Here you can read our Ultimate free guide on the CMRJ-501 Week Five paper: Essay and its solution on Owlisdom. Click here to read the complete guide now!
Instructions of CMRJ-501 Week Five paper
Week 5 Essay
Instructions
Note: All quotes must be encapsulated in quotation marks. Likewise, all papers must be 100% original work to this class. The discovery of past work being used will be treated as cheating and plagiarism and as a minimum will result in a 0 for the paper. Also the rubric aside, papers that fall short of minimum length will have a max point award related to the % of the paper they actually submit. For example the max possible for a paper that is 50% short of the minimum length will be 50%.
CMRJ501 Essay Paper Assignment
Topic Instructions:
For this paper you are to compare and contrast two criminology theories (you pick the criminology theories) and evaluate how these theories helped establish police patrol procedures and other strategies for crime prevention. The purpose of this assignment is for each student to demonstrate original critical thinking on criminology theories, the published scholarly literature, and how you can apply criminological theories to help address a real-world problem.
CMRJ-501 Paper Requirements Checklist
– All papers must be AT LEAST 10 pages of written text (you may not go under, but may go over) – this DOES NOT includes title page, table of contents, Abstract, references, charts, images, quotes, and any appendices (appendices are not required).
– VERY IMPORTANT: All papers must be 100% original work for this class. The discovery of previous work being used as part of your paper will be treated as plagiarism. You cannot reuse papers submitted for previous courses. There is no double dipping of papers allowed at the University. All submitted work must be fresh. If you choose to use previous work, on a limited basis, you must quote the material per APA 7th edition standards, and use it very sparingly. Please police yourself accordingly as questionable Turn It In results will have an adverse impact on your score and may result in the forwarding of the work to the Dean’s Office as a matter of University protocol.
– All papers must be typed and DOUBLE-SPACED.
– All papers must use 12 point Times New Roman font, with 1″ margins all around (top, bottom, and sides)
– All papers must have page numbers (excluding the cover page) in the top right-hand corner of each page
– All papers must use APA 7th edition format for citations and references
– All papers must have a minimum of five (5) different acceptable/peer reviewed academic sources
– Only the following are considered acceptable academic sources:
- Peer-reviewed journal articles (online or hard copy)
- The readings/articles in the content section may be used
- U.S. Government publications. You cannot use all government documents, you must use at least three peer reviewedsources as part of your five.
– Title, save, and upload your papers to the Assignments Folder as a word.doc only
– Papers that fall short of minimum length will have a max point award related to the % of the paper they actually submit. For example the max possible for a paper that is 50% short of the minimum length will be 50%.
Note: This Assignment is directly connected to the following Course Objectives:
CO1: Analyze the main assumptions of prominent theories within criminology
to current topics within the criminal justice arena
CO3: Judge the impact of criminological theory and research on social policy.
Step-By-Step Guide of CMRJ-501 Week Five paper: Essay
Introduction to CMRJ-501 Week Five Paper
The CMRJ-501 Week Five paper: Essay requires you to compare and contrast two criminology theories and evaluate their influence on developing police patrol procedures and other crime prevention strategies. The goal is to understand how theoretical frameworks in criminology inform practical approaches in law enforcement.
NOTE: I am choosing to analyze Behavior theory and Conflict theory for this essay.
Compare and contrast two criminology theories (you pick the criminology theories).
Comparing and Contrasting Two Criminology Theories
We will select and compare two criminology theories to start the CMRJ-501 Week Five paper: Essay.
- Choose two well-documented criminology theories that have significantly impacted policing strategies.
- Provide a detailed explanation of the first chosen theory.
- Discuss its origins, main assumptions, key proponents, and core concepts.
- Explain how the theory seeks to explain criminal behavior.
- Similarly, provide a detailed explanation of the second chosen theory.
- Discuss its origins, main assumptions, key proponents, and core concepts.
- Explain how the theory seeks to explain criminal behavior.
- Compare and contrast the two theories.
- Highlight similarities and differences in their assumptions, focus areas, and explanatory power.
- Discuss how each theory approaches the understanding of crime causation and prevention.
Example
Conflict Theory: An Overview
Conflict Theory, rooted in the works of Karl Marx, views society through the lens of social conflict and posits that crime arises from the inherent inequalities and power struggles between different social classes. According to this theory, society is structured to benefit the ruling class at the expense of the lower classes. It emphasizes that laws and criminal justice systems are not neutral or impartial but tools used by the ruling class to control and oppress the lower classes (Albertus, 2020). Conflict theory’s primary assumption is that crime results from social and economic inequalities and that the law is inherently biased in favor of the powerful.
Key proponents of Conflict Theory in criminology include Richard Quinney and William Chambliss. Quinney’s “The Social Reality of Crime” theory argues that crime is a social construct defined by those in power to maintain dominance (Albertus, 2020). He suggests that the ruling class’s interests determine criminal behavior and that laws are created to protect those interests. This perspective highlights how the definition of crime can be manipulated to serve the needs of the powerful while criminalizing the behaviors of the less powerful.
William Chambliss’s work on the “Law of Vagrancy” further illustrates how laws are designed to serve the ruling class’s interests, often at the expense of the disadvantaged. Chambliss demonstrated how vagrancy laws in medieval England were used to control the movement and labor of people with low incomes, ensuring a steady supply of cheap labor for the ruling elite (Howard & Gibson, 2023). This historical example underscores the idea that laws are not created for the general good but to maintain the existing power structure.
Conflict Theory suggests that crime prevention should address social inequalities and injustices. It argues for systemic changes that reduce economic disparities, improve social welfare, and ensure equal access to resources and opportunities (Howard & Gibson, 2023). According to this theory, efforts to prevent crime should not solely focus on punishing individual offenders but should also aim to dismantle the structural inequalities contributing to criminal behavior. By addressing the root causes of crime, such as poverty, lack of education, and limited access to social services, Conflict Theory advocates for a more equitable and just society where the underlying conditions that foster crime are significantly reduced (Kazansky, 2020).
Behavioral Theory: An Overview
Behavioral Theory, in contrast to Conflict Theory, is rooted in the principles of psychology and focuses on observable behaviors. This theory posits that all behaviors, including criminal behaviors, are learned through environmental interactions. The theory suggests that individuals are not inherently predisposed to criminality but acquire criminal behaviors through learning from their surroundings (Hayden, 2022). Critical concepts in Behavioral Theory include conditioning, reinforcement, and modeling. Conditioning involves learning through association, while reinforcement and punishment increase or decrease the likelihood of a behavior being repeated. Modeling involves learning by observing and imitating the behavior of others.
Key proponents of Behavioral Theory in criminology include B.F. Skinner and Albert Bandura. Skinner’s operant conditioning theory highlights the role of reinforcement and punishment in shaping behavior. According to Skinner, behaviors followed by positive outcomes are likely to be repeated, whereas behaviors followed by adverse outcomes are less likely to be repeated (Rachmad, 2024). This concept of operant conditioning explains how behaviors can be encouraged or discouraged through systematic reinforcement or punishment.
Albert Bandura’s Social Learning Theory expands on these ideas by emphasizing the importance of observational learning. Bandura demonstrated through his famous Bobo doll experiment that individuals, especially children, learn behaviors by observing others and the consequences of those behaviors (Conner, 2020). According to Bandura, people can learn new behaviors by watching others without directly experiencing reinforcement or punishment. This concept underscores the significant impact that role models, peers, media, and societal norms can have on behavior.
Behavioral Theory suggests that crime prevention should focus on modifying environmental factors that reinforce criminal behavior. This can be achieved through strategies such as positive reinforcement for pro-social behaviors, effective punishment for criminal behaviors, and modeling desirable behaviors through community programs and media (Howard & Gibson, 2023). For example, community programs that reward positive behavior, such as academic achievement or community service, can reinforce pro-social behaviors and reduce the likelihood of criminal activity. Similarly, effective and fair punishment for criminal behaviors can deter individuals from engaging in illegal activities.
Moreover, media campaigns and public education programs that showcase positive role models and promote pro-social values can help shape behavior through observational learning (Hayden, 2022). Such initiatives can influence individuals to adopt more positive behaviors by highlighting the benefits of lawful behavior and the consequences of criminal activity.
In conclusion, Behavioral Theory provides a framework for understanding how criminal behaviors are learned and maintained through environmental interactions. By focusing on the mechanisms of learning and reinforcement, this theory offers practical strategies for crime prevention that involve modifying environmental factors to promote pro-social behaviors and discourage criminal activities.
Comparison of Conflict Theory and Behavioral Theory
While Conflict Theory and Behavioral Theory offer valuable insights into the causes of crime, they differ significantly in their assumptions and focus areas.
Assumptions and Focus Areas
Conflict Theory views crime as a social construct resulting from economic and social inequalities, positing that crime arises from the inherent disparities between different social classes. This theory emphasizes the role of power dynamics and the ruling class’s interests in defining what constitutes crime (Howard & Gibson, 2023). According to Conflict Theory, laws are created and enforced to protect the interests of the powerful while oppressing the lower classes. This perspective suggests that crime is not an objective phenomenon but is constructed based on what the ruling class considers threatening to their interests. For instance, activities that threaten property or economic stability are often criminalized, while white-collar crimes committed by the powerful may be overlooked or lightly punished. Conflict Theory highlights how the criminal justice system serves as a mechanism of social control, maintaining the status quo by disproportionately targeting marginalized groups and reinforcing social hierarchies (Kazansky, 2020).
In contrast, Behavioral Theory views crime as a learned behavior influenced by environmental factors and individual experiences. This theory focuses on observable behaviors and the learning and reinforcement processes, arguing that criminal behavior is not inherent but acquired through environmental interaction (Hayden, 2022). Behavioral Theory posits that individuals learn behaviors through conditioning, reinforcement, and modeling. For example, if a person grows up in an environment where criminal behavior is rewarded or goes unpunished, they are likelier to engage in similar behavior. This theory underscores the importance of external stimuli in shaping behavior, suggesting that changes in the environment can lead to changes in behavior. Behavioral Theory also emphasizes the role of social learning, where individuals imitate behaviors observed in others, especially if those behaviors appear to have positive outcomes. This perspective highlights the potential for crime prevention through environmental modification and behavior reinforcement strategies.
Evaluate how these theories helped establish police patrol procedures and other strategies for crime prevention.
Evaluation of Theories’ Impact on Police Patrol Procedures
Next, in CMRJ-501 Week Five paper: Essay, we will discuss the impact of those theories on police patrol procedures.
- Evaluate how the first theory has influenced the development of police patrol procedures.
- Provide specific examples of patrol strategies or crime prevention programs based on this theory.
- Discuss how these strategies reduce crime according to the theory’s principles.
- Evaluate how the second theory has influenced the development of police patrol procedures.
- Provide specific examples of patrol strategies or crime prevention programs based on this theory.
- Discuss how these strategies reduce crime according to the theory’s principles.
- Comparison of the Impact of Both Theories on Crime Prevention Strategies
- Compare the effectiveness and implementation of crime prevention strategies influenced by both theories.
- Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.
- Provide evidence or case studies to support your evaluation.
Example
Conflict Theory has significantly influenced the development of police patrol procedures by emphasizing the role of law enforcement in maintaining social order and exerting control over marginalized groups. According to Conflict Theory, police patrols are not merely a mechanism for preventing and responding to crime but also serve as tools of social control employed by the ruling class to sustain the existing power dynamics and social hierarchies (Howard & Gibson, 2023). This perspective suggests that police practices are often designed to target disadvantaged communities more intensively, thereby reinforcing social inequalities and perpetuating the status quo.
In practice, this can be seen in the implementation of patrol strategies that focus disproportionately on low-income neighborhoods and communities of color. These areas are often subjected to higher levels of surveillance and more frequent stops, searches, and arrests. Such practices can lead to a cycle of criminalization and marginalization, where individuals in these communities are more likely to be labeled as criminals and less likely to trust law enforcement. Policies like stop-and-frisk and zero-tolerance policing are often justified as necessary for maintaining public safety. However, according to conflict theory, they primarily control populations perceived as threats to social order.
This focus on marginalized groups underscores the broader implications of Conflict Theory in understanding the role of law enforcement in society. It highlights the need for critically examining policing practices and policies, advocating for reforms that address the root causes of social inequality rather than simply reinforcing them. By drawing attention to how police patrol procedures can perpetuate social inequities, Conflict Theory provides a framework for advocating for more equitable and just law enforcement practices.
Examples of Patrol Strategies Influenced by Conflict Theory
Targeted Policing in High-Crime Areas: Conflict Theory suggests that police patrols often focus on high-crime areas, typically disadvantaged neighborhoods. This targeted policing can increase these communities’ surveillance and control, reinforcing social inequalities.
Stop-and-frisk policies involve stopping and searching individuals suspected of carrying weapons or contraband and are often justified as crime prevention measures. However, Conflict Theory argues that they disproportionately target minority and low-income communities, perpetuating discrimination and social control.
Impact on Crime Prevention
While targeted policing and stop-and-frisk policies may lead to short-term reductions in crime rates, they can also result in negative consequences such as increased mistrust of law enforcement, social alienation, and further marginalization of disadvantaged communities. Conflict Theory emphasizes that sustainable crime prevention requires addressing the underlying social and economic inequalities that drive criminal behavior.
Influence of Behavioral Theory on Police Patrol Procedures
Behavioral Theory has influenced the development of police patrol procedures by emphasizing the importance of modifying environmental factors and behaviors to prevent crime. This theory advocates for strategies that reinforce pro-social behaviors and deter criminal behaviors through positive reinforcement and punishment (Conner, 2020).
Examples of Patrol Strategies Influenced by Behavioral Theory
Community Policing: This strategy involves building positive relationships between police officers and community members. By fostering trust and cooperation, police can reinforce pro-social behaviors and encourage community members to participate actively in crime prevention.
Problem-Oriented Policing: This approach focuses on identifying and addressing the underlying causes of specific crime problems. Police officers work with community members and other stakeholders to develop targeted interventions that modify environmental factors and reduce opportunities for criminal behavior.
Impact on Crime Prevention
Community policing and problem-oriented policing effectively reduce crime rates and improve community relations. By focusing on positive reinforcement and addressing the root causes of crime, these strategies align with the principles of Behavioral Theory and promote long-term crime prevention.
Strengths and Weaknesses
Conflict Theory provides valuable insights into the systemic causes of crime and the role of social inequalities in driving criminal behavior. However, its focus on macro-level analysis can sometimes overlook the importance of individual behaviors and environmental factors. Behavioral Theory, on the other hand, offers practical strategies for modifying behaviors and environmental factors to prevent crime (Rachmad, 2024). However, it may not fully address the broader social and economic inequalities contributing to criminal behavior.
Conclusion
Here, we will summarize the critical points found in the essay to conclude our CMRJ-501 Week Five paper: Essay.
- Summarize the key points discussed in the essay.
- Emphasize the importance of criminological theories in shaping effective policing strategies.
- Highlight the value of understanding different theoretical perspectives to develop comprehensive crime prevention approaches.
Example
In conclusion, both Conflict Theory and Behavioral Theory offer valuable insights into the causes of crime and the development of police patrol procedures. Conflict Theory highlights the role of social inequalities and power dynamics in driving criminal behavior and emphasizes the need for systemic changes to address these issues. Behavioral Theory focuses on modifying environmental factors and behaviors to prevent crime and advocates for strategies such as community policing and problem-oriented policing.
By comparing and contrasting these theories, we can better understand how theoretical frameworks in criminology inform practical approaches in law enforcement. While each theory has strengths and weaknesses, both contribute to developing comprehensive and effective crime prevention strategies. Understanding these theoretical perspectives is essential for developing informed, balanced, evidence-based approaches to policing and crime prevention.
Closing
The CMRJ-501 Week Five paper: Essay encourages you to delve into criminological theories and understand their practical applications in law enforcement. By comparing different theories, you will gain insights into how theoretical frameworks influence real-world policing strategies and crime prevention efforts. This How-To Owlisdom Guide underscores the importance of evidence-based reasoning and the ability to evaluate the impact of theoretical concepts on practical outcomes critically. In the upcoming module of CMRJ-501, we will explore Marijuana and Prostitution Legalization.
References
Albertus, M. (2020). Land Reform and Civil Conflict: Theory and Evidence from Peru. American Journal of Political Science, 64(2), 256–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12466
Conner, M. (2020). Theory of Planned Behavior—Handbook of Sport Psychology—Wiley Online Library. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119568124.ch1
Hayden, J. (2022). Introduction to Health Behavior Theory. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Howard, J. A., & Gibson, M. A. (2023). Testing evolutionary conflict theories for sexual and physical intimate partner violence in Sub-Saharan Africa. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 5, e6. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2022.58
Kazansky, R. (2020). THE CONFLICT THEORY AS A PILLAR OF SECURITY SCIENCE. Security Science Journal, 1(2), Article 2.
Rachmad, Y. E. (2024). The Evolution of Consumer Behavior: Theories of Engagement, Influence, and Digital Interaction. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.