CMRJ 524 WEEK seven DISCUSSION: Ethics

Step-By-Step Guide CMRJ 524 Week Seven Discussion: Ethics

Introduction to CMRJ 524 Week Seven Discussion

The Owlisdom, CMRJ 524 week seven discussion: ethics requires you to explore various aspects of organised crime, focusing on labour racketeering, the influence of organised crime in gambling in Las Vegas and New Jersey, and the Harrison Act. By examining these topics, you will develop a comprehensive understanding of how organised crime has shaped various sectors. This How-To Guide provides structured steps to help you effectively approach and complete each discussion part.

Examine labour racketeering and the “Big Four” (i.e., the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, the Laborers International Union, the Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International Union, and The International Longshoremen’s Association), and cite at least two “specific” examples. Lastly, conclude your post by identifying some potential advantages a company may gain by entering into a corrupt relationship with their employee’s union (please ensure your views are well supported, i.e., not just opinion).

Examine Labor Racketeering and the “Big Four”

For the CMRJ 524 week seven discussion: ethics, we will begin by examining labour racketeering, and we will also discuss the Big Four.

• Overview of Labor Racketeering: Define labour racketeering and its significance in organised crime. Discuss how criminal organisations infiltrate labour unions to control labour markets and extort money.
• Specific Examples: Identify and explain at least two examples of labour racketeering involving the “Big Four” unions (International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Laborers International Union, Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International Union, and International Longshoremen’s Association). Provide details on how organised crime exploited these unions.
• Advantages for Companies: Conclude this section by discussing the potential advantages a company may gain by entering into a corrupt relationship with a union. Ensure your views are well supported with evidence, such as increased labour peace, reduced costs, or enhanced control over labour practices.

Example

1. Examine Labor Racketeering and the “Big Four”

Labor racketeering involves the manipulation of labor unions by organized crime groups to control labor markets and extort money. The International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT) is a prime example, with figures like Jimmy Hoffa accused of collaborating with mobsters to control union activities and pension funds. Another example is the Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International Union, which faced similar infiltration, leading to widespread corruption and violence.

Companies may gain advantages by entering into corrupt union relationships, such as avoiding strikes and ensuring labour peace. These arrangements can also reduce labour costs through illicit deals and gaining control over labour practices, thereby improving efficiency. However, these benefits come at the cost of legal risks and ethical breaches, highlighting the complex dynamics of labour racketeering.

Compare the role of organised crime in gambling in Las Vegas and New Jersey. As part of your response, explain how Las Vegas and New Jersey would be different today (good or bad) if not for the influence of organised crime (please ensure your views are well supported, i.e., not just opinion).

Compare the Role of Organized Crime in Gambling in Las Vegas and New Jersey

Here CMRJ 524 week seven discussion: ethics, we will compare the role of organized crime in gambling in Las Vegas and New Jersey.

• Historical Influence in Las Vegas: Describe the role of organised crime in developing gambling in Las Vegas. Include critical figures and their contributions to the casino industry.
• Historical Influence in New Jersey: Outline the involvement of organised crime in New Jersey’s gambling scene. Discuss significant events and figures.
• Impact of Organized Crime on Current Landscape: Analyze how Las Vegas and New Jersey would be different today if not for the influence of organised crime. Support your views with evidence, considering both positive and negative impacts on the economy, tourism, and societal norms.

Example

1. Compare the Role of Organized Crime in Gambling in Las Vegas and New Jersey

Organised crime played a crucial role in the development of gambling in Las Vegas. Figures like Bugsy Siegel were instrumental in establishing significant casinos, transforming Las Vegas into a gambling hub. In New Jersey, mob influence was also significant, with the Mafia heavily involved in Atlantic City’s casino industry.

Without organised crime, Las Vegas might not have developed into the major entertainment and tourism destination it is today. Organised crime investments fueled rapid growth and attracted tourists despite the violence and corruption. In New Jersey, the absence of mob influence might have led to slower development and fewer casinos, potentially reducing the region’s economic benefits and limiting criminal activities and corruption.

Thoroughly review the Harrison Act and its ramifications. As part of your response, defend whether or not you believe this Act was beneficial (please ensure your views are well supported, i.e., not just opinion).

Review the Harrison Act and its Ramifications

Now, CMRJ 524 week seven discussion: ethics, we will review the Harrison Act and its Ramifications.

• Overview of the Harrison Act: Provide a brief overview, including its purpose and main provisions.
• Ramifications: Discuss the immediate and long-term effects of the Harrison Act on drug control and organised crime.
• Defence of the Act’s Benefits or Drawbacks: Present a well-supported argument on whether you believe the Harrison Act was beneficial or detrimental. Use evidence to support your position, considering factors such as its impact on public health, law enforcement, and the criminal justice system.

B. Review the Harrison Act and its Ramifications

The Harrison Act of 1914 was enacted to regulate and tax the production, importation, and distribution of opiates and coca products. Its primary goal was to curb drug abuse and addiction. However, the act had significant ramifications, including the criminalisation of drug possession and use, which inadvertently fueled the growth of organised crime as gangs took over the illegal drug market.

The Harrison Act’s effectiveness is debatable. While it aimed to control drug abuse, it also led to increased incarceration rates and the expansion of illegal drug trafficking. On the positive side, it raised awareness about the dangers of drug abuse and established a framework for drug regulation. On the negative side, it contributed to the stigmatisation of drug users and overwhelmed the criminal justice system. Overall, the Harrison Act had mixed outcomes, highlighting the need for balanced drug policies that address both public health and criminal justice concerns.

Closing

By completing the CMRJ-524 week seven discussion: ethics, you will gain a deeper understanding of the complex interactions between organised crime and various sectors such as labour, gambling, and drug control. This analysis will enhance your ability to critically evaluate organised crime’s historical and socio-political patterns and its ongoing impact on society. You will develop a well-rounded perspective on these significant issues through careful examination and supported arguments. In the next module of CMRJ 524 WEEK EIGHT RESEARCH PAPER: ETHICS.