summarize your chosen topic into a concise title of no more than five words. This title should reflect the essence of your argument and catch the audience’s attention.

Research Process

Identify two credible sources that provide substantial information on your topic. These could be academic journals, reputable news outlets, or specialized publications.

• Ensure these sources offer diverse perspectives and sufficient depth to support your arguments.
• Verify the authenticity of your sources by checking their publication dates, the credentials of the authors, and the presence of citations or references.

Example

For my speech on racial injustice, I will utilize two critical resources that shed light on racial disparities and their profound implications in the United States. The first resource is an article from the U.S. Department of the Treasury (2024), which explores the nation’s extensive landscape of racial inequality, highlighting systemic issues and their economic impacts. The second resource is a publication by the Economic Policy Institute (2022), focusing specifically on the labor market outcomes between Black and White Americans, detailing the enduring disparities in employment and wages.

Summarizing Research

• Begin with an introduction that outlines the main points from your sources.
• Discuss each source separately, highlighting key evidence that supports your persuasive speech.
• Use direct quotes, statistics, or summarized ideas from sources to support your claims.
• Ensure each piece of evidence is linked to your overall argument.

Example

Both resources emphasize that racial injustice extends beyond individual discrimination to encompass structural barriers that affect minorities disproportionately. The Treasury article (2024) outlines how historical and ongoing policies have segregated communities and limited access to essential services, reinforcing cycles of poverty. On the other hand, the Economic Policy Institute’s analysis (2022) provides a granular look at how racial biases in hiring, pay, and promotion continue to undermine Black Americans’ economic opportunities. Together, these sources paint a comprehensive picture of how deeply embedded racial inequalities are in the fabric of American society, challenging us to confront these injustices through informed action and policy change. This understanding underscores the necessity for a concerted effort toward social justice, emphasizing rights, equality, and community solidarity, especially in times of crisis.

Closing

Completing the COM 205 Week 6 Assignment: Speech Project – Part I will advance your ability to persuade and inform an audience and enhance your critical thinking and research skills. These capabilities are essential for academic success and can significantly impact your effectiveness in future communication tasks.

References

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY. (2024, May 3). Racial Inequality in the United States. U.S. Department of the Treasury. https://home.treasury.gov/news/featured-stories/racial-inequality-in-the-united-states Wilson, V. (2022). Understanding black-white disparities in labor market outcomes requires models that account for persistent discrimination and unequal bargaining power. Economic Policy Institute. https://www.epi.org/unequalpower/publications/understanding-black-white-disparities-in-labor-market-outcomes/

COM 205 Week 7 Discussion: Effective Group Communication

Instructions for COM 205 Week 7 Discussion

Discussion

Due: Post your initial response by Wednesday at 11:59 pm Pacific Time.

Respond to at least two of your fellow students’ posts by Sunday night at 11:59 pm Pacific Time.

Effective Group Communication

Other than your online discussions in your various classes, perhaps one of the most significant examples of the importance of effective group communication comes in jury deliberations, where a consensus is not immediately obtained. Whether or not you have served on a jury, what do you think are some difficulties you might encounter that could prevent a consensus? What are some strategies you or the group could employ to overcome these difficulties and reach an agreement on a verdict? How could the same strategies apply to a small work group that cannot reach an agreement?

Response Posts: In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. In your responses to your peers, consider critically assessing your peers’ solutions to the deadlock in jury deliberations and/or to the lack of agreement among members of the work group, if applicable. Can you identify situations when their solutions may not be successful? Maybe you can describe alternate strategies for reaching an agreement.

Select Reply to join the discussion. For grading details, select the three dots above [] to see the rubric.

Introduction to COM 205 Week 7 Discussion

The COM 205 Week 7 Discussion: Effective Group Communication focuses on the dynamics of effective group communication, particularly in high-stakes environments such as jury deliberations and workplace team discussions. You will explore potential challenges that can prevent a group from reaching a consensus and propose strategies to overcome these difficulties. The insights gained here apply to various group settings, emphasizing the importance of strategic communication and collaboration.

Whether or not you have served on a jury, what do you think are some difficulties you might encounter that could prevent a consensus?

Identifying Difficulties in Reaching Consensus

To start the COM 205 Week 7 Discussion: Effective Group Communication, we will discuss difficulties in reaching a consensus.

• Reflect on common challenges that might arise during group discussions, such as conflicting personalities, diverse viewpoints, or a lack of clear information. 
• Consider how these factors could impact decision-making in a jury setting or any collaborative group environment.
• Analyze specific scenarios where these challenges could prevent consensus, using hypothetical examples or drawing from general knowledge of group dynamics.

Example

In group discussions, especially in settings as critical as jury deliberations, several challenges can impede consensus. Predominantly, conflicting personalities within the group can lead to friction and resistance against unanimous decisions. Additionally, the diversity of viewpoints, which is typically beneficial, can sometimes complicate consensus if not properly managed, as individuals may hold strong, differing opinions based on their backgrounds and experiences. Another significant hurdle is the lack of clear, comprehensive information, which can leave jurors or group members uncertain and unable to make a decision confidently. For example, in a jury, if the evidence presented is ambiguous or incomplete, it may lead to prolonged discussions and difficulty in reaching a verdict. Similarly, in a corporate setting, unclear project objectives can result in misaligned team efforts and failed consensus.

What are some strategies you or the group could employ to overcome these difficulties and reach an agreement on a verdict?

Strategies for Achieving Group Consensus

Next, we will explore strategies to overcome the difficulties of reaching an agreement on a verdict.

• Discuss effective communication strategies that could facilitate consensus-building, such as active listening, mediation techniques, or structured decision-making processes like voting or ranking choices.
• Outline how each strategy could be implemented in a jury deliberation to address and overcome the identified difficulties. Provide a step-by-step approach to applying these techniques in group discussions.

Example

Several strategies can be effectively employed to navigate the complexities of group consensus. Active listening is fundamental; by ensuring that every member’s viewpoints are heard and considered, the group can prevent misunderstandings and foster a respectful discussion environment. Introducing mediation techniques can also be beneficial, particularly when conflicts escalate. A neutral third party or a designated mediator within the group can help reconcile differing viewpoints by focusing on common goals rather than individual interests. Structured decision-making processes such as anonymous voting or ranking choices can also facilitate consensus by allowing members to express their opinions without pressure, potentially leading to a more agreeable outcome for all involved. In a jury setting, these strategies could be sequentially applied: starting with a round of active listening, moving to mediated discussion if needed, and finally employing a vote to conclude the deliberation decisively.

How could the same strategies apply to a small workgroup that cannot reach an agreement?

Applying Strategies to Work Group Scenarios

For this segment of COM 205 Week 7 Discussion: Effective Group Communication, we will explore how to apply strategies to small groups that cannot reach an agreement.

• Translate the strategies used in jury deliberations to a small workgroup context. 
• Explain how these methods can be adapted to help work teams overcome disagreements and reach a unified decision.
• Highlight the benefits of these strategies in fostering a cooperative and productive work environment.

Example

The strategies effective in jury deliberations are equally applicable to small workgroup scenarios. For instance, in a project team unable to agree on the next phase of development, employing structured decision-making processes can clarify the team’s priorities. Implementing active listening ensures that each team member’s professional insight and personal concerns are acknowledged, which can transform a conflicted discussion into a constructive dialogue. Additionally, mediation techniques can help manage interpersonal conflicts that might arise due to stress or high stakes, ensuring that the team remains focused on the collective goal rather than individual disagreements. The benefits of these strategies are manifold: they not only promote a more harmonious work environment but also enhance the productivity and decision-making quality of the team, ensuring that projects are completed efficiently and to the satisfaction of all involved. By understanding and implementing these strategies, groups in any context can improve their ability to reach consensus, fostering environments where diverse viewpoints are seen as strengths rather than obstacles. This approach not only improves the outcomes of specific discussions but also enhances the overall communication and collaboration skills of all participants.

In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. In your responses to your peers, consider critically assessing your peers’ solutions to the deadlock in jury deliberations and to the lack of agreement among members of the workgroup, if applicable. Can you identify situations when their solutions may not be successful? Maybe you can describe alternate strategies for reaching an agreement.

Peer Responses

Engage with at least two peers’ posts by critically assessing their proposed solutions to communication deadlock. 

• Consider the feasibility and potential pitfalls of their approaches.
• Offer constructive feedback or alternative strategies, providing brief explanations on when and why these might be more effective.

Response 01

Hey Max, nice post! You have outlined key strategies like active listening and structured decision-making, which are vital for resolving group conflicts. However, one potential pitfall might be the group’s reliance on a mediator, which could lead to dependency rather than fostering individual problem-solving skills. As an alternative, promoting skill-building workshops in conflict resolution and negotiation could empower team members to manage disputes independently, ensuring long-term effectiveness in reaching consensus without external mediation. This proactive approach can enhance team dynamics and ensure sustainable problem-solving capabilities within the group.

Response 02

We are supposed to write two peer responses. I have addressed the given instructions in one response. Following these instructions, you can write your peer responses to the Week 7 Discussion without a hassle.

Closing

Understanding and implementing effective communication strategies in group settings are crucial for achieving consensus and ensuring productive outcomes. The COM 205 Week 7 Discussion: Effective Group Communication not only enhances your ability to function within a team but also equips you with the tools to lead and facilitate discussions, essential skills in both professional and personal contexts. By following this How-To COM 205 Guide, you can significantly improve group dynamics and decision-making processes, leading to more successful and harmonious collaborations.

Precap

Next week, we will discuss Professional Communication. We will explore the techniques of professional communication.

COM 205 Week 8 Discussion: Professional Communication

Instructions for COM 205 Week 8 Discussion

Overview

Effective communication in professional environments often relies on the seamless use of techniques that we have covered in this course. Imagine that you want to ask your boss for a raise. Which techniques used for communicating effectively would you want to consider when presenting your request to your boss? Be specific and describe why you think the techniques you have selected are important in the interaction with your boss. How might you respond if your boss denies your request?

Response Posts: In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. In your response to your peers, you might offer some additional insights about their examples.

Select Reply to join the discussion. For grading details, select the three dots above [] to see the rubric.

Recap

The previous module of COM 205 explored Effective Group Communication. We discussed:

• Challenges in group communication.
• Strategies to overcome such challenges.
• How can these strategies be applied to different groups?

Introduction to COM 205 Week 8 Discussion

This COM 205 guide is designed to help students understand and apply effective communication techniques in a professional setting, particularly when making significant requests such as asking for a raise. By following these guidelines, students will learn not only how to construct their arguments but also how to respond to potential outcomes, fostering a professional demeanour throughout their interactions.

Which techniques used for communicating effectively would you want to consider when presenting your request to your boss?

Effective Communication Techniques

To start the COM 205 Week 8 Discussion, we will look into effective professional communication techniques.

• Effective communication involves clarity, empathy, and understanding of your audience. 
• When preparing to communicate significant requests like a salary increase, it is crucial to use strategies that align with these principles to enhance the likelihood of a favourable outcome.

Example

This week’s focus on effective professional communication techniques could not be more timely as I have been contemplating how to approach my boss about a raise. Here is how I plan to apply the communication techniques we have studied to enhance my request.

Be specific and describe why you think the techniques you have selected are important in the interaction with your boss.

Identification of Appropriate Communication Techniques

Next, we will select the appropriate communication technique to interact with the boss.

• Assertiveness: Clearly and confidently state your request without being aggressive.
• Evidence-based Justification: Use concrete examples of your achievements and contributions to the organisation as a basis for your request.

Example

First, I believe that assertiveness will be crucial. It is important to present my request confidently, ensuring that I communicate my needs clearly without seeming aggressive. I think this shows that I respect not only my worth but also the professional setting of the conversation. For example, I plan to start the conversation with a direct yet respectful statement like, “I would like to discuss my contributions to the team and the possibility of a salary adjustment based on these contributions.”

Justification of Selected Techniques

We will also justify selecting the communication technique.

• Why Assertiveness? It shows confidence in your worth to the organisation.
• Why Evidence-based Justification? It demonstrates your value through measurable contributions, making your request more compelling.

Example

Next, I plan to use evidence-based justification. I have prepared a list of projects I have led over the past year, along with their impacts on our team’s performance and efficiency. For instance, the marketing campaign I spearheaded last quarter resulted in a 20% increase in leads, aligning with our department’s goals. I believe that presenting this data will demonstrate my value to the team and strengthen my case for a raise.

How might you respond if your boss denies your request?

Responding to a Denial

In this section of the COM 205 Discussion Week 8, we will discuss how to react to the denial. 

• Seek Feedback: Politely ask for reasons behind the denial and areas for improvement.
• Express Gratitude: Thank your boss for considering your request, showing professionalism, and maintaining a positive relationship.

Example

However, if my boss denies my request, I intend to respond professionally by employing strategies we have learned about handling rejection. I will politely ask for feedback, saying something like, “I appreciate your consideration. Could you provide some insight into what might increase my chances in the future or areas you would like me to improve?” This not only shows that I am open to growth but also keeps the conversation positive and forward-thinking.

In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. In your response to your peers, you might offer some additional insights about their examples.

Peer Response

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the COM 205 discussion posts. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the following points in mind.

• When responding to peers, your feedback should be constructive and supportive. 
• Offer insights that might help them refine their approach or consider aspects they might have overlooked. 
• Keep your response concise and focused on providing value.

Response 01

Hey Sara, great approach! I like how you’ve used assertiveness and evidence-based justification. One suggestion: Consider discussing the timing of your request, such as during performance reviews or after successful project completions, as it might further strengthen your case by aligning with the company’s appraisal cycle.

Response 02

We are supposed to write two peer responses. I have addressed the given instructions in one response. Following these instructions, you can write your peer responses to the 8-1 Discussion without a hassle.

Closing

Mastering effective communication techniques is essential for professional success, especially when making requests that can significantly impact your career. By understanding and applying these strategies, you can enhance your interactions within the workplace and respond gracefully to any outcome. Remember, each communication is an opportunity to reinforce your professionalism and dedication.

Precap

For the next assignment, we will make the Speech Project Draft – Part II. In the COM 205 Week 8 Assignment, we will do a peer review for the speech project part I, and then we will write a draft of our speech using the research we found in previous assignments

COM 205 WEEK 8 Assignment: Speech Project Draft – Part II

Instructions for COM 205 Week 8 Assignment

Overview

In this assignment, you will do a peer review for the speech project part I, and then you will write a draft of your speech using the research you found in previous assignments. You will analyze the audience, select the appropriate pattern of organization, and develop an effective speech introduction and conclusion.

Assignment Details

Perform the following tasks:

• Complete Speech Project Part I peer review by Wednesday (you can view a peer review notification in your Dashboard To Do sidebar).
• Complete the reading assignment and the interactive lecture before attempting this assignment.
• Write a 450-to 500-word draft of a persuasive speech.
• To complete the assignment:
  • Organize your speech similar to this order:
    • An introduction that grabs attention
    • Argument 1
    • Argument 2
    • Argument 3
    • Conclusion that seals the persuasive intent
  • Use this structure (or one similar) to create an outline that details the persuasive arguments or evidence from your research that you will use.
  • Develop your draft:
    • Create the introduction, something that will grab the audience's attention. This could be a startling statistic or a quick personal story of success.
      • Use your e-textbook and the lecture for guidance.
    • Write a conclusion that ties back to the introduction and brings resolution to the arguments presented in favor of your goal.
  • Put all of these pieces together with some transitions that make the speech flow.
  • Read the speech aloud; try it out on friends or family to get feedback for areas that you are struggling with completing.
  • Time your speech. It should be about 3 to 5 minutes in length.
  • Use the plagiarism tool to check your written draft against unintended plagiarism.
  • Spell check your summary.
• Use the proper naming convention when saving your assignment:
  • COM205_wk8_assn_jsmith_mmddyyy
• Submit your assignment for peer review by Sunday.
• Once a peer review has been assigned, you can view a notification in your Dashboard To Do sidebar.
• Conduct a peer review and provide constructive feedback. Your peer review is due on Wednesday (in Week 10).

Recap

In last week’s discussion, we explored Effective Group Communication. We discussed the importance of effective group communication. We also suggested strategies a group could employ to overcome these difficulties and agree on a verdict.

Introduction to COM 205 Week 8 Assignment

The COM 205 Week 8 Assignment: Speech Project Draft – Part II involves crafting a persuasive speech using research gathered from previous activities. You will analyse your audience, choose an effective organisational pattern, and draft a speech that captures attention and persuasively argues your case. This How-To COM 205 Guide aims to refine your ability to influence and engage an audience through well-structured arguments and compelling narratives.

Drafting the Speech

To start the COM 205 Week 8 Assignment: Speech Project Draft – Part II, we will revisit the research and notes from previous assignments. Ensure you fully grasp the key points and evidence supporting your arguments.

• Crafting the Introduction: Create an engaging opening that introduces the topic while hooking the audience. Use emotional or intriguing hooks to ensure the audience is invested. Plan an introduction that captures attention immediately. This could be a surprising statistic, a relevant quote, or a brief anecdote that sets the stage for your topic.

• Developing the Body: Construct each argument clearly and concisely. Use data, quotations, or narratives to substantiate your claims. Ensure each argument flows logically to the next, maintaining coherence and focus. Outline three main arguments for your speech. Each should be distinct and support your thesis with evidence from your research.
• Writing the Conclusion: Summarize the main points and restate the significance of your argument. Ensure the conclusion provides closure and reinforces your call to action or persuasive intent. Design your conclusion to reinforce your persuasive intent and tie back to the elements introduced at the beginning.

Example

Have you ever been ridiculed or singled out because of your race? Imagine living every day where such experiences are not just isolated incidents but systematic expectations. Today, I will talk about racial discrimination—a persistent poison in the fabric of our society that not only divides us but also hinders our collective progress. Argument 1: Systemic Racial Inequalities. First, consider the vast economic disparities the U.S. Department of the Treasury highlighted. It reveals how policies continue to segregate communities and perpetuate poverty among minorities. This isn’t just history; it’s our present, a glaring testament to racial injustice that demands urgent reform. Argument 2: Labor Market Disparities. Secondly, the Economic Policy Institute sheds light on the labour market outcomes between Black and White Americans. Despite equal capabilities, Black Americans face significant obstacles in hiring, pay, and promotion. This inequality is not just unfair; it’s economically and socially debilitating. Argument 3: The Need for Informed Action and Policy Change. Finally, understanding these issues compels us to act. We need policies that address these disparities head-on, ensuring that all citizens, regardless of race, have equal opportunities to succeed. In conclusion, racial discrimination is not a relic of the past but a vivid reality of the present. It affects all aspects of society, from economics to personal interactions. As we have explored today, the road to justice requires more than passive acknowledgement—it demands active reform and participation. Let’s commit to being part of the solution, for in the fight against racial discrimination, neutrality is not an option.

Final Adjustments

• Final Review: Review your speech to ensure all components are polished. Check for logical flow, coherence, and the effectiveness of your persuasive elements.
• Practice Delivery: Rehearse your speech multiple times to gain confidence and adjust pacing, tone, and gestures to enhance delivery.

Closing

By following this How-To Owlisdom Guide structured approach to drafting your persuasive speech, you will develop a compelling argument that effectively communicates your perspective and engages your audience. The COM 205 Week 8 Assignment: Speech Project Draft – Part II enhances your writing skills and ability to think critically and argue persuasively. Remember, the key to a successful persuasive speech is a transparent organisation, strong evidence, and passionate delivery.

COM 205 Week 9 Discussion: Communication in the Digital Age

Instructions for COM 205 Week 9 Discussion

Overview

Due: Post your initial response by Wednesday at 11:59 pm Pacific Time.

Respond to at least two of your fellow students’ posts by Sunday at 11:59 pm Pacific Time.

Communication in the Digital Age

Explain what are some of the significant differences between face-to-face communication and communication by way of digital technology (e.g., email, texting, the Internet, social media)? To be successful in today’s business environment, which model do you believe requires the greatest degree of mastery? Explain. Which model are you most comfortable with and why?

Response Posts: In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. In your responses to your peers, you might elaborate upon some of the pros and cons of both types of communication. Consider sharing some difficult experiences you have had communicating both face-to-face and via some form of technology. How might your communication efforts have been improved? What would the interaction have looked like had you used the opposite model?

Select Reply to join the discussion. For grading details, select the three dots above [] to see the rubric.

Recap

The previous week focused on the discussion of Professional Communication. We also solved the assignment for Week 8, in which we explored the second part of the speech project draft.

Introduction to COM 205 Week 9 Discussion

This How-To Owlisdom Guide provides instructions for approaching an assignment that compares face-to-face communication with digital communication methods such as email, texting, and social media. The COM 205 Week 9 Discussion: Communication in the Digital Age will explore which communication model is critical to master in today’s business environment and which model students are most comfortable with.

Explain some of the significant differences between face-to-face communication and communication via digital technology (e.g., email, texting, the Internet, and social media).

Differences Between Face-to-Face and Digital Communication

To start the COM 205 Week 9 Discussion: Communication in the Digital Age, we will explore the difference between face-to-face and digital modes of communication.

In the COM 205 Week 9 Discussion: Communication in the Digital Age, we dive into the intriguing contrasts between face-to-face and digital communication models, the importance of mastering these models in today’s fast-paced business environment, and our comfort with each model.

• Start by defining both communication models.
• List and explain the significant differences, such as the immediacy of feedback, emotional expression, and convenience.
• Use examples to illustrate these differences. Keep descriptions concise and focused.

Example

Face-to-face communication refers to interactions that occur in person, allowing for immediate feedback and rich non-verbal cues such as body language and facial expressions. In contrast, digital communication encompasses various forms of interaction through technology, including emails, texting, internet forums, and social media, which do not require physical presence and often lack the immediacy of feedback and richness of non-verbal cues.

One significant difference between these models is the immediacy of feedback. In face-to-face conversations, responses are instant, and misunderstandings can be clarified immediately. For instance, during a business meeting, if a point is not clear, it can immediately be addressed, facilitating more dynamic and engaging discussions. On the other hand, digital communication often involves a delay. An email might sit unread for hours or days, delaying responses and potentially leading to bottlenecks in decision-making processes.

Another difference lies in the expression of emotions. Face-to-face communication allows for a fuller emotional expression through gestures, tone of voice, and facial expressions, crucial for building trust and empathy. For example, a comforting smile or a reassuring pat on the back can be profoundly impactful during sensitive discussions. Digital communication, while versatile and convenient, often strips away these layers of emotional context, making it challenging to convey empathy and may lead to misunderstandings.

To be successful in today’s business environment, which model do you believe requires the most significant degree of mastery? Explain.

Importance of Mastery in the Modern Business Environment

Next, we will discuss the importance of mastery of communication models in a business environment.

• Explain why mastering these communication models is essential.
• Argue which model is more crucial for success in modern businesses. Support your choice with reasons.
• Provide clear criteria for evaluation, such as the speed of business operations and the global reach of digital platforms.

Example

Mastering both communication models is essential for success in today’s business environment. However, the digital communication model demands a greater degree of mastery due to its complexity and the critical role it plays in modern businesses. Given the speed of business operations and the global reach of digital platforms, communicating effectively via digital means is crucial. For example, companies operate across different time zones and rely on digital tools to collaborate. A well-crafted email or a clear and concise project update shared on a digital platform can significantly impact the efficiency and clarity of business operations.

Which model are you most comfortable with and why?

Personal Comfort with Communication Models

For this segment of the COM 205 Week 9 Discussion: Communication in the Digital Age, we will explore our comfort with the model of communication selected.

• Reflect on your personal experience with both models.
• Discuss which model you find more comfortable and why.
• Use personal anecdotes to support your preferences, ensuring they are relevant and brief.

Example

Reflecting on my personal experiences, I am more comfortable with digital communication due to its convenience and flexibility. My role in a multinational company requires frequent interaction with colleagues across the globe, where arranging face-to-face meetings is often impractical. The ability to communicate effectively through digital means—detailed emails, structured instant messages, or comprehensive virtual presentations—has been instrumental in maintaining smooth operations and building strong professional relationships despite geographical distances.

While face-to-face communication has unique advantages in fostering personal connections and facilitating immediate feedback, mastering digital communication is indispensable in today’s digitally interconnected business landscape. My preference for digital communication stems from necessity, efficiency, and broad scope, aligning well with the demands of modern professional environments.

In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. In your responses to your peers, you might elaborate upon some of the pros and cons of both types of communication. Consider sharing some difficult experiences you have had communicating face-to-face and via technology. How might your communication efforts have been improved? What would the interaction have looked like had you used the opposite model?

Peer Responses

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the COM 205 discussion posts. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the following points in mind.

• Engage with at least two peers’ posts.
• Expand their views by discussing the pros and cons of each communication type.
• Keep responses constructive and polite. 
• Aim to add value to the discussion by introducing new perspectives or reinforcing good points.

Response 01

Hey Max, great post! Excellent points on the nuances between face-to-face and digital communication! I have noticed that while digital tools offer unmatched convenience, they sometimes lead to misunderstandings due to the absence of non-verbal cues. For instance, a crucial project update via email once got misinterpreted, causing unnecessary delays. Had it been conveyed in a face-to-face meeting, immediate clarification could have prevented the confusion, underscoring the importance of choosing the correct communication method for the context.

Response 02

According to the COM 205 Week 9 Discussion: Communication in the Digital Age instructions, we are supposed to write two peer responses. I have addressed the given instructions in one response. Following these instructions, you can write your peer responses to the Week 9 Discussion without a hassle.

Closing

The COM 205 Week 9 Discussion: Communication in the Digital Age encourages a deep dive into the nuances of different communication models, highlighting their applications and challenges in both personal and professional contexts. Mastery of face-to-face and digital communication is crucial, but reflecting on personal comfort and experiences can provide valuable insights into individual communication strengths and areas for improvement.

Precap

Next week, we will discuss speech planning. We will explore the importance of planning and preparing the delivery of a speech. We will also discuss the obstacles we may have faced and how we overcame those obstacles. 

COM 205 WEEK 10 DISCUSSION: Speech Planning

Instructions of COM 205 Week 10 Discussion

Overview

Due: Post your initial response by Wednesday night at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Time.

Respond to at least two of your fellow students’ posts by Sunday night at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Time.

Speech Planning

While you still have a week to go before you deliver your final speech, this week, describe the process you have followed so far in developing your speech. Why is it important to plan and prepare the delivery of a speech? Identify any obstacles you may have faced and how you overcame those obstacles. What can you do to set your speech apart from those of your peers?

Response Posts: In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. In your response to your peers, you might offer some additional insights about their examples.

Step-By-Step Guide COM 205 Week 10 Discussion: Speech Planning

Recap

Previously, we discussed Communication in the Digital Age. We explored the significant differences between face-to-face and communication through digital technology. We also discussed how to be successful in today’s business environment, which model we believe requires the most significant degree of mastery. 

Introduction to COM 205 Week 10 Discussion

This How-To Guide is designed to assist you in crafting a reflective post about your speech preparation process for your COM 205 final assignment. You will explore the importance of meticulous planning, discuss challenges, and consider strategies to make your speech stand out. Additionally, guidelines for responding constructively to peers are included to enrich your learning experience.

Why is it essential to plan and prepare the delivery of a speech?

Importance of Planning and Preparation

To start the COM 205 Week 10 Discussion: Speech Planning, we will explain the importance of planning and preparation for speech communication.

• Outline your initial steps in the speech preparation process, emphasizing the value of a structured approach.
• Discuss how thorough planning contributes to a more confident and effective delivery.

Example

The cornerstone of any successful speech is its planning and preparation phase. Starting with a structured approach, I outlined the main points I wanted to cover, ensuring a logical flow from the introduction to the conclusion. This initial mapping clarified my thoughts and helped me allocate appropriate time for each segment, preventing any last-minute rushes that could compromise the quality of my presentation. Thorough planning significantly boosts confidence. Knowing precisely what and how you will say it alleviates much of the anxiety associated with public speaking. For instance, I refined my delivery by rehearsing various parts of my speech multiple times, making it more confident and effective. This preparation also allowed room for flexibility, as I was well-acquainted with the material and could easily adjust to time constraints or audience reactions during the presentation.

Identify any obstacles you may have faced and how you overcame those obstacles.

Identifying and Overcoming Obstacles

Next, we will discuss identifying and overcoming obstacles during communication. 

• Reflect on any challenges you faced during the speech preparation.
• Describe specific strategies you used to address these challenges.

Example

One major obstacle I faced throughout the preparation process was finding the right balance between providing information and engaging the audience. Initially, my speech was too dense with facts, which could potentially disengage listeners. To overcome this, I incorporated stories and relevant examples that made the content more relatable and memorable. Additionally, practicing in front of a small audience provided me with real-time feedback, helping me gauge and adjust the pacing and tone of my speech accordingly. Another challenge was dealing with technology. Reliance on multimedia elements like slides and videos introduced a risk of technical issues. I mitigated this by ensuring all equipment was tested beforehand and preparing a backup plan in case of technical failures. This proactive approach prevented potential disruptions during the speech.

What can you do to set your speech apart from your peers?

Differentiating Your Speech

Now, for this segment of the COM 205 Week 10 Discussion: Speech Planning, we will discuss how our speech differs from our peers.

• Consider what unique angles or elements you can incorporate to make your speech stand out.
• Suggest incorporating personal stories, advanced presentation aids, or interactive elements to engage your audience more effectively.
• Example: Share how using a particular visual aid or a unique rhetorical question made your speech more memorable.

Example

I focused on integrating unique elements that would resonate with the audience to set my speech apart. I chose to incorporate a compelling personal anecdote that aligned with the central theme of the speech, providing a human element that textbooks or quotations could not. Additionally, I used high-quality visual aids to illustrate key points and posed rhetorical questions to provoke thought and encourage audience interaction. An example of a memorable element was using a short, impactful video clip that emphasized the speech’s central message. This captured the audience’s attention and reinforced the content, making the speech more effective and engaging. In conclusion, effective speech preparation involves meticulous planning, overcoming potential obstacles with strategic solutions, and employing unique elements to distinguish your presentation. By addressing these areas diligently, one can enhance both the delivery and impact of their speech, ensuring it is influential and memorable.

In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. You might offer additional insights about their examples in your response to your peers.

Peer Responses

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the COM 205 Week 10 Discussion: Speech Planning. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the following points in mind.

• Provide constructive feedback that builds on their ideas.
• Offer additional insights or personal experiences related to the challenges or strategies they’ve discussed.
• Keep your response supportive and focused, aiming to enhance the collaborative learning environment.

Response 01

Hey Jules, great post! Your focus on the balance between information and engagement is spot-on! I faced a similar challenge and found that integrating relevant questions throughout the speech helped maintain audience interest. Your strategy of using a backup plan for technical issues is invaluable, too—it saved my presentation once when a video failed to play. It is great to see such proactive measures in place. Your approach adds depth and reliability to any presentation.

Response 02

We are supposed to write two peer responses. I have addressed the given instructions in one response. Following these instructions, you can write your peer responses to the Week 10 Discussion without a hassle.

Closing

In preparing for your final speech, recognizing the significance of thorough planning, overcoming personal barriers, and finding ways to distinguish your presentation are crucial steps toward success. This reflective process enhances your current project and contributes to your communication growth. Engaging thoughtfully with peers further enriches your understanding and contributes to your learning community.

Precap

Next week, we will explore Politics and Persuasive Speech. We will discuss some of the past campaign speeches you may have heard.

COM 205 Week 10 Assignment: Speech Project Final – Part III

Instructions for COM 205 Week 10 Assignment

Overview

In this assignment, you will revise your speech using feedback from your peer and the instructor. You will analyze the cultural impact of your speech on the audience and make any adjustments necessary for intercultural communication.

Assignment Details

Perform the following tasks:

• Complete Speech Project Draft Part II peer review by Wednesday (you can view a peer review notification in your Dashboard To Do sidebar).
• Complete the reading assignment and the interactive lecture before attempting this assignment
• To complete the assignment:
  • Use the feedback from the peer review and instructor, make any necessary changes, and finalize your 450-to 500-word persuasive speech.
  • Read your speech aloud, noting anything that doesn’t flow. Make changes for fluency.
  • Consider your topic and whether there are any cultural issues that need to be addressed.
    • For example, if you use a slang term that the audience may not understand, find a way to phrase the information so you can be interculturally appropriate.
  • Time your speech. It should be about 3 to 5 minutes in length.
  • Use the plagiarism tool to check your written draft against unintended plagiarism.
  • Spell check your summary.
• Use the proper naming convention when saving your assignment:
  • COM205_wk10_assn_jsmith_mmddyyy
• Submit your assignment.

Download the Assignment Worksheet. Download Assignment Worksheetfor complete instructions. Be sure to start working on this now so that you can work through any questions with your instructor well ahead of the due date.

Recap

Previously, we explored Communication in the Digital Age. We discussed significant differences between face-to-face communication and communication by way of digital technology. 

Introduction to COM 205 Week 10 Assignment 

In the COM 205 Week 10 Assignment: Speech Project Final – Part III, you are tasked with refining your persuasive speech by incorporating feedback from both peers and your instructor. The goal is to enhance the effectiveness of your communication, particularly considering the cultural diversity of your audience. This How-To Owlisdom Guide will help you develop a keen eye for both content and audience engagement in intercultural settings.

Completing Peer and Instructor Feedback

For the COM 205 Week 10 Assignment: Speech Project Final – Part III, we need to incorporate the corrections and feedback our instructor or peers marked on the Persuasive passage draft two. I will provide detailed guidelines on how to incorporate the feedback while giving examples from my Draft II. At the end of this How-To Guide, you will be provided with a revised version of the COM 205 Speech Project Passage.

• Check your dashboard regularly to access and complete the peer review by the specified Wednesday deadline.
• Carefully consider the feedback provided by your peers and instructor. Note areas for improvement and strengths as highlighted.

Revising the Speech

• Utilising Feedback: Incorporate the feedback from your peers and instructor into your speech. Focus on areas that were specifically pointed out for improvement, such as argument clarity, persuasive elements, and language use.
• Enhancing Fluency: Read your speech aloud to identify parts that may not flow well. Listening to the rhythm and pace can help you spot inconsistencies and awkward phrasing.
• Addressing Cultural Sensitivity: Analyze your speech for any cultural references or slang that a diverse audience might not understand. Replace or explain such terms to maintain clarity and respect for all cultural backgrounds.

Example

Old Solution: It does not give an explanation of our stance, and there is no source to what we stated. Argument 1: Systemic Racial Inequalities. First, consider the vast economic disparities the U.S. Department of the Treasury highlighted. It reveals how policies continue to segregate communities and perpetuate poverty among minorities. This is not just history; it is our present, a glaring testament to racial injustice that demands urgent reform. Updated Solution: Provide an explained justification along with the source to prove our stance. Argument 01: Systemic Racial Inequalities. First, let us consider the vast economic disparities highlighted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury (U.S. Department of the Treasury, 2022). Their reports reveal that discriminatory policies continue to segregate communities and perpetuate poverty among minorities. These are not remnants of a distant past but are stark realities of our present. For instance, housing policies that enforce segregation indirectly by economic means, such as redlining or unequal housing loans, have long-lasting impacts on minority communities. This systemic injustice extends beyond mere economic metrics; it is a glaring testament to the deeply entrenched racial barriers that demand urgent, comprehensive reform.

Final Review and Submission

• After revisions, review your speech one last time to ensure it adheres to the word limit and effectively incorporates all necessary adjustments.
• Ensure that your final draft is clear, culturally sensitive, and maintains a persuasive tone throughout.

Final Updated Solution

Introduction: Have you ever been ridiculed or singled out because of your race? Imagine living every day where such experiences are not just isolated incidents but systematic expectations. Today, I will delve into the issue of racial discrimination—a persistent poison that seeps into the fabric of our society. This pervasive issue not only divides us but also significantly hinders our collective progress toward a more equitable world. Argument 01: Systemic Racial Inequalities First, let us consider the vast economic disparities highlighted by the U.S. Department of the Treasury (U.S. Department of the Treasury, 2022). Their reports reveal that discriminatory policies continue to segregate communities and perpetuate poverty among minorities. These are not remnants of a distant past but are stark realities of our present. For instance, housing policies that enforce segregation indirectly by economic means, such as redlining or unequal housing loans, have long-lasting impacts on minority communities. This systemic injustice extends beyond mere economic metrics; it is a glaring testament to the deeply entrenched racial barriers that demand urgent, comprehensive reform. Argument 02: Labor Market Disparities Moving on, the Economic Policy Institute provides crucial insights into the labour market outcomes between Black and White Americans (Wilson, 2022). Despite possessing equal capabilities and qualifications, Black Americans consistently face significant obstacles in hiring, pay scales, and promotional opportunities. This disparity is not merely unfair—it is economically and socially debilitating, perpetuating a cycle of poverty and exclusion. These labour market biases reflect broader societal attitudes and necessitate a shift towards more inclusive employment practices that value skills and talents over racial background. Argument 03: The Need for Informed Action and Policy Change. Understanding the depth and breadth of these issues compels us to take informed action. It is essential to implement policies that directly confront these disparities, ensuring that all citizens, regardless of their racial background, have equal opportunities to succeed (Delgado & Stefancic, 2020). This includes revising employment laws to enforce and enhance equal opportunity measures, investing in educational reforms that equip all children with the skills needed to thrive, and transforming the housing policies that have historically disadvantaged minority populations. Conclusion In conclusion, racial discrimination remains a stark and pervasive reality in our society, affecting everything from economic opportunities to personal relationships. Our exploration today underscores that rectifying these injustices is far from simple; it requires a committed, multifaceted approach. We must implement proactive reforms in employment, education, and housing policies to ensure equitable opportunities for all, regardless of racial background. Each of us bears the responsibility to engage in this fight against discrimination—passivity only reinforces the status quo. As we move forward, let us pledge to actively participate in shaping a more just and inclusive society. The challenge is great, but our collective action can drive the significant changes necessary to dismantle the systemic barriers that perpetuate racial inequalities.

Closing

The COM 205 Week 10 Assignment: Speech Project Final – Part III not only sharpens your persuasive speaking skills but also deepens your understanding of intercultural communication. By carefully revising your speech to reflect diverse cultural perspectives, you enhance your ability to engage and influence a broader audience effectively. This How-To Owlisdom Guide is the key to a successful speech, not just in the strength of your arguments but also in how inclusively and respectfully those arguments are presented.

References

Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2020). Against Equality: A Critical Essay for the NAACP and Others. Hastings Const. LQ, 48, 235. U.S. Department of the Treasury. (2022). Racial Inequality in the United States. U.S. Department of the Treasury. https://home.treasury.gov/news/featured-stories/racial-inequality-in-the-united-states Wilson, V. (2022). Understanding black-white disparities in labour market outcomes requires models that account for persistent discrimination and unequal bargaining power. Economic Policy Institute. https://www.epi.org/unequalpower/publications/understanding-black-white-disparities-in-labor-market-outcomes/

COM 205 WEEK 11 DISCUSSION: Politics and Persuasive Speech

Instructions for COM 205 Week 11

Overview

Due: Post your initial response by Wednesday at 11:59 pm Pacific Time.

Respond to at least two of your fellow students’ posts by Sunday night at 11:59 pm Pacific Time.

Politics and Persuasive Speech

For a politician to be successful and gain reelection, he or she must convince you – the voter – of his or her values. Campaign speeches are the candidates’ attempts to persuade you to vote for them. Recall some of the campaign speeches you may have heard in the past (or look online for different campaign speeches from various candidates). Are these speeches persuasive? Explain. Based on your readings, how do the speeches agree or disagree with what the text presents as characteristics of successful persuasive speeches?

Response Posts: In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. In your responses to your peers, discuss the persuasive elements described in your peers’ posts. Do you agree with their assessments? Why or why not?

Recap

In the previous Discussion of Week 10, we explored how to plan speech communication and described the process we followed in developing our speech. We also explored why it is vital to plan and prepare the delivery of a speech.

Introduction to COM 205 Week 11 Discussion

This How-To Owlisdom Guide will help you critically analyse campaign speeches from various politicians to determine their effectiveness in persuading voters. You will recall or research speeches you have heard online, evaluate their persuasive elements, and compare them to the characteristics of successful persuasive speeches outlined in your readings.

Recall some of the campaign speeches you may have heard in the past (or look online for different campaign speeches from various candidates)

Recall and Select Campaign Speeches

To start the COM 205 Week 11 Discussion: Politics and Persuasive Speech, we will recall and explain some of the campaign speeches we may have heard before.

• Start by recalling any campaign speeches you have listened to in the past or search online for speeches by various candidates. 
• Choose at least two for a comparative analysis.

Example

I revisited two notable campaign speeches: President Obama’s victory speech (2012) and Senator Elizabeth Warren’s speech in New York (2019). Each speech, delivered in very different contexts and political climates, provided a rich basis for comparative analysis. Obama’s speech, known for its uplifting and unifying rhetoric, and Warren’s, recognised for its focus on policy and reform, offer distinct approaches to campaign oratory.

Are these speeches persuasive? Explain.

Assess the Persuasiveness of the Speeches

Next, we will explain whether the speeches we selected above were persuasive.

• Analyse each speech to determine if it is persuasive. 
• Consider elements such as the clarity of the message, the speaker’s credibility, emotional appeal, and the logical structure of the arguments.

Example

Analysing the persuasiveness of these speeches, several elements stood out:

Clarity of Message – Obama’s speech was clear with his message of hope and change, effectively communicated through a simple yet powerful narrative. Warren’s speech, while more complex, clearly outlined her policy priorities and vision for change, making it accessible to a broad audience.

Speaker’s Credibility – Both speakers established their credibility: Obama through his demeanour and previous achievements, and Warren through her law expertise and detailed policy knowledge.

Emotional Appeal – Emotional appeal was strong in Obama’s speech, resonating with themes of hope and collective effort. Warren’s speech appealed to a sense of urgency and justice concerning social and economic reform.

Logical Structure – Obama’s speech followed a logical structure that highlighted his journey and vision, making it easy to follow. Warren used a problem-solving structure that effectively laid out the issues and her plans to address them.

Based on your readings, how do the speeches agree or disagree with what the text presents as characteristics of successful persuasive speeches?

Compare Speech Characteristics with Textbook Criteria

This section of the COM 205 Week 11 Discussion: Politics and Persuasive Speech explores whether the speeches agree or disagree with the characteristics of a successful persuasive speech.

• Refer to your course materials or textbooks to identify the characteristics of effective persuasive speeches.
• Compare and contrast these academic criteria with the elements used in your analysed speeches. 
• Discuss any discrepancies or alignments.

Example

According to our textbook, effective persuasive speeches should embody clarity, credibility, emotion, and logic—the pillars of persuasion (ethos, pathos, logos). Both speeches aligned well with these criteria:

Ethos (Credibility): Both speakers’ backgrounds and demeanour bolstered their ethos.

Pathos (Emotional Appeal): Each speaker adeptly connects emotionally with their audience through different appeals.

Logos (Logical Structure): Their arguments’ clear and logical flow helped consolidate their messages and facilitate audience understanding.

However, discrepancies arose in the intensity of pathos used. Obama’s speech was more emotionally charged than Warren’s, which focused more on logos with detailed policy discussions. This difference illustrates a strategic use of rhetorical elements tailored to their audience and campaign goals.

In conclusion, both speeches exemplify how different rhetorical strategies can be effectively employed in campaign speeches. The analysis reaffirms the principles outlined in our textbooks and provides a nuanced understanding of how context and audience can influence the strategic deployment of persuasive techniques.

In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. Discuss the persuasive elements described in your peers’ posts in your responses to your peers. Do you agree with their assessments? Why or why not?

Peer Responses

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the COM 205 Week 11 Discussion: Politics and Persuasive Speech. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the following points in mind.

• Review the persuasive elements they have discussed in their posts.
• Constructively agree or disagree with their assessments. If you disagree, provide reasons and possibly suggest an alternative perspective.
• Keep your responses focused and supportive, aiming to enrich the discussion and understanding of persuasive speech effectiveness.

Response 01

I appreciate your detailed analysis of Obama’s and Warren’s speeches, particularly your breakdown of rhetorical strategies. Your points on their use of ethos and pathos resonate well with what we’ve learned about the pillars of persuasion. However, I wonder if considering the audience’s expectations might also affect the emotional intensity of each speech. For instance, Warren’s focus on policy might have been a strategic choice to cater to an audience seeking substantive plans rather than emotional engagement. It’s an interesting angle to consider how audience expectations shape rhetorical approaches.

Response 02

According to the instructions of the COM 205 Week 11 Discussion: Politics and Persuasive Speech, we are supposed to write two peer responses. I have addressed the given instructions in one response. Following these instructions, you can write your peer responses to the Week 11 Discussion without a hassle.

Closing

Understanding the dynamics of persuasive speeches in political campaigns is crucial for analysing political communication. By comparing real-life speeches to theoretical characteristics, you deepen your understanding of what makes a speech compelling. The COM 205 Week 11 Discussion: Politics and Persuasive Speech enhances your analytical skills and prepares you to be a more informed voter or communicator in political contexts.

Precap

In the upcoming last week of the COM 205 Course, we will discuss the Reflection of the whole course. Based on all that we have learned thus far, we will explore how human communication will evolve in the future.

References

The Guardian. (2012, November 7). Barack Obama’s victory speech – full text. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/nov/07/barack-obama-speech-full-text

Warren. (2019). Elizabeth Warren Speaks in New York City. https://2020.elizabethwarren.com/nyc-speech

COM 205 Week 12 Discussion: Reflection

Instructions for COM 205 Week 12 Discussion

Overview 

Due: Post your initial response by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Time.

Respond to at least two of your fellow students’ posts by Friday at 11:59 p.m. Pacific Time.

Reflection

Throughout the previous eleven weeks, it is hoped you have gained an appreciation for the complexities of human communications. Though in some ways simplifying communication, technology has also added to those complexities. Based on all that you have learned thus far, how do you think human communication will evolve in the future? Do you predict an improvement in the ways we communicate with each other? Or do you see greater communication breakdowns occurring in the future? Explain.

Response Posts

 In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. In your responses to your peers, discuss the persuasive elements described in your peers’ posts. Do you agree with their assessments? Why or why not?

Recap

Previously, we discussed Politics and Persuasive Speech. We chose some of the past campaign speeches we may have heard. Based on our readings, we explained how the speeches agree or disagree with what the text presents as characteristics of successful persuasive speeches.

Introduction to COM 205 Week 12 Discussion

This How-To COM 205 Guide is intended to help you reflect on the evolution of human communication as influenced by technology, a topic you have explored over the past eleven weeks. The COM 205 Week 12 Discussion: Reflection encourages you to synthesize your learning and anticipate future trends in communication. You will analyze whether these trends might lead to improvements or further complications in how we connect.

Based on all you have learned thus far, how do you think human communication will evolve?

Reflect on the Impact of Technology

To start the COM 205 Week 12 Discussion: Reflection, we will analyze the impact of technology on communication.

• Consider how technology has simplified certain aspects of communication, such as speed and accessibility.
• Discuss how it has introduced new challenges, like digital miscommunication or information overload.

Example

Technology has dramatically transformed communication, primarily enhancing its speed and accessibility. Emails, instant messaging, and social platforms allow us to connect across global divides in real-time, a feat that was unfathomable just a few decades ago. This immediacy and ease of access have democratized information dissemination and connectivity, empowering voices from various socio-economic backgrounds. However, these advancements are not without their pitfalls. Digital communication often lacks the nuanced emotional context of face-to-face interactions, leading to frequent miscommunications. Moreover, the sheer volume of information available can overwhelm individuals, leading to what is commonly known as information overload. This environment makes it challenging to discern critical information from trivial updates, potentially diluting meaningful communication.

Do you predict an improvement in the ways we communicate with each other?

Predict Future Changes in Communication

Next, we will discuss the prediction of future changes in the modes of communication.

• Based on current trends and your learning, predict how human communication might evolve in the next decade.
• Consider technological advancements, such as AI and virtual reality, and their potential to reshape communication practices.

Example

Looking ahead, the evolution of communication seems poised to accelerate with advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and virtual reality (VR). AI promises to refine how we interact with machines and each other, potentially offering more personalized and context-aware communication tools. For instance, AI-driven algorithms could tailor communication styles to individual preferences, enhancing understanding and engagement. Virtual reality could take remote communication to new heights by providing immersive environments where people can interact as if they were physically present with one another. This technology can potentially add back some of the emotional and physical nuances often lost in current digital communications.

Or do you see more excellent communication breakdowns occurring in the future? Explain.

Anticipate Potential Improvements or Breakdowns

For this section of the COM 205 Week 12 Discussion: Reflection, we will explore potential improvements or breakdowns in future modes of communication.

• Will these technological advancements enhance our communication capabilities (e.g., by improving accessibility or fostering global connections) or lead to more significant misunderstandings and isolation?
• Provide reasons for your predictions, possibly drawing on academic theories or historical trends in technology adoption.

Example

With these technologies, we stand at a crossroads that could lead to profound improvements in communication or significant breakdowns. On the one hand, enhanced accessibility and new immersive experiences could foster global connections, breaking down previous barriers imposed by geography. On the other hand, relying on sophisticated technologies could exacerbate the digital divide and lead to more isolation and misunderstanding, especially among populations with limited technological access or literacy. Moreover, integrating AI and VR in communication processes must be navigated carefully to avoid issues like the erosion of privacy and the potential manipulation of realistic simulations that could mislead or harm users. In conclusion, while technology presents clear opportunities for enhancing communication, it also poses significant challenges that must be addressed to prevent new barriers from arising. The future of communication will likely depend on our ability to balance these innovations with thoughtful regulation and an emphasis on maintaining and enhancing human connection.

In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. In your responses to your peers, discuss the persuasive elements described in your peers’ posts. Do you agree with their assessments? Why or why not?

Peer Responses

Responding to peers is one of the most essential parts of the COM 205 Week 12 Discussion: Reflection. You can write the peer responses by following the sample response I am providing.

• Review the future communication trends they predict.

• Constructively agree or disagree with their assessments, providing insights or alternative perspectives.
• Maintain a supportive tone, focusing on enriching the discussion and understanding the diverse viewpoints on the evolution of communication.

Response 01

Hey Max, nice post! I appreciate your insightful analysis of how AI and VR could enhance our communication by adding some nuances currently missing in digital interactions. Your point about these technologies potentially deepening the digital divide is particularly thought-provoking. While I agree with your optimistic view on technological advancements, I’m concerned about privacy and ethical implications, which could lead to significant communication breakdowns if not appropriately managed. It’s crucial to consider how to safeguard against these risks while embracing new communication technologies.

Response 02

We are supposed to write two peer responses. I have addressed the given instructions in one response. Following these instructions, you can write your peer responses to the Week 12 Discussion without a hassle.

Closing

As we conclude this exploration of communication’s evolution influenced by technology, it’s clear that the future holds both promising advancements and potential challenges. By critically analyzing these trends, you equip yourself to navigate the changing landscape of human interaction more effectively. The COM 205 Week 12 Discussion: Reflection reflects your understanding and prepares you to engage thoughtfully in the ongoing dialogue about the role of technology in our lives.

COM 205 Week 12 Assignment: Speech Project – Speech Delivery

Instructions for COM 205 Week 12 Assignment

Overview

In this assignment, you will deliver your speech through your computer’s webcam, smartphone, or other technology that produces the deliverable file format.

Assignment Details:

Perform the following tasks:

• Complete the reading assignment and the interactive lecture before attempting this assignment
• To complete the assignment:
  • Use the feedback from your instructor provided after turning in your final speech last week.
  • Use the Week 12 lecture as a guide for putting the final touches on your speech for presentation.
  • Review the directions on using your webcam to record the speech in the recording details.
    • The instructions for recording and submitting videos can be found in the Student Resources area.
  • Record your speech using your webcam.
• Use the proper naming convention when saving your assignment:
  • COM205_wk12_assn_jsmith_mmddyyy
• Submit your assignment.

Download the Assignment Worksheet. Download the Assignment Worksheet for complete instructions. 

Recap

Week 11 of COM 205 discussed Politics and Persuasive Speech. We explored some of the past campaign speeches we may have heard (or looked online for different campaign speeches from various candidates) and explained whether these speeches were persuasive.

Introduction to COM 205 Week 12 Assignment

In the COM 205 Week 12 Assignment: Speech Project – Speech Delivery, you are tasked with delivering a polished speech using a webcam or similar technology. This will test your oratory skills and ability to effectively integrate technology into your communication practices. Following this How-To COM 205 Guide will ensure your speech is well-prepared and professionally delivered. I will provide guidelines for submitting the Week 12 Solution according to the rubric’s requirements. Carefully follow the guide to achieve the maximum score.

Preparation Phase

• Completing Required Readings and Interactive Lectures: Before drafting your speech, complete all assigned readings and participate in interactive lectures. This will provide valuable insights and enhance your understanding of the assignment’s expectations.
• Reviewing Feedback: Utilize the feedback received from your instructor on your previous speech draft to refine your content and delivery.

Finalization of Speech

• Incorporating Lecture Insights: Use critical points and strategies from the Week 12 lecture to polish your speech, ensuring it is compelling and well-structured.
• Final Adjustments Based on Feedback: Based on the feedback, make necessary adjustments to improve the clarity, engagement, and effectiveness of your speech.

Recording the Speech

• Setting Up Technology: Ensure your webcam, smartphone, or other recording device is set up correctly. Test the device to check audio and video quality before recording.
• Recording Tips: Speak clearly and maintain eye contact with the camera as if addressing an audience. Check your background for distractions and ensure good lighting.

Submission Details

• Follow the specific file format requirements and submission guidelines provided by your instructor or course syllabus. 
• Ensure the file is named correctly and uploaded to the designated platform.

Closing

Delivering your speech digitally is an invaluable skill in today’s technology-driven world. The COM 205 Week 12 Assignment: Speech Project – Speech Delivery enhances your speaking abilities and proficiency in using digital tools for effective communication. By carefully preparing, utilizing feedback, and mastering the technical aspects of recording, you will deliver a compelling and professional presentation.