ENG-101 – English Composition I: Building Academic Writing, Reading, and Research Skills

Introduction:

ENG-101 – English Composition I focuses on developing effective academic writing, critical reading, and analytical thinking skills. The course helps students craft structured essays, strengthen grammar, and integrate credible research sources. For expert help with essays or composition projects, visit Owlisdom’s English Homework Help for professional writing support.

ENG 101 MODULE 2 Discussion: Portfolio Creation

Instructions for ENG 101 Module 2 Discussion

Overview

Learning Outcomes:

 Gain experience engaging respectfully with and being open to diverse perspectives and ideas that may challenge preconceptions; Practice giving and receiving feedback within the writing community, including evaluating and acting on feedback from different sources.

Instructional Materials:

 Before beginning, review the following:

• Digital Portfolio Description
• Module 2 Learning Materials
• Resources on Discussions 
• Netiquette Guidelines
• How to Use Canvas Discussion Forum FeaturesLinks to an external site.

In this initial Canvas discussion assignment, you will share your portfolio as a first step in getting to know the other members of the class community: you, your classmates, your instructor, and your Writing Mentor. Understanding that we’re all working toward the same goals of practicing and improving in the habits and processes of writing will strengthen the collaboration and support throughout the class, through feedback, encouragement, and constructive criticism.

The digital portfolio is a social and digital way of communicating. Most of you likely use technology and social media like Facebook or Instagram to communicate with and participate in different communities in the personal, professional, and civic areas of your lives. This discussion will give you an opportunity to build a digital community in this course by sharing your personal digital portfolio and exchanging ideas through the digital discussion space in Canvas.

Instructions

Step 1: Share Your Digital Portfolio

Copy the link (URL) to your portfolio and paste it in your Canvas discussion post. Make sure to include a clickable hyperlink to an external site. for your readers.

If you need help with your portfolio’s privacy settings, sharing your portfolio URL, or creating a clickable hyperlink, refer to the Writers’ Studio Portfolio GuideLinks to an external site. resource, which has information on all those areas and more.

• Digital Portfolio: Privacy Settings and PublishingLinks to an external site.
• Find and share your Public Portfolio URLs to an external site.
• Creating hyperlinks to an external site.

Watch the video below to ensure your portfolio and embedded documents are public for your readers to view.

Step 2: Compose a Brief Introduction Post

In your post, respond to the following prompts:.

• What communities are you a part of (digital or otherwise)? These may be related to where you live, what you study, your hobbies, or your profession.
• Where are you taking this class from?
• What technologies or social media sites do you use to connect with your communities?
• What are your interests or hobbies?
• What else do you want the class to know about you?

Step 3: Peer Responses

After you complete your initial post for this assignment, you will have time to read over your peers’ posts. Then, by the due date indicated in the course calendar, return to Canvas and respond to two of your peers following the 3CQ approach discussed in the link above.

Note: If you are unable to access a peer’s portfolio from the link they provided, please let them know with a comment so they can fix it.

Sample Portfolio

Click here to view our Sample Portfolio. Links to an external site. 

Submission Requirements

Initial Post:

• Your initial post for this discussion should include your portfolio link (URL) and your 2-3 paragraph introduction post. Your post/URL should be typed or copied/pasted directly into the discussion text box (not handwritten). Do not submit your post as an attachment in the discussion forum.
• Submit posts directly in the Canvas discussion forum below, not on InScribe. Click “Reply” below, add your post in the box provided, and click “Post Reply” to submit.

Peer Responses:

•  Respond to the posts of at least two of your peers. A strong peer response will follow the 3CQ method, including a comment on your peer’s post, a compliment on their work, and a connection to your own work/experience. Finally, make sure to ask a question to further the discussion.

Introduction to ENG 101 Module 2 Discussion: Portfolio Creation

The ENG 101 Module 2 Discussion: Portfolio Creation is designed to help you share your digital portfolio and introduce yourself to your classmates, instructor, and Writing Mentor. Sharing your portfolio and engaging in discussions will build a digital community, enhancing collaboration and support throughout the course. This How-To Owlisdom Guide will provide clear and concise instructions on effectively completing each part of the ENG 101 Module 2 Discussion.

Copy the link (URL) to your portfolio and paste it into your Canvas discussion post. Be sure to include clickable hyperlinks to an external site for your readers. If you need help with your portfolio’s privacy settings, sharing your portfolio URL, or creating a clickable hyperlink, refer to the Writers’ Studio Portfolio GuideLinks to an external site—resource, which has information on all those areas and more.

Share Your Digital Portfolio

To start the ENG 101 Module 2 Discussion: Portfolio Creation, we will share our digital portfolio on the Canvas Discussion Post.

• Copy and paste your portfolio link: Open your digital portfolio, copy the URL, and paste it into your Canvas discussion post.
• Ensure a clickable hyperlink: Make the URL clickable for easy access by your readers. Highlight the URL in your post and use the hyperlink feature to create a clickable link.
• Adjust privacy settings: Ensure your portfolio and embedded documents are public. Refer to the Writers’ Studio Portfolio Guide for detailed instructions on adjusting privacy settings and publishing your portfolio.

In your post, respond to the following prompts. What communities are you a part of (digital or otherwise)? These may be related to where you live, what you study, your hobbies, or your profession. Where are you taking this class from? What technologies or social media sites do you use to connect with your communities? What are your interests or hobbies? What else do you want the class to know about you?

Compose a Brief Introduction Post

Next, we will compose a short introductory discussion post. We will add a few details in the introduction post.

• Identify your communities: Mention any communities you are part of, whether they are digital (e.g., social media groups) or physical (e.g., neighborhood groups, school clubs).
• State your location for taking the class: Let your classmates know where you are geographically located while taking this course.
• Mention technologies or social media used: List the technologies or platforms you use to stay connected with your communities.
• Share your interests or hobbies: Briefly describe your interests or hobbies to give your peers a sense of who you are outside of the academic setting.
• Add personal information: Share any relevant details you want your classmates to know about you.

Example

Hello everyone,

I am Alex, and I am excited to be participating in this class. I am currently enrolled at Arizona State University. I am part of several online communities on Facebook related to my interests and volunteer at a local food bank. To stay connected, I use Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn. My hobbies include reading, hiking, and photography. I look forward to collaborating with all of you and learning new skills this semester.

Best,

Alex.

After you complete your initial post for this assignment, you will have time to read over your peers’ posts. Then, by the due date indicated in the course calendar, return to Canvas and respond to two of your peers following the 3CQ approach discussed in the link above.

Peer Responses

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the ENG 101 Module 2 Discussion: Portfolio Creation. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the following points in mind.

• Read your peers’ posts: Take time to read through the posts made by your classmates.
• Respond to two peers using the 3CQ approach: Comment on at least two posts using the 3CQ method—Compliment, Comment, Connect, and Question. This method encourages thoughtful and constructive feedback.

Example

Response 01

Hey Alex, great post! I found your introduction interesting. Your engagement in digital and physical communities is commendable, especially your volunteer work at the local food bank. Seeing how you use Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn to stay connected is inspiring. Your hobbies, particularly photography, sound captivating, and I also share a love for hiking. I am excited to learn and collaborate with you this semester!

Response 02

As per the instructions, we are required to write two peer responses. I have addressed the given instructions in one response. Following these instructions, you can write your peer responses to ENG 101 Module 2 Discussion: Portfolio Creation without a hassle. Remember, the 3CQ approach discussed in the link above is a helpful guide for your responses.

Closing

Following these steps, you’ll successfully share your digital portfolio and engage in meaningful peer interactions. This assignment helps you build a digital presence and fosters a supportive learning environment through collaborative feedback and shared experiences. Embrace this opportunity to connect with classmates and enhance your writing skills through digital communication.

ENG 101 First Reflection – Your Writing Journey Begins

Instructions for ENG 101 First Reflection

Overview and Purpose

Estimated Time: 3-4 hours

Process Step: Reflection

Learning Outcomes: Use composing processes and strategies as a means to invent, discover, and reconsider ideas; learn metacognitive strategies for reflecting on evolving composing practices to transfer knowledge to other situations.

Instructional Materials: Before beginning, review the following:

• Course Learning Goals and the Habits of MindLinks to an external site.
• Digital Portfolio Description
• Module 2 Learning Materials
• Sample Student PortfolioLinks to an external site.
• Writers’ Studio Portfolio GuideLinks to an external site.

One of our main course goals in this class is for you to be able to transfer the writing skills you learn here to future writing situations (no matter if they are academic, professional, or personal). Thinking and writing about your writing experiences – what we call “metacognitive reflective writing” – is essential to making your learning “stick” so you can use it again in the future.

In this class, you will write three reflective pieces on your writing experiences. Though each reflection will be a bit different, in general, the reflective writing assignments will help you accomplish the following:

• Identify and set goals.
• Make sense of and grow from learning experiences.
• Use what you’ve learned in the past to inform and guide your future learning.

Instructions

Step 1: Reflect and Brainstorm

Consider your past writing experiences. Look back and think critically (carefully, deliberately, and methodically) about your past experiences composing and writing, and how you feel about writing as a result. 

Brainstorm ideas for your reflection, keeping in mind that roughly half of your reflection should be spent both “Looking Back” and “Looking Forward.” Use the following questions to help you generate (invent) ideas. Choose the questions that resonate with you; you do not need to cover all of the questions, but you should have a fairly equal balance between the two categories.

Looking Back

Looking Forward

What kinds of writing do you have experience with? Describe those experiences.  What kinds of writing are part of your workplace? Your social life? Your academic life? How confident do you feel about those types of writing? Why do you feel that way? What kinds of writing habits have you developed? Which habits help you? Which habits hold you back? How have the perceptions of others (such as teachers or peers) about your writing impacted your identity as a writer? How do you feel about yourself as a writer? What is your current identity as a writer/composer?

What new media would you like to try composing in? What kinds of writing would you like to experiment with? What writing practices and strategies do you want to practice and strengthen? What habits of mind do you want to practice and strengthen? What type of writing identity would you like to have? How would you like to feel about yourself as a writer? How would you like others to see you as a writer? What specific writing goals do you have in this class? What would you like to be able to accomplish as a writer after completing this class?

Step 2: Compose and Design

Compose the story of your writing experiences and goals as a short essay. Do not simply answer the questions above or use bullet points; use the questions as a brainstorming and planning tool to help you as you compose your reflective essay. Make sure to organize your ideas logically and structure your essay in a way that will make sense for your readers.

Discuss the following:

• Your attitudes about what you’ve learned about writing up to this point.
• The evolution of your writing.
• Your perceptions about yourself as a writer. 

Support your claims with evidence that explains why you feel the way you do. Include the following:

• Detailed explanations.
• Parts of texts you have written.
• Visuals that support the message of the written text. 

You can also use design features to draw your readers’ attention to key parts of your reflection:

• Add section headings to guide your readers to the different parts of your reflection.
• Use indentations and white space to separate paragraphs/sections.
• Use colored and formatted text to highlight important words and phrases.

Step 3: Include Visual Examples

Include 1-2 visual examples (or evidence) of your experience with writing. Spend time selecting important examples that will show your readers something meaningful, and make sure to explain them in your reflection. This might include the following:

• Screenshots of your previous writing, which can include previous school work/feedback, writing from your professional life, social media posts, emails/text messages, and more.
• Hyperlinks to your writing if it exists elsewhere on the web, such as on a personal blog or website.
• Photos you have taken that reflect your reading and writing life (books you have read, your workspace, things that inspire you).
• Engaging images found online that represent the ideas or concepts you are writing about.
• Even video or audio content (YouTube videos, TED Talks, links to songs, etc.).

Make sure to engage with the visual examples you include in your reflection. Where should they be included within your reflection? Will you use text wrap and/or captions to help your readers?

Step 4: Revise and Proofread

Revise and proofread your reflection for overall organization and flow within each paragraph.

Step 5: Submit to Canvas and Add to Portfolio

When you have completed your reflection, you need to both submit it here on Canvas as a Word document or PDF and upload it to your portfolio on the appropriate “Reflections” page.

• Submit to Canvas
  • Follow the instructions linked hereLinks to an external site. Submit your reflection in this assignment on Canvas for your instructor to grade.
  • Before you submit, make sure to create a clickable hyperlinkLinks to an external site. that leads to your portfolio’s Home page. Add that hyperlink in the reflection document that you submit here so that your instructor can easily access your portfolio to see how it is coming along. You can add the hyperlink anywhere you’d like, but at the very beginning or end of your reflection is best. Follow the instructions linked hereLinks to an external site. to create a hyperlink and add it to your document.
  • Do not include the hyperlink in the “Comments” area of your submission.
• Upload to Portfolio
  • Follow the instructions linked hereLinks to an external site. to add your reflection to your portfolio on the appropriate “Reflections” page.

Note that this does not submit your assignment for instructor grading. You still need to submit your reflection as a Word document or PDF here in this assignment as discussed above.

Introduction to ENG 101 First Reflection

The ENG 101 First Reflection – Your Writing Journey Begins aims to help you reflect on your writing experiences and set goals for future improvement. Following this How-To ENG 101 Guide will enhance your understanding of your writing processes and practices, which is crucial for transferring these skills to different contexts. 

Consider your past writing experiences. Look back and think critically (carefully, deliberately, and methodically) about your past composing and writing experiences and how you feel about writing. Brainstorm ideas for your reflection, considering that roughly half of your reflection should be spent on both “Looking Back” and “Looking Forward.” Use the following questions to help you generate (invent) ideas. Choose the questions that resonate with you; you do not need to cover all of the questions, but you should have a relatively equal balance between the two categories.

Reflect and Brainstorm

To start the ENG 101 First Reflection – Your Writing Journey Begins, we will compare and contrast our past writing experiences.

• Consider past writing experiences: Think critically about your past writing experiences, including the types of writing you’ve done and how you feel about them.
• Brainstorm ideas: Use the questions under “Looking Back” and “Looking Forward” to generate ideas. Ensure an equal balance between reflecting on past experiences and setting future goals.

Example

Reflecting on my writing journey, I realize how diverse and transformative my experiences have been. Each form of writing has contributed to my writing growth, from academic essays to professional reports and personal journaling. This reflection not only looks back at my past writing experiences but also sets goals for my future development, aligning with the course’s objective of transferring learned skills to various contexts.

My writing journey began with academic essays in high school, where I learned the fundamentals of structure and argumentation. These early experiences were challenging, yet they laid the groundwork for my academic confidence. Transitioning to university, I encountered more complex writing tasks, including research papers and critical analyses. These assignments demanded more critical thinking and synthesis, pushing me to refine my writing. In my professional life, writing took the form of reports, emails, and presentations. Each required clarity, conciseness, and a formal tone, which differed significantly from my academic writing. Socially, I engaged in creative writing, such as short stories and blog posts, which allowed me to explore different styles and voices.

Compose the story of your writing experiences and goals as a short essay. Do not simply answer the questions above or use bullet points; use the questions as a brainstorming and planning tool to help you as you compose your reflective essay. Organize your ideas logically and structure your essay to make sense for your readers.

Compose and Design

Next, we will compose a brief and short essay to organize our reflection.

• Organize ideas: Compose a short essay that logically organizes your thoughts and reflections. Avoid bullet points; instead, integrate the questions into a cohesive narrative.
• Discuss critical points: Address your attitudes towards writing, the evolution of your writing, and your self-perception as a writer. Support your claims with detailed explanations and examples from your writing.
• Incorporate visuals: Use visuals to support your message. Include section headings, indentations, and formatted text to guide your readers.

Example

Confidence in writing varied across these contexts. Academic writing initially felt daunting due to the rigorous standards and feedback from professors. However, positive reinforcement and constructive criticism helped me build confidence. Professional writing, while straightforward, emphasized precision and professionalism, which bolstered my ability to communicate effectively in the workplace. Creative writing provided an outlet for expression and creativity, fostering a more relaxed and enjoyable writing experience.

My writing habits have evolved. In the past, I often procrastinated, leading to rushed and less polished work. Recognizing this, I developed a habit of starting early and breaking down tasks into manageable chunks. This approach improved the quality of my writing and reduced stress. Feedback from peers and mentors has also shaped my identity as a writer. Teacher encouragement enhanced my confidence, while critiques highlighted areas for improvement, driving my continuous development.

Looking ahead, I am eager to explore new media, such as digital storytelling and multimedia presentations. These formats offer innovative ways to engage audiences and convey messages. To broaden my skill set, I aim to experiment with different writing genres, including technical writing and opinion pieces. Strengthening my revision and editing practices is another priority, as these are crucial for producing high-quality work.

I aspire to cultivate a clear, creative, and adaptable writing identity. I want to be seen as a versatile writer who can effectively communicate across various platforms and contexts. In this class, my specific goal is to refine my argumentative writing skills, ensuring my essays are persuasive and well-supported by evidence. By the end of the course, I hope to confidently tackle any writing task, equipped with a robust toolkit of strategies and practices.

Make sure to engage with the visual examples you include in your reflection. Where should they be included within your reflection? Will you use text wrap and captions to help your readers?

Include Visual Examples

To make our reflective essay more attractive, we will use visuals.

• Select meaningful examples: Choose 1-2 visual examples illustrating your writing experiences. These could be screenshots of previous work, hyperlinks, photos, or engaging images.
• Explain examples: Ensure the visuals are integrated into your essay with clear explanations and appropriate placement. Use text wrap and captions if necessary.

Example

To illustrate my journey, I include a screenshot of an academic research paper that received high praise for its thorough analysis and a blog post that showcases my creative writing. These examples highlight the diversity of my writing and the progress I have made over the years.

In summary, reflecting on my writing experiences has been enlightening. It has highlighted my growth, from hesitant high school essays to confident professional and creative writing. Setting clear future goals motivates me to continue developing my skills and exploring new writing avenues. This metacognitive reflection cements my learning and prepares me for diverse writing challenges.

Revise and proofread your reflection for overall organization and flow within each paragraph.

Revise and Proofread

Here, we will revise and proofread the reflection before submitting it.

• Revise for organization: Check your essay’s overall structure and flow. Ensure each paragraph transitions smoothly.
• Proofread for errors: Correct grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors to enhance readability.

Closing

By completing the ENG 101 First Reflection – Your Writing Journey Begins, you’ll gain valuable insights into your writing journey and set clear goals for future improvement. Reflecting on past experiences and envisioning your development as a writer will strengthen your writing skills and prepare you for various writing situations in the future.

ENG 101 MODULE 3 DISCUSSION: Project 1 Genre

Instructions for ENG 101 Module 3 Discussion

Overview and Purpose

Estimated Time: 3-4 hours

Process Step: Invention

Learning Outcomes: Practice choosing from and composing in different genres and media for diverse audiences and purposes; gain experience reading and composing in different genres to understand differences in genre conventionsLinks to an external site. and how they are shaped by readers’ and writers’ intentions and purposes; gain experience reading a diverse range of texts rhetorically to understand how various features of texts are organized to suit different audiences and purposes.

Instructional Materials: Before beginning, review the following:

• Project 1 Project Description and Rubric
• Module 3 Learning Materials
• Resources on Discussions
• Netiquette Guidelines

In this invention assignment, you and your classmates will review sample rhetorical analyses, gain a clearer understanding of the rhetorical analysis genre, and begin to plan your own rhetorical analysis.

Instructions

Step 1: Read Critically

• Read through the following sample rhetorical analyses linked below. As you read these rhetorical analyses, pay attention to the features—or conventions—these samples share in common.
  • Sample 1 

Actions

• Sample 2

Actions

• Sample 3
• Sample 4

Remember, *none* of these sample analyses were written specifically for our Project 1 assignment and are not exact models for you to follow. All authors had different purposes than you did for Project 1.

Step 2: Summarize and Apply Your Learning

Next, compose your discussion post. Your post will be two paragraphs in total. 

Paragraph 1: Summarize what you have learned about the rhetorical analysis genre. 

Using quotations from the learning materials and sample rhetorical analyses as support, please:

• Explain the goal of a rhetorical analysis, as though you were teaching someone who had never heard of one before. 
• Briefly describe the tone, style, and organization of these samples. What keywords or phrases do they share?
• Describe 1-2 features you have noticed about how images are integrated into these sample rhetorical analyses (e.g., location, text wrapping, size, captioning). How do these images support the goal of each sample rhetorical analysis?
• Explain what makes for a successful rhetorical analysis. 

Paragraph 2: Apply your learning and begin planning your own rhetorical analysis.

• Identify 2-3 genre conventions (at least one of which has to do with the visual mode of communication) that you would like to try out in your rhetorical analysis. Explain how these choices will enhance your audience’s reading experience. 
  • Reminder: According to the Project 1 description, “You will present the results of your rhetorical analysis as an online text written to your own target audience: members of your community interested in the business/organization or who want to learn more about communication strategies.”
• List any questions or concerns you have about composing in this genre.
• Optional: Are there any genre conventions you would like to subvert, and how would that help you achieve the goal of your rhetorical analysis?

Step 3: Respond to Peers

• After you complete your initial post for this assignment, read over your peers’ posts. Then, by the due date indicated in the course assignment tracker, respond to two of your peers following the 3CQ approach.

Submission Requirements

• Two-paragraph initial post.
• Two peer responses that follow the 3CQ models, each with a fully developed paragraph. 
• Submit posts directly in the discussion forum below. Click “Reply” below, write your response in the box provided, and click “Post Reply” to submit your post.

Introduction to ENG 101 Module 3 Discussion

The ENG 101 Module 3 Discussion: Project 1 Genre is designed to help you practice choosing and composing in different genres and media for diverse audiences and purposes. By reviewing sample rhetorical analyses and planning your own, you will better understand the rhetorical analysis genre. This guide provides clear and concise instructions on effectively completing each part of the assignment.

Read through the following sample rhetorical analyses linked below. As you read these rhetorical analyses, pay attention to the features or conventions these samples share.

Review Sample Rhetorical Analyses

We will review and analyze the given samples to start the ENG 101 Module 3 Discussion: Project 1 Genre.

• Read and analyze the provided samples: Carefully read the four sample rhetorical analyses in your course materials.
• Identify standard conventions: Pay attention to the features these samples share, such as tone, style, organization, and integration of images.

Example

I better understood the rhetorical analysis genre when reviewing the sample rhetorical analyses. A rhetorical analysis examines how an author persuades their audience using various rhetorical strategies. This involves analyzing the author’s use of ethos, pathos, and logos, as well as the overall effectiveness of their communication. The tone of the sample analyses is generally formal and analytical, while the style is precise and focused. Organizationally, these analyses follow a clear structure, often starting with an introduction that outlines the main argument, then body paragraphs that delve into specific rhetorical strategies, and concluding with a summary of the findings.

A common feature among the samples is the strategic use of images. Images are typically integrated near the relevant text, using text wrapping or captions to enhance the reader’s understanding. For instance, in one sample, a photo of a campaign poster is placed next to the discussion of visual rhetoric, providing a concrete example that supports the analysis. This integration of visuals not only aids comprehension but also keeps the reader engaged.

Successful rhetorical analysis is characterized by a clear thesis, well-organized content, and detailed evidence supporting the analysis. It should comprehensively examine the text, addressing how and why specific rhetorical strategies are used.

Summarize what you have learned about the rhetorical analysis genre. Apply what you have learned and begin planning your rhetorical analysis.

Summarize and Apply Your Learning

Next, we will summarize our understanding and learning.

• Explain the goal of a rhetorical analysis: Describe the purpose as if you were teaching someone new to the concept. Use quotations from the learning materials and samples to support your explanation.
• Describe tone, style, and organization: Briefly outline the samples’ familiar tone, style, and organizational structure. Highlight keywords or phrases they share.
• Discuss image integration: Note 1-2 features about how images are used in the samples (e.g., location, text wrapping, size, captioning) and explain how these images support the rhetorical goals of each sample.
• Explain what makes a successful rhetorical analysis: Summarize the key elements that contribute to a successful rhetorical analysis based on the samples.
• Identify genre conventions: Choose 2-3 conventions, including at least one visual mode of communication, that you plan to use in your rhetorical analysis. Explain how these choices will enhance your audience’s reading experience.
• List questions or concerns: Mention any questions or concerns about composing in this genre.
• Optional: Consider if there are any genre conventions you want to subvert and explain how this could help achieve the goal of your rhetorical analysis.

Example

For my rhetorical analysis, I plan to incorporate genre conventions such as a formal tone, structured organization, and the strategic use of visuals. Specifically, I will use images to illustrate key points, ensuring they are relevant and adequately captioned. This will enhance the reading experience by providing visual evidence that supports my analysis.

I am confident in applying these conventions, but I have concerns about balancing the analysis with sufficient evidence without overwhelming the reader. Additionally, I am considering subverting the typical format by incorporating interactive elements, such as hyperlinks to related content, to create a more dynamic reading experience. This approach could make my analysis more engaging and accessible to a broader audience.

After you complete your initial post for this assignment, read over your peers’ posts. Then, by the due date indicated in the course assignment tracker, respond to two of your peers following the 3CQ approach.

Respond to Peers

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the ENG 101 Module 3 Discussion: Project 1 Genre. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the following points in mind.

• Read peers’ posts: Take time to read through the posts made by your classmates.
• Respond using the 3CQ approach: Comment on at least two posts using the 3CQ method—Compliment, Comment, Connect, and Question. 
• This method encourages thoughtful and constructive feedback.

Example

Response 01

Hi Jane, nice post! I enjoyed your detailed summary of the rhetorical analysis genre. Your plan to use images effectively is commendable. I also appreciate your idea of incorporating interactive elements to enhance engagement. I share your concern about balancing analysis and evidence.

Response 02

We are supposed to write two peer responses. I have addressed the given instructions in one response. Following these instructions, you can write your peer responses to Module 3 Discussion without a hassle.

Closing 

By completing the ENG 101 Module 3 Discussion: Project 1 Genre, you will better understand how to analyze and compose in different genres for various audiences and purposes. This How-To ENG 101 Guide will enhance your ability to transfer writing skills to future academic, professional, and personal contexts. Engaging with your peers’ analyses will enrich your learning experience through collaborative feedback and discussion.

ENG 101 Module 3 Assignment: Project 1 Topic Proposal

Instructions for ENG 101 Module 3 Assignment: Project 1

Overview and Purpose

Estimated Time: 3-4 hours

Process Step: Invention

Learning Outcomes: Use critical languaging (thinking, reading, and composing) to deepen learning and understanding about a given topic and use composing processes and strategies as a means to invent, discover, and reconsider ideas.

Instructional Materials: Before beginning, review the following:

• Project 1 Description and Rubric
• Module 3 Invention Learning Materials

This assignment will help you choose the business or organization you will be analyzing and begin to research how they are communicating to their target audience. You will clarify the rhetorical situation, multimodal elements, and primary research for your analysis. 

Instructions

Step 1: List Potential Choices

List at least five small businesses or nonprofit organizations in your local community that you are interested in analyzing for Project 1. Keep in mind the guidelines discussed in the Project 1 project description, as well as any other guidance your instructor has given. Spend at least 10–15 minutes thinking carefully, reflecting, and listing. You can include your list of five choices in your submission, but this is not required.

Step 2: Identify Your Top Choice 

Identify your final choice and include a clickable hyperlink to the website or social media page of the business/organization so your instructor can review it to ensure your choice will work for this project.

Step 3: Initial Research

Spend at least one hour looking at various types of communication produced by your chosen business or organization. Choose 1-2 examples to analyze how the rhetorical concepts are being used. Refer to the project description and learning materials linked above for tips and questions to guide you as you begin your research.

Note: You should take plenty of notes as you begin your research, but you do not need to submit anything for this step of the assignment.

Step 4: Initial Findings and Visual Examples

Reference your initial research notes to compose 1-2 paragraphs totaling at least 300 words discussing the findings of your initial analysis and the visual examples you plan to analyze. Consider the following questions as you compose this paragraph:

• What is your subject’s rhetorical goal? What is your subject’s target audience?
• What types of communication did you find and analyze? What, if any, further types of communication do you plan to analyze later in the project?
• What examples for each of the four rhetorical concepts have you found so far? 
• What specific visual examples do you plan on including in your analysis? (You may provide them here as part of this assignment, but this is not required.)
• What is your plan for conducting further research? What other rhetorical concepts do you need to look for? What other visual examples are needed?

Step 5: Thesis Statement

Compose a 1-2 sentence thesis statement introducing the key takeaway/main idea of your analysis. Make sure your thesis statement is clearly indicated/labeled at the end of your submission. Consider the following questions as you create your thesis statement:

• How is your subject using ethos, pathos, logos, and kairos to persuade the audience to act, think, or believe in a particular way?
• What is interesting or memorable about your subject’s use of rhetoric that you want to communicate to your readers?

Submission Requirements

In a single Word document or PDF file, include the following three components:

1. The name of your chosen business/organization with a clickable hyperlink to their website/social media.

• You can include your list of five choices in your submission, but this is not required.

Your 300-word (1-2 paragraph) discussion of your initial findings and visual examples. Your 1-2 sentence thesis statement introduces the main idea of your rhetorical analysis.

Submit your assignment to Canvas by clicking Start Assignment and then uploading the correct file. For additional help uploading an assignment, visit the Canvas Guide on how to upload a file as an assignment Links to an external site..

Introduction to ENG 101 Module 3 Assignment

The ENG 101 Module 3 Assignment: Project 1 Topic Proposal involves using critical thinking, reading, and composing skills to analyze how a small business or nonprofit organization communicates with its target audience. With this How-To ENG 101 Guide, you will learn to identify rhetorical situations, multimodal elements, and primary research, which will deepen your understanding of effective communication strategies.

List at least five small businesses or nonprofit organizations in your local community that you want to analyze for Project 1.

List Potential Choices

To start the ENG 101 Module 3 Assignment: Project 1 Topic Proposal, we will first spend 10-15 minutes brainstorming and listing at least five small businesses or nonprofit organizations in our local community.

• Refer to the Project 1 description and any additional guidance from your instructor.
• You can include your list in your submission, but it is not mandatory.
• Choose five local businesses or nonprofits you are interested in.
• Ensure they fit the project guidelines.
• Spend adequate time reflecting on your choices.

Identify your final choice and include a clickable hyperlink to the website or social media page of the business/organization so your instructor can review it to ensure your choice will work for this project.

Identify Your Top Choice

For this segment of the ENG 101 Module 3 Assignment: Project 1 Topic Proposal, we will pick the one business or organization we are most interested in analyzing.

• Provide Hyperlink: Include a clickable hyperlink to their website or social media page for your instructor’s review.
• Decide on your top choice from the list of five.
• Insert a clickable hyperlink to their main website or social media page.

Example

I have chosen TOMS Shoes to analyze their communication strategies and rhetorical approaches for this assignment. 

Spend at least one hour looking at various types of communication produced by your chosen business or organization. Choose 1-2 examples to analyze how the rhetorical concepts are being used. Refer to the project description and learning materials for tips and questions to guide you as you begin your research.

Initial Research

Here, we will dedicate at least one hour to examining various types of communication produced by your chosen business or organization.

• Select 1-2 examples to analyze for rhetorical concepts.
• Note-taking: Take detailed notes, but do not submit them for this step.
• Investigate different communication forms used by your chosen organization.
• Identify examples that demonstrate rhetorical concepts.
• Document your observations in detail.

Example

In my initial research, I spent an hour exploring various types of communication produced by TOMS Shoes, including their website content, social media posts, and marketing campaigns. TOMS is a well-known small business that creates socially conscious footwear and eyewear. Their rhetorical goal is to persuade consumers to purchase their products by emphasizing the social impact of their “One for One” program, where every purchase contributes to helping those in need. TOMS targets socially conscious consumers who value ethical business practices and social responsibility.

I analyzed their website and social media pages, focusing on their use of ethos, pathos, logos, and kairos. Ethos is evident through their credible partnerships and transparent impact reports, which build trust with their audience. Pathos is effectively used in their emotional storytelling, showcasing real-life beneficiaries of their donations, which evoke empathy and a sense of connection. Logos is present in their clear explanations of how their business model works; providing logical reasons for purchasing TOMS products makes a positive difference. Kairos is utilized through timely campaigns that align with global events and social movements, making their messages relevant and urgent.

The visual examples I plan to include in my analysis are the impactful images and videos on their website and social media. These visuals illustrate the direct impact of their donations, making the abstract concept of social good tangible and relatable. My plan for further research includes examining customer testimonials and reviews to understand the audience’s perception and how TOMS’ communication strategies influence their purchasing decisions.

Reference your initial research notes to compose 1-2 paragraphs totaling at least 300 words discussing the findings of your initial analysis and the visual examples you plan to analyze. Consider the following questions as you compose this paragraph:

Initial Findings and Visual Examples

We will write 1-2 paragraphs (at least 300 words) discussing our initial findings.

• What is the rhetorical goal and target audience?
• What types of communication were analyzed?
• What examples of rhetorical concepts (ethos, pathos, logos, kairos) did you find?
• What specific visual examples will you include?
• What is your plan for further research?
• Use your research notes to draft 1-2 paragraphs about your initial findings.
• Address the provided questions to guide your analysis.

Example

Compose a 1-2 sentence thesis statement introducing your analysis’s key takeaway/main idea. Ensure your thesis statement is indicated/labeled at the end of your submission. 

Thesis Statement

For this section of the ENG 101 Module 3 Assignment: Project 1 Topic Proposal, we will develop a 1-2 sentence thesis statement that summarizes the main idea of our analysis.

• How are ethos, pathos, logos, and kairos used?
• What makes the subject’s use of rhetoric exciting or memorable?
• Reflect on your analysis to formulate a clear, concise thesis statement.
• Place your thesis at the end of your submission and label it clearly.

Example

TOMS Shoes effectively uses ethos, pathos, logos, and kairos to engage and persuade its audience by highlighting the social impact of its products, making ethical consumerism both appealing and accessible. 

Closing

The ENG 101 Module 3 Assignment: Project 1 Topic Proposal aims to enhance your critical thinking and composing skills by analyzing the communication strategies of a local business or nonprofit. By following this How-To Owlisdom Guide, you will better understand how rhetorical concepts are used to engage and persuade target audiences. The critical takeaway is learning to identify and analyze practical communication elements crucial in academic and professional settings.

ENG 101 Module 4: Project 1 Drafting

Instructions for ENG 101 Module 4

Overview and Purpose

Estimated Time: Your feedback draft Links to an external site. will take approximately 4-6 hours to complete.

Process Step: Drafting 

Learning Outcomes: Practice using flexible, culturally relevant, audience-specific language for a specific purpose; learn to negotiate and integrate ideas that differ from and/or challenge your own, and develop a writing project through multiple drafts.

Instructional Materials: Before beginning, review the following.

• Project 1 Description and Rubric
• Module 4 Learning Materials
• Feedback on Your Project 1 Invention Assignments

In this drafting assignment, you will synthesize your thinking related to the local business or community organization you are analyzing by writing a draft of your rhetorical analysis. You will then submit this draft and a self-assessment for instructor feedback. 

Instructions

Complete the requirements below in one Microsoft Word file or PDF.

Step 1: Compose a Draft of your Rhetorical Analysis

After reviewing the instructional materials listed above, compose a complete draft of your rhetorical analysis for feedback from your instructor and peers. 

Step 2: Assess Your Own Project 1 Feedback Draft

At the end of your draft document, write a one-paragraph self-assessment of your draft, in which you respond to these questions: 

• What was the main idea you wanted to communicate to your readers? 
• How do you feel your draft turned out? 
• How does it meet the expectations discussed in the Project 1 project description and rubric? 

Then, write a list of the top 4-5 concerns/questions you have about your draft (use the Project 1 description and rubric for inspiration!).

This assessment and list will help your readers engage with the concerns you identify. They will also help you set goals for how you will further develop your analysis. Make sure your self-assessment and list are clearly separated from your draft, ideally on a new page.

Step 3: Submit Draft and Self-Assessment

After you complete a full draft of your rhetorical analysis and assess your project, submit your assignment to Canvas. To do this, click Start Assignment and then upload the correct Microsoft Word file or PDF. For additional help uploading an assignment, visit the Canvas Guide on how to upload a file as an assignment. Links to an external site..

Then, navigate to the next module to learn about how to participate in peer review. Note that you will be submitting your draft in two places: here for instructor review, and in Module 5 for peer review.

Submission Requirements

• A complete draft of your Project 1 rhetorical analysis. As a reminder, here are the main project requirements listed in the project description document:
  • Genre: A rhetorical analysis meant to be read/viewed online
  • Subject: A small business or nonprofit organization in your local community
  • Audience: Members of your local community interested in the business/organization or who want to learn more about communication strategies
  • Title: Something creative that indicates the topic and purpose of the analysis
  • Length: 750-1250 words
  • Multimodality: Include at least four visual examples that support and enhance your rhetorical analysis
  • Format: Microsoft Word file or PDF
• A one-paragraph self-assessment and list of concerns/questions, included at the end of your draft document.

Resources

• How to Convert Google Docs, Microsoft Word, and Apple Pages to New File Types Links to an external site.

How to View Instructor Feedback Links to an external site

Introduction to ENG 101 Module 4 Project Draft

The ENG 101 Module 4: Project 1 Drafting involves writing your rhetorical analysis of a local business or community organization. This How-To ENG 101 Guide aims to help you practice using culturally relevant and audience-specific language, integrating diverse ideas, and developing a writing project through multiple drafts. You will submit your draft and a self-assessment for instructor feedback, which will help refine your analysis.

After reviewing the instructional materials listed above, compose a complete draft of your rhetorical analysis for feedback from your instructor and peers.

Compose a Draft of Your Rhetorical Analysis

To start the ENG 101 Module 4: Project 1 Drafting, before starting, review the instructional materials provided in the course.

• Write a complete rhetorical analysis draft addressing all required elements.
• Analyze the communication strategies of the chosen local business or nonprofit.
• Discuss how they use ethos, pathos, logos, and kairos to engage their audience.
• Ensure your draft covers all aspects mentioned in the project description.

Example

TOMS Shoes effectively establishes credibility, or ethos, through transparent impact reports and reputable partnerships. By openly sharing detailed reports on the impact of its unique “One for One” program, where for every pair of shoes purchased, a pair is donated to a child in need, TOMS builds trust with its audience. These reports provide insights into how the company’s initiatives have positively affected communities worldwide, detailing the number of shoes donated, the lives changed, and the sustainable practices implemented. This transparency allows consumers to see the tangible results of their purchases, reinforcing TOMS’ commitment to social responsibility.

Moreover, TOMS partners with well-known and respected organizations such as Save the Children. These partnerships enhance TOMS’ credibility by aligning the company with established entities already trusted by the public. Collaborating with reputable organizations amplifies TOMS’ efforts and lends additional legitimacy to their cause. Consumers are more likely to trust and support a company that respected partners endorse. This strategic use of ethos ensures that TOMS is seen as a reliable and ethical brand dedicated to making a positive social impact.

Emotional appeal, or pathos, is at the heart of TOMS’ marketing strategy. The company uses compelling stories and images of beneficiaries to evoke empathy and emotional responses from its audience. For example, TOMS frequently shares personal stories of individuals who have directly benefited from their donations. These narratives often highlight the struggles and triumphs of people in underserved communities, creating a powerful connection between the consumer and the cause.

The visual elements used in TOMS’ marketing materials further enhance this emotional appeal. Photographs and videos depicting happy children wearing new shoes or communities thriving because of TOMS’ initiatives are strategically used to tug at consumers’ heartstrings. By showcasing the direct impact of their products, TOMS creates an emotional bond with its audience, motivating them to support the cause. This effective use of pathos drives consumer engagement and fosters a sense of shared purpose and community.

TOMS employs logical appeal, or logos, by clearly explaining its business model and the direct benefits of purchasing its products. The company provides rational reasons for consumers to support their cause by illustrating how their purchases translate into tangible benefits for those in need. TOMS’ “One for One” model is straightforward: for every product sold, a similar item is donated to someone in need.

This clear and logical explanation of their business model makes it easy for consumers to understand the impact of their purchases. TOMS frequently uses statistics and data to support its claims, further enhancing its logical appeal. For instance, they might highlight how many shoes have been donated or the number of people who have received eye care as a result of their eyewear sales. By presenting factual information and data, TOMS appeals to the rational side of consumers, providing them with concrete reasons to support the brand.

TOMS skillfully leverages timely opportunities, or kairos, to enhance the effectiveness of its messaging. The company aligns its campaigns with global events and social movements to make its appeals more relevant and urgent. By doing so, TOMS ensures that its messages resonate with current societal concerns and the immediate interests of its audience.

For example, TOMS might launch a campaign with World Health Day, emphasizing their efforts to improve health and well-being in underserved communities. Similarly, they might align their marketing efforts with environmental initiatives, highlighting their commitment to sustainability during Earth Day celebrations. This strategic use of kairos allows TOMS to capitalize on moments when their audience is already focused on similar issues, thereby increasing the impact and relevance of their campaigns.

Additionally, TOMS stays responsive to emerging social movements and global crises. TOMS maintains a sense of urgency and importance in its campaigns by addressing timely issues and incorporating them into its messaging. This responsiveness keeps its marketing fresh and relevant and demonstrates the company’s adaptability and commitment to addressing current global challenges.

At the end of your draft document, write a one-paragraph self-assessment of your draft in which you respond to these questions: (a) What was the main idea you wanted to communicate to your readers? (b) How do you feel your draft turned out? (c) How does it meet the expectations discussed in the Project 1 project description and rubric?

Assess Your Own Project 1 Feedback Draft

For this section of the ENG 101 Module 4: Project 1 Drafting, we will write a one-paragraph self-assessment at the end of our draft.

Questions to Answer

• What is the main idea you want to communicate?
• How do you feel your draft turned out?
• How does it meet the project expectations?
• List Concerns/Questions: Write down 4-5 concerns or questions about your draft based on the project description and rubric.
• Reflect on your draft and write a self-assessment addressing the provided questions.
• List your top concerns or questions to guide feedback from your instructor and peers.
• Ensure this section is on a new page and clearly separated from your draft.

Example

The main idea communicated in this draft is how TOMS Shoes uses rhetorical strategies to promote ethical consumerism and engage its audience. The draft effectively analyzes TOMS’ communication strategies by addressing ethos, pathos, logos, and kairos, meeting the project expectations. It provides a comprehensive rhetorical analysis, including relevant visual examples and a precise examination of TOMS’ strategies. By integrating these elements, the draft adheres to the guidelines in the project description and rubric, ensuring a thorough exploration of TOMS’ persuasive techniques and their impact on the target audience. The analysis showcases how TOMS’ communication fosters a sense of community and shared purpose among consumers.

Concerns/Questions

• Is the analysis of each rhetorical strategy sufficiently detailed?

• Are the visual examples effectively integrated into the analysis?

• Does the draft adhere to the word count requirement?

• Is the thesis statement clear and concise?

• How can the draft be improved for better coherence and flow?

After completing a full rhetorical analysis draft and assessing your project, submit your assignment to Canvas. To do this, click Start Assignment and then upload the correct Microsoft Word file or PDF.

Submit Draft and Self-Assessment

Next, we will submit our draft to the Canvas.

• Submit your completed draft and self-assessment to Canvas.
• Submit in two places – one for instructor review and one in Module 5 for peer review.
• Follow the steps in Canvas to upload your Microsoft Word file or PDF.
• Ensure you submit to the instructor review section and the peer review module.

Requirements

To score the maximum score, we will fulfill these Rubric Requirements.

• Complete Draft: A full draft of your rhetorical analysis.
• Genre: Rhetorical analysis meant to be read/viewed online.
• Subject: A small business or nonprofit organization in your local community.
• Audience: Local community members interested in the business/organization or communication strategies.
• Title: Creative title indicating the topic and purpose of the analysis.
• Length: 750-1250 words.
• Multimodality: Include at least four visual examples supporting your analysis.
• Format: Microsoft Word file or PDF.
• Self-Assessment: A one-paragraph self-assessment and a list of concerns/questions are included at the end of the draft.

Closing

By following ENG 101 Module 4: Project 1 Drafting How-To Guide, you will effectively draft and assess your rhetorical analysis, enhancing your understanding of audience-specific language and communication strategies. This process will prepare you for further development and refinement of your analysis through instructor and peer feedback. The key takeaway of the ENG 101 Module 4 Project Draft is the importance of iterative drafting and self-assessment in producing a coherent and impactful rhetorical analysis.

ENG 101 Module 5 Assignment: Project 1 Feedback and Revision

Instructions for ENG 101 Module 5 Assignment

Overview and Purpose

Estimated Time: 2 hours

Process Step: Feedback

Learning Outcomes: Practice giving and receiving feedback within the writing community, including evaluating and acting on feedback from different sources; Learn to negotiate and integrate ideas that differ from and/or challenge the writer’s ideas 

Instructional Materials: Before beginning, review the following.

• Project 1 Description and Rubric
• Module 5 Feedback Learning Materials
• Writers’ Studio Peer Review GuideLinks to an external site.

Note: This assignment has two deadlines: one for posting your draft for your peers to review, and another for completing your two assigned peer reviews.

Instructions

Step 1: Submit Your Draft

First, you will submit your completed draft of your Project 1 rhetorical analysis here for peer review. (This is the same draft, including the self-assessment paragraph, that you submitted for instructor review.) You must submit your draft in both places.

Step 2: Locate Your Assigned Peers to Review

The morning after the deadline for this assignment, Canvas will automatically assign you two peers to review. You can find your assigned peers through this assignment page, in your to-do list, and/or in your Canvas notifications (depending on your settings). If you need help finding your assigned peers, refer to the Writers’ Studio Peer Review GuideLinks to an external site. resource.

• Finding Your Assigned Peers to ReviewLinks to an external site.

Note: If you do not submit your draft for peer review by the deadline, you may not be included in the automatic peer review assignments. If this happens, please reach out to your instructor right away so they can manually assign you peers to review.

Step 3: Review Your Peers’ Drafts

Once you have located your assigned peers, read through their drafts. Be attentive as you read each draft, keeping in mind that the goal of peer review is to help your peer see ways to revise their work. 

Step 4: Complete Your Peer Reviews Using the Built-In Rubric

Once you have reviewed a peer’s draft, use the built-in rubric to give feedback to your peer. In each rubric category, do the following three things:

1. Tell your peer one thing they did well in the rubric category.
2. Tell your peer one thing they could improve on in the rubric category.
3. Leave a piece of actionable advice. For example, if you felt your peer’s conclusion should be improved, tell them specifically what they could add/change that would make the conclusion stronger. It is not enough to just tell them something needs improvement.

Note that you must fill in the built-in rubric for each peer to complete your peer reviews. Your reviews should not be e-comments or text in the “Comments” area of this assignment. You can give feedback in both of those areas if you wish, but only what is included in the built-in rubric will be scored. If you need help finding and using the embedded rubric, refer to the Writers’ Studio Peer Review GuideLinks to an external site. resource.

• Using the Embedded Peer Review Rubric Links to an external site.

Here are some other tips to keep in mind as you complete your peer reviews.

• Do not click “Save” or “Save Comments” until you have completed your review, as this might submit your incomplete review. If this happens, reach out to your instructor. They may be able to reset your review.
• You may want to compose your reviews in an outside document (such as a Word file or Google Doc) first, rather than typing them directly into the rubric as you go. This way, you have your reviews saved if you run into any technical issues.
• Do not attach a separate file or leave your feedback in the “Comments” area. Use the embedded rubric only to complete your peer reviews.
• If you see a comment stating that you need to “leave at least one comment” for your review to be finished, you can ignore that comment. The only thing you need to do is fill in the rubric.

Submission Requirements

• Submit your Project 1 draft in this assignment for peer review.
• Complete reviews of two of your peers’ drafts using the built-in peer review rubric.

*Note: the Canvas Student app does not support peer review. Please use a current web browser to complete peer reviews in Canvas. Chrome or Firefox is recommended by Canvas.

Introduction to ENG 101 Module 5 Assignment

The ENG 101 Module 5 Assignment: Project 1 Feedback and Revision focuses on the essential practice of giving and receiving feedback within the writing community. You will submit your draft for peer review, review your peers’ drafts, and provide constructive feedback using a built-in rubric. This How-To ENG 101 Guide will help refine your work and improve your ability to evaluate and integrate diverse ideas.

Submit Your Draft

For the ENG 101 Module 5 Assignment: Project 1 Feedback and Revision, we will submit the completed draft of our Project 1 rhetorical analysis for peer review. This includes the self-assessment paragraph.

Also, we will ensure to submit our draft in both the instructor review and peer review sections on Canvas.

• Log in to Canvas and navigate to the assignment page.
• Upload your draft, including the self-assessment, for peer review.
• Confirm submission in both required sections.

Locate Your Assigned Peers to Review

• Assignment Notification: Canvas will automatically assign you two peers to review the morning after the deadline.
• Finding Peers: Check the assignment page, your to-do list, and Canvas notifications to locate your assigned peers.
• The morning after the submission deadline, log in to Canvas.
• Navigate to the assignment page to find your assigned peers.
• If you cannot find your peers, refer to the Writers’ Studio Peer Review Guide or contact your instructor.

Review Your Peers’ Drafts

Next, we will carefully read through each assigned peer’s draft.

• Purpose: Focus on identifying areas for improvement and providing constructive feedback.
• Open each assigned peer’s draft.
• Read the entire draft attentively.
• Take notes on strengths and areas for improvement.

Peer Reviews 

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the ENG 101 Module 5 Assignment: Project 1 Feedback and Revision. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the following points in mind.

• One area for improvement.
• Actionable advice for improvement.
• Access the rubric on Canvas for each peer’s draft.
• Fill out each rubric category with specific feedback.
• Provide actionable advice to help your peers improve their drafts.

Example

Response 01

Hi Sara, great post! Your draft on analyzing TOMS Shoes’ rhetorical strategies is comprehensive and insightful. You effectively highlight how TOMS uses ethos, pathos, logos, and kairos to engage its audience and promote ethical consumerism. The integration of transparent impact reports, emotional storytelling, straightforward business model explanations, and timely campaigns is well-articulated. The visuals complement your analysis, enhancing the overall impact.

However, the analysis could benefit from more specific examples and direct quotes from TOMS’ marketing materials to further substantiate your points. Additionally, consider refining the thesis statement to make it more succinct and impactful. Overall, your draft provides a thorough exploration of TOMS’ communication strategies.

Response 02

We are supposed to write two peer responses. I have addressed the given instructions in one response. Following these instructions, you can write your peer responses to Module 5 Assignment without a hassle.

Tips

• Complete the Rubric: Ensure all feedback is entered into the built-in rubric.
• Avoid Saving Incomplete Reviews: Do not click “Save” until your review is complete.
• Compose Externally: Consider drafting your feedback in a separate document first.
• No Separate Files: Do not attach files or leave feedback in the “Comments” area.
• Ignore Comment Warnings: You only need to fill in the rubric.

Closing

The ENG 101 Module 5 Assignment: Project 1 Feedback and Revision helps you develop critical skills in giving and receiving feedback within a writing community. By submitting your draft, reviewing peers’ drafts, and providing detailed feedback using the rubric, you enhance your ability to evaluate writing and integrate diverse ideas. The key takeaway is the importance of constructive feedback in improving writing quality and fostering collaborative learning.

ENG 101 Module 5 Project Review: Project 1 Revision Workshop Signups

Instructions for ENG 101 Module 5 Project Review

Overview and Purpose

Estimated Time: You should spend 2 hours to complete the self-assessment, prepare for the workshop, attend the workshop, and plan your next revision steps.

Revision workshops allow you to work collaboratively with your Writing Mentor to help understand and implement the feedback you have received and discuss additional revisions to your project.

It is highly recommended that you make some initial revisions based on your first round of feedback before submitting your draft for a workshop. However, you can also use these workshops to get help understanding and applying the feedback you received.

These workshops are held both synchronously over Zoom and asynchronously through written and audio/video/screencast feedback. Synchronous revision workshops may be recorded for quality control and training purposes.

Instructions

Complete the requirements in each step.

Step 1:

Review the feedback you received from your instructor and peers on your draft. Review the project assignment description and rubric.

Step 2: 

Begin to revise your draft using the feedback you received as a guide.

Step 3: 

Download and complete the self-assessment form

Actions

Step 4: 

Sign up for your preferred workshop by attaching your self-assessment form and most recent revised draft.

Step 5: 

Attend the Zoom workshop, or review the asynchronous feedback from your Writing Mentor.

Participation Guidelines

• Please note that we always use Arizona time in the Writers’ Studio. Arizona does NOT participate in Daylight Savings Time.
• Sign-ups operate on a first-come, first-served basis.
• The first four students who post their form and draft to a time-slot thread will attend that workshop or receive asynchronous feedback.
• Make sure to attach your draft and self-assessment worksheet at least 24 hours before your workshop time so that your Writing Mentor has time to prepare.

Introduction to ENG 101 Module 5 Project Review

The ENG 101 Module 5 Project Review: Project 1 Revision Workshop Signups involves conducting a self-assessment, preparing for and attending a revision workshop, and planning your next steps for revising your draft. The goal is to collaboratively work with a Writing Mentor to understand and implement feedback, ensuring your project meets the highest standards.

Review Feedback

To start the ENG 101 Module 5 Project Review: Project 1 Revision Workshop Signups, we will review the feedback from the Instructor and peers. We will revise the project draft we created in Module 4 by considering the input.

• Instructor and Peer Feedback: Carefully review the feedback from your instructor and peers.
• Assignment Description and Rubric: Revisit the project assignment description and rubric to understand the expectations.
• Gather all feedback received on your draft.
• Compare the feedback with the project requirements and rubric.
• Initial Revisions: Making some initial revisions before the workshop is recommended.

• Identify critical areas for improvement from the feedback.
• Implement changes to enhance your draft.

Example

Old Solution: If you went through the Sample Solution of the ENG 101 Project Draft, you must have noticed that I did not cite any references. For any project or assignment, it is essential to cite the resources used. Here, I will use the feedback from the instructor and peers to update my solution to the ENG 101 Project Draft.

Updated Solution: I am adding a small section of the project Analysis to show the cited references.

TOMS Shoes effectively establishes credibility, or ethos, through transparent impact reports and reputable partnerships. By openly sharing detailed reports on the impact of its unique “One for One” program, where for every pair of shoes purchased, a pair is donated to a child in need, TOMS builds trust with its audience (Offerdal et al., 2021). These reports provide insights into how the company’s initiatives have positively affected communities worldwide, detailing the number of shoes donated, the lives changed, and the sustainable practices implemented. This transparency allows consumers to see the tangible results of their purchases, reinforcing TOMS’ commitment to social responsibility.

Moreover, TOMS partners with well-known and respected organizations such as Save the Children. These partnerships enhance TOMS’ credibility by aligning the company with established entities already trusted by the public (Mihalciuc et al., 2020). Collaborating with reputable organizations amplifies TOMS’ efforts and lends additional legitimacy to their cause. Consumers are more likely to trust and support a company that respected partners endorse. This strategic use of ethos ensures that TOMS is seen as a reliable and ethical brand dedicated to making a positive social impact.

Complete the Self-Assessment Form

Next, we will complete the self-assessment form. It will be available on your Canvas. 

• Form Download: Download the self-assessment form.
• Complete Assessment: Reflect on your draft and complete the form.
• Access the self-assessment form provided.
• Fill out the form, addressing all prompts.

Sign Up for a Workshop

Next, we will sign up for a workshop that we prefer.

• Workshop Sign-Up: Choose your preferred workshop time.
• Attach Documents: Attach your self-assessment form and revised draft.
• Sign up for a workshop slot on Canvas.
• Upload your completed self-assessment form and the latest version of your draft.

Attend the Workshop or Review Feedback

• Workshop Attendance: Participate in the Zoom workshop or review asynchronous feedback.
• Engage Actively: Engage with your Writing Mentor to understand and apply the feedback.
• Attend the scheduled Zoom workshop or review the provided feedback.
• Take notes and plan further revisions based on the discussion.

Closing

The ENG 101 Module 5 Project Review: Project 1 Revision Workshop Signups helps you refine your writing through self-assessment and collaborative revision. Reviewing feedback, revising your draft, and participating in a workshop will enhance your understanding of the project requirements and improve your draft. The key takeaway of this How-To ENG 101 Guide is the importance of iterative revision and feedback in producing high-quality writing.

References

Mihalciuc, C. C., Grosu, M., & Apetri, A. N. (2020). Supporting the Sustainable Development of Companies Through the Use of Social Responsibility Practices In International Affairs. LUMEN Proceedings, 13, 206–225. https://www.ceeol.com/search/chapter-detail?id=971775

Offerdal, T. S., Just, S. N., & Ihlen, O. (2021). Public ethos in the pandemic rhetorical situation: Strategies for building trust in authorities’ risk communication. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, 4(2), 247–270. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.099047207644909

ENG 101 MODULE 6 Discussion: Analyzing Multimodal Evidence

Instructions for ENG 101 Module 6 Discussion

Overview and Purpose

Estimated Time: 2-3 hours

Process Step: Revision

Learning Outcomes: Practice choosing from and composing in different genres and media for diverse audiences and purposes; gain experience reading and composing in different genres to understand differences in genre conventions and how they are shaped by readers’ and writers’ intentions and purposes.

Instructional Materials: Before beginning, review the following.

• Project 1 Description and Rubric 
• Module 5 Learning Materials 
• Resources on Discussions
• Netiquette Guidelines

In this discussion, you and your classmates will review sample rhetorical analyses to gain a clearer understanding of how to include and analyze multimodal evidence, as well as consider how to revise your own rhetorical analysis.

Instructions

Step 1: Read and View Critically 

Study the sample rhetorical analyses linked below. 

As you review these samples, consider how the composers incorporate the visuals they have chosen. Note that these samples aren’t exactly like our rhetorical analysis assignment; they are only meant to help you develop your ability to present and analyze multimodal evidence.

• Sample 1 

Actions

• Sample 2

Actions

• Sample 3

Actions

• Sample 4

Actions

Step 2: Summarize and Apply Your Learning

Next, compose a two-paragraph initial post. Include one visual example from your feedback draft or a new piece of evidence you want to include in your revised draft.

Paragraph 1: Summarize what you have observed about presenting and analyzing multimodal evidence. Refer directly to the samples to support your claims. Discuss the following in your paragraph:

• Identify which sample you found most effective, and explain why.
• Identify the specific features of the sample that helped you understand how to use visuals effectively in your analysis.
• Identify which sample you found least effective, and explain why.
• Describe specifically how the use of visuals could be improved to help the audience understand the analysis.

Paragraph 2: Describe the multimodal choices you would like to make in your own rhetorical analysis. Discuss the following in your paragraph:

• Based on what you learned, describe how you want to more effectively integrate visuals into your rhetorical analysis. 
• Share a screenshot of a piece of visual evidence you are using in your rhetorical analysis (or a new visual you want to add) and explain how it enhances readers’ understanding of your analysis, using at least one of the rhetorical concepts (ethos, pathos, logos, and kairos).
• List the questions or concerns you have about integrating visuals more effectively into your rhetorical analysis.

Step 3: Respond to Peers

After you complete your initial post for this assignment, read over your peers’ posts. Then, by the due date indicated in the course assignment tracker, respond to two of your peers following the 3CQ approach.

Submission Requirements

• Note that you will have to use the insert tool in the Discussion Board text box. Links to an external site.To add your image and then type (or copy and paste from a Word document) your text under the image.
• The two-paragraph initial post, including one visual example.
• Two peer responses following the 3CQ method, each with a fully developed paragraph.
• Submit posts in the discussion forum below. Click “Reply” below, complete your responses in the box provided, and click “Post Reply” to submit.

Resources

• How to Use Canvas Discussion Forum Features Links to an external site.
• Netiquette Guidelines

Introduction to ENG 101 Module 6 Discussion

The ENG 101 Module 6 Discussion: Analyzing Multimodal Evidence involves reviewing sample rhetorical analyses to understand how to present and analyze multimodal evidence effectively. You will summarize your observations and apply what you have learned to your rhetorical analysis, integrating visuals to enhance your analysis. Additionally, you will engage with your peers’ posts using the 3CQ approach.

Study the sample rhetorical analyses linked below. As you review these samples, consider how the composers incorporate the visuals they have chosen. Note that these samples aren’t exactly like our rhetorical analysis assignment; they are only meant to help you develop your ability to present and analyze multimodal evidence.

Study Sample Rhetorical Analyses

To start the ENG 101 Module 6 Discussion: Analyzing Multimodal Evidence, we will first read and analyze the sample rhetorical analyses.

• Review Samples: Carefully study the provided sample rhetorical analyses.
• Focus on Visuals: How each sample incorporates and analyzes visuals.
• Access and review Sample 1, Sample 2, Sample 3, and Sample 4.
• Note how each sample uses visuals to support the analysis.

Next, compose a two-paragraph initial post. Include one visual example from your feedback draft or a new piece of evidence you want to include in your revised draft. Paragraph 1: Summarize your observations about presenting and analyzing multimodal evidence. Paragraph 2: Describe the multimodal choices you want to make in your rhetorical analysis.

Summarize and Apply Your Learning

Next, we will summarize what we learned and discuss our understanding.

Paragraph 01

• Effective Sample: Identify the most effective sample and explain why.
• Effective Features: Discuss specific features that demonstrate effective use of visuals.
• Least Effective Sample: Identify the least effective sample and explain why.
• Improvement Suggestions: Suggest how the visuals in the least effective sample could be improved.
• Summarize your observations on presenting and analyzing multimodal evidence.
• Refer directly to the samples to support your claims.

• Integration of Visuals: Describe how you plan to integrate visuals into your rhetorical analysis.
• Visual Example: Include a screenshot of a visual you use or plan to use.

Example

The most effective sample was Sample 1 due to its explicit integration of visuals with the text. The analysis seamlessly incorporated images to illustrate points, using captions to provide context and enhance understanding. Specifically, the visual examples were closely tied to the textual analysis, making the argument more compelling. The least effective sample was Sample 3, which used visuals less effectively. The images felt disconnected from the analysis and lacked explanatory captions, reducing their impact. To improve, Sample 3 could better integrate visuals by providing context and clear connections to the text, thereby enhancing the reader’s comprehension.

Paragraph 02

• Enhancement Explanation: Explain how this visual enhances understanding using rhetorical concepts (ethos, pathos, logos, kairos).
• Questions/Concerns: List any questions or concerns about using visuals effectively.
• Describe your planned multimodal choices for your rhetorical analysis.
• Explain how your chosen visual enhances your analysis.
• Include your questions or concerns about integrating visuals.

Example

In my rhetorical analysis, I aim to enhance the integration of visuals, drawing inspiration from the successful approach of Sample 1. I plan to incorporate screenshots of TOMS’ marketing campaigns that exemplify ethos, pathos, logos, and kairos. For instance, a poignant image from a campaign showcasing children receiving shoes will be used to evoke pathos. This visual will enhance understanding and create an emotional connection by directly illustrating the impact of TOMS’ mission. However, I am mindful of ensuring all visuals are relevant and well-integrated. Each visual must directly support the textual analysis and include captions that provide context and explanation.

After you complete your initial post for this assignment, read over your peers’ posts. Then, by the due date indicated in the course assignment tracker, respond to two of your peers following the 3CQ approach.

Peer Responses

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the ENG 101 discussion posts. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the following points in mind.

• 3CQ Approach: Respond to two peers using the 3CQ approach (Compliment, Comment, Connect, Question).
• Read your peers’ initial posts.
• Respond to at least two posts by complimenting, commenting, connecting, and questioning their ideas.

Response 01

Hi Sara, your post is excellent! Your analysis of the samples is insightful, particularly your recognition of Sample 1’s effective integration of visuals with context. Your plan to use images from TOMS’ campaigns to evoke pathos is a strong strategy. The inclusion of captions to provide context will further enhance your analysis. It’s commendable that you’re addressing concerns about relevance and integration, as this is a crucial aspect of effective visual integration. Your approach ensures that the visuals will indeed support your rhetorical analysis effectively.

Response 02

We are supposed to write two peer responses. I have addressed the given instructions in one response. Following these instructions, you can write your peer responses to the Module 3 Discussion without a hassle.

Closing

Completing the ENG 101 Module 6 Discussion: Analyzing Multimodal Evidence will enhance your understanding of effectively incorporating and analyzing multimodal evidence in rhetorical analyses. Engaging with sample analyses and peer feedback will improve your ability to use visuals to support your arguments. The critical takeaway is learning to integrate diverse media into your analysis, enhancing clarity and persuasion. This How-To Owlisdom Guide provides a structured approach to help you effectively review and apply multimodal evidence in your rhetorical analysis. By following these steps, you can create a compelling and well-supported analysis, engaging your audience through thoughtful integration of visuals.

ENG 101 MODULE 7 ASSIGNMENT: Project 1 Revised Draft

Instructions for ENG 101 Module7 Assignment

Overview and Purpose

Estimated Time: 4-6 hours

Process Step: Revision

Learning Outcomes: Develop an adaptable and transferable process; develop a writing project through connected assignments and drafts; develop flexible strategies for reading, drafting, collaborating, revising, proofreading, and editing; and practice evaluating and acting on feedback from different sources.

Instructional Materials: Before beginning, review the following: 

• Project 1 Description and Rubric
• Module 5: Revising and Editing Learning Materials

The revised draft is the culmination of all the work you have completed so far in the project: invention, research, feedback, and revision. Your revised draft should be a substantial revision of your feedback draft.

Instructions

Step 1: Revise the Content of Your Rhetorical Analysis

Substantially revise the content of your rhetorical analysis using the feedback you have received from your instructor, peers, and Writing Mentor (if applicable).

Step 2: Polish Your Draft

Spend time polishing your draft (editing to correct surface errors, proofreading line by line, etc.).

Step 3: Assess Your Revision Process

Review the feedback you received throughout Project 1. Then, at the end of your revised draft document, write a one-paragraph self-assessment of your revision process, in which you discuss the following:

• Explain your process of deciding how to act on the feedback you received. What aspects of your project did you decide to revise and why?
• Compare this draft to the feedback draft you previously submitted. What major changes will your instructor notice about this new, revised draft?

Step 4: Submit Your Revised Draft and Self-Assessment

Submit your Project 1 revised draft and self-assessment paragraph to Canvas by clicking Start Assignment and then uploading the correct Microsoft Word File or PDF. For additional help uploading an assignment, visit the Canvas Guide on how to upload a file as an assignment. Links to an external site..

Congratulations on completing Project 1!

Submission Requirements

• Submit a revised draft of your rhetorical analysis. As a reminder, these are the main project requirements as listed in the project description:
  • Genre: A rhetorical analysis meant to be read/viewed online
  • Subject: A small business or nonprofit organization in your local community
  • Audience: Members of your local community interested in the business/organization or who want to learn more about communication strategies
  • Title: Something creative that indicates the topic and purpose of the analysis
  • Length: 750-1250 words
  • Multimodality: Include at least four visual examples that support and enhance your rhetorical analysis
  • Format: Microsoft Word file or PDF
• One-paragraph self-assessment, included at the end of your draft document.

Resources

• How to Convert Google Docs, Microsoft Word, and Apple Pages to New File Types Links to an external site.

How to View Instructor Feedback Links to an external site.

Introduction to ENG 101 Module 7 Assignment

The ENG 101 Module 7 Assignment: Project 1 Revised Draft involves the final stage of your rhetorical analysis project. You will substantially revise your draft using feedback, polish it for clarity and correctness, assess your revision process, and submit your final revised draft along with a self-assessment. This How-To ENG 101 Guide aims to develop a refined, cohesive analysis demonstrating your ability to incorporate feedback and enhance your writing through revision.

Substantially revise the content of your rhetorical analysis using the feedback you have received from your instructor, peers, and Writing Mentor (if applicable).

Revise the Content of Your Rhetorical Analysis

To start the EENG 101 Module 7 Assignment: Project 1 Revised Draft, we will focus on making significant content changes based on feedback from your instructor, peers, and Writing Mentor.

• Address specific suggestions and critiques to improve your analysis’s clarity, depth, and effectiveness.
• Review all feedback received on your initial draft.
• Identify critical areas for improvement in your rhetorical analysis.
• Make substantial revisions to enhance the content and coherence of your analysis.

Spend time polishing your draft (editing to correct surface errors, proofreading line by line, etc.).

Polish Your Draft

Next, we will revise the draft. Correct surface errors such as grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

• Carefully review your draft line by line to ensure clarity and readability.
• Edit your draft to fix any grammatical and punctuation errors.
• Proofread your draft meticulously to ensure it is free of mistakes and flows smoothly.

Review the feedback you received throughout Project 1. Then, write a one-paragraph self-assessment of your revision process at the end of your revised draft document

Assess Your Revision Process

For this section of the ENG 101 Module7 Assignment: Project 1 Revised Draft, we will reflect on the feedback received throughout the project.

• Write a one-paragraph self-assessment at the end of your revised draft.
• Reflect on how you decided to act on the feedback received.
• Explain your process for deciding which feedback to incorporate.
• Discuss the significant changes made in the revised draft compared to the feedback draft.

Submit your Project 1 revised draft and self-assessment paragraph to Canvas by clicking Start Assignment and then uploading the correct Microsoft Word File or PDF. For additional help uploading an assignment, visit the Canvas Guide to upload a file as an assignment link to an external site.

Submit Your Revised Draft and Self-Assessment

For this section, we will ensure our revised draft and self-assessment are in Microsoft Word or PDF format.

• Combine your revised draft and self-assessment into a single document.
• Log in to Canvas and navigate to the assignment submission page.
• Upload your document and submit it for review.

Closing

By following this How-To Guide, you will effectively revise and polish your rhetorical analysis, demonstrating your ability to incorporate feedback and improve your writing. The ENG 101 Module 7 Assignment: Project 1 Revised Draft enhances your final draft’s quality and develops your reading, drafting, collaborating, revising, proofreading, and editing skills. The key takeaway is the importance of iterative revision and self-assessment in producing a high-quality written analysis.