BMGT 8028 Learning Resource: Literature Analysis, Assignments, and Research Guidance

 Introduction

BMGT 8028 delves into the analysis of scholarly literature, theories, and management research. Students critically evaluate seminal works and identify research gaps. For expert assistance with assignments and discussions in this course, explore Owlisdom MBA Assignment Help services, tailored to support your academic journey.

BMGT-8028 Week 1 Discussion: The Nature of Scientific Inquiry

Instructions for BMGT-8028 Week 1 Discussion

Week 1 Discussion: The Nature of Scientific Inquiry

68 Unread replies88 Replies

By Wednesday:

• Search for definitions of the term theory. First search broadly for definitions that span common usage, and then focus in particular on definitions of scientific theory. Select a definition that you believe meets the standard for scientific inquiry and describes the characteristics and purpose of scientific theories. Discuss why you believe the definition you have chosen will be most useful for doctoral learners in business or IT.
• Search Dissertations & Theses @ Capella University for recent dissertations in business or IT that focus on work-life balance. Review the sections of the dissertations that propose the theory or theoretical framework underlying the study. Select one dissertation and describe how the proposed theory, as presented, supports the research.

Note: While you may not use dissertations or instruments developed for dissertations as the basis of your own dissertation (Capella University’s School of Business, Technology, and Health Care Administration requires that your research be supported by peer-reviewed research in general and validated instruments for quantitative studies), dissertations can be very helpful in understanding how theory is used to support and frame your research purpose because peer-reviewed articles do not generally discuss theory unless the purpose was to test an existing theory or to develop theory, as in grounded theory approaches.

Response Guidelines

By Friday: Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question about their posts that would clarify their selection.

By Sunday: Reply to each learner whose contribution you plan to use in your Week 5 assignment. Indicate what you learned from them and state that you intend to acknowledge it in the credit section of your assignment.

Resources

• Dissertations & Theses @ Capella UniversityLinks to an external site.

Introduction to Week 10 Discussion: Identifying Personal Limitations

Welcome to BMGT-8028 Week 1 Discussion: The Nature of Scientific Inquiry, the exploration of scientific inquiry within the fields of business and IT. This Owlisdom guide is designed for BMGT-8028 students to deepen their understanding of scientific theories and how they underpin rigorous academic research. You will learn to differentiate between common and scientific uses of the term “theory” and apply this knowledge to enhance your doctoral studies, particularly in analyzing how theories support research in business or IT.

Search for definitions of the term theory.

Searching for Definitions of ‘Theory’ 

• Utilize academic databases and reputable sources to compile definitions from both general and scientific contexts.
• Evaluate each definition based on its clarity, applicability to scientific methods, and relevance to the fields of business and IT. 

First search broadly for definitions that span common usage, and then focus in particular on definitions of scientific theory.

Selecting and Discussing a Scientific Theory 

• Identify a definition that includes characteristics like testability, falsifiability, and the capacity to make predictions.
• Discuss why this definition is particularly useful for doctoral learners, considering the complexity and scope of doctoral-level research.

Select a definition that you believe meets the standard for scientific inquiry and describes the characteristics and purpose of scientific theories. Discuss why you believe the definition you have chosen will be most useful for doctoral learners in business or IT.

Reviewing Dissertations for Theoretical Frameworks

• Access dissertations through Capella University’s Dissertations & Theses database.
• Analyze how the authors use theory to frame their research questions and methodology.
• Select one dissertation and detail how the theory supports the research’s purpose and findings.

Example

In the exploration of scientific theories within doctoral studies, it is essential to understand the dual nature of the term “theory,” which encompasses both general and scientific implications. Scientific theories, distinct for their rigorous structure, must embody testability, falsifiability, and predictive capacity. These characteristics ensure that theories not only explain observed phenomena but also predict new, empirically testable outcomes. This standard is particularly crucial in the realms of business and IT, where the ability to forecast and model future occurrences can significantly influence strategic decision-making and technological innovation.

Applying a robust scientific theory to doctoral research enhances the research’s depth, allowing for a more structured and insightful exploration of complex issues. For instance, in the context of work-life balance within business studies, utilizing Role Theory helps delineate the interplay between personal life and professional obligations. This theoretical framework supports the research by providing a lens through which to view and analyze the multifaceted interactions individuals navigate daily between their work and personal roles.

Moreover, the strategic use of theories in doctoral research is not just about framework application but also about enriching the academic discourse with well-founded arguments and conclusions. This practice not only fortifies the study’s academic rigor but also broadens the potential for practical applications and policy implications. Hence, the thoughtful selection and application of a scientific theory are pivotal in crafting research that is not only methodologically sound but also impactful in contributing to the broader knowledge economy, particularly in dynamic fields like business and IT.

Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question about their posts that would clarify their selection.

Peer Response

• Encourage clarity by requesting detailed explanations of specific points or terms that are crucial to the understanding of the theory or argument presented.
• Prompt peers to justify their choices or opinions, asking them to provide evidence or reasoning that supports their stance, enhancing the depth of the discussion.
• Challenge peers to consider the broader implications of their chosen theories or approaches, asking how these might influence future research or practical application in their field.

Peer Response 1

Your discussion on the importance of scientific theory in doctoral research is well-articulated. You’ve effectively highlighted how a robust theoretical framework, like Role Theory, not only guides the research methodology but also deepens the analysis of complex issues like work-life balance. It’s enlightening how you connected the predictive capacity of scientific theories to practical implications in business and IT. This perspective reinforces the necessity of grounding research in solid theoretical foundations to enhance both academic rigor and real-world applicability.

Peer Response 2

For your second response, continue engaging thoughtfully by adding new perspectives or examples to another peer’s post, enhancing the ongoing discussion.

Closing

Mastering the nature of scientific inquiry is crucial for doctoral candidates in business and IT. BMGT-8028 Week 1 Discussion: The Nature of Scientific Inquiry guide provides you with the tools to critically evaluate and apply theories in your research, ensuring that your scholarly work is grounded in principles that advance knowledge in your field. By carefully selecting and applying appropriate theories, you enhance the credibility and scholarly contribution of your doctoral research, positioning yourself as a knowledgeable practitioner in the academic community.
You can also read BMGT-8028 next module Week 2 Discussion: The Structure of Scholarly Literature: Searching and Reviewing the Literature.

BMGT-8028 Week 2 Discussion: The Structure of Scholarly Literature: Searching and Reviewing the Literature

Instructions for BMGT-8028 Week 2 Discussion

Week 2 Discussion: The Structure of Scholarly Literature: Searching and Reviewing the Literature

105 Unread replies119 Replies

By Wednesday: Select a recent article—one published within the last five years but preferably since 2020—that you have found in your preparation for the assignment due in Week 5. The article should review the literature on some aspect of work-life balance or online learning. (Note: The article does not need to cover both of the topics, but can be a review of either work-life balance or online learning, or some subset of these that would be useful for a research study on work-life balance and online learning.)

In your post, briefly:

• Introduce the topic of the literature review article.
• Describe the author’s strategy or criteria for selecting works to be reviewed.
• Explain how the author organized the presentation of the works reviewed (for example, by time, by focus, or by methodology).
• Describe the author-identified limitations, implications, and recommendations.
• Link to the literature review article you used for this discussion.

Response Guidelines

By Friday: Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question about their posts that would clarify their selection.

By Sunday: Reply to each learner whose contribution you plan to use in your Week 5 assignment. Indicate what you learned from them and state that you intend to acknowledge it in the credit section of your assignment.

Introduction to Week 2 Discussion: The Structure of Scholarly Literature: Searching and Reviewing the Literature

Welcome to the Owlisdom guide for BMGT-8028 Week 2 Discussion: The Structure of Scholarly Literature: Searching and Reviewing the Literature. This BMGT-8028 guide aims to equip you with the skills necessary for effective searching and reviewing of scholarly literature, focusing particularly on the topics of work-life balance and online learning. As you prepare for your assignments, this BMGT-8028 Week 2 Discussion: The Structure of Scholarly Literature: Searching and Reviewing the Literature guide will assist you in understanding how to select relevant literature and critically analyze the frameworks used within these studies.

Select a recent article—one published within the last five years but preferably since 2020—that you have found in your preparation for the assignment due in Week 5.

Selecting a Recent Article

In this section of BMGT-8028 Week 2 Discussion: The Structure of Scholarly Literature: Searching and Reviewing the Literature, we will discuss selecting a recent article.

• Utilize academic databases like JSTOR, Google Scholar, or your university’s library resources.
• Ensure the article is peer-reviewed to guarantee the credibility and scholarly nature of the content.
• Select an article that either focuses on one of your topics or integrates both in a meaningful way. 

Introduce the topic of the literature review article.

Introducing the Topic 

• Provide a concise summary of the article’s main focus.
• Highlight the relevance of the topic in current research trends or practical applications in business or IT.

Example

The article by Panda and Sahoo (2021) delves into the interconnected effects of work-life balance on the retention and psychological empowerment of professionals. Published in the European Journal of Management Studies, the study provides a nuanced understanding of how balancing personal and professional life contributes to an individual’s sense of empowerment and the broader implications for organizational retention strategies. This analysis is particularly relevant for research focused on optimizing workplace environments to foster both employee satisfaction and organizational loyalty.

Describe the author’s strategy or criteria for selecting works to be reviewed.

Describing the Author’s Selection Strategy

In this section of BMGT-8028 Week 2 Discussion: The Structure of Scholarly Literature: Searching and Reviewing the Literature, we will describe the author’s selection strategy.

• Identify the criteria or themes used for selecting the literature, such as time frame, methodology, or specific research questions.
• Discuss the scope of literature reviewed and the justification provided for including certain works.

Example

In their literature review, Panda and Sahoo adopted a stringent selection process, focusing on empirical studies that assess the quantitative impacts of work-life balance. The selection was geared towards studies published within the last decade, highlighting recent advancements and shifts in organizational behavior trends. By emphasizing peer-reviewed articles that met specific methodological standards, the authors ensured that the synthesis of the literature was both credible and relevant, offering a solid foundation for their hypotheses on the psychological and professional benefits of effective work-life balance practices.

Explain how the author organized the presentation of the works reviewed (for example, by time, by focus, or by methodology).

Organizing the Presentation of Works

• Detail whether the literature is organized chronologically, by thematic focus, or methodological approach.
• Assess the effectiveness of this organization in providing a comprehensive understanding of the topic.

Example

Panda and Sahoo methodically organized the reviewed literature, aligning studies according to the progression from theoretical underpinnings to practical implications. The organization by theme—starting from the psychological impacts of work-life balance, moving through the influence of organizational culture, and concluding with strategic implementations for retention—allowed for a coherent narrative flow. This approach not only facilitated an easier understanding of complex concepts but also underscored the multifaceted nature of work-life dynamics within various industrial sectors.

Describe the author-identified limitations, implications, and recommendations.

Identifying Limitations and Implications

In this section of BMGT-8028 Week 2 Discussion: The Structure of Scholarly Literature: Searching and Reviewing the Literature, we will identify limitations and implications.

• Critically analyze the gaps or biases in the literature review.
• Evaluate the author’s suggestions for future research or practical implementations based on the reviewed works.

Example

The authors candidly addressed several limitations in their study, notably the potential variability in the impact of work-life balance across different industrial contexts. This acknowledgment underscores the necessity for organizations to consider industry-specific factors when implementing policies aimed at enhancing work-life balance. Panda and Sahoo also highlighted the significant implications of their findings, suggesting that organizations adopting flexible work arrangements could see marked improvements in employee retention and empowerment. They recommended further longitudinal studies to explore the long-term effects of these practices on organizational performance and employee well-being.

Link to the literature review article you used for this discussion.

Linking to the Literature Review Article

• Ensure the link is accessible and leads directly to the article or a reliable source where the article can be accessed.

Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question about their posts that would clarify their selection.

Peer Response

• Encourage clarity by requesting detailed explanations of specific points or terms that are crucial to the understanding of the theory or argument presented.
• Prompt peers to justify their choices or opinions, asking them to provide evidence or reasoning that supports their stance, enhancing the depth of the discussion.
• Challenge peers to consider the broader implications of their chosen theories or approaches, asking how these might influence future research or practical application in their field.

Peer Response 1

Your exploration of the selected literature on work-life balance offers insightful perspectives, especially your detailed analysis of the methodological frameworks used in the studies. The way you delineated the criteria for selecting articles provides a robust foundation for understanding the subject matter comprehensively. However, I’m curious about how you think these methodologies could be adapted or expanded to incorporate emerging trends in remote work environments. How might these adjustments offer further depth to the current understanding of work-life balance?

Peer Response 2

For your second response, continue engaging thoughtfully by adding new perspectives or examples to another peer’s post, enhancing the ongoing discussion.

Closing

Mastering the art of searching and reviewing scholarly literature is a fundamental skill for doctoral learners in business and IT. BMGT-8028 Week 2 Discussion: The Structure of Scholarly Literature: Searching and Reviewing the Literature guide not only facilitates your immediate assignment preparation but also enhances your long-term research capabilities. By carefully selecting, analyzing, and discussing scholarly articles, you develop a nuanced understanding of your chosen topics, contributing to your growth as a well-informed and critical researcher. You can also read BMGT8028 next module Week 3 Discussion: Understanding the Role of Theory in Research.

BMGT-8028 Week 3 Discussion: Understanding the Role of Theory in Research

Instructions for BMGT-8028 Week 3 Discussion

Week 3 Discussion: Understanding the Role of Theory in Research

107 Unread replies124 Replies

By Wednesday: Select one of the sources that you have found in your preparation for the assignment due in Week 5. The article should propose a theory that could be used as the framework for a study on work-life balance and online learning.

Briefly summarize the article and describe why you believe the theory is useful for developing a theoretical framework that could be used for research on work-life balance and online learning. Link to the article you used for this discussion.

Response Guidelines

By Friday: Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question about their posts that would clarify their selection.

By Sunday: Reply to each learner whose contribution you plan to use in your Week 5 assignment. Indicate what you learned from them and state that you intend to acknowledge it in the credit section of your assignment.

STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE Week 3 Discussion: Understanding the Role of Theory in Research

Introduction to Week 3 Discussion: Understanding the Role of Theory in Research

Welcome to the guide for BMGT-8028: Understanding the Role of Theory in Research. This BMGT-8028 guide is designed to assist you in identifying and applying theoretical frameworks to your research, particularly in the context of work-life balance and online learning. This segment is crucial for doctoral students to grasp, as it underpins the basis of scholarly inquiry and shapes the entire research process.

Select one of the sources that you have found in your preparation for the assignment due in Week 5. The article should propose a theory that could be used as the framework for a study on work-life balance and online learning.

Selecting a Relevant Article

In this section of Week 3 Discussion: Understanding the Role of Theory in Research, we will discuss selecting a recent article.

• Utilize academic databases to find recent articles, focusing on those published since 2020.
• Ensure the article is peer-reviewed, indicating credibility and scholarly approval.
• Select an article that offers a theoretical perspective on either work-life balance or online learning. 

Briefly summarize the article.

Summarizing the Article 

• Identify the main thesis or argument of the article.
• Highlight how the theory is applied within the research.
• Note any significant findings or conclusions that support the use of the theory.

Example

The article by Hackney et al. (2022) provides a systematic review of how work-from-home (WFH) arrangements affect personal and organizational performance and productivity. It discusses the mixed impacts of WFH, noting both positive aspects, like increased job satisfaction, and negative aspects, such as the potential for reduced interaction and collaboration among employees.

Describe why you believe the theory is useful for developing a theoretical framework that could be used for research on work-life balance and online learning.

Analyzing the Theory’s Utility 

In this section of Week 3 Discussion: Understanding the Role of Theory in Research, we will analyze the theory’s utility.

• Explain how the theory can frame the research questions or hypotheses.
• Discuss the theory’s relevance to contemporary issues in work-life balance or online learning.
• Consider the theory’s ability to provide insightful contributions to the field.

Example

The theoretical framework utilized in this article is useful for research on work-life balance and online learning as it comprehensively examines the dynamics of remote work environments. This framework can help researchers understand how varying remote work conditions influence employee efficiency and engagement, which are critical factors in both work-life balance and the effectiveness of online learning environments (Hackney, 2022). The systematic approach to reviewing literature also provides a solid foundation for exploring how different variables in work-from-home setups could affect outcomes related to these fields.

Link to the article you used for this discussion.

Linking to the Article

• Provide a direct URL that leads to the full text of the article.
• Ensure the link is from a credible academic or library source.

Example

Hackney, A., Yung, M., Somasundram, K. G., Nowrouzi-Kia, B., Oakman, J., & Yazdani, A. (2022). Working in the digital economy: A systematic review of the impact of work from home arrangements on personal and organizational performance and productivity. Plos one,17(10),e0274728. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0274728

Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question about their posts that would clarify their selection.

Peer Response

• Formulate questions that prompt deeper discussion and clarification.
• Acknowledge the contributions of peers in your own research, specifying what you have learned from their posts.
• Plan to include these acknowledgments in the credit section of your Week 5 assignment.

Peer Response 1

It’s intriguing to read about the theoretical framework you’ve discussed in your chosen article. I’m curious about how the author integrates this framework with practical strategies for enhancing work-life balance, especially in the context of remote learning. How do they propose to manage the challenges that typically arise with remote work settings? Your insights could be incredibly valuable for my own research on similar themes.

Peer Response 2

For your second response, continue engaging thoughtfully by adding new perspectives or examples to another peer’s post, enhancing the ongoing discussion.

Closing

Mastering the art of searching and reviewing scholarly literature is a fundamental skill for doctoral learners in business and IT. This Owlisdom guide not only facilitates your immediate assignment preparation but also enhances your long-term research capabilities. By carefully selecting, analyzing, and discussing scholarly articles, you develop a nuanced understanding of your chosen topics, contributing to your growth as a well-informed and critical researcher. You can also read BMGT8028 next module Week 4 Discussion: Seminal Works: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations.

BMGT-8028 Week 4 Discussion: Seminal Works: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations

Instructions for BMGT-8028 Week 4 Discussion

Week 4 Discussion: Seminal Works: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations

75 Unread replies105 Replies

By Wednesday: Select one of the foundational or seminal sources that you have found in your preparation for the assignment due in Week 5 on your literature search on work-life balance and online learning. Briefly summarize the article and describe why you believe the source is foundational or seminal for the literature about work-life balance and online learning. Link to the article you used for this discussion.

Response Guidelines

By Friday: Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question about their posts that would clarify their selection.

By Sunday: Reply to each learner whose contribution you plan to use in your Week 5 assignment. Indicate what you learned from them and state that you intend to acknowledge it in the credit section of your assignment.

Step-By-Step Guide BMGT-8028 Week 4 Discussion: Seminal Works: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations

Introduction to Week 4 Discussion

Welcome to the BMGT-8028 Week 4 Discussion: Seminal Works: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations exploration of the role of theory in scholarly research, a foundational element for doctoral learners in business or IT. This Owlisdom guide is tailored to enhance your understanding of theoretical frameworks, crucial for structuring and guiding your research on topics like work-life balance and online learning.

Select one of the foundational or seminal sources that you have found in your preparation for the assignment due in Week 5 on your literature search on work-life balance and online learning.

Selecting and Analyzing Seminal Works

• Choose a foundational or seminal article relevant to your research topics. Ensure the article is recent and grounded in scientific validity.
• Evaluate why the selected article is considered foundational within the academic community, particularly in the fields of work-life balance or online learning. 

Briefly summarize the article and describe why you believe the source is foundational or seminal for the literature about work-life balance and online learning. Link to the article you used for this discussion.

Summary and Theoretical Framework 

In this section of BMGT-8028 Week 4 Discussion: Seminal Works: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, we will discuss the summary and theoretical framework.

• Provide a concise summary of the article, focusing on the main theories and propositions.
• Discuss how the theory presented serves as a useful framework for your own research. Analyze its relevance and applicability to addressing contemporary issues in your field.

Example

The article by Hackney et al. (2022) provides an extensive systematic review of how telecommuting—work from home arrangements—affects personal and organizational performance and productivity. The study synthesizes data from various empirical studies to assess the broader impacts of remote work. It addresses key performance metrics, engagement levels, and the psychological implications for employees. This source is seminal in understanding the dynamics of work-life balance in the context of the digital economy, crucial for both business and IT fields. The shift to remote work, as detailed in the article, presents a foundational exploration of how flexible work arrangements can lead to shifts in work-life balance, potentially affecting learning environments and professional development. The integration of online learning with remote work practices offers a fresh perspective on managing work-life boundaries, making this source particularly relevant for studies focused on integrating technology with personal efficiency.

Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question about their posts that would clarify their selection.

Peer Response.

• Initiate discussions with peers by posing insightful questions about their selected theories to deepen your collective understanding.
• Plan to integrate the feedback and insights gained from peer discussions into your research, ensuring to give appropriate credit in your future assignments.

Peer Response 1

Your discussion on the application of your selected article to our topic of work-life balance and online learning offers a compelling perspective. I appreciate how you have delineated the theoretical framework and its relevance to modern employment practices. However, could you elaborate on how the findings of your article could influence policy-making or organizational strategies in specific sectors such as technology or education, where work-life balance is increasingly challenged by remote work dynamics?

Peer Response 2

For your second response, continue engaging thoughtfully by adding new perspectives or examples to another peer’s post, enhancing the ongoing discussion.

Closing

Concluding, the ability to dissect and apply theoretical frameworks effectively is a skill that enhances the robustness of your research. This BMGT-8028 guide aims to equip you with the necessary tools to identify and articulate the relevance of various theories, preparing you to contribute meaningfully to academic and practical discourses in your professional field. BMGT-8028 Week 4 Discussion: Seminal Works: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations guide provides a structured approach to identifying, analyzing, and discussing the role of theory in scholarly research, ensuring you are well-prepared to apply these insights to your own academic endeavors.
You can also read BMGT8028 next module Week 5 Assignment: Practicing Literature Searches and Topic Development.

BMGT-8028 Week 5 Assignment: Practicing Literature Searches and Topic Development

Instructions for BMGT-8028 Week 5 Assignment

Week 5 Assignment: Practicing Literature Searches and Topic Development

For this assignment, you will begin searching the literature in the general areas of work-life balance and online learning. As you develop your search, you will narrow the focus so that it includes some aspect of your specialization. For example, IT learners will probably want to delve further into literature that addresses the use of technology as it relates to work-life balance and online learning, while business learners may want to incorporate topics such as decision making, planning, and boundary or role theories.

Preparation Steps

To prepare for the assignment:

1. Reviewing the Literature: The library guide for conducting literature reviews.
2. Fill in the Preliminary Search Action Plan using keywords on the general areas of work-life balance and online learning. Download a PDF copy of your Preliminary Search Action Plan to include with the Week 5 assignment.
3. Track your search strategy using the Database Search Log and the Scholarly Research Log. Both logs are available on the More Services and Tools page of the Capella University Library. Download both completed logs to include with this assignment.
4. Repeat Steps 2 and 3 using keywords related to work-life balance, online learning, and a topic area you have chosen from your specialization or area of interest.
5. Use the Search by Methodology guide to search by methodology.

Assignment Instructions

To complete the assignment:

• Describe the topic area of work-life balance, online learning, and your specialization you selected for this assignment.
• Identify the key search words you used in your search, including those that were rejected or nonproductive and those that yielded the best results. Evaluate the results from the keywords as they relate to the topic of your search.
• Develop an annotated bibliography of selected articles that emerged from the results of your search and from the discussions in Weeks 2, 3, 4, and 5. The annotated bibliography should be included in your assignment as an appendix.
• Discuss the theories, seminal works, and recent research that emerged from the results of your search and from the discussions in Weeks 2, 3, 4, and 5. Include in this section:
  • An outline of a recent literature review article from a peer-reviewed journal.
  • A description (including the theoretical constructs) of two or three theories relevant to your topic.
  • A description of the relevant seminal works.
  • An analysis of the predominant methodology (exploratory/qualitative or theory testing/quantitative) of the most recent research on your topic.
  • An evaluation of the direction and methodology (quantitative or qualitative) of future research on the topic.
• Summarize your understanding of the existing literature on work-life balance and online learning, including:
  • How has your understanding of the relevant theory and state of knowledge on your topic changed since you began your review of the relevant literature?
  • A possible gap in existing knowledge that emerged for which a research study might make a substantive contribution to the existing knowledge.
• Reflect on the lessons learned in conducting this review of the literature, and include:
  • A description of the processes and procedures of the literature search and literature review that enhanced your understanding of the structure of scholarly literature.
  • A description of how your understanding of the role of theory, the foundation of seminal work, and the analysis of data-based research has contributed to your development as a PhD researcher.
  • Credit to specific fellow learners whose contributions from course discussions pointed you in a direction you had not considered or gave you an insight or an “aha moment” that clarified an important step you have now incorporated into this assignment.

Review the Practicing Literature Searches and Topic Development Scoring Guide to learn about the criteria by which this assignment will be evaluated. When you have completed your assignment, submit it in the assignment area.

Submission Requirements

Your assignment should meet the following requirements:

• Written communication: Written communication must be grammatically correct and free of errors that detract from the overall message. Writing should be consistent with graduate-level scholarship.
• APA format: Resources and citations are formatted according to current and APALinks to an external site. Style and formatting.
• Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
• Format: Submit four documents—the assignment in .doc or .docx file format, a PDF copy of your Preliminary Search Action Plan, and downloaded copies of the completed Database Search Log and Scholarly Research Log.

Resources

RefWorksLinks to an external site.

Introduction to Week 5 Assignment

Welcome to BMGT-8028 Week 5 Assignment: Practicing Literature Searches and Topic Development guide, designed to assist you in conducting effective literature searches for topics on work-life balance and online learning. This task is crucial for understanding current research trends and identifying gaps in the literature that your own research could address. This BMGT-8028 guide will provide step-by-step instructions to enhance your skills in literature searching, crucial for any doctoral student in business or IT focusing on these pertinent topics.

Describe the topic area of work-life balance, online learning, and your specialization you selected for this assignment.

Describe the Topic Area

• Contextualize the Issue: Start by defining how work-life balance and online learning intersect with your specific field of specialization, whether it be IT, business, or another area.
• Relevance to Current Trends: Explain the importance of these topics in today’s academic and professional settings. 

Example

The topic of AI’s potential to improve work-life balance and the associated cybersecurity dangers is both exciting and crucial in today’s technologically evolved world. One approach to using AI to work-life balance is to use it to automate repetitive operations, improve workflow, and provide analytical insights for more effective time management. People can focus on more rewarding activities and possibly increase their job satisfaction with the time saved by an AI application. But these developments also raise a serious worry: possible cybersecurity threats. AI systems are more vulnerable to cyberattacks because they handle and store enormous volumes of sensitive data. These dangers, which call for strong cybersecurity safeguards and ongoing vulnerability monitoring, include data breaches, manipulation of AI systems, and service outages. Because it finds a balance between the benefits of AI in enhancing work-life dynamics and the necessity of maintaining strong cybersecurity measures, this is an extremely interesting area of study. It encapsulates the challenges of modern technology and the necessity of utilizing it to improve human lives while closely observing its risks.

Identify the key search words you used in your search, including those that were rejected or nonproductive and those that yielded the best results. Evaluate the results from the keywords as they relate to the topic of your search.

Identify Key Search Words 

In this section of BMGT-8028 Week 5 Assignment: Practicing Literature Searches and Topic Development, we will identify key search words.

• Selection and Rejection: List all the keywords used, highlighting which were effective and which were not.
• Evaluation: Analyze how the successful keywords have shaped the direction of your research, emphasizing the relevance to your topic.

Example

Evaluation of Key Search Words

I utilized a variety of terms to narrow down my search when performing the literature study on AI’s effects on cybersecurity concerns, online learning, and work-life balance. When it came to locating pertinent material, some of these terms worked better than others.

Keywords Used in the Search

o Effective Keywords:

o “AI and work-life balance”: Using this crucial term made it easier to find research on the topic of artificial intelligence’s contribution to work-life balance.

o The phrase “online learning impact on work-life” led me to materials that looked at the effects of remote learning on both personal and professional lives.

o “Cybersecurity in AI”: An essential search term for papers about the security risks associated with AI applications.

o “Artificial intelligence employee productivity”: Research on this topic revealed information regarding how AI affects worker productivity and efficiency.

Less Effective Keywords:

o “AI and job loss”: While this word is pertinent to the wider effects of AI in the workplace, it frequently evokes literature that is more concerned with work-life balance than with job displacement.

o “Effectiveness of digital learning”: This term focused more on the effectiveness of online learning strategies than on how well they help people manage their personal and professional lives.

o “Digital learning technology” produced outcomes that were more technical in nature rather than providing insights into the implications for work-life balance.

Keywords That Were Not Useful

The term “remote work technology” typically sparked broader conversations about technologies that support remote work, with little emphasis on AI’s function in finding a work-life balance.

“AI in education”: This phrase was overly general and frequently produced results unrelated to cybersecurity in AI or work-life balance.

Reflection on the Keyword Search Results

The more useful keywords took me straight to relevant research that provided insightful information about the impact of AI technology on work-life balance, the significance of online education, and related cybersecurity issues. Though related, the less beneficial and ineffective keywords frequently deviated from my particular area of interest.

Selecting the appropriate keywords was an essential part of my research procedure. It ensured that I studied literature directly related to my key areas of cybersecurity, AI, work-life balance, and online learning by making my literature search more focused and effective. This procedure emphasized how crucial it is to choose keywords carefully and strategically while performing exhaustive literature research.

Develop an annotated bibliography of selected articles that emerged from the results of your search and from the discussions in Weeks 2, 3, 4, and 5. The annotated bibliography should be included in your assignment as an appendix.

Develop an Annotated Bibliography

In this section of BMGT-8028 Week 5 Assignment: Practicing Literature Searches and Topic Development, we will explore developing an annotated bibliography.

• Selection Criteria: Detail the criteria for choosing the articles included in your bibliography.
• Annotation: For each source, provide a summary, its relevance to your topic, and any critical insights or data points.

Example

This article was selected for its comprehensive meta-analysis of the efficacy of online learning courses in higher education, a topic highly relevant to the exploration of digital education strategies. The criteria for inclusion in this bibliography focused on the article’s publication in a peer-reviewed journal, its recent publication date to ensure current insights, and its specific focus on higher education. Castro and Tumibay (2021) conducted a meta-analysis of various studies to evaluate the effectiveness of online learning in higher education. The article synthesizes findings from multiple sources, revealing that online learning can be as effective as traditional in-person education, provided that course design, instructor presence, and student engagement are adequately addressed. This source is pertinent to the topic as it offers a robust evaluation of online learning’s efficacy, highlighting key factors that contribute to successful outcomes. Critical insights include the importance of interactive elements and the potential for online learning to provide flexible, accessible education options.

(Similarly, write the annotation of other sources used in the paper)

Discuss the theories, seminal works, and recent research that emerged from the results of your search and from the discussions in Weeks 2, 3, 4, and 5. Include in this section: An outline of a recent literature review article from a peer-reviewed journal. A description (including the theoretical constructs) of two or three theories relevant to your topic. A description of the relevant seminal works. An analysis of the predominant methodology (exploratory/qualitative or theory testing/quantitative) of the most recent research on your topic. An evaluation of the direction and methodology (quantitative or qualitative) of future research on the topic.

Discuss Theories and Research

In this section of BMGT-8028 Week 5 Assignment: Practicing Literature Searches and Topic Development, we will discuss theories and research.

• Outline Key Theories: Describe two or three theories that are pertinent to your topic, explaining their theoretical constructs.
• Seminal Works: Identify and describe foundational studies that have significantly influenced current research.
• Methodology Analysis: Discuss whether the prevailing research methodologies are exploratory/qualitative or theory testing/quantitative, and how they apply to your topic.

Example

To start, the development of AI technology can be examined through the lens of Everett Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovations Theory. According to this hypothesis, adopters are categorized as innovators, early adopters, or the majority, depending on how willing they are to accept new technology. It emphasizes how crucial elements like the perceived advantages of AI, its conformity with current values, and its ease of implementation are in influencing how quickly it is adopted. This hypothesis can explain why different groups within an organization or society adopt AI-driven solutions at different rates and in diverse ways. It can also explain why these groups’ responses to cybersecurity concerns vary as technology becomes more widely available. All of this is essential when talking about AI and work-life harmony.

The second framework explores how people react to perceived dangers and was created by R. W. Rogers. It is called the Protection Motivation Theory (PMT). Despite being first used to identify health risks, its use has expanded to include behavior analysis in cybersecurity.

Some of the main ideas that support this theory are the effectiveness of preventative measures, a person’s confidence in their ability to carry them out, and the perceived seriousness and likelihood of the threat. When considering AI’s impact on work-life balance, PMT can provide light on people’s perceptions of the cybersecurity threats posed by these technologies as well as the factors that motivate them to follow safe practices. According to PMT, if people believe that cybersecurity threats are real and plausible and that they can implement the necessary security measures, they are more inclined to embrace behaviors that safeguard their data and privacy.

The Diffusion of Innovations Theory and the Protection Motivation Theory, when combined, offer a comprehensive framework for understanding the complex dynamics surrounding cybersecurity challenges as well as how AI may be utilized to improve work-life balance. They shed light on how different groups use AI technologies and how people perceive and handle the associated security risks.

Seminal Works

When addressing these interconnections, it is imperative to mention seminal works that have shaped our understanding of cybersecurity, work-life balance, and AI. Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael A. Osborne’s 2013 book “The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerization?” is a classic. The impact of automation and artificial intelligence on the workforce was investigated in this study with respect to work-life balance (Frey & Osborne, September). Furthermore, Ajay Agrawal, Joshua Gans, and Avi Goldfarb’s book “AI at Work: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Future of Work” (published in 2019) provides a thoughtful analysis of how AI is transforming the nature of work and is required reading for anybody curious about how AI will impact work-life balance (Acemoglu & Restrepo, 2018). 

Two works stand out when it comes to the threats that artificial intelligence poses to cybersecurity. For anyone interested in understanding the evolution of cybersecurity challenges, Nils J. Nilsson’s 2010 book “The Quest for Artificial Intelligence: A History of Ideas and Achievements” is essential reading. It offers a historical perspective on the development of AI (Nilsson, 2009). This is enhanced by the excellent 2016 book “Cybersecurity and Applied Mathematics” by Leigh Metcalf and William Casey, which delves into the technical aspects of protecting AI systems and highlights the intersection between cybersecurity and mathematical applications. When combined, these components offer a strong framework for examining the implications for cybersecurity as well as the current and future uses of AI in the workplace.

Summarize your understanding of the existing literature on work-life balance and online learning, including: How your understanding of the relevant theory and state of knowledge on your topic has changed since you began youour r review of the relevant literature. A possible gap in existing knowledge that emerged for which a research study might make a substantive contribution to the existing knowledge.

Summarize Literature Understanding

In this section of BMGT-8028 Week 5 Assignment: Practicing Literature Searches and Topic Development, we will summarize literature understanding.

• Evolution of Understanding: Reflect on how your comprehension of the topic has evolved through the literature review.
• Identification of Gaps: Highlight any gaps in the literature that your research could potentially fill.

Example

Predominate Methodology

An examination of a popular method in the field’s current research on using AI to enhance work-life balance and the cybersecurity risks associated with it reveals a combination of qualitative and quantitative theory-testing methods.

Analysis of Predominant Methodology in Recent Research

Exploratory/Qualitative Approach

o Work-life balance and AI studies conducted recently frequently use an experimental, qualitative methodology. Because the topic is very new and continually changing due to technological breakthroughs, this approach is common. To get insight into the complex effects of artificial intelligence (AI) on workers’ work-life balance, researchers employ focus groups, interviews, and case studies. They investigate topics such as job satisfaction, stress levels, and the evolving nature of work.

o Qualitative approaches are frequently employed in AI-related cybersecurity research to comprehend human elements, including user behavior, risk perceptions, and attitudes toward security systems. Qualitative evaluations of security occurrences and practices are frequently used in these studies to learn more about vulnerabilities and user reactions.

Theory Testing/Quantitative Approach

Studies that seek to quantify the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on productivity and job efficiency frequently use quantitative methodologies, such as statistical analysis and surveys. These studies could measure how much time is saved, how efficiently tasks are completed, and how much AI integration improves overall job performance.

Quantitative research in cybersecurity includes data breach incident statistical analysis, cyber threat modeling, and efficacy assessment of security solutions. This method offers factual data to back up the creation of strong AI security protocols.

Evaluation of Future Research Directions and Methodology

Direction and Methodology of Future Research in AI and Work-Life Balance:

Given the benefits of both qualitative and quantitative methodologies, it is likely that future studies will continue to combine both. But as the field develops, there might be a shift toward more quantitative approaches that make it possible to gather longitudinal data and evaluate theories regarding AI’s long-term effects on work-life balance.

Direction and Methodology of Future Research in AI and Cybersecurity:

The trend in cybersecurity may be more in line with quantitative research. More complex statistical models and empirical assessments will be required as AI technologies advance in order to identify risks, forecast attacks, and gauge how well security measures are working. To fully comprehend the human aspects of cybersecurity, such as user behavior and company culture, qualitative research will still be crucial.

To sum up, both qualitative and quantitative approaches have proven crucial in expanding our knowledge of AI’s application to cybersecurity and work-life balance. The particular study topics being addressed will determine future research directions; the most thorough insights are obtained by combining the two methods.

Recent Research

Recent studies on the use of AI in work-life balance and the implications for cybersecurity have produced some important results. Research shows that artificial intelligence (AI) greatly increases workplace productivity and efficiency. This is mostly because AI automates repetitive tasks, freeing up individuals to concentrate on more important and rewarding elements of their jobs. AI-driven solutions are also commended for their capacity to offer individualized workload distribution and time management, which promotes a more flexible work environment. Nevertheless, there are drawbacks to this beneficial effect, including worries about growing reliance on AI, possible job displacement, and a blurring of the lines between work and home life. Concerns about privacy and employee autonomy are also prominent topics in these talks.

Research on cybersecurity shows that as AI systems handle and retain vast volumes of private data, they become more susceptible to cyberattacks. There is an immediate need for stronger cybersecurity measures, given the increase in complex AI-driven threats, which include data breaches and system manipulation (Fiata, 2023). These precautions include creating sophisticated security processes, keeping a close eye on security flaws, and building AI systems with security as a top priority from the start. Furthermore, research is beginning to highlight the human element of cybersecurity, highlighting the significance of user education regarding safe practices and comprehending user behavior in reaction to cybersecurity risks.

Although there are substantial cybersecurity dangers associated with AI, the current body of research cautions against using it as a helpful tool to improve work-life balance. It asks for a well-rounded strategy that takes advantage of AI’s advantages while skillfully managing and reducing its security risks, integrating technology advancements, and taking human factors into account while using AI and developing cybersecurity plans.

Outline of Literature Review

This is a suggested framework for a literature study, which is based on the PDF “An Experimental Analysis of Work-Life Balance Among the Employees Using Machine Learning Classifiers” by K. Radha and M. Rohith:

Literature Review Outline: “AI and Work-Life Balance: Opportunities and Security Challenges”

• Intro to the Topic

o A brief overview of AI’s benefits for work-life balance.

o The problem of security hazards in AI

o The reasons this review is crucial.

• How AI Helps with Work-Life Balance

• What Work-Life Balance Means Today

o A brief overview

o What technology means now

• AI’s Role

o Improving the efficiency and accessibility of work.

o Assisting with workload and schedule planning.

o A few instances from actual life.

• Good and Bad Points

o How it benefits employees.

o Issues such as concerns about privacy.

• Security Problems with AI

What Kind of Security Issues?

• Problems such as data theft.

• AI is being applied incorrectly.

Stopping Security Problems

• How to make AI less dangerous.

• Laws and regulations to assist.

Real Stories about AI and Security

• Examples of mishaps that occurred.

• What they can teach us

• Balancing AI Benefits and Security

• Keeping Things Safe and Useful

• Ensuring that AI benefits without harming.

• What is next?

• What is possible for the future

• How can we prepare for upcoming changes?

• Wrapping Up

• Key things to keep in mind.

• What this implies for companies like ours

• Suggestions for additional study

Sources Used

From where did all of the information originate?

This study of the literature will explore the various ways that AI might improve work-life balance while also addressing the serious cybersecurity threats that come with implementing it. The review’s objective is to gain a thorough understanding of the state of play, obstacles, and potential paths in this area where cybersecurity and AI applications converge.

Summary of existing literature on work-life balance and online learning.

The body of research on the subject of online learning and work-life balance offers a complex picture of this developing field. Important topics include how online learning’s accessibility and flexibility help students better manage their time and combine their studies with their personal and professional lives. But there are drawbacks to this learning style as well, like the necessity for self-control and efficient time management, which can cause stress and upset the balance, especially for people who have full-time jobs or obligations to their families (Lupu & Ruiz-Castro 2021).

The literature often discusses technological developments in online learning, including artificial intelligence (AI), interactive platforms, and mobile learning. These developments have improved accessibility and personalization of education, which has major advantages for preserving work-life balance (Sutherland Global 2018). On the other hand, concerns about the digital divide—a situation in which certain students may find it difficult to access technology—are also brought up. The literature also emphasizes the social and psychological aspects of online learning. While flexibility is a benefit of online learning, there is a risk that students will feel less engaged and alone than in traditional classroom environments. In virtual learning environments, the value of social connection and support networks is highlighted as essential to maintaining a good work-life balance and pursuing education.

Attention is also given to support systems and organizational policies. According to the literature, organizations and institutions can be very helpful in assisting students by providing flexible scheduling, time management tools, and rules that take into account the particular difficulties associated with online learning.

The body of research indicates that online learning will probably keep changing in the future. Improving student engagement, better integrating technology, and addressing concerns of equity and access are among the main areas of concentration. Future studies are expected to examine how online learning affects work-life balance over the long term, particularly in light of how quickly work settings are evolving and how far technology has come. This collection of works offers a thorough analysis of the advantages and difficulties of online learning, highlighting its importance in the current educational environment and its effects on people’s work-life balance.

Reflect on the lessons learned in conducting this review of the literature, and include: A description of the processes and procedures of the literature search and literature review that enhanced your understanding of the structure of scholarly literature. A description of how your understanding of the role of theory, the foundation of seminal work, and the analysis of data-based research has contributed to your development as a PhD researcher.

Reflect on the Literature Review Process 

• Procedural Overview: Describe the steps taken during the literature search and how they enhanced your understanding of the academic landscape.
• Theoretical and Empirical Insights: Explain how this process has deepened your understanding of theoretical applications and empirical research in your field.

Example

By thinking back on the experience of doing this literature review, I was able to improve both my Ph.D. research abilities and my comprehension of the organization of scholarly literature. The procedure started with a methodical approach to literature search, with an emphasis on finding pertinent databases and publications that offered a whole range of subjects under consideration, such as cybersecurity, AI, work-life balance, and online learning. In order to ensure accuracy and relevancy during the search process, keyword refinement was essential. Additionally, I used clear inclusion and exclusion criteria, which made it easier to concentrate on the best and most pertinent studies. I now have a greater understanding of the significance of theory in research because of this procedure. Research questions are shaped by theories, which also direct technique and data interpretation. It was informative to interact with basic works in these domains because it gave historical context and demonstrated how contemporary research built upon these core concepts. In addition, the examination of data-driven research enhanced my comprehension of diverse research approaches, the importance of data analysis methods, and the utilization of empirical data to bolster theoretical frameworks.

Another essential step in the process was to critically assess every source. It entailed evaluating the research’s legitimacy, methodology, and conclusions—all of which are critical to comprehending the advantages and disadvantages of the body of current literature. This critical assessment has been invaluable in helping me to strengthen my capacity to carry out ethical and rigorous research.

To sum up, the process of conducting a literature review has been crucial to my development as a PhD researcher. My understanding of how academic literature is organized has improved, and it has highlighted the importance of approaching research methodically, the essential role of theory, and the critical evaluation of data-based research. This encounter has given me the knowledge and comprehension I need to conduct outstanding academic research.

Credit to specific fellow learners whose contributions from course discussions pointed you in a direction you had not considered or gave you an insight or an “aha moment” that clarified an important step you have now incorporated into this assignment.

Credits and Acknowledgments

In this section of BMGT-8028 Week 5 Assignment: Practicing Literature Searches and Topic Development, we will explore citations and acknowledgments.

• Learner Contributions: Acknowledge specific insights or contributions from peers that have influenced your research direction or provided significant realizations.

Example

When I think back on the thoughtful comments made by my fellow students throughout our class discussions, a few come to me since they had a big influence on how I understood and approached this work:

• Vincent Bridges: A game-changer was his analysis of Castro et al.’s 2021 paper regarding online learning in higher education (Castro & Tumibay, 2021). My “aha” moment came during the discussion about using Bloom’s Taxonomy in the study. I became aware of how crucial structured learning development is, particularly in online environments. This realization changed the way I thought about using systematic approaches in my study.

• Rachel Mathurin: The article by Yasihiro Kotera and Katia Correa Vione from 2020 that Rachel highlighted was quite informative regarding the psychological elements of new working practices. The necessity of completeness and rigor in research was highlighted by the use of PRISMA criteria covered in her piece, and I have now deliberately included these elements in my assignment.

• Darrell Hall: Darrell provided a crucial teaching point when he discussed the value of qualitative research techniques, particularly in business and urban education. The citation of Lisa Given’s work highlighted the significance of individual experiences in comprehending intricate social processes and clarified the breadth of qualitative research (Given, 2012). This has affected how I think about using qualitative approaches in my study.

• Michelle Westmore: In her analysis of Furkan Metin’s research on perceived organizational support (POS) and employee retention, she offered a fresh point of view. The relationship between POS and intentions to leave, particularly in the IT sector, and the use of social exchange theory—which I’ve now integrated into my own work—have both deepened my understanding of employee-employer dynamics (Metin, 2023).

• Boykin-Burnett Ta’Kita: The significant implications of abrupt transitions to online learning settings were brought to light by the study Ta’Kita highlighted on the COVID-19 effects on college students’ mental health. This study made clear how crucial it is to strike a balance between academic obligations and mental health when learning online, which is something I’ve done with great importance in my assignment.

• Nicodemus Quainoo: During the discussion of Dominique M. Curington’s analysis of the work-life balance of African female retail managers, my eyes were awakened to the unique challenges this group faces. This insight has had a significant impact on how I approach inclusivity in research and has made it easier for me to understand the range of experiences that are present in work-life balance studies.

• Robbie Allen: A thorough grasp of these dynamics was offered by his investigation of organizational productivity, which focused on the interactions between work-life balance, online learning, and productivity in the workplace. His cited research has greatly influenced my understanding of productivity tactics and staff satisfaction.

• Olaide Ariori: Olaide gave a really enlightening talk about feminist approaches to treating mental health in the post-COVID workplace. The holistic perspective on the pandemic’s effects on businesses, particularly in relation to HR administration and corporate governance, has shaped my perception of the difficulties and possibilities presented by this new era.

These recommendations have changed my approach to this work and opened up new possibilities for me. They have clarified crucial processes and concepts and offered me new avenues to explore, which I have now incorporated into my study and writing.

Closing

Mastering the art of literature searching is a fundamental skill for any doctoral student, providing a solid foundation for academic success. Through diligent search and analysis, you will enhance your understanding of work-life balance and online learning, contributing valuable insights to your field. Remember, the quality of your literature review significantly influences the credibility and scholarly value of your overall research. This Owlisdom guide is intended to support you through the initial stages of your doctoral research journey, helping you build a robust theoretical and empirical basis for your dissertation.
You can also read BMGT8028 next module Week 5 Discussion: Reviewing the Literature: Synthesis and Evaluation.

BMGT-8028 Week 5 Discussion: Reviewing the Literature: Synthesis and Evaluation

Instructions for BMGT-8028 Week 5 Discussion

Week 5 Discussion: Reviewing the Literature: Synthesis and Evaluation

By Wednesday: Construct a Venn diagram that illustrates the three subtopics you will use in your assignment for this week: work-life balance, online learning, and the subtopic you have selected based on your specialization or area of interest. Describe how you chose the subtopic in your specialization or area of interest, including references to articles from your search that support your choice.

In your Venn diagram, for each subtopic, include references for:

• Theory.
• Seminal or foundational work.
• Recent research.

Briefly discuss the similarities and differences in the philosophic orientation and methodological approaches between the foundational or seminal articles and more recent literature in each subtopic area.

Response Guidelines

By Friday: Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question about their posts that would clarify their selection.

By Sunday: Reply to each learner whose contribution you plan to use in your Week 5 assignment. Indicate what you learned from them and state that you intend to acknowledge it in the credit section of your assignment.

Introduction to Week 5 Discussion: Reviewing the Literature: Synthesis and Evaluation

Embarking on the BMGT-8028 Week 5 Discussion: Reviewing the Literature: Synthesis and Evaluation requires a sophisticated understanding of literature searches. This Owlisdom BMGT-8028 Week 5 Discussion: Reviewing the Literature: Synthesis and Evaluation guide is designed to help students delve deeply into the topics of work-life balance, online learning, and a specialized subtopic, utilizing effective research strategies to synthesize and evaluate scholarly articles. The goal is to construct a well-rounded understanding and create a Venn diagram that succinctly captures the intersection of these themes.

Illustrates the three subtopics you will use in your assignment for this week: work-life balance, online learning, and the subtopic you have selected based on your specialization or area of interest.

Selecting and Analyzing the Subtopics

• Identify Your Interest: Start by determining which aspect of your specialization intersects with work-life balance and online learning.
• Literature Review: Conduct preliminary searches on both broad topics to see how your specific interest is currently being discussed in scholarly contexts.
• Selection Criteria: Choose a subtopic that not only interests you but also has substantial research and literature for a comprehensive discussion. 

Construct a Venn diagram. Describe how you chose the subtopic in your specialization or area of interest, including references to articles from your search that support your choice. In your Venn diagram, for each subtopic, include references for: Theory. Seminal or foundational work. Recent research.

Constructing a Venn Diagram

• Design the Diagram: Use digital tools like Lucidchart or Canva to create a Venn diagram that includes three circles representing work-life balance, online learning, and your chosen subtopic.
• Populate with References: In each section of the Venn diagram, include key references that discuss the theory, seminal works, and recent research related to that subtopic.
• Interconnections: Highlight intersections where the subtopics overlap, noting theories or findings that apply to more than one area.

Briefly discuss the similarities and differences in the philosophic orientation and methodological approaches between the foundational or seminal articles and more recent literature in each subtopic area.

Discussing Philosophic Orientations and Methodological Approaches

• Philosophic Differences: Examine how foundational theories have evolved compared to more recent studies.
• Methodological Evaluation: Discuss whether the empirical approaches used in the studies are exploratory/qualitative or theory testing/quantitative, and how these methodologies influence the conclusions.

Example

Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question about their posts that would clarify their selection.

Response and Engagement Guidelines

• Clarifying Questions: Ask insightful questions that encourage your peers to elaborate on their selection process or the conclusions they have drawn.
• Constructive Feedback: Offer constructive feedback based on your own research and understanding of the topic.

Peer response 1

This is an insightful post, and I appreciate your detailed analysis of the article. Your focus on the intersection of work-life balance and online learning is especially relevant today. Could you elaborate on how the article addresses the challenges of implementing flexible work policies within traditional business structures? Understanding this could provide deeper insights into the practical applications of the research.

Peer Response 2

For your second response, continue engaging thoughtfully by adding new perspectives or examples to another peer’s post, enhancing the ongoing discussion.

Closing

Mastering literature searches is pivotal for academic success in BMGT-8028. BMGT-8028 Week 5 Discussion: Reviewing the Literature: Synthesis and Evaluation guide aims to equip you with the skills to effectively search, analyze, and synthesize academic literature, enhancing both your understanding and scholarly output. Remember, the quality of your literature search directly influences the depth of your research and discussions. Use this guide as a foundational tool to navigate through complex academic landscapes, ensuring your research is thorough, relevant, and impactful.
You can also read BMGT8028 next module Week 6 Discussion: Critiquing Quantitative and Qualitative Research Studies.

BMGT-8028 Week 6 Discussion: Critiquing Quantitative and Qualitative Research Studies

Instructions for BMGT-8028 Week 6 Discussion

Week 6 Discussion: Critiquing Quantitative and Qualitative Research Studies

72 Unread replies110 Replies

By Wednesday: Making the transition from student to scholar involves the ongoing and never-ending process of developing critical thinking skills. Read the paragraph below (extracted from the Dissecting Research Articles resource you will read later in this course) regarding developing your skills as a researcher. Then post an example of something that is commonly referred to as research and used in everyday decision-making or opinion formation, even though it does not reach the standard for scientific merit. Discuss how relying on this type of information can influence decision-making or behavior.

Developing Your Research Skills

Knowing how to evaluate research does not happen naturally. Throughout life, individuals make decisions about truth based on nonscientific methods. Examples of nonscientific evidence are opinions, value judgments, personal experiences, unsupported assertions, and second-hand reports. Therefore, learning to distinguish between nonscientific evidence and scientific evidence is a learning process that requires self-awareness and practice. As a graduate student, recognizing nonscientific methods and learning how to apply critical thinking skills to the dissection and evaluation of research articles is an essential tool for your educational success.

Response Guidelines

By Friday: Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question that clarifies their posts or with an idea that extends the discussion.

By Sunday: Reply to the learners who responded to questions about their posts. Indicate what you learned from them and how you intend to use the information in your strategy for developing your dissertation research.

Resources

• Dissecting Research Articles [PDF]

Introduction to Week 6 Discussion: Critiquing Quantitative and Qualitative Research Studies

Welcome to the BMGT-8028 Week 6 Discussion: Critiquing Quantitative and Qualitative Research Studies comprehensive guide on critiquing and understanding quantitative and qualitative research studies. This Owlisdom guide is designed to help you, a scholar in the making, develop critical thinking skills crucial for dissecting research articles. By the end of this BMGT-8028 guide, you will be equipped with the knowledge to distinguish between scientific and nonscientific evidence, enhancing your ability to evaluate research with a critical eye.

Illustrates the three subtopics you will use in your assignment for this week: work-life balance, online learning, and the subtopic you have selected based on your specialization or area of interest.

Understanding Research Types 

• Scientific Research: Familiarize yourself with features of scientific research such as peer review, methodology, and data analysis. Understanding these elements will help you recognize robust research.
• Nonscientific Information: Identify common nonscientific sources such as opinions, anecdotes, and media articles. Learn to distinguish these from research based on empirical evidence. 

Construct a Venn diagram. Describe how you chose the subtopic in your specialization or area of interest, including references to articles from your search that support your choice. In your Venn diagram, for each subtopic, include references for: Theory. Seminal or foundational work. Recent research.

Developing Critical Thinking Skills

In this section of BMGT-8028 Week 6 Discussion: Critiquing Quantitative and Qualitative Research Studies, we will explore developing critical thinking skills.

• Evaluating Evidence: Practice assessing the validity of information by checking for sources, author credentials, and the presence of a rigorous peer review process.
• Recognizing Biases: Develop the ability to see through biases and subjective statements that may color the interpretation of data.

Briefly discuss the similarities and differences in the philosophic orientation and methodological approaches between the foundational or seminal articles and more recent literature in each subtopic area.

Applying Skills to Everyday Decision-Making

• Informed Decision Making: Use your enhanced skills to base your decisions on well-supported evidence rather than on assumptions or incomplete information.
• Behavioral Influence: Understand how nonscientific information can lead to poorly informed decisions that might affect personal or professional behaviors.

Example

In the journey from student to scholar, critical thinking becomes an indispensable skill, necessitated by the need to distinguish between scientific evidence and widespread nonscientific assertions that populate our decision-making processes. A typical example of nonscientific ‘research’ often encountered is the use of online reviews and ratings. These are frequently treated as solid evidence when choosing products or services. Although useful, these reviews often lack rigorous standardization and can be heavily biased due to personal experiences, undisclosed affiliations, or emotional responses.

Relying on such nonscientific evidence can significantly skew decision-making. For instance, purchasing decisions based solely on user reviews without considering controlled, comparative studies might lead to choices that don’t align with one’s needs or expectations. In more critical areas such as health and education, basing decisions on anecdotes or poorly supported claims found in online articles or viral posts can lead to choices that might not only be ineffective but also potentially harmful.

This highlights the importance of developing the ability to critically evaluate the quality of information, differentiating between opinions and scientifically validated facts. It’s a skill that requires practice and awareness, fostering a mindset that seeks out and prioritizes well-researched, peer-reviewed, and scientifically sound sources over convenient and often persuasive nonscientific evidence. As scholars, cultivating this discernment can enhance not only academic success but also informed decision-making in everyday life.

Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question about their posts that would clarify their selection.

Response and Engagement Guidelines 

• Constructive Responses: Develop skills to ask clarifying questions that promote deeper understanding and discussion among peers.
• Extending Research Conversations: Learn how to build on existing research, propose new angles, and suggest future studies that contribute to the field.

Peer response 1

Your exploration of nonscientific sources commonly mistaken for credible research is insightful. It’s crucial to recognize these elements, especially in an era dominated by a deluge of information. How do you suggest we can improve awareness and education about this among the broader public, especially on platforms inundated with such misinformation? Your approach could significantly impact how non-scholars perceive and evaluate information they encounter daily.

Peer Response 2

For your second response, continue engaging thoughtfully by adding new perspectives or examples to another peer’s post, enhancing the ongoing discussion.

Closing

In your journey from student to scholar, mastering the art of critiquing and understanding research studies is pivotal. BMGT-8028 Week 6 Discussion: Critiquing Quantitative and Qualitative Research Studies guide aims to cultivate your abilities to think critically and engage constructively in scholarly discussions. Remember, every piece of research is a stepping stone to further discovery, and your critical insights are valuable for advancing knowledge in your field. Let BMGT-8028 Week 6 Discussion: Critiquing Quantitative and Qualitative Research Studies serve as your roadmap for developing a nuanced understanding of quantitative and qualitative research methodologies.
You can also read BMGT8028 next module Week 7 Discussion: Analyzing and Evaluating Data-Based Research Articles.

BMGT-8028 Week 7 Discussion: Analyzing and Evaluating Data-Based Research Articles

Instructions for BMGT-8028 Week 7 Discussion

Week 7 Discussion: Analyzing and Evaluating Data-Based Research Articles

77 Unread replies84 Replies

By Wednesday: Select one qualitative and one quantitative article from your search for your Week 5 assignment. For your post, find and copy each article’s purpose statement. Then describe the sampling strategy and the data collection process for each study. Compare and contrast the differences in each approach and how each is aligned with the purpose statement.

Response Guidelines

By Friday: Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question that clarifies their posts or with an idea that extends the discussion.

By Sunday: Reply to the learners who responded to questions about their posts. Indicate what you learned from them and how you intend to use the information in your strategy for developing your dissertation research.

Introduction to Week 7 Discussion

Welcome to the BMGT-8028 Week 7 Discussion: Analyzing and Evaluating Data-Based Research Articles guide on analyzing and evaluating data-based research articles. This Owlisdom guide is designed to aid students in transitioning from academic learning to scholarly analysis, focusing on the critical evaluation of qualitative and quantitative research. This skill is vital for any student advancing in the field of research, as it shapes the ability to discern scientific merit within various studies.

Select one qualitative and one quantitative article from your search for your Week 5 assignment.

Article Selection Guidelines for Research

• Choose articles with clear relevance to your primary research themes.
• Select articles based on their research methodology—qualitative or quantitative.
• Ensure articles meet academic standards and contribute meaningfully to your topic.

For your post, find and copy each article’s purpose statement. 

Understanding Purpose Statements 

• Locate the purpose statement in each article, which usually summarizes the research intent and objectives.
• Note the clarity and scope of these statements—do they clearly align with the study’s goals? 

Example

1. Impact of AI on Work (Deranty & Corbin, 2022):

This article provides a comprehensive review of the social sciences’ perspectives on artificial intelligence’s influence in the workplace. It discusses technological unemployment, algorithmic management, and the sociopolitical implications of AI technologies, offering a broad theoretical framework for understanding AI’s integration into modern work environments.

• Work-Life Balance Prediction in IT (Paigude & Shikalgar, 2022):

This quantitative study applies machine learning models to predict work-life balance among female IT professionals. By utilizing data from surveys and implementing algorithms like MLP and LSTM, the research aims to identify key factors influencing work-life balance, providing a predictive framework that can assist in organizational planning and support systems.

Then describe the sampling strategy and the data collection process for each study.

Evaluating Sampling Strategies and Data Collection Processes

• Describe the population from which samples are drawn and the method of selection (random, convenience, etc.).
• Assess whether the sampling strategy is appropriate for the study’s aims and if it allows for generalization of results.

Example

Qualitative Approach (Deranty & Corbin, 2022):

The sampling strategy revolves around a literature review that synthesizes a wide range of social science research, offering a qualitative analysis of secondary data sources to outline the multifaceted impacts of AI.

Quantitative Approach (Paigude & Shikalgar, 2022):

Employs a structured survey method collecting data from 150 participants, utilizing statistical models to analyze the relationship between various work-life balance factors and outcomes among women in the IT sector.

Compare and contrast the differences in each approach and how each is aligned with the purpose statement.

Comparing Research Approaches

In this section of BMGT-8028 Week 7 Discussion: Analyzing and Evaluating Data-Based Research Articles, we will compare research approaches.

• Discuss how each approach aligns with the respective study’s purpose.
• Analyze the strengths and limitations of each methodological approach in addressing the research questions.

Example

The qualitative study by Deranty and Corbin (2022) offers a theoretical exploration, focusing on broad societal impacts and theoretical implications without direct data collection from subjects, emphasizing narrative synthesis and critical analysis. In contrast, Paigude and Shikalgar’s (2022) quantitative research is data-driven, with direct measurement of variables influencing work-life balance, employing statistical methods to validate hypotheses.

This juxtaposition highlights the complementarity of qualitative and quantitative approaches in addressing complex issues like AI’s role in the workplace and work-life balance. While the qualitative review provides a necessary theoretical backdrop and broad contextual understanding, the quantitative analysis offers precise, actionable insights crucial for developing targeted interventions and policies. These methodologies, when combined, can provide a more holistic understanding of the dynamics at play, reinforcing the need for interdisciplinary approaches in organizational studies and human resource strategies.

Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question that clarifies their posts or with an idea that extends the discussion.

Response and Engagement Guidelines 

• Formulate questions that clarify or challenge your peers’ evaluations and analyses.
• Share insights from your analysis and how they might influence your future research strategies.

Peer response 1

Your post offers a thorough analysis, adeptly comparing the nuanced perspectives of qualitative and quantitative research. The contrast between Deranty & Corbin’s broad theoretical approach and Paigude & Shikalgar’s precise, data-driven methodology underscores the diverse ways these strategies can enrich our understanding of workplace dynamics, particularly regarding AI’s impact and work-life balance. The synthesis of such varied methodologies certainly broadens the scope of discussion in our field. How do you think these differing methodologies could be integrated in future research to further benefit organizational studies?

Peer Response 2

For your second response, continue engaging thoughtfully by adding new perspectives or examples to another peer’s post, enhancing the ongoing discussion.

Closing

As you delve into this critical evaluation, remember that discerning the merits and drawbacks of different research methods will refine your ability to conduct and critique research effectively. This process is not only about finding faults but also about appreciating the strengths of different scientific approaches, thereby enriching your journey as a developing scholar. You can also read BMGT-8028 next module Week 8 Assignment: Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research Articles.

BMGT-8028 Week 8 Assignment: Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research Articles

Instructions for BMGT-8028 Week 8 Assignment

Week 8 Assignment: Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research Articles

Due: Sun Mar 3, 2024 11:59pm3/3/2024

For this assignment, you will read two articles, one with a quantitative methodology and another with a qualitative methodology, answer a series of questions about them, and summarize your evaluations.

Assignment Instructions

Read the sample qualitative and quantitative articles in the following reading list:

• Week 8: Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research ArticlesLinks to an external site..

Then open and complete the Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research Articles Template [DOCX].

Note: You may want to refer to Dissecting Research Articles [PDF] as you work on this assignment.

Review the Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research Articles Scoring Guide to learn about the criteria by which this assignment will be evaluated. When you have completed your assignment, submit it in the assignment area.

Submission Requirements

Your assignment should meet the following requirements:

• Written communication: Written communication must be grammatically correct and free of errors that detract from the overall message. Writing should be consistent with graduate-level scholarship.
• Format: Submit the completed Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research Articles Template as your assignment.

Resources

• RefWorksLinks to an external site..

Evidence and APALinks to an external site..

Introduction to Week 8 Assignment

Evaluating research articles is a critical skill for graduate students transitioning from learners to scholars. BMGT-8028 Week 8 Assignment: Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research Articles guide outlines the steps to critique and understand both quantitative and qualitative research articles effectively, enhancing academic prowess and depth of understanding in various research methodologies.

The first step to dissecting and evaluating a research article is the review for clarity and consistency. The abstract, the introduction, the problem statement, and the research hypothesis or research question should be clearly stated and consistent. The reader should be able to understand the relationship between each component. These components set the stage for the rest of the document. Please answer the following questions about elements of the quantitative research article. For questions with Agree/Disagree options, type an “x” in front of your selected option. Write one paragraph supporting your answers and reflecting on the strengths and weaknesses of Section 1.

Quantitative Research Article Evaluation

Abstract, Introduction, Hypothesis, Research Question, and Literature Review

• Ensure the abstract offers a clear summary and that the introduction adequately sets the context for the research question and hypothesis.
• Evaluate the literature review for its breadth, depth, and relevance to the research question.

Example

Please answer the following questions about the methodology for the quantitative article. For questions with Agree/Disagree options, type an “x” in front of your selected option. Write one paragraph supporting your answers and reflecting on the strengths and weaknesses of Section 2.

Methodology – Research Design, Methods and Procedures, and Sampling

• Assess the clarity and appropriateness of the research design and methods.
• Consider the sampling strategy’s effectiveness in addressing the research question. 

Example

Please answer the following questions about the quantitative methodology for the quantitative research article. For questions with Agree/Disagree options, type an “x” in front of your selected option. An extraneous variable can create problems for the researcher. Extraneous variables are undesired variables that can influence the dependent variable and change or invalidate the results of an experiment. Can you identify any extraneous variables in the sample quantitative article?

Write one paragraph supporting your answers and reflecting on the strengths and weaknesses of Section 3.

Quantitative Methodology

In this section of BMGT-8028 Week 8 Assignment: Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research Articles, we will explore quantitative methodology.

• Understand the statistical methods used and their suitability for the research questions posed.
• Examine how variables are defined and measured within the study.

Example

Please answer the following questions about the results presented in the quantitative article. For questions with Agree/Disagree options, type an “x” in front of your selected option. Write one paragraph supporting your answers and reflecting on the strengths and weaknesses of Section 4.

Analysis, Findings, Discussion

• Discuss how each approach aligns with the respective study’s purpose.
• Analyze the strengths and limitations of each methodological approach in addressing the research questions.

Example

Please answer the following questions about what you observed in the quantitative article regarding research ethics and implications of the research findings. For questions with Agree/Disagree options, type an “x” in front of your selected option. Summarize your evaluation of this study, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses and proposing possible changes that might improve the study.

Ethics and Implications of the Research Findings

In this section of BMGT-8028 Week 8 Assignment: Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research Articles, we will explore Ethics and Implications of the Research Findings.

• Scrutinize the ethical considerations reported in the study.
• Consider the broader implications of the research findings within the field.

Example

Please answer the following questions about elements of the qualitative research article. For questions with Agree/Disagree options, type an “x” in front of your selected option. Write one paragraph supporting your answers and reflecting on the strengths and weaknesses of Section 1.

Qualitative Research Article Evaluation

Abstract, Introduction, Hypothesis, Research Question, and Literature Review

• Check for a comprehensive summary in the abstract and a solid foundation in the introduction.
• Assess the formulation of the research question and the integration of the literature review.

Example

Please answer the following questions about the methodology of the sample qualitative article. For questions with Agree/Disagree options, type an “x” in front of your selected option. Write one paragraph supporting your answers and reflecting on the strengths and weaknesses of Section 2.

Methodology – Research Design, Methods and Procedures, and Sampling

• Evaluate the appropriateness of the qualitative research design and data collection methods.
• Analyze the process for selecting participants and the depth of the demographic data provided.

Example

Please answer the following questions about the qualitative research article. For questions with Agree/Disagree options, type an “x” in front of your selected option.

Information Specific to Qualitative Methodology

• Understand the qualitative methods used and discuss how they contribute to theme development and theory building.

Example

Please answer the following questions about the discussion and analysis elements of the qualitative research article. For questions with Agree/Disagree options, type an “x” in front of your selected option. Write one paragraph supporting your answers and reflecting on the strengths and weaknesses of the discussion and analysis elements.

Discussion and Analysis

• Assess the depth of the discussion and the logical flow from results to conclusions.
• Evaluate the integrity of the analysis and the justification of the conclusions drawn.

Example

Please answer the following questions about the qualitative research article. For questions with Agree/Disagree options, type an “x” in front of your selected option. Write one paragraph supporting your answer and reflecting on the ethical strengths and weaknesses of the research.

Ethics

• Review ethical considerations, participant consent, and the measures taken to protect participant confidentiality.

Example

Please answer the following questions about the qualitative research article. For questions with Agree/Disagree options, type an “x” in front of your selected option. Summarize your evaluation of this study, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses and proposing possible changes that might improve the study.

Research Contribution to the Literature

• Analyze the contribution of the research to existing knowledge and its implications for future research.

Example

Closing

Mastering the critique of research articles is not just an academic exercise but a foundational skill that enhances a scholar’s ability to engage critically with literature. BMGT-8028 Week 8 Assignment: Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research Articles guide provides a structured approach to dissecting both quantitative and qualitative research, fostering a deeper understanding and application of rigorous academic standards. Use this framework to refine your analytical skills and contribute meaningfully to your field of study. By systematically evaluating each section of both quantitative and qualitative research articles, you develop a critical eye necessary for academic success. This Owlisdom guide should serve as a foundational tool in your educational journey, helping you discern research quality and applicability to your own studies. You can also read BMGT-8028 next module Week 8 Discussion: Critiquing Research: Ethics and Threats to Validity.

BMGT-8028 Week 8 Discussion: Critiquing Research: Ethics and Threats to Validity

Instructions for BMGT-8028 Week 8 Discussion

Week 8 Discussion: Critiquing Research: Ethics and Threats to Validity

85 Unread replies104 Replies

By Wednesday: While most people associate research ethics with the protection of participants, other ethical issues can also arise about the conduct of the research itself. Discuss how the choice of topic, sampling strategy, data collection, analysis, and the researcher’s role might present ethical issues and how these might impact the validity of the findings.

Response Guidelines

By Friday: Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question that clarifies their posts or with an idea that extends the discussion.

By Sunday: Reply to the learners who responded to questions about their posts. Indicate what you learned from them and how you intend to use the information in your strategy for developing your dissertation research.

Introduction to Week 8 Discussion

BMGT-8028 Week 8 Discussion: Critiquing Research: Ethics and Threats to Validity guide of Owlisdom serves as an introduction for students and emerging researchers to critically analyze research studies with a focus on ethical considerations and threats to validity. Understanding these elements is crucial in distinguishing robust studies from those with potential biases or ethical concerns, thereby enhancing the researcher’s ability to conduct and evaluate research effectively.

While most people associate research ethics with the protection of participants, other ethical issues can also arise concerning the conduct of the research itself. Discuss how choice of topic.

Choosing a Topic

• Discuss potential ethical issues related to topic selection.

• Analyze how the chosen topic could impact the stakeholders involved. 

Example

When engaging in research, especially within academic settings, it’s imperative to adhere to stringent ethical standards and rigorously assess the validity of the findings. Ethical considerations span across various facets of research—from the choice of topic, which must not harm participants or subjects, to the methods of data collection, which should protect their privacy and consent.

Choosing a research topic requires a thoughtful balance between scholarly relevance and ethical implications. Topics must be chosen based on their potential to contribute to knowledge without causing unnecessary distress or harm to those involved. Similarly, the sampling strategy must be equitable, avoiding biases that could skew the study’s results or its applicability to broader populations.

Discuss sampling strategy.

Sampling Strategy

• Examine how the sampling method used can influence the study’s validity and ethical alignment.

• Consider the representation and fairness of the sample selection.

Example

A sampling strategy is critical in research for ensuring the collected data represent the population under study. Effective strategies must prioritize random selection to minimize bias, ensuring inclusivity and diversity within the sample. This approach enhances the generalizability of the findings, allowing for more reliable and valid conclusions drawn from the research.

Discuss data collection.

Data Collection

In this section of the MGT-8028 Week 8 Discussion: Critiquing Research: Ethics and Threats to Validity guide, we will discuss data collection.

• Evaluate the transparency and appropriateness of data collection methods.

• Assess potential biases introduced through selected data collection techniques.

Example

Data collection methods must also uphold high ethical standards, ensuring that participants are not subjected to manipulation or coercion. Transparency in how data is collected not only strengthens the study’s ethical foundations but also enhances its credibility. The role of the researcher is another critical element; maintaining objectivity and minimizing personal biases is crucial for the integrity of the study.

Discuss Data Analysis.

Data Analysis

• Scrutinize the methods of data analysis for accuracy and impartiality.

• Reflect on how data interpretation could be influenced by the researcher’s biases.

Example

The analysis phase is where the validity of the research is most tested. Researchers must employ robust analytical techniques that accurately interpret the data, avoiding overgeneralizations and unsupported conclusions. Discussions around these processes should openly address potential limitations and biases, offering a transparent evaluation of the study’s robustness.

The researcher’s role might present ethical issues, and how these might impact the validity of the findings.

Researcher’s Role

• Consider the impact of the researcher’s involvement on the study’s outcomes.

• Discuss the ethical responsibilities of the researcher to maintain objectivity.

Example

Engaging critically with these aspects, researchers can fortify their studies against ethical breaches and validity threats, thereby elevating the quality and impact of their research. This approach not only furthers the field but also upholds the moral obligations researchers bear to their subjects and society.

Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question that clarifies their posts or with an idea that extends the discussion.

Peer Response

• Formulate questions that prompt deeper discussion and clarification.

• Acknowledge the contributions of peers in your own research, specifying what you have learned from their posts.

Peer Response 1

Your discussion on the importance of a well-thought-out sampling strategy is insightful. I appreciate how you highlighted the significance of random selection to minimize bias. It’s essential, as you mentioned, to ensure that the sample reflects the diversity of the population to enhance the reliability and validity of the study. Have you considered the challenges that might arise from implementing such strategies in large-scale studies where accessibility and cost are constraints?

Peer Response 2

For your second response, continue engaging thoughtfully by adding new perspectives or examples to another peer’s post, enhancing the ongoing discussion.

Closing

Critiquing research requires a balanced approach to understanding both the strengths and weaknesses of a study. Researchers must be vigilant about ethical issues and threats to validity to enhance the credibility and applicability of their findings. Through meticulous analysis and adherence to ethical standards, one can significantly contribute to the advancement of knowledge while upholding the integrity of the research process. This BMGT-8028 Week 8 Discussion: Critiquing Research: Ethics and Threats to Validity guide should serve as a foundational tool for developing these essential skills in academic and professional research environments. You can also read BMGT-8028 next module Week 9 Prepare: Assignment Preparation.

BMGT-8028 Week 9 Prepare: Assignment Preparation

Instructions for BMGT-8028 Week 9: Prepare

Week 9 Prepare: Assignment Preparation

The final assignment in this course, Dissertation Search Strategy and Topic Development, is due next week in Week 10. The assignment will require you to select a topic area for your dissertation research and conduct a literature review search. Take time this week to begin working on this assignment by taking the following action:

• Using the applicable Acceptable Topics and Designs document below, select a topic area in your specialization that you are considering for your dissertation research.
  • Acceptable Topics and Designs BMGT PhD [PDF].
  • Acceptable Topics and Designs IT PhD [PDF].

Once you have identified your topic area, you may begin your literature search. Refer to the Week 10 assignment for information about this portion of the assignment.

Introduction to Week 9 Prepare Assignment Preparation

The purpose of this assignment is to guide students in selecting a dissertation topic and conducting a literature review search within their area of specialization. This process involves identifying a feasible and relevant research topic that aligns with current academic standards and the guidelines set by Capella University. The ultimate goal of Owlisdom BMGT-8028 Week 9 Prepare: Assignment Preparation guide is to develop a well-rounded understanding of your chosen topic and the methodologies that are most suitable for your research.

Identify one of the key journals in your specialization or area of interest.

Selecting a Topic Area 

• Refer to the Acceptable Topics and Designs document specific to your program.
• Choose a topic area that aligns with your specialization and interests.
• Ensure the topic is feasible within the timeframe of your degree. 

Example

Impact of Online Learning on Work-Life Balance

The division of one’s time between work and family or recreational activities is known as work-life balance. An individual who maintains a healthy work-life balance makes equal use of their time spent with family, friends, and leisure activities. It is impossible to overstate the value of work-life balance since it reduces stress at work and keeps people from burning out (Bucea-Manea-Ğoniş et al., 2020). Using digital learning environments to carry out learning tasks is known as online learning. As a result, all learning activities can be completed remotely, from home, for example. Significant learning activities are now being conducted online as part of a revolution in education. The ability to work and study from home has had an impact on work-life balance and online learning. Nonetheless, it has been demonstrated that this harms people’s health, particularly their mental health. According to Berry and Hughes (2019), before technological improvements allowed people to work from home, the lines separating work and family time were rigidly drawn. People spend more time working and studying than they do spending time with their families or relaxing with hobbies.

Furthermore, communication technology blurs the line between work and life, both physically and chronologically, allowing people to transcend boundaries (Berry & Hughes, 2019). People who study or work for extended periods of time without taking breaks risk burnout and chronic stress; as a result, they should strive for a work-life balance by maintaining the boundaries that separate work from family or leisure time. The culture and environment of work and learning have undergone tremendous changes as a result of technology (Bucea-Manea-\oniş et al., 2020). As a result of technology breakthroughs, the present generation of workers and learners is adjusting to new modes of working and learning. For instance, there is no need for physical sites because class meetings can be conducted virtually on digital platforms. Increased flexibility from online learning can contribute to a better work-life balance. But sometimes, when people are at home in comfort, they are working or studying for longer periods of time. Determining the effect of online learning on work-life balance is crucial.

What are the editorial guidelines for this journal?

Conducting a Literature Review Search

• Begin your search using the Capella Library and other academic databases.
• Use keywords and phrases relevant to your topic to find peer-reviewed journal articles.
• Evaluate the quality and relevance of the articles you find.

Example

Evaluation of the Search Approach

The search terms that were utilized are “technology,” “work-life balance,” and “online learning.” Additionally, the search was conducted using the terms “online learning and work-life balance.” The terms “technology and online learning and work-life balance” and “online learning and work-life balance” are the most effective ones that generated the most pertinent search results. The most pertinent publications that addressed the research issue under investigation were found using these keywords. Nonetheless, certain ineffective keywords yielded excessively broad outcomes, making them unrelated to the influence of technology on virtual education and work-life equilibrium. As a consequence, the best keywords that generated the most pertinent results were those that were entered first, followed by the word “and,” and then another keyword. This combination helps to highlight where the most pertinent items are located.

Literature Review Outline

Most research on work-life balance examines work and home life separately. They are said to have boundaries that an individual transcends when working, either physically or mentally. Nonetheless, it is seen that workplaces and learning environments are becoming more digitally oriented. The growth of communication technologies has caused a breakdown in the borders that traditionally divide work from home (Berry and Hughes, 2020). Additionally, many work during what was once thought of as “family time” and occasionally rest during that same period. Work-life balance can be achieved with the use of digital technologies since one can work from the comfort of their home. However, this has drawbacks; when boundaries are not created, people may spend more time working although they are at home.

The border and boundary theory holds that there are boundaries dividing times, places, and people who are involved in work versus family roles. People cross these borders every time to are working or learning, whether physically or psychologically, as they switch from work and family or leisure time (Johari et al., 2017). Additionally, people have separated their lives in terms of work environment and home or leisure time. Similarly, the spillover theory focuses on when there is a spillover between work and family, creating either negative or positive relationships. Where there is no flexibility between work and family time, there is bound to be a negative spillover. On the other hand, where there is flexibility, there is a positive spill. This means that people with flexible schedules find it easy to create time for family or leisure. At the same time, those without flexibility have difficulty creating time for family or leisure time, hence no work-life balance.

Most studies on work-life balance utilized qualitative methodology. This allows the researchers to gain an in-depth understanding of an issue (Berry and Hughes, 2020). Moreover, the data is accurate since the respondents can give their experiences, feelings, and thoughts without any constraint. The researchers can also follow up on the respondents’ answers in real-time; hence, the qualitative analysis offers a dynamic research approach. The respondents in quantitative research can also elaborate their answers whenever necessary, enabling the researcher to gain more insight into the topic.

Future research on the topic should adopt a quantitative methodology for further exploration of the issue. A larger sample should be used for the research to increase the generalizability of the findings. Moreover, future researchers should look into the impacts of digital working spaces on employees’ work-life balance and performance while working at home. Currently, most of the studies explored (Berry & Hughes, 2020; Bucea-Manea-Țoniş et al., 2020; Bauwens et al., 2020) looked into the impacts of technology on online learning work-life balance. Still, no significant studies have fully addressed the impact on performance.

The border and boundary theory outlines that there are boundaries between work and life. Various studies support the fact that there are physical and temporal boundaries in online learning and work-life balance (Berry & Hughes, 2020. However, these boundaries exist psychologically when people are learning online. Additionally, it is easy for people to have a balance of work and life while learning online since they work in the comfort of their homes. However, it may lead to burnout and stress when the boundaries are not adhered to (Bauwens et al., 2020). It is a widespread belief that working at home exposes people to unlimited schedules with no time frames, hence a possibility of working longer than required to complete tasks, hence work-life balance is compromised. There has been a change in understanding since the various literature used in the study suggests that people can achieve a work-life balance while learning online.

The processes and procedures of the literature search start with a clear definition of the search topic. A topic is defined by asking the questions that need to be answered. For this case, it was whether online learning had any impact on work-life balance. A topic ensures that the research maintains focus on a specific issue throughout the whole research process. A search strategy ensures that relevant information for the study can be obtained. The search study used for this literature search entailed a Preliminary Search using keywords in the Capella University Library databases. The keywords that were successful in locating the relevant articles were a combination of ‘online learning and work-life balance.’ The information obtained was evaluated to ensure that it was credible. This involved considering the currency, authority, and relevance to the topic.

Theory in research has proved important as it enhances its meaningfulness and provides a connection between issues in real life and literature. It establishes meaningful relationships among variables that would otherwise not be considered. Moreover, theories provide the researcher with the guidelines to use as they look for information, pointing out the areas that are likely to be successful. It also helps to narrow down the range of facts the research is supposed to study, hence helping maintain focus on key issues. Similarly, seminal works present ideas of great importance to a certain field. They helped this study to understand how people can strike a balance between work and life by utilizing online learning, as it offers more room for flexibility; hence, one can participate in leisure or family activities. The analysis of data-based research helps understand the importance of the use of information in research.

My acknowledgments go to colleagues who gave me unlimited assistance in specific areas of the assignment whenever I faced challenges. Without their effort, I would likely have spent more time figuring out things on my own. Moreover, their support helped maintain focus on key issues that needed to be addressed in the assignment. Therefore, this work is dedicated to their relentless efforts.

Closing

Selecting a dissertation topic and conducting a thorough literature review are critical steps in your academic journey. By following the BMGT-8028 Week 9 Prepare: Assignment Preparation guidelines, you will ensure that your research is relevant, feasible, and aligned with current academic standards. This process not only helps in developing a solid foundation for your dissertation but also enhances your understanding of the research landscape in your field. Take advantage of the resources available to you, seek feedback, and refine your topic to ensure a successful dissertation journey. You can also read BMGT-8028 next module Week 9 Discussion: Literature Review Strategies for Topic Development.

BMGT-8028 Week 9 Discussion: Literature Review Strategies for Topic Development

Instructions for BMGT-8028 Week 9 Discussion

Week 9 Discussion: Literature Review Strategies for Topic Development

78 Unread replies89 Replies

By Wednesday: Identify one of the key journals in your specialization or area of interest. What are the editorial guidelines for this journal, and how do those guidelines shape the type of articles they publish and the research methods used in the field?

Response Guidelines

By Friday: Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question that clarifies their posts on how the journal’s editorial policy shapes the types of articles and research methods in the field.

By Sunday: Reply to the learners who responded to questions about their posts. Indicate what you learned from them and how you intend to use the information in your strategy for developing your dissertation research.

Step-By-Step Guide BMGT-8028 Week 9 Discussion: Literature Review Strategies for Topic Development

Introduction to Week 9 Discussion

The BMGT-8028 Week 9 Discussion: Literature Review Strategies for Topic Development aims to deepen your understanding of the role that editorial guidelines play in shaping the research landscape within your specialization or area of interest. This Owlisdom BMGT-8028 Week 9 Discussion: Literature Review Strategies for Topic Development assignment requires you to identify a key journal in your field, analyze its editorial policies, and discuss how these policies influence the types of articles and research methods prevalent in the discipline.

Identify one of the key journals in your specialization or area of interest.

IDENTIFYING A KEY JOURNAL IN YOUR SPECIALIZATION 

• Choose a reputable journal that is well-regarded in your field.
• Ensure the journal publishes research relevant to your specific interests.
• Review the journal’s impact factor and citation metrics to confirm its significance. 

Example

One of the key journals in my specialization, psychology, is the “Journal of Counseling Psychology.” The editorial guidelines for this journal emphasize empirical research that advances the understanding of counseling processes and outcomes. These guidelines shape the type of articles published by prioritizing rigorous methodological standards, including both quantitative and qualitative studies that are methodologically sound and contribute new knowledge to the field.

What are the editorial guidelines for this journal?

UNDERSTANDING EDITORIAL GUIDELINES

• Locate the journal’s submission guidelines on its official website.
• Analyze the guidelines for types of articles accepted (e.g., empirical studies, literature reviews, theoretical articles).
• Examine the preferred research methodologies (quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods) indicated in the guidelines.
• Note any specific requirements for manuscript structure, length, and referencing style.

Example

The editorial policy outlines several key areas. First, articles must present clear, testable hypotheses or research questions. This emphasis on empirical rigor ensures that published studies are not merely descriptive but offer measurable contributions to the field. The guidelines also highlight the importance of using appropriate and advanced statistical methods, which further enforces the standard of methodological excellence. Additionally, there is a strong preference for studies that have practical implications for counseling practice, meaning that research must not only be theoretically sound but also applicable in real-world settings.

These guidelines influence the types of articles published by fostering a balance between innovative research and adherence to established scientific methods. For instance, the preference for empirically robust studies means that articles often feature complex statistical analyses and large sample sizes, enhancing the reliability and validity of the findings. This can sometimes limit the publication of exploratory or preliminary studies, which may lack the methodological rigor required but still offer valuable insights.

How do those guidelines shape the type of articles they publish and the research methods used in the field?

ANALYZING THE IMPACT OF EDITORIAL GUIDELINES

• Reflect on the influence of editorial guidelines on the diversity of research topics published.
• Consider how methodological preferences shape the research questions and designs adopted by authors.
• Evaluate the balance between innovative research and adherence to established norms within the journal’s publications.
• Identify trends or biases that may emerge from the journal’s editorial policies.

Example

Furthermore, the journal’s editorial policies encourage diversity in research topics by inviting submissions across a broad range of counseling contexts, including multicultural issues, career development, and mental health interventions. This inclusive approach ensures that the journal reflects the wide scope of the counseling field, although the high methodological standards may inadvertently favor researchers with access to substantial resources and statistical expertise.

In conclusion, understanding the editorial guidelines of the “Journal of Counseling Psychology” highlights how these policies shape research trends within the field. By setting high standards for methodological rigor and practical relevance, the journal ensures that published studies significantly contribute to both the scientific community and counseling practice. Engaging with these guidelines can enhance my approach to literature reviews and topic development, ensuring that my research aligns with the expectations of leading journals in the field.

Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question that clarifies their posts on how the journal’s editorial policy shapes the types of articles and research methods in the field.

Response and Engagement Guidelines 

• Read your peers’ posts thoroughly and thoughtfully.
• Pose questions that encourage deeper analysis and reflection on their observations.
• Avoid yes/no questions; instead, ask open-ended questions that invite discussion.

Peer response 1

Your discussion about the “Journal of Counseling Psychology” effectively highlights how the editorial guidelines shape research in the field. I appreciate how you emphasized the balance between empirical rigor and practical applicability. One question I have is about the accessibility of publishing for researchers with fewer resources. Do you think high methodological standards might limit contributions from diverse or underfunded settings, and if so, how could the journal address this issue? Your insights into the broad range of counseling contexts covered are particularly useful for understanding the journal’s inclusivity. This discussion definitely enhances my approach to evaluating research publications.

Peer Response 2

For your second response, continue engaging thoughtfully by adding new perspectives or examples to another peer’s post, enhancing the ongoing discussion.

Closing

In conclusion, the BMGT-8028 Week 9 Discussion: Literature Review Strategies for Topic Development provides an opportunity to critically examine how editorial guidelines influence research trends and methodologies within your field. By engaging with key journals and interacting with peers, you will gain valuable insights that will enhance your research skills and contribute to the development of your dissertation. This exercise underscores the importance of understanding the broader context in which academic research is conducted and disseminated. You can also read BMGT-8028 next module WEEK 10 DISCUSSION: DRAWING CONCLUSIONS.

BMGT-8028 WEEK 10 DISCUSSION: DRAWING CONCLUSIONS

Instructions for BMGT-8028 Week 10 Discussion

Week 10 Discussion 1: Drawing Conclusions

• 39 Unread replies60 Replies
• By Wednesday: Select a recent research article (published 2018 or later) from a key journal in your specialization or area of interest you identified for your Week 10 assignment. Seek out an article in which the method and design are either a generic qualitative inquiry or a quantitative regression.
• For your post, briefly describe the subject of the article, the research method and design (i.e., generic qualitative inquiry, quantitative regression), the sample population, the phenomenon (qualitative) or variables (quantitative), and the theoretical framework.

• Response Guidelines

• By Friday: Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question that clarifies their posts or with an idea that extends the discussion.
• By Friday: Reply to the learners who responded to questions about their posts. Indicate what you learned from them and how you intend to use the information in your strategy for developing your dissertation research.

Introduction to WEEK 10 DISCUSSION: DRAWING CONCLUSIONS

In this BMGT-8028 Week 10 Discussion: Drawing Conclusions discussion, you will analyze a recent research article from a key journal within your specialization or area of interest. BMGT-8028 Week 10 Discussion: Drawing Conclusions task aims to enhance your ability to critically evaluate research methodologies and theoretical frameworks. By examining either a generic qualitative inquiry or a quantitative regression study, you will develop a deeper understanding of how research findings are derived and interpreted in your field.

Select a recent research article (published in 2018 or later) from a key journal in your specialization or area of interest you identified for your Week 10 assignment.

SELECTING A RECENT RESEARCH ARTICLE

• Choose an article published in 2018 or later from a reputable journal in your field.
• Ensure the article uses either a generic qualitative inquiry or a quantitative regression method.

Example

For this discussion, I chose the article “Work-Life Balance and Emergency Telework: Lessons from COVID-19” by Lunde et al. (2022), published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Briefly describe the subject of the article.

DESCRIBING THE SUBJECT OF THE ARTICLE

In this section of BMGT-8028 Week 10 Discussion: Drawing Conclusions, we will describe the subject of the article.

• Briefly summarize the main topic or research question of the article.
• Highlight the significance and relevance of the study in your specialization.

Example

The article explores the impact of emergency telework on work-life balance during the COVID-19 pandemic. It focuses on how sudden shifts to remote work environments affected employees’ ability to maintain a balance between their professional and personal lives.

Briefly describe the research method and design (i.e., generic qualitative inquiry, quantitative regression).

IDENTIFYING THE RESEARCH METHOD AND DESIGN

• Specify whether the study employs a generic qualitative inquiry or a quantitative regression design.
• Explain why this method is suitable for the research question addressed.

Example

The research employs a generic qualitative inquiry method. This approach is well-suited for understanding personal experiences and gaining insights into how individuals navigated the challenges posed by the abrupt transition to telework.

Briefly describe the sample population.

DISCUSSING THE SAMPLE POPULATION

• Describe the demographics and characteristics of the study’s participants.
• Mention how the sample was selected and its size.

Example

The study involved in-depth interviews with 15 employees from various sectors who transitioned to telework during the pandemic. These participants were selected to provide a diverse range of experiences and perspectives on managing work-life balance under emergency telework conditions.

Briefly describe the phenomenon (qualitative) or variables (quantitative).

EXPLAINING THE PHENOMENON OR VARIABLES 

In this section of BMGT-8028 Week 10 Discussion: Drawing Conclusions, we will explain the phenomenon or variables.

• For qualitative studies: Identify and explain the central phenomenon being explored.
• For quantitative studies: List the independent and dependent variables examined.

Example

The phenomenon under investigation is the disruption of work-life balance due to emergency telework. The study examines factors contributing to this disruption, including increased work hours, lack of clear boundaries between work and home life, and the psychological stress associated with managing dual roles simultaneously.

Describe the theoretical framework.

DESCRIBING THE THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

• Outline the theoretical framework that underpins the study.
• Discuss how the theory informs the research design and interpretation of results.

Example

The theoretical framework for this study is the work-family border theory. This theory explores how individuals manage and negotiate the boundaries between work and family roles. It provides a lens through which the researchers analyze the challenges and strategies employed by participants to maintain work-life balance during telework.

This discussion highlights the importance of organizational support in establishing clear work-life boundaries and the need for flexible work arrangements. Understanding these dynamics will inform my dissertation research by focusing on strategies that organizations can implement to support work-life balance in remote work settings.

Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question that clarifies their posts or with an idea that extends the discussion.

PEER RESPONSES 

• Engage with at least two peers’ posts by Friday.
• Ask clarifying questions or extend the discussion with additional insights.
• Respond to those who have commented on your post.
• Reflect on what you learned from their perspectives and how it influences your research approach.

Example

Your selection of the article by Lunde et al. (2022) on work-life balance during emergency telework provides a comprehensive overview of the challenges faced by employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. The use of a generic qualitative inquiry method and the work-family border theory framework is well-justified for this research. Your insights on organizational support and flexible work arrangements are crucial for developing strategies to maintain work-life balance in remote settings. This aligns well with my focus on employee well-being in telework environments and offers valuable perspectives for my own research.

Closing

This BMGT-8028 Week 10 Discussion: Drawing Conclusions discussion is essential for honing your skills in critically evaluating research methods and theoretical frameworks. By thoroughly analyzing recent studies, you gain insights into effective research practices and methodologies. Use these Owlisdom guidelines to systematically dissect each component of the research article, fostering a deeper understanding of your field and improving your research acumen. This exercise is pivotal for your progression in academic research and will aid in the development of your dissertation. By adhering to these guidelines for BMGT-8028 Week 10 Discussion: Drawing Conclusions, you will be well-prepared to tackle this discussion with confidence and precision, enhancing your ability to draw meaningful conclusions from complex research data. You can also read BMGT-8028 next module Week 10 Discussion 2: Reflecting on Your Course Experience.

BMGT-8028 Week 10 Discussion 2: Reflecting on Your Course Experience

Instructions for BMGT-8028 Week 10 Discussion 2

Week 10 Discussion 2: Reflecting on Your Course Experience

55 Unread replies62 Replies

By Wednesday: Review your discussion post from Week 1. Now that you have completed the course, what have you learned that has changed your understanding of how theory is used to advance knowledge and to support and frame research? Describe how theory is viewed differently when the study approach is a qualitative method versus a quantitative method. Based on your current understanding of the literature around your topic, discuss whether future research on your topic requires a quantitative or qualitative method.

Response Guidelines

By Friday: Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question about their posts that would clarify what they wrote.

By Sunday: Reply to the learners who responded to your questions about their posts.

Introduction to Week 10 Discussion 2: Reflecting on Your Course Experience

The BMGT-8028 Week 10 Discussion 2: Reflecting on Your Course Experience is an opportunity for students to reflect on their learning journey throughout the course. This assignment involves reviewing your initial discussion post from BMGT-8028 Week 1 and evaluating how your understanding of theory has evolved, particularly in its research application. The reflection will also distinguish between qualitative and quantitative approaches to theory and assess the appropriate methodology for future research based on current literature.

Review your discussion post from Week 1.

Reviewing Initial Discussion Post

• Revisit your Week 1 discussion post to recall your initial perspectives.
• Note any changes or growth in your understanding since the beginning of the course.
• Reflect on specific theories or concepts that have influenced your learning journey.

Example

Reflecting on my Week 1 discussion post, I realize that my understanding of the role of theory in research has significantly deepened. Initially, I saw theory as merely a backdrop for research. However, I now recognize it as an essential framework that shapes the entire research process, from formulating questions to interpreting results.

Now that you have completed the course, what have you learned that has changed your understanding of how theory is used to advance knowledge and to support and frame research?

Understanding Theory in Advancing Knowledge

• Reflect on how theory supports and frames research in your specialization.
• Discuss how theoretical frameworks guide the research process and contribute to the development of new knowledge.
• Consider examples from course materials that illustrate the practical application of theory in research.

Example

Through this course, I have learned that theory is dynamic and instrumental in advancing knowledge. It provides a lens for understanding phenomena and helps frame research in a way that can yield meaningful insights. For example, theory in qualitative research can guide the interpretation of complex social behaviors, while in quantitative research, it helps in hypothesis testing and establishing causality.

Describe how theory is viewed differently when the study approach is a qualitative method versus a quantitative method.

Comparing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods

In this section of BMGT-8028 Week 10 Discussion 2: Reflecting on Your Course Experience, we will compare qualitative and quantitative methods.

• Explain the differences in how theory is used in qualitative versus quantitative research.
• Qualitative: Emphasize the exploration of phenomena and the development of theories.
• Quantitative: Highlight the testing of hypotheses and measurement of variables.
• Use course readings to support your explanation.

Example

Qualitative methods, such as those used by Smith and Doe (2019), rely on theories to provide deep, contextual understandings of phenomena. They use grounded theory to explore lived experiences, which allows for rich, nuanced data. In contrast, quantitative methods, exemplified by Johnson and Lee’s (2020) regression analysis study, use theory to test hypotheses and quantify relationships between variables, emphasizing precision and generalizability.

Based on your current understanding of the literature around your topic, discuss whether future research on your topic requires a quantitative or qualitative method.

Determining Future Research Methodology

• Based on your understanding of the literature, decide whether future research on your topic should use a qualitative or quantitative approach.
• Consider the strengths and weaknesses of each method in relation to your research goals.
• Justify your choice by referring to specific studies or theoretical perspectives.

Example

Based on my current understanding, I believe a mixed-methods approach would be most beneficial for future research on my topic. This approach combines the depth of qualitative insights with the rigor of quantitative validation, providing a comprehensive understanding of complex issues. By integrating both methods, I can leverage the strengths of each to address research questions more effectively.

By Friday: Reply to at least two fellow learners with a question about their posts that would clarify what they wrote. By Sunday: Reply to the learners who responded to your questions about their posts.

PEER RESPONSES 

• Engage with at least two peers’ posts by Friday.
• Ask clarifying questions or extend the discussion with additional insights.
• Respond to those who have commented on your post.
• Reflect on what you learned from their perspectives and how it influences your research approach.

Example

Your reflection on the evolving role of theory in research is insightful. I appreciate how you distinguish between the applications of theory in qualitative and quantitative methods. The example of mixed-methods research integrating both qualitative and quantitative approaches is particularly compelling. It emphasizes the value of a comprehensive strategy in addressing complex research questions. Your shift towards a mixed-methods approach resonates with my own research experiences and highlights the importance of flexibility in methodology. How do you plan to integrate theoretical frameworks into your future mixed-methods research?

Closing

Reflecting on your course experience helps consolidate your learning and prepares you for future research endeavors. By evaluating your initial understanding, exploring how theory advances knowledge, comparing research methodologies, and determining the best approach for future research, you develop a comprehensive perspective on your field. This Owlisdom How-To guide of BMGT-8028 Week 10 Discussion 2: Reflecting on Your Course Experience is crucial for identifying areas of growth and planning your next steps in academic and professional development. You can also read BMGT-8028 next module Week 10 Assignment: Dissertation Search Strategy and Topic Development.

BMGT-8028 Week 10 Assignment: Dissertation Search Strategy and Topic Development

Instructions for BMGT-8028 Week 10 Assignment

Week 10 Assignment: Dissertation Search Strategy and Topic Development

For this assignment, you will begin developing a topic and search strategy for your dissertation.

Preparation Steps

Select a topic area for your dissertation research and conduct a literature review search by completing the steps below.

1. Using the applicable Acceptable Topics and Designs document below, select a topic area in your specialization that you are considering for your dissertation research.

• Acceptable Topics and Designs BMGT PhD [PDF].
• Acceptable Topics and Designs IT PhD [PDF].

Reviewing the Literature: the library guide for conducting literature reviews. Fill in the Preliminary Search Action Plan. Download a PDF copy of your Preliminary Search Action Plan to include with this assignment. Track your search strategy using the Database Search Log and the Scholarly Research Log. Both logs are available on the More Services and Tools page of the Capella University Library. Download both completed logs to include with this assignment. Use the Search by Methodology guide to search by methodology.

Assignment Instructions

To complete the assignment:

• Describe the topic area from your specialization or area of interest you selected for this assignment.
• Identify the keywords you used in your search, including those that were rejected or nonproductive and those that yielded the best results. Evaluate the results from the keywords as they relate to the topic of your search.
• Develop an annotated bibliography of selected articles that emerged from the results of your search. The annotated bibliography should be included with your assignment as an appendix.
• Discuss the theories, seminal works, and recent research that emerged from the results of your search. Include in this section:
  • An outline of a recent review of the literature article.
  • A description (including the theoretical constructs) of two or three theories relevant to your topic.
  • A description of the relevant seminal works.
  • An analysis of the predominant methodology (exploratory/qualitative or theory testing/quantitative) of the most recent research on your topic.
  • An evaluation of the direction and methodology (quantitative or qualitative) of future research on the topic.
• Summarize your understanding of the existing literature on your topic, including:
  • How has your understanding of the relevant theory and state of knowledge in your focus area changed since you began your review of the relevant literature?
  • A possible gap in existing knowledge emerged for which a research study might make a substantive contribution to the existing knowledge.
• Summarize your progress to date on your literature search and topic in your topic area, and describe your strategy going forward, including:
  • How has your understanding of the state of knowledge in your topic area changed since you began your review of the relevant literature?
  • A discussion of whether the existing research on your topic supports a qualitative or quantitative approach for your research.
• Describe the next steps for your strategy to develop a topic, research purpose, and research question.

Review the Dissertation Search Strategy and Topic Development Scoring Guide to learn about the criteria by which this assignment will be evaluated. When you have completed your assignment, submit it in the assignment area.

Submission Requirements

Your assignment should meet the following requirements:

• Written communication: Written communication must be grammatically correct and free of errors that detract from the overall message. Writing should be consistent with graduate-level scholarship.
• APA format: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APALinks to an external site. Style and formatting.
• Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

Format: Submit four documents—the assignment in .doc or .docx file format, a PDF copy of your Preliminary Search Action Plan, and downloaded copies of the completed Database Search Log and Scholarly Research Log.

Introduction to Week 10 Assignment: Dissertation Search Strategy and Topic Development

The BMGT-8028 Week 10 Assignment: Dissertation Search Strategy and Topic Development is a critical step in the process of developing your dissertation. This task requires you to select a topic area, conduct a literature review, and begin forming a comprehensive understanding of the existing research in your chosen field. By following this Owlisdom BMGT-8028 Week 10 Assignment: Dissertation Search Strategy and Topic Development guide, you will systematically explore relevant literature, identify key theories and methodologies, and shape the direction of your dissertation research.

Describe the topic area from your specialization or area of interest you selected for this assignment.

Describe the Topic Area

• Provide an overview of the topic area you have selected.
• Explain why this area is significant and worthy of research.
• List the keywords used in your search.
• Highlight which keywords were productive and which were not.
• Evaluate the relevance of the results to your topic.

Example

Work-Life Balance, Online Learning, and Technology

Since the 1970s, scholars have been interested in the work-family relationship as it shows how work affects the family and vice versa (Clark, 2000). On the other hand, the information society of today offers us a societal picture in which ICTs play a significant part in every aspect of life, including education. Online learning is one of the new educational formulas made feasible by the broad growth of communications and technology. On the other hand, the influx of new technologies has hurt the workplace. Since its debut, the workplace has undergone significant change. The productive reality includes things like email use, Internet access, automated worker data processing, teleworking, and the use of new technologies for labor benefit monitoring and control. These are just a few examples of how new technologies are becoming more widely used in businesses.

Identify the keywords you used in your search, including those that were rejected or nonproductive and those that yielded the best results. Evaluate the results from the keywords as they relate to the topic of your search.

keywords

• Used “work-life balance” and “online learning” – yielded relevant articles focused on the intersection of these topics.
• Tried “digital learning environments” – produced fewer specific results, mainly broad studies on online education.
• Searched “remote work stress” – effective in finding studies linking remote work and stress management.
• Rejected “virtual classrooms impact” – too broad, with many unrelated results not directly addressing work-life balance.

Example

Peer review and academic publication reviews are included in this work. To guarantee the articles’ veracity and accuracy. One of the most important steps in the bibliographic search process is properly formulating the search strategy. We can use the search method on many databases once it has been developed and designed. The Capella University Library, Google Scholar, ProQuest, and EBSCO were among the resources consulted for this paper. A combination of keywords, including work-life balance, seminal, online learning, mobile worker, mobile workforce, teleworker, and systematic literature review, was used in the search approach. Which keywords were deemed ineffective or rejected? To have a more in-depth discussion about the keywords that fulfill a portion of the assignment, Patricia, add these keywords here.] These keywords aid in refining the search and locating the research for this article. Although it took a lot of time, employing the strategic plan also helped to speed up the process. The year of publication was the basis for the article selection process, particularly for the foundational work. “Seminal works are papers that first introduced a concept of significant importance or effect within a certain discipline. They are also commonly referred to as crucial or landmark studies. You will probably see these sources often cited in other journal articles, books, dissertations, etc., since seminal articles are widely cited in research (Capella, n.d.). Reviewing the bibliography, which lists the articles we chose because they fit our theme, was also crucial.

Develop an annotated bibliography of selected articles that emerged from the results of your search. The annotated bibliography should be included with your assignment as an appendix.

Develop an Annotated Bibliography

In this section of BMGT-8028 Week 10 Assignment: Dissertation Search Strategy and Topic Development, we will discuss developing an annotated bibliography.

• Choose articles that are highly relevant to your research topic.
• Provide a summary and analysis of each article in the bibliography.
• Include the purpose of the study, methodology, key findings, and relevance.
• Append the annotated bibliography to your assignment.

Example

Antonaci, A., Klemke, R., & Specht, M. (2019). The effects of Gamification in online learning environments: A systematic literature review. Informatics, 6(3), 32. doi:10.3390/informatics6030032

Antonaci, Klemke & Specht (2019) explained that Gamification has recently been presented as a successful strategy to engage users, with potential for online education. However, the authors performed a systematic literature review to close the gap explaining the effect of Gamification on user behavior in online learning. The authors affirmed that Gamification effects had been investigated in different domains such as banking, trading, the medical field, and marketing. The study addressed the effects of gamification in six areas: performance, motivation, and engagement, attitude towards gamification, collaboration, and social awareness. The findings explained that Gamification and its application in online learning and, in particular, in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are still a new field; therefore, there is a lack of empirical research on Gamification.

Ayadurai, V. K. (2018). Work-Life Balance, Work-Study Interface, Gender, Stress, and Satisfaction of Online Students.

Ayaduri (2018) asserted that the interface between work and private life has been characterized by different terms, such as work-life balance. It is claimed that there is always interference between work and aspects of a person’s life not linked to work, which

implies inter-role conflict, in which the pressures from the labor and family spheres are mutually incompatible in some respect (Ayadurai, p. 6, 2018). The author used a quantitative study to measure “the effects of gender on the relationships between work-life balance and work-study interface of working online students and their perceived stress and satisfaction with life.” (Ayadurai, p. 9, 2018). Furthermore, the study examined the changing social role in gender and spillover experiences of working online students in their work-life balance and work-study interface. However, the author used a spillover theory and a social role theory. According to Ayadauri (2018), the Spillover theory is a process by which individuals’ experiences in one role affect their experiences in another role, and the experience in each role could develop a positive spillover or negative spillover (p. 9). In addition, people may experience stress and fatigue during these spillovers. The study explained that “demographics of marital or partner status, long working hours, child-care responsibilities and support from the head of the department influenced the work-life balance of schoolteachers” (Ayadauri, p. 10, 2018). Furthermore, social role theory attempts to understand the origin of sex differences and similarities in social behavior. The author explained that according to the role,” individuals may experience stronger negative emotions when one role interferes with the other role” (Ayadauri, p. 10, 2018). One of the limitations found in this study was establishing awareness and understanding of the role conflicts faced by working online students in their work-life balance (Ayadauri, p. 16, 2018).

Chan, X. W., Kalliath, T., Brough, P., Siu, O. L., O’Driscoll, M. P., & Timms, C. (2016). Work–family enrichment and satisfaction: The mediating role of self-efficacy and work–life balance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(15), 1755-1776.

Based on social cognitive theory, Chan, Kalliath, Brough, Siu, O’Driscoll & Timms (2016) examined in their research how work-family enrichment contributes to job and family satisfaction by exploring the mediating mechanisms of self-efficacy and work-life balance. The authors used a heterogeneous sample of Australian employees from four different organizations. Furthermore, Chan et al. (2016 used structural equation modeling; the result provided support to their hypothesis that work-to-family enrichment and family-to-work enrichment are related to self-efficacy, and those a positive effect on work-life balance. The theoretical foundation of this research is based on the concept and prepositions of role accumulation theory, which is understood as the experiences of one role improving the quality of life of the other role. The authors highlighted the importance of managers and human resources in implementing positive psychology interventions regularly. The study argues about the impact of work-family enrichment on self-efficacy to balance work and life. Chan et al. (2016 explained the importance that organizations helping employees to build self-efficacy.

Dechen, T., Wangyal, S., Tanimoto, S., Sato, H., & Kanai, A. (2020). A Preliminary Study of Risk Assessment of Mobile Workers for Improvement of Work-Life Balance. Bulletin of Networking, Computing, Systems, and Software, 9(1), 43-45.

The researchers presented a preliminary study about the risk of mobile workers. Dechen, Wangyal, Tanimoto, Sato & Kanai (2020) compile 20 different risks found in past literature reviews and surveys on mobile workers and the mobile workforce. The authors asserted that due to the increase in business competitiveness, organizations are enabling workers to work remotely and creating new workspace environments. The data obtained by the global mobile workforce stated that it would increase from 1.45 billion in 2016, accounting for 38.8% of the global workforce, to 1.87 billion in 2022, accounting for 42.5% of the global workforce (p. 43). On the other hand, the study highlighted that further studies showed that “81% of CIOs said their company had experienced a Wi-Fi related security incident in the last year, and 62% of Wi-Fi related security incidents occurred in cafés and coffee shops. 94% of CIOs believe the rise of BYOD has increased mobile security risks, and only 46% of enterprises were confident that mobile workers were using a VPN” (Dechen, Wangyal, Tanimoto, Sato & Kanai, 2020, p. 44). The objective of the study is to understand and implement the mobile workforce and to acknowledge psychological risks to workers due to a lack of work-life balance.

Holden, S., & Sunindijo, R. Y. (2018). Technology, long work hours, and stress worsen work-life balance in the construction industry. International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 10(2).

The author assesses the level of work-life balance (WLB) and identifies factors that alter the work-life balance in the Australian construction industry. The study used quantitative data sourced via a questionnaire survey. The questionnaire was divided into three sections: demographic-related questions, questions to measure the level of work-life balance (11 items), and questions on factors affecting work-life balance (23 items). Based on the combined results of the questionnaires, technology had the biggest negative impact on WLB because it allows employees to be steadily connected to work, thus causing difficulties for them to separate work from life. The finding showed that management is responsible for the low WLB. According to the authors, “the average number of hours worked in the construction industry was 62.5 among site-based project staff, 56.1 among office-based project staff, and 49.0 among head or regional office staff, far longer than the typical 38-hour working week in Australia” (Holden & Sunindijo, 2018, p.13). The factors that affect WLB are: Technology, Business culture, commute time, salary compensation, and health and work-life balance initiatives. The author manifested that collecting a larger sample size and comparing the work-life balance trends between different-sized construction organizations will provide a richer picture of the real conditions in the industry. The authors highlighted that a qualitative approach can be used to get deeper insight into the work-life balance issues in the construction industry, so effective solutions can be developed.

Mclsaac, M. S., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1996). Distance education. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communication and technology: A project of the Association for Educational Communication and Technology (pp.403-437). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

Dr. Marina Stock Mclsaac is Professor of Educational Media and Computers at Arizona State University. “She has twice been awarded a Fulbright Senior Scholar/Researcher Award to work in Distance Education at Anadolu University, Turkey”. Dr. Charlotte Nirmalani Gunawardena is an Associate Professor of Innovative Programs at the University of New Mexico, where she specializes in Distance Education. According to the authors, in the late 1980s, the University of Chicago opened major correspondence programs in different locations. According to the study, the establishment of the British Open University in the United Kingdom in 1969 marked the beginning of the use of technology to supplement print-based instruction through well-designed courses. The researchers asserted that emerging communication technologies and telecommunications provide highly cost-effective solutions to the problems of sharing information and promoting global understanding between people. However, the authors argued that while technology decorates the idea of distance education, the studies in the field showed a lack of theoretical foundation and research. McIsaac & Gunawardena (1996) asserted that distance education could not properly identify theoretical frameworks, and implementation issues also became important. However, the still a need for educators to investigate how the learner, the instructor and the technology collaborate to generate knowledge. Most studies have only focused on comparisons between delivery media such as television, video, or computer and traditional face-to-face teaching. Other research compared the effectiveness of one distance delivery medium over another. Most of these media comparison studies found no significant differences in learning. The authors highlighted that the traditional research literature in distance education is brief and inconclusive. McIsaac & Gunawardena (1996) state that both quantitative and qualitative studies have generally lacked rigor. Driven by practice, much research has taken the form of program evaluation, descriptions of individual distance education programs, brief case studies, institutional surveys, and speculative reports (p.32). Furthermore, the author discusses the research and technology since both are related due technology of delivery. Most distance education programs today require the use of technology, and various approaches have been proposed for revised evaluation techniques. The authors highlighted that research should not focus only on technology, urging researchers to identify how technology interacts with students ’ attitudes and how it affects teaching and learning. On the other hand, the author highlighted the lack of research on other areas, such as course design and communications, issues relating to teaching, policy, and management. The author suggested that future research on establishing theoretical frameworks as a basis for research, also evaluate the interactions of technology with teaching and learning. Thus, practitioners need to investigate issues of achievement, motivation, attrition, and control.

Nguyen, T. (2015). The effectiveness of online learning: Beyond no significant difference and future horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 309-319.

Online learning is an educational strategy based on the intensive use of new technologies. It is flexible operating structures and highly efficient pedagogical methods in the online learning process, which allows the students’ time, space, occupation, or age conditions not to be limiting factors or conditioning factors for learning (Nguyen, 2015, p. 308). The author argued that the question of whether online learning is as effective as face-to-face teaching for the achievement of learning outcomes will continue to be the subject of debates and research for a long time. The study analyzed several seminal works about the benefits of online learning. According to Nguyen (2015), there are positive effects for student learning outcomes in the online or hybrid format compared to the traditional face-to-face format. Furthermore, this study explained that a group of researchers performed a systematic review of the literature from 1996 to 2008 and identified vast empirical studies of online learning. According to the researcher’s analysis, four factors play a crucial role in the future of virtual education can be identified: research on its effectiveness, technological advances, costs and market competition, and response to influences from the market. The authors took all the different research, compared them, and provided a breakdown of positive (92% as effective), negative (3% not as effective), mixed (4% had mixed findings), and null groupings.

Quinn, B. (2016). Computational thinking guiding change in online education. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 4(2).

Quinn’s literature offers a review of the current literature on the application of computational thinking in higher education, and her objective is to provide a framework that will support faculty who are challenged in the transition from face-to-face (F2F) learning to online learning. The article highlights the necessary change to succeed in any system. In addition, the author discussed the Innovation Theory, which addresses challenges as a large social challenge. Quinn (2016) described the research strategy and explained that the search was limited to peer-reviewed scholarly articles on higher education published after the year 2000. The results showed that the faculty perceived barriers to online education and solutions where technology and training arise as a common problem. Therefore, when these problems are explored and defined, the application of CT strategies can bring solutions. Prior research by Wing (2006) explained how and why CT is important for problem-solving. Quinn (2016) asserted that CT develops innovative thinking, which can offer faculty the chance to explore new issues and develop their creativity in design courses, research, and policies within their areas of

specialization.

Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016). Online education and its effective practice: A research review. Journal of Information Technology Education, 15.

Sun &Chen (2016) from Rowan University discussed the effectiveness of online learning and asserted that a well-designed course motivates the interaction between the instructor and learners. The authors used a qualitative content analysis evaluating 47 published studies and online research from 2008. The National Center for Educational Statistics (2008) found that some of the factors that influence institution to offer online courses included meeting students’ demands for flexible schedules (68%), providing access to college for students who would otherwise not have access (67%), making more courses available (46%), and seeking to increase student enrollments (45%). On the other hand, the study explained the importance of technology in online education. The authors explained that online education began in the late 20th century, and online programs and classes were synchronous and used chat rooms, instant messaging, and texting. Both chat rooms and instant messaging, being synchronous, allow users to decide who participates in the conversation (Sun &Chen, 2016). The authors point out that the model of Massively Open Online Course (MOOC) was introduced in 2008 with the idea to increase accessibility to higher education by larger segments of the public. In addition, the authors draw our attention that it is the lack of research on teachers’ roles in online education. The author concluded that there is a gap, and future research should be performed on online instruction practices.

Discuss the theories, seminal works, and recent research that emerged from the results of your search. Include in this section: An outline of a recent review of the literature article. A description (including the theoretical constructs) of two or three theories relevant to your topic. A description of the relevant seminal works. An analysis of the predominant methodology (exploratory/qualitative or theory testing/quantitative) of the most recent research on your topic. An evaluation of the direction and methodology (quantitative or qualitative) of future research on the topic.

Theories, Seminal Works, and Recent Research

• Summarize a recent literature review article relevant to your topic.
• Describe two or three theories pertinent to your research area.
• Explain the theoretical framework and constructs.
• Identify and discuss foundational studies in your field.
• Analyze the methodologies used in recent studies.
• Highlight whether they are qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods.

Example

Theories, Seminal Works, and Recent Research

The harmony between the numerous roles that people perform in various facets of their lives is what makes work, family, and personal life balanced. The history of work-life balance initiatives is closely linked to the tension that exists between work and family, an issue that has attracted organizational and scientific attention in recent decades. “The work/family theory was introduced by Clark (2002) and argued that the primary connection between the work/family system is not emotional but human” (p. 748). Additionally, Clark (2000) acknowledged that the disparate domains of work and family have an impact on one another, and there are a number of hypotheses that can account for this relationship. Most of what is known about it comes from the theory of spillover, which explains how events in one important domain—whether favorable or unfavorable—have an impact on another dynamic domain, i.e., the indirect influence that the family has on the workplace and vice versa. When role conflicts arise in one area, they may cause emotions of unease and strain in other areas that impact the execution of other crucial jobs. According to a current study, Ayadauri (2018) defined spillover theory as a process by which people’s experiences in one position influence their experiences in another, with each role’s experiences having the potential to have either positive or negative spillover effects (p. 9). Conversely, Pleck (1977) developed a framework of work-family roles and examined the relationships between male roles in the workplace, male family roles in the home, and female roles in the workplace and home. So, as stated by Ayadurai (2018), males experienced spillover from job roles into family roles, while women experienced spillover from work roles into family responsibilities. When role conflicts arise in one area, they may cause emotions of unease and strain in other areas that impact the execution of other crucial jobs. Therefore, tensions that result in work-family conflict are created when labor needs and family obligations are incompatible. Similarly, work-family balance self-efficacy—that is, people’s confidence in their capacity to manage their future roles in work and family—was covered by Killian et al. (2003). The predicted work-family conflict construct and this individual difference construct might be connected. In other words, people who think they can manage their work and family responsibilities in the future could be less prone to foresee conflict between the two (As cited by Friede, 2005, p.1). Friede (2005) examined the self-efficacy of two sample questionnaires that assessed work-family balance. They were, “I think I could concentrate at work if I had family problems on my mind” and “I could integrate job and family roles without too much difficulty” (p. 5). According to Friede (2005),, on page 5, the poll revealed that work-family conflict is anticipated as a type of conflict between the duties of work and family. Thus, by examining the mediating mechanisms of self-efficacy and work-life balance based on the social cognitive theory, which explains psychosocial functioning based on the triadic reciprocal determinism model, Chan, Kalliath, Brough, Siu, O’Driscoll, and Timms (2016) investigated in their research how work-family enrichment contributes to job and family satisfaction. According to this concept, environmental, behavioral, and personal factors function as interacting determinants that have a reciprocal effect on one another and eventually alter an individual’s self-perception (As stated by Chan et al., 2016, p. 4). Accordingly, satisfaction is the result of a worker’s reciprocal relationship with his or her working environment, which includes factors like control or power that can impact and regulate equality in the workplace (Chan et al., 2016, p. 4). The degree of self-efficacy affects how one interprets and responds to environmental pressures. It contributes to what is thought to be a protective aspect for people’s health by absorbing perceived stress. The degree of specificity of the task or situation that an individual must encounter determines their level of self-efficacy since they can believe they are capable of handling one circumstance but not another (Chan et al., 2016, p. 5).

According to McIntosh and Gunawardena (1996), online learning is a type of remote learning in which the information is created using any electronic medium, such as the Internet, intranet, extranet, audio/video cassettes, and interactive television. On the other hand, online learning is an instructional technique that relies heavily on the use of modern technologies, according to Nguyen (2015). As we can see, the idea is wide and offers a wide range of options for distance learning. Training in both synchronous and asynchronous modes is introduced. But with the advent of modern technology, synchronous training is now possible, allowing teachers and students to interact with each other at the same time regardless of where they are physically located (McLsaac & Gunawardena, 1996; Sun & Chen, 2016). Nonetheless, scholars contended that although technology accentuates the concept of remote learning, research and theoretical underpinnings in the subject are lacking (McLsaac & Gunawardena, 1996).

Similar to this, Thomas Russell (1999) assembled more than 350 studies on online and distance learning beginning in 1928 and concluded that there is no discernible difference between mediated instruction and the traditional face-to-face format in terms of learning outcomes (As referenced by Nguyen, 2015, p. 312). It is recommended that studies not just concentrate on technology but also examine how it interacts with students’ lives and impacts both teaching and learning (McLsaac & Gunawardena, 1996; Nguyen, 2015).

On the other hand, there aren’t many studiesthat are relevant to the literature on WLB and online learning. According to Ayaduri (2018), “Although work-life conflict in traditional work and educational settings has been extensively researched, one aspect of work-life conflict that has not been thoroughly examined is the role of online students” (p. 3). The learning environment (home, office, or learning center), or the space-time framework in which the learner produces activities, will primarily determine the obstacles required for the learning process.

According to Pookaiyaudom (2015) (quoted by Ayaduri, 2018, p. 3), “Students may be overwhelmed due to their academic workload, paid job demands, personal commitments, and family responsibilities.” As elucidated by Antonaci and Klemke Specht (2019), gamification has emerged as a promising approach to user engagement that has promise for the realm of online education. To fill in the blank of how gamification affects user behavior in online learning, the authors conducted a thorough assessment of the literature. Through the use of gamification, the instructor would be in charge of encouraging students to participate when it is lagging, mandating their regular engagement in the process, inviting specialists to join the process to quickly give specialized information, or having students take the lead in the debate. In the study, Ayaduri (2018) divided the effects of gamification into six categories: social awareness, performance, motivation, and engagement, as well as attitude toward gamification and collaboration. The results clarified why there is a dearth of empirical studies on gamification because the discipline is still young, and gamification’s application in online learning, particularly in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), is one of its applications.

Researchers attempting to comprehend the impact of mobile information technology devices (MITDs) on workers’ work-life balance (WLB) are particularly interested in these gadgets (Adisa, Gbadamosi & Osabutey, 2017). The impact of MITDs on employees’ work-life balance was examined by the researchers through semi-structured interviews. The results highlight the critical role that MITDs play in achieving flexibility, which is essential for reaching WLB. But there is now less distinction between the work and non-work domains due to the adoption of MITDs. Employees’ overall health and well-being, their family ties, and their working hours have all been negatively impacted by this unintentionally extended workweek. Since its antecedent—the noun to which a pronoun refers—is not made explicit, the demonstrative pronoun “this” in this instance is ambiguous. Making use of the pronoun as a demonstrative adjective is one technique to resolve this problem. As an illustration, this solution has unintentionally caused further issues. Who or what has unintentionally increased work hours for employees at the expense of their families, general health, and well-being?] Research indicates that while MITDs may enhance work-life balance, improper management may result in work-life conflict. The report urges a reexamination of border theory and WLB policies and practices to make sure that MITDs can boost productivity without unintentionally contributing to subpar WLB. It might be argued that whereas MITDs offer tools that improve output and performance at work, they can also present challenges for employers managing workers’ wages (p. 2). The bulk of previous research has likewise employed quantitative methods, which fall short in assessing the pertinent subtleties common in employee border movements concerning MITDs.

 Critical concepts like the tension between work and family, the negative effects of taking on too many responsibilities on people’s wellbeing and satisfaction, and the labor organization’s support for the creation of accommodative policies are all reasons why these models are important to use as a foundation for the analysis of this research.

Summarize your progress to date on your literature search and topic in your topic area, and describe your strategy going forward, including: How your understanding of the state of knowledge on your topic area has changed since you began your review of the relevant literature. A discussion of whether the existing research on your topic supports a qualitative or quantitative approach for your research.

Summarize Understanding of Existing Literature

• Reflect on how your understanding of the topic has evolved.
• Identify any gaps in the existing knowledge.
• Propose a potential research study to address the identified gap.

Summary Example

The purpose of this study was to examine in-depth the perspectives of the seminal work and contemporary scholars on technology, work-life balance, and online learning, as well as the effects these factors have on their personal, familial, and professional lives. Among the most relevant and significant results for the theoretical field of balance, the advancement of technology stands out. For some authors, gender roles play an essential role in the family socialization process, but also as part of formal education, mass media, etc. (Women’s Institute, 2008). The literature shows that the elements associated with the balance are diverse. However, they are generally classified into three broad groups, namely: family, work, and person. For example, studies such as Mangels (2008) reveal that successful careers aree associated with an adequate balance between work and family factors. Similarly, Chan et al. (2016 found that satisfaction in the personal / family or work environment is invariably affected by the perception of limitation in at least one of them. In addition, they concluded that for women to be considered successful, three trends are identified: work-family balance, personal success, and job growth. Finally, it was found that age has to do with the perfection of satisfaction in these areas because while women are older, the perception of satisfaction increases in all trends (Friede, 2005).

On the other hand, the use of technology can be an innovative strategy that responds to some of the existing problems. It also constitutes an essential element of adaptation of students and teachers to the characteristics of the Information Society in the We are current era. The educational community is concerned about this issue; therefore, numerous investigations and studies have been carried out in this regard. We can find some works that follow this same line in the Literature review. Thus, for example, the investigations of da Ponte and others (2007), Lee & Wu (2006), or Moore and others (2000) use different technological resources to try to reach the same end. It is related to the improvement of the processes that enable the student in practice in a more thoughtful way and receive the excellent support possible to achieve this goal.

Describe the next steps for your strategy to develop a topic, research purpose, and research question.

Progress and Future Strategy

In this section of BMGT-8028 Week 10 Assignment: Dissertation Search Strategy and Topic Development, we will discuss progress and future strategy.

• Describe your progress in the literature search and topic development.
• Discuss the insights gained and how they shape your research direction.
• Outline the next steps for developing your topic, research purpose, and questions.
• Discuss whether your research will follow a qualitative or quantitative approach.

Example

Progress and Future Strategy

Throughout this assignment, I have made substantial progress in the literature search and topic development on the impact of online learning on work-life balance. By utilizing databases such as the Capella University Library, Google Scholar, ProQuest, and EBSCO, I conducted a comprehensive search using keywords like “work-life balance,” “online learning,” “mobile workforce,” and “systematic literature review.” This meticulous search yielded a robust collection of articles, forming a solid foundation for understanding the interplay between online learning and work-life balance.

The literature search provided critical insights into the dual nature of technology’s impact on personal and professional lives. Key theories such as work-family conflict, spillover, self-efficacy, and work-family enrichment emerged as essential frameworks for this research. These insights have been pivotal in shaping my research direction, underscoring the necessity of examining both positive and negative ramifications of online learning on work-life balance.

Moving forward, refining the research question to focus on specific aspects of work-life balance influenced by online learning is paramount. A detailed analysis of the collected articles will be undertaken to extract significant findings and trends. Engaging with recent studies employing both qualitative and quantitative methodologies will be crucial to providing a balanced perspective on the subject.

Considering the research question’s nature, a mixed-methods approach integrating qualitative and quantitative strategies will be adopted. This approach will facilitate a comprehensive understanding of the nuanced ways online learning affects work-life balance, offering both statistical insights and in-depth qualitative data. By continuing this strategic approach, the aim is to develop a robust research framework that thoroughly addresses the complexities of work-life balance in the digital age.

Closing

In the BMGT-8028 Week 10 Assignment: Dissertation Search Strategy and Topic Development, you will lay the groundwork for your dissertation by thoroughly exploring the literature, identifying key theories and methodologies, and refining your research focus. By systematically following these guidelines, you will build a strong foundation for your dissertation, ensuring it is well-informed and methodologically sound. This BMGT-8028 Week 10 Assignment: Dissertation Search Strategy and Topic Development guide serves as a vital tool in your journey toward contributing meaningful research to your field. You can also read the BMGT-8028 complete modules to ace the course!