Table of Contents

Share this article

NHS-FPX4000 – Developing a Healthcare Perspective: Understanding the Foundations of Modern Health Practice

Published: 2025-10-10

Modified: 2025-10-10

Samples Solutions

Introduction

NHS-FPX4000 – Developing a Healthcare Perspective introduces students to the core principles of healthcare delivery, professional collaboration, and ethical practice. The course helps learners build a foundational understanding of health systems and their impact on individual and community well-being. For expert help with healthcare reflection papers or course projects, visit Owlisdom’s Nursing Coursework Help.

Ultimate Guide on NHS-FPX4000 Assessment 1: Pledge of Academic Honesty

Instructions of NHS-FPX4000 Assessment 1

Overview

Academic honesty is a critical component of an undergraduate degree. In this assessment, you will review and sign the Pledge of Academic Honesty, looking at the factors that lead to successful online learning and the expectations for academic honesty.

Academic honesty is a critical component of an undergraduate degree. For this assessment, download the Pledge of Academic Honesty [DOCX] Download Pledge of Academic Honesty [DOCX] document and review the information in the document. Sign and date the document electronically, and submit it as an attachment to the assignment area.

In completing this assignment, you will:

Examine factors that lead to successful online learning, including academic honesty.
Read factors that contribute to successful online learning.
Accept factors that comprise academic honesty.

Competencies Measured

By completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

Competency 3: Apply ethical principles and academic standards to the study of health care.
- Examine factors that lead to successful online learning, including academic honesty

Introduction to NHS-FPX4000 Assessment 1

Welcome to NHS 4000: Developing a Healthcare Perspective! In this initial assessment, you will engage with one of the most fundamental aspects of your academic journey—academic honesty. The assessment requires you to review and sign the Pledge of Academic Honesty, which underscores the principles and expectations for maintaining integrity in your academic work. By exploring the factors that contribute to successful online learning and understanding the critical importance of ethical academic conduct, you will lay a strong foundation for your studies. This How-To NHS-FPX4000 Guide is designed to help you navigate this assignment, ensuring you grasp the significance of academic honesty and are well-prepared to uphold these standards throughout your educational experience.

Examine factors that lead to successful online learning, including academic honesty. Read factors that contribute to successful online learning. Accept factors that comprise academic honesty.

Pledge of Academic Honesty

To start the NHS-FPX4000 Assessment One, we must read and understand the Academic Honesty Pledge.

Proper Citation Practices: Always cite sources when quoting, paraphrasing, or summarizing someone else’s work. Use APA format to provide in-text citations and full references.
Original Work Creation: Ensure your submissions are your original thoughts and analysis. Avoid copying others’ work and rephrasing it slightly to pass it off as your own.
Peer Work Respect: Do not use your peers’ discussion posts or assignments as a template for your work. Respect their intellectual property and create your unique submissions.

Importance and Advantages of the Academic Pledge

I will discuss a few essential points and advantages of the Academic Pledge.

Promotes Personal Integrity: Committing to this pledge fosters a sense of personal responsibility and integrity, ensuring that all academic work reflects one’s actual effort and understanding.
Encourages Originality: The pledge emphasizes the importance of original thought and creativity, which are crucial for academic and professional growth.
Prevents Academic Dishonesty: The pledge helps prevent unintentional violations and encourages ethical behavior by clearly outlining what constitutes plagiarism and academic dishonesty.
Builds Trust: Adhering to the pledge builds trust between students and instructors, ensuring the student genuinely authors all submitted work.
Enhances Learning: Committing to producing original work ensures that students engage deeply with the material, leading to a better understanding and retention of knowledge.
Protects Degree Integrity: Ensuring all work is original helps maintain the integrity and value of the degree, benefiting all students and alumni of the institution.
Promotes Fairness: The pledge ensures a level playing field where all students are assessed based on their work, fostering a fair academic environment.
Supports Academic Development: The pledge encourages proper citation and referencing practices to help students develop essential academic writing and research skills.
Mitigates Legal and Ethical Risks: Understanding and adhering to the pledge reduces the risk of facing severe academic and legal consequences of plagiarism and academic dishonesty.
Cultivates Ethical Mindset: The pledge helps cultivate an ethical mindset beyond academics into professional and personal life, promoting ethical behavior.

Closing

Completing NHS-FPX4000 Assessment 1 has introduced you to the foundational principles of academic honesty and underscored their critical role in your academic journey. By understanding and committing to these principles, you ensure the integrity and value of your educational achievements.

In the following assessment, you will build upon your foundational knowledge by focusing on “Applying Research Skills.” This task will involve honing your ability to effectively locate, evaluate, and apply scholarly resources.

NURS-FPX4000 Assessment 2: Applying Research Skills

Instructions of NURS-FPX4000 Assessment 2

Applying Research Skills

This course has been completed and no further assessments may be submitted.

Create a 3-5 page annotated bibliography and summary based on your research related to best practices addressing a current healthcare problem or issue.

Collapse All

Introduction

In your professional life, you will need to find credible evidence to support your decisions and your plans of action. You will want to keep abreast of best practices to help your organization adapt to the ever-changing healthcare environment. Being adept at research will help you find the information you need. For this assessment, you will research a healthcare problem or issue faced by current healthcare organizations.

Instructions

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

For this assessment, research best practices related to a current healthcare problem. Your selected problem or issue will be utilized again in Assessment 4. To explore your chosen topic, you should use the first two steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach to aid your critical thinking.

Select one of the healthcare problems or issues presented in the Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF] Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]resource. Write a brief overview of the selected healthcare problem or issue. In your overview:

Summarize the health care problem or issue.
Describe the professional relevance of this topic.
Describe any professional experience you have with this topic.

Identify peer-reviewed articles relevant to this healthcare issue or problem.

Search academic peer-reviewed literature related to the topic and describe the criteria you used to search for articles, including the names of the databases you used. You will select four current academic peer-reviewed journal articles published during the past 3–5 years that relate to your topic.
- Refer to the NHS-FPX4000: Developing a Health Care Perspective Library Guide to help you locate appropriate references.
Use keywords related to the healthcare problem or issue you are researching to select relevant articles.

Assess the credibility and explain the relevance of the information sources you find.

Determine if the source is from an academic peer-reviewed journal.
Determine if the publication is current.
Determine if information in the academic peer-reviewed journal article is still relevant.

Identify the purpose of the article.
Summarize the information.
Provide a rationale for the inclusion of each article.
Include the conclusions and findings of the article.
Write your annotated bibliography in paragraph form. The annotated bibliography should be approximately 150 words (1–3 paragraphs) in length.
List the full reference for the source in APA format (author, date, title, publisher, et cetera) and use APA format for the annotated bibliography.
Make sure the references are listed in alphabetical order, are double-spaced, and use hanging indents.

Summarize what you have learned while developing an annotated bibliography.

Summarize what you learned from your research in a separate paragraph or two at the end of the paper.
List the main points you learned from your research.
Summarize the main contributions of the sources you chose and how they enhanced your knowledge about the topic.

Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:

Assessment 2 Example [PDF] Download Assessment 2 Example [PDF].

Additional Requirements

Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

Length: 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 points.
APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance.
Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
Content: Provide a title page and reference page following APA style.
References: Use at least four scholarly peer-reviewed journal articles.
APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citation of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

Competency 2: Apply scholarly information through critical thinking to solve problems in the field of health care.
- Assess the credibility and relevance of information sources.
- Analyze academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format.
- Summarize what was learned from developing an annotated bibliography.
Competency 4: Write for a specific audience, in an appropriate tone and style, in accordance with Capella’s writing standards.
- Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to the healthcare problem or issue being researched.
- Produce text with minimal grammatical, usage, spelling, and mechanical errors.
- Integrate into text appropriate use of scholarly sources, evidence, and citation style.

Resources

This course has been completed and no further assessments may be submitted.

Use the resources linked below to help complete this assessment.

Collapse All

Research and Annotated Bibliographies

How do you approach a problem or issue within your organization? How often do you need credible information to solve a personal or professional problem? Credible information is information that is trustworthy. One of the best sources for credible information is the professional literature of the field you are studying; in your case, it will be health care. Professional literature is research that has been written and reviewed by other people in your field.

The following reading list will help you as you complete your research and seek out professional literature on a healthcare topic:

Assessment 2: Research and Annotated Bibliographies.

Each of the following research guides is written with a specific program in mind. The one for your program can provide insights about researching topics related to your field:

The following resources provide specific information about annotated bibliographies:

Writing

The following media and Campus resources provide information and assistance for building your writing skills:

Activity

This course has been completed and no further assessments may be submitted.

Click the linked Credible Evidence title to practice evaluating whether particular pieces of evidence are credible and/or peer-reviewed. This activity is designed to support your learning as you evaluate sources of evidence.

This tool needs to be loaded in a new browser window

Introduction to NURS 4000 Assessment 2

Welcome to the How-To Guide for NURS-FPX4000 Assessment 2: Applying Research Skills. This How-To NURS-FPX4000 Guide is designed to assist students in mastering the essential skills required to complete their research-based assignments in the healthcare field. Throughout this assessment, students will learn to select a relevant healthcare issue, identify and analyze peer-reviewed articles, assess the credibility and relevance of their sources, and effectively synthesize their findings in an annotated bibliography. This guide will provide step-by-step instructions on these critical components, ensuring students can confidently apply scholarly information through critical thinking to solve problems and enhance their writing skills to meet academic standards.

Select one of the healthcare problems or issues presented in the Assessment 02 Supplement. Write a brief overview of the selected healthcare problem or issue in your overview. Summarize the health care problem or issue. Describe the professional relevance of this topic. Describe any professional experience you have with this topic.

Selecting a Health Care Problem or Issue

To start the NURS-FPX4000 Assessment 2: Applying Research Skills, we will first choose a healthcare problem.

Summarization of the Problem: Draft a concise summary that captures the essence of the chosen issue. This summary should provide a clear picture of the problem’s impact on healthcare.
Describing Professional Relevance: Explain why the chosen issue is significant in today’s healthcare industry. Discuss its implications on operational efficiency, patient care, and policymaking.
Reflecting on Personal Experience: If applicable, describe any personal or professional encounters with the chosen issue. This adds a practical perspective to your research.

Example

The lack of medical workers in the field significantly impacts both patient care and the overall well-being of medical staff. These shortages increase the responsibilities of present employees, endangering patient safety and escalating healthcare personnel’s weariness. The quality of care that patients get is greatly influenced by nurse-to-patient ratios. Thus, it is imperative to address staffing issues using evidence-based solutions. The focus is increasingly on activities like recruiting drives, specialized training programs, and flexible scheduling to lessen the pressure caused by shortages. The complexity of a demanding healthcare environment is increased by the lack of adequately skilled and sufficient workers.

Identify peer-reviewed articles relevant to this healthcare issue or problem. Search scholarly peer-reviewed literature related to the topic and describe the criteria you used to search for articles, including the names of the databases you used. You will select four current scholarly peer-reviewed journal articles published during the past 3–5 years that relate to your topic. Refer to the NHS-FPX4000: Developing a Health Care Perspective Library Guide to help you locate appropriate references. Use keywords related to the healthcare problem or issue you are researching to select relevant articles.

Identifying Relevant Literature

Next, we will look for review articles related to the healthcare problem we selected.

Criteria: Focus on articles published within the last 3-5 years on healthcare staffing shortages. Databases: Use PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science.
Search Techniques: Keywords: Use terms like “healthcare staffing shortages” and “nurse staffing.” Filters: Limit to peer-reviewed articles from the past 3-5 years.
Effective Keyword Use: Combine terms with AND, OR NOT. Use quotes for exact phrases, e.g., “staffing shortages in hospitals. Use for variations.

Example

Identifying Academic Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles

Pertinent sources were found using the Capella University Library database, and a shortlist was created. Search phrases, including workload, healthcare recruiting, and nurse-to-patient ratio, helped me find academic publications about staffing shortages using Summon Advanced Search. Furthermore, the inclusion of the most recent data on best practices was guaranteed by the focus on recent publications published in the last three to five years. The extensive database of “Nursing and Healthcare Sciences” was quite helpful in providing a wide range of scholarly viewpoints that promised an in-depth analysis of staffing shortages. The approach aimed to incorporate a range of views that would increase knowledge of the topic through reliable and diverse scholarly contributions. Diversity was prioritized during the selection process to depict the nuanced nature of healthcare challenges.

Assess the credibility and explain the relevance of the information sources you find. Determine if the source is from an academic peer-reviewed journal. Determine if the publication is current. Determine if the information in the academic peer-reviewed journal article is still relevant.

Assessing Credibility and Relevance of Sources

For this section of the NURS-FPX4000 Assessment 2: Applying Research Skills, we will assess the credibility and relevance of the chosen resources.

Verify that each article is peer-reviewed; this information is often listed on the journal’s website or database.
Check the reputation of the publishing journals, favoring those known for rigorous review processes and academic integrity.
Confirm publication dates are within the last 3-5 years to ensure current information.
Review the content of the articles to ensure they directly relate to and enhance understanding of your specific research topic on staffing shortages in healthcare.

Example

Assessing Relevance and Credibility of Information Sources

Credibility and relevancy were prioritized during the thorough review procedure of selecting articles. Because the articles chosen for this investigation of staffing shortages could only be found in peer-reviewed journals that have been published, a high level of scientific scrutiny was guaranteed. The author’s experience and professional knowledge were crucial in proving the reliability of the sources she used. Furthermore, the emphasis on relevance necessitated that the selected publications provide significant insights into staffing shortages, offering practical interventions and substantially contributing to a more extensive understanding of the problem. This careful source selection process aimed to create a solid body of knowledge firmly based on respectable and relevant academic contributions supporting the validity and importance of the selected articles.

Analyze academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format. Provide a rationale for the inclusion of each selected article. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of references along with crucial information about each one. The detail about the reference is the annotation. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about the selected topic. In your annotated bibliography: a) Identify the purpose of the article. b) Summarize the information. c) Provide a rationale for the inclusion of each article. d) Include the conclusions and findings of the article. e) Write your annotated bibliography in a paragraph form. The annotated bibliography should be approximately 150 words (1–3 paragraphs).

Analyzing Academic Peer-Reviewed Journal Articles

Here, we will analyze the reviewed articles related to the healthcare problem selected.

Purpose Identification: Clearly state the article’s primary objective to understand its focus.
Information Summary: Summarize key points and findings, concentrating on elements directly relevant to healthcare staffing shortages.
Rationale for Inclusion: Explain each article’s relevance to your research, highlighting its contribution to understanding or solving staffing shortages.
Conclusions and Findings: Detail significant conclusions or findings and their implications for the healthcare sector.
Annotation Writing: Write each annotation in paragraph form, approximately 150 words, focusing on clarity and conciseness.
APA Formatting: Cite each article in APA format, including author, year, title, journal name, volume, issue, and pages.
Bibliography Formatting: List references alphabetically by the first author’s last name.
Use double spacing and hanging indents to enhance readability.

Example

Annotated Bibliography

Aziz, S., Arabi, Y. M., Waleed Alhazzani, Evans, L., Citerio, G., Fischkoff, K., Salluh, J. I., Geert Meyfroidt, Fayez Alshamsi, Oczkowski, S., Azoulay, É., Price, A., Burry, L., Dzierba, A., Benintende, A. J., Morgan, J. S., Giacomo Grasselli, Rhodes, A., Morten Hylander Møller, & Chu, L. F. (2020). Managing ICU surge during the COVID-19 crisis: rapid guidelines. Intensive Care Medicine, 46(7), 1303–1325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06092-5

Aziz et al.’s study on ICU surge control during the COVID-19 crisis sheds light on the severe psychological effects that medical personnel had to deal with. The article encourages introducing programs to strengthen healthcare workers’ resilience and provide emotional support throughout the pandemic’s breakout by offering specific and doable recommendations. The recommendations address the primary and secondary stresses of the crisis and provide a strong foundation for supporting medical professionals during these trying times. This article’s apparent connection to the more significant issue of personnel shortages and the particular difficulties critical care units face justifies its inclusion in the bibliography. It is an extensive and valuable resource for healthcare businesses searching for efficient ways to aid their employees in emergencies. It helps understand and handle the difficulties associated with staffing in a healthcare context. (Aziz et al., 2020).

Summarize what you have learned while developing an annotated bibliography.

Summarizing Learned Insights

For the last section of Assessment One, we will summarize the key takeaways.

Summarize what you learned from your research in a separate paragraph or two at the end of the paper.
List the main points you learned from your research.
Summarize the main contributions of your chosen sources and how they enhanced your knowledge about the topic.

Example

The study of healthcare staffing shortages has yielded valuable insights into the intricate problems and possible remedies associated with this vital subject. After examining the selected articles, I now understand how the number of nurses on staff directly affects patient safety outcomes. Wang’s study provided evidence-based recommendations for the proper staffing ratios for various nursing units, underscoring the vital significance of legislated staffing ratios. The work by McHugh et al. clarified the adverse effects of high nurse-to-patient ratios and provided helpful guidance for overcoming shortages.

Closing

In the NURS-FPX4000 Assessment 2: Applying Research Skills, we explored the steps necessary to conduct thorough and effective research within the healthcare sector. By adhering to this How-To Owlisdom Guide, you can ensure they develop a well-rounded understanding of significant healthcare issues backed by credible and relevant sources. Remember, the key to successful research lies in meticulousness and a critical approach to information evaluation.

In Assessment 3, you will learn to apply moral principles to develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a healthcare professional.

NHS-FPX 4000 ASSESSMENT THREE: Applying Ethical Principles

Instructions for NHS-FPX 4000 Assessment Three

Applying Ethical Principles

Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a healthcare professional by applying ethical principles. Describe the issues and a possible solution in a paper of 3-5 pages.

Collapse All

Introduction

Whether you are a nurse, a public health professional, a health care administrator, or in another role in the health care field, you must base your decisions on a set of ethical principles and values. Your decisions must be fair, equitable, and defensible. Each discipline has established a professional code of ethics to guide ethical behavior. In this assessment, you will practice working through an ethical dilemma as described in a case study. Your practice will help you develop a method for formulating ethical decisions. In Capella 4000 Assessment 3, you will practice working through an ethical dilemma as described in a case study. Your practice will help you develop a method for formulating ethical decisions.

Instructions

For this assessment, develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a healthcare professional. In your assessment:

Select one of the case studies presented in the Assessment 03 Supplement: Applying Ethical Principles [PDF] Download Assessment 03 Supplement: Applying Ethical Principles [PDF]resource.

Note: The case study may not supply all of the information you need. In such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and infer potential conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any assumptions or speculations you make.

Summarize the facts in the selected case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it.

Identify which case study you selected and briefly summarize the facts surrounding it. Identify the problem or issue that presents an ethical dilemma or challenge and describe that dilemma or challenge.
Identify who is involved or affected by the ethical problem or issue.
Access the Ethical Decision-Making Model media piece and use the three components of the ethical decision-making model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior) to analyze the ethical issues.
- Apply the three components outlined in the Ethical Decision-Making Model media.
Analyze the factors that contributed to the ethical problem or issue identified in the case study.
- Describe the factors that contributed to the problem or issue and explain how they contributed.

Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case.

In addition to the readings provided, use the Capella Library to locate at least one academic peer-reviewed journal article relevant to the problem or issue that you can use to support your analysis of the situation. The NHS-FPX4000: Developing a Health Care Perspective Library Guide will help you locate appropriate references. You will select at least one current academic peer-reviewed journal article published during the past 3–5 years that relates to your topic.
- Cite and apply key principles from the journal article as evidence to support your critical thinking and analysis of the ethical problem or issue.
- Review the Think Critically About Source Quality resource.
  - Assess the credibility of the information source.
  - Assess the relevance of the information source.

Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study.

Describe how the healthcare professional in the case study communicated with others.
Assess instances where the professional communicated effectively or ineffectively.
Explain which communication approaches should be used and which ones should be avoided.
Describe the consequences of using effective and ineffective communication approaches.

Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study.

Describe the actions taken in response to the ethical dilemma or issue presented in the case study.
Summarize how well the professional managed professional responsibilities and priorities to resolve the problem or issue in the case.
Discuss the key lessons this case provides for healthcare professionals.

Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study.

Describe the proposed solution.
Discuss how the approach makes this professional more effective or less effective in building relationships across disciplines within his or her organization.
Discuss how likely it is the proposed solution will foster professional collaboration.

Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.

Apply the principles of effective composition.
Determine the proper application of the rules of grammar and mechanics.

Write using APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.

Determine the proper application of APA formatting requirements and scholarly writing standards.
Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.

Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:

Assessment 3 Example [PDF] Download Assessment 3 Example [PDF].

Additional Requirements

Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

Length: 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 points.
APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance.
Written communication: Use correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
References: Integrate information from outside sources to include at least two references (the case study and an academic peer-reviewed journal article) and three in-text citations within the paper.
APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citation of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information in the field of health care.
- Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case.
Competency 3: Apply ethical principles and academic standards to the study of health care.
- Summarize the facts in a case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it.
- Discuss effective communication approaches the provider can use to address the issue in the case study.
- Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study.
Competency 4: Write for a specific audience, in an appropriate tone and style, in accordance with Capella’s writing standards.
- Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study.
- Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
- Write the following APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.

Resources

This course has been completed and no further assessments may be submitted.

Use the resources linked below to help complete this assessment.

Collapse All

Ethics for Health Care

Perhaps the most basic and important subject in the healthcare field is ethics. Remember Hippocrates and the Hippocratic Oath about doing no harm. This simple proposition, written sometime in the fifth century BC, is one of the oldest binding ethical documents in human history. Almost 100 percent of graduating healthcare professionals take an ethically based oath before they begin practice.

The resources in the following reading list provide information about the codes of ethics of professional associations, government entities, and other organizations:

Assessment 3: Ethics for Health Care.

Implicit Bias

Adverse patient outcomes occur when members of the health care team have implicit bias. According to the Joint Commission (2016):

Implicit (subconscious) bias refers to the attitudes or stereotypes that affect our understanding, actions, and decisions unconsciously. These biases, which encompass both favorable and unfavorable assessments, are activated involuntarily and without an individual’s awareness or intentional control (p. 1).

Public Radio International (PRI) shares a story about how implicit bias can manifest itself in a healthcare screening, highlighting a specific situation for Asian Americans regarding Type 2 diabetes:

Assessment 3: Implicit Bias.

The Joint Commission provides these further insights:

Assessment 3: Implicit Bias (The Joint Commission).

Writing

Writing is one of the most important skills you need to excel in your healthcare studies and in your professional life. In this assessment, you can begin to build the skills needed to express your thoughts clearly and directly in writing and to support your thoughts by citing credible evidence. You can also gain practice using APA standards for academic writing. Adhering to these standards will boost the credibility of your writing.

The following media and Campus resources provide information and assistance for building your writing skills and understanding APA standards:

Each of the following research guides is written with a specific program in mind. The one for your program can provide insights about researching topics related to your field:

The following resources will help you assess the articles you find to ensure they are appropriate, peer-reviewed articles that have credibility and relevance:

Activity

This course has been completed and no further assessments may be submitted.

Click the linked Ethical Terminology title to check your understanding of the terminology associated with ethical practice in health care. This is for your own self-assessment.

Introduction to NHS 4000 Assessment Three

The NHS-FPX 4000 Assessment Three: Applying Ethical Principles focuses on ethical decision-making in healthcare, specifically examining a case involving Nurse Amelia Brooks. It explores the intricate balance between personal convictions and professional responsibilities when faced with moral dilemmas. This How-To NHS-FPX 4000 Guide helps utilize an ethical decision-making model to navigate and resolve these conflicts effectively, which is the goal.

Select one of the case studies presented in the Assessment 03 Supplement: Applying Ethical Principles.

Identifying Key Issues and Stakeholders

To start the NHS-FPX 4000 Assessment Three: Applying Ethical Principles, we will identify the key issues and stakeholders.

Read the case study thoroughly to understand the core ethical dilemma.
Identify the main stakeholders, including the nurse, the patient, and other healthcare professionals.
Determine the specific ethical issues at play. In this case, it involves conscientious objection versus professional duty.

Example

Healthcare practitioners frequently face difficult moral decisions that need rigorous thought and the application of ethical precepts. This essay discusses the ethical problem that Riverside Medical Center nurse Amelia Brooks encountered when it came to her conscientious objection to taking part in Sophie Turner’s elective abortion operation. The case examines the complex interplay between one’s convictions, professional obligations, and the values of autonomy, accountability, and non-maleficence. This essay will discuss the case study to pinpoint Nurse Amelia’s moral problem and use the Ethical Decision-Making Model to provide a workable solution.

As requested to help patient Sophie Turner, whose request is within her legal rights, have an elective abortionAmelia must balance her professional obligation to offer fair treatment with her conscientious objection, which is motivated by her strong personal views against abortion. In Capella 4000 Assessment 3, this ethical dilemma will be explored further, helping to develop a framework for addressing such conflicts in a professional setting., nurse Amelia Brooks is put in a difficult moral position. Amelia must balance her professional obligation to offer fair treatment with her conscientious objection, which is motivated by her strong personal views against abortion. In Capella 4000 Assessment 3, this ethical dilemma will be explored further, helping to develop a framework for addressing such conflicts in a professional setting.

Summarize the facts in the selected case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze a moral problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it.

Application of Ethical Decision-Making Models

Next, we will discuss the applications of the ethical decision-making models.

Select a model that fits the context, such as Beauchamp and Childress’ principles of biomedical ethics or another suitable framework.
Follow the model’s steps systematically to analyze the dilemma and consider all relevant ethical principles.

Example

The moral dilemma arises from Nurse Amelia’s commitment to offer impartial treatment and her conscientious aversion to taking part in an elective abortion. An examination examining abortion service providers in Zimbabwe found that their negative view of women seeking abortion services was influenced by the cultural opinion that abortion is morally wrong (Chiweshe and Macleod, 2017). Conflicting ethical principles or values are at issue in moral dilemmas, which gives rise to arguments about how to weigh these principles and reach a conclusion (Beauchamp & Childress, 2001). The problem is made more difficult by the competing ideals of professional obligation and personal convictions.

Analyzing Ethical Principles

Here, we will analyze the ethical principles.

Respect the patient’s right to make informed decisions about their healthcare.
Ensure that actions do not cause harm to the patient.
Balance personal beliefs with professional obligations to provide fair and unbiased care.

Example

Complexity is increased by Amelia’s ethical problem, which involves her convictions, the patient’s legal rights, and her professional obligations. Her battle with conformist reasoning is consistent with the findings of Dierckx de Casterlé et al. (2008), which place more weight on conformist reasoning than on critical thinking. The conflicting values in clinical nursing are brought to light by the impact of underlying somatic constructions on Amelia’s moral judgments, which are based on her opposition to abortion. Since ethical dilemmas in clinical nursing frequently include negotiating opposing values, finding a solution to her situation would necessitate sacrificing her personal and professional principles, impairing her capacity to offer compassionate and high-quality care (Robson et al., 2000). The instance emphasizes how important it is to support nurses in critical and creative thought, as this enables a more thorough approach to ethical decision-making that considers each individual’s complexity.

Consistent with previous research, the majority of ethical challenges faced by medical professionals stemmed from their comprehension and application of abortion laws (Miljeteig et al., 2019). In their work, nurses are frequently confronted with morally challenging scenarios that go beyond life-or-death crises to include everyday problems. These moral judgments are supported by the ethical principle of justice, which is based on ideas of equality and fairness. Justice requires conformity to universal standards emphasizing individualism, objectivity, and optimism. Reliance on bioethical principles may not give sufficient advice in situations with unclear treatment advantages or competing interests between patients and healthcare providers because of possible discrepancies (Haahr et al., 2019). Under such circumstances, nurses can encounter moral problems similar to Nurse Amelia’s.

Identifying Affected Parties

In this section of Assessment Three, we will identify the affected Parties.

Focus on those directly involved, such as the patient and the nurse.
Consider the broader impact on colleagues, the healthcare institution, and other patients.

Example

Dr. Rebecca Martin, who asks for help, Nurse Amelia Brooks, and patient Sophie Turner, whose autonomy and well-being are crucial, are important stakeholders. In addition to the persons directly engaged, coworkers, patients, and the healthcare facility are also impacted by the ethical dilemma.

Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study. Explain which communication approaches should be used and which ones should be avoided.

Communication Strategies

Here, we will discuss communication strategies.

Practice clear, empathetic, and respectful communication to convey ethical concerns and decisions.
Use negotiation and conflict resolution skills to handle disagreements and find mutually acceptable solutions.

Example

In the case study of Nurse Amelia, communicating effectively is essential to resolving the moral problem. Amelia effectively and respectfully informs Dr. Martin of her conscientious objection, assuring openness regarding her moral position. However, how well she communicates with Dr. Martin—who could have different opinions—will determine its effectiveness. If Amelia doesn’t express her issue adequately or Dr. Martin sees it as challenging to accept medical procedures, communication may be ineffective, and patient care may be jeopardized. Amelia has to communicate with empathy and transparency to be more productive. She should encourage candid discussion, value other viewpoints, and maintain cooperative connections. Ineffective communication strategies, including being condescending or contemptuous, can damage our professional relationships, affecting the continuity of patient treatment and the team’s cohesiveness. One of the outcomes of poor communication is a collapse in team trust within the medical community. As such, understanding the ethical aspects of the problem and promoting a cooperative settlement need excellent communication.

Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study.

Professional Approaches to Ethical Practice

Now, we will look into the professional approaches to ethical practices.

Reflect on personal values and how they align with professional responsibilities.
Strive to provide high-quality care while respecting ethical boundaries and personal convictions.

Example

Nurse Amelia takes a sophisticated approach to balancing competing principles to resolve the ethical problem. She exhibits moral awareness by acknowledging the contradiction between her moral obligations to care for others and her convictions. Her moral judgment entails weighing the values of non-maleficence, professional responsibility, and autonomy, which results in a deliberate decision-making process. Amelia searches for a solution that upholds the patient’s conscientious objection and her independence in an ethical manner. Her attitude indicates her dedication to maintaining professional standards even in challenging ethical situations. The most important lesson for healthcare professionals is the value of proactive, compassionate, ethical involvement. Transparent communication and an emphasis on patients are vital components in resolving ethical quandaries.

Proposed Solutions and Recommendations

Here, we will propose solutions and recommendations.

Propose realistic and ethical solutions to the dilemma, such as reassignment or alternative care options.
Use ethical principles and evidence from literature to justify the proposed solutions.

Example

As a solution to the moral problem, Nurse Amelia can ask to be transferred to a different assignment where her convictions are more in line with her duties as a professional, enabling her to give care without sacrificing her conscientious objection to abortion. Based on moral precepts, this approach upholds patient autonomy and puts their needs first. Amelia can maintain her dedication to delivering high-quality treatment while navigating the challenging ethical terrain thanks to the suggested strategy. From an interdisciplinary standpoint, by exhibiting a proactive and moral reaction to possible problems, this strategy could aid in developing beneficial relationships. Fostering professional collaboration among healthcare professionals is contingent upon the organizational support afforded to conscientious objection accommodations and open communication.

Closing

NHS-FPX 4000 Assessment Three: Applying Ethical Principles How-To Owlisdom Guide provides a structured approach for students to effectively navigate and resolve ethical dilemmas in healthcare settings. By following these steps, students can develop a comprehensive understanding of moral decision-making and apply it to real-world scenarios.

References

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Chiweshe, M., & Macleod, C. (2017). ‘If You Choose to Abort, You Have Acted As an Instrument of Satan’: Zimbabwean Health Service Providers’ Negative Constructions of Women Presenting for Post Abortion Care. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 24(6), 856–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-017-9694-8

Miljeteig, I., Defaye, F., Desalegn, D., & Danis, M. (2019). Clinical ethics dilemmas in a low-income setting: a national survey among physicians in Ethiopia. BMC Medical Ethics, 20, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0402-x

Haahr, A., Norlyk, A., Martinsen, B., & Dreyer, P. (2019). Nurses’ experiences with ethical dilemmas: A literature review. Nursing Ethics, 27(1), 258-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733019832941

Burkholder, J., Burkholder, D., & Gavin, M. (2020). The role of decision-making models and reflection in navigating ethical dilemmas. Counseling and Values, 65(1), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/cvj.12125

Hervey, L. (2007). Embodied ethical decision-making. American Journal of Dance Therapy, 29(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10465-007-9036-5.

Dierckx de Casterlé, B., Izumi, S., Godfrey, N. S., et al. (2008). Nurses’ responses to ethical dilemmas in nursing practice: meta-analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 63(6), 540–549.

Robson, M., Cook, P., Hunt, K., & Alred, G. (2000). Towards ethical decision-making in counseling research. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 28(4), 533-547. DOI:10.1080/713652317.

NHS-FPX 4000 ASSESSMENT FOUR: Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue

Instructions of NHS-FPX 4000 Assessment Four

Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue

This course has been completed and no further assessments may be submitted.

Write a 4-6 page analysis of a current problem or issue in health care, including a proposed solution and possible ethical implications.

Collapse All

Introduction

In your healthcare career, you will be confronted with many problems that demand a solution. By using research skills, you can learn what others are doing and saying about similar problems. Then, you can analyze the problem and the people and systems it affects. You can also examine potential solutions and their ramifications. This assessment allows you to practice this approach with a real-world problem.

Instructions

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

Describe the healthcare problem or issue you selected for use in Assessment 2 and provide details about it.

As you describe the topic you explored in Assessment 2, use the first four steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach to aid your critical thinking. This approach was introduced in Assessment 2.
Identify possible causes for the problem or issue.

Use scholarly information to describe and explain the health care problem or issue and identify possible causes for it.

Identify at least three scholarly peer-reviewed journal articles about the topic.
- You may find the How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles? The library guide helps locate appropriate references.
- You may use articles you found while working on Assessment 2, or you may search the Capella library for other articles.
- You may find the applicable Undergraduate Library Research Guide helpful in your search.
Review the Think Critically About Source Quality to help you complete the following:
- Assess the credibility of the information sources.
- Assess the relevance of the information sources.

Analyze the health care problem or issue.

Describe the setting or context for the problem or issue.
Describe why the problem or issue is important to you.
Identify groups of people affected by the problem or issue.
Provide examples that support your analysis of the problem or issue.

Discuss potential solutions for the health care problem or issue.

Describe what would be required to implement a solution.
Describe the potential consequences of ignoring the problem or issue.
Provide the pros and cons of one of the solutions you are proposing.

Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if the potential solution was implemented.

Describe what would be necessary to implement the proposed solution.
Explain the ethical principles that need to be considered (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if the potential solution is implemented.
Provide examples from the literature to support the points you are making.

Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:

Assessment 4 Example [PDF] Download Assessment 4 Example [PDF].

Additional Requirements

Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

Length: 4–6 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 points.
APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance.
Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
Using outside sources: Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.
References: Integrate information from outside sources to include at least three scholarly peer-reviewed journal articles and three in-text citations within the paper.
APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citations of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.

Organize your paper using the following structure and headings:

Title page. A separate page.
Introduction. A brief one-paragraph statement about the purpose of the paper.
Elements of the problem/issue. Identify the elements of the problem, issue or question.
Analysis. Analyze, define, and frame the problem or issue.
Considering options. Consider solutions, responses, or answers.
Solution. Choose a solution, response, or answer.
Ethical implications. Ethical implications of implementing the solution.
Implementation. Implementation of the potential solution.
Conclusion. One paragraph.

Competencies Measured:

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information in the field of health care.
- Use scholarly information to describe and explain a healthcare problem or issue and identify possible causes for it.
Competency 2: Apply scholarly information through critical thinking to solve problems in the field of health care.
- Analyze a healthcare problem or issue by describing the context, explaining why it is important, and identifying populations affected by it.
- Discuss potential solutions for a healthcare problem or issue and describe what would be required to implement a solution.
Competency 3: Apply ethical principles and academic standards to the study of health care.
- Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if the potential solution was implemented
Competency 4: Write for a specific audience, in an appropriate tone and style, in accordance with Capella’s writing standards.
- Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
- Write the following APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.

Resources

This course has been completed and no further assessments may be submitted.

Use the resources linked below to help complete this assessment.

Collapse All

Evidence-Based Practice

In health care, research is important. It helps you see what has worked and what has not worked effectively for wellness and patient care. It is important for you to explore research about evidence-based practices in your areas of interest. This research will help you develop and demonstrate a professional healthcare perspective and expand your organizational, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills.

The resources in the following reading list provide information about evidence-based practice:

Assessment 4: Evidence-Based Practice.

Critical Thinking

How do you approach a situation within your organization and apply critical thinking skills to analyze it? What are the important skills you need for critical thinking?

The following resources provide insights into critical thinking:

Writing

The following media and Campus resources provide information and assistance for building your writing skills:

Each of the following research guides is written with a specific program in mind. The one for your program can provide insights about researching topics related to your field:

Activity

Click the linked Socratic Problem-Solving Practice title to walk through the steps of the Socratic problem-solving method. This learning activity is designed to support your understanding of the method.

This tool needs to be loaded in a new browser window.

Introduction to NHS 4000 Assessment Four

The NHS-FPX 4000 Assessment Four: Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue requires you to analyze a current healthcare problem or issue, using a structured approach to identify the root causes, evaluate potential solutions, and propose a comprehensive plan. In this How-To NHS-FPX 4000 Guide, we will walk through the process step-by-step, providing clear guidelines for effectively tackling each part of the assignment.

Analyze the health care problem or issue. Describe the setting or context for the problem or issue. Describe why the problem or issue is essential to you. Identify groups of people affected by the problem or issue. Provide examples that support your analysis of the problem or issue.

Identifying the Core Issues

We will discuss the core issues to start the NHS-FPX 4000 Assessment Four: Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue.

Thoroughly read the case study to understand the primary problem. In this example, the focus is on staffing shortages in the healthcare sector.
Identify how this issue affects patient care and healthcare professionals.
Determine the key stakeholders involved, such as patients, nurses, and healthcare administrators.
Understand the implications of the problem for each group.

Example

One of the frequent and significant issues at healthcare institutions that affects patients and staff separately is a shortage of workers. According to Perkin, the Lack of appropriately trained labor causes a cascade of issues, such as increasing workloads for the present workforce. The increased workload compromises patient safety since it becomes more challenging to provide high-quality medical care. Because providing medical treatment is complicated, patient safety is put at risk because accurate and rapid responses are frequently essential. Stress impacts the health of medical professionals who offer direct patient care. This also clarifies why persistent understaffing causes fatigue and a propensity for burnout in healthcare personnel. Ultimately, this kind of burnout impacts the standard of care given and the resilience of the health workforce as a whole. Therefore, staffing levels are critical as they ensure patient safety, favorable working conditions for healthcare professionals, and the long-term viability of the healthcare system.

Literature Review and Analysis

Next, we will explore and analyze the literature review.

Choose studies that provide insights into the problem from different perspectives.
For example, select studies that discuss nurse staffing levels, legislative impacts, and crisis management in healthcare.
Summarize the key findings of each study.
Highlight how these findings contribute to understanding the staffing shortage issue.

Example

Three research studies with different points of view on the intricate details of this pervasive problem have been evaluated, adding to the depth of investigation on staffing shortages in the healthcare industry. Romero (2022) comprehensively analyzes the relationship between nurse staffing levels and patient safety results and how these factors affect care quality. Additionally, it highlights staffing difficulties and provides an interstate examination of the inadequacies of the various health sectors nationwide.

McHugh et al. (2021) elaborate on the literature on laws about nurse-to-patient ratios. Their paper, published in The Lancet, provides an overview of the law’s effects on the number of nurses worldwide. It includes up to nine European nations with a combined population of almost 500,000. Adding such a component ensures a well-rounded conclusion and emphasizes the importance of considering the context while tackling the staff shortage issue.

Modern healthcare can particularly benefit from Aziz et al.’s (2020) work on controlling ICU surge in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. It draws attention to the crisis’ emotional consequences on healthcare professionals and offers workable alternatives that foster resilience. This paper adds a comprehensive perspective to the ongoing discourse about the lack of resources tailored to ICU concerns.

In a problematic healthcare situation, the nurse-to-patient ratio becomes apparent when determining the quality of care. This context emphasizes how crucial evidence-based strategies are for resolving pressing staffing issues. In the complicated healthcare staffing field, these academic publications provide evidence to support the analysis and serve as the foundation for an evidence-based strategy.

Discuss potential solutions for the health care problem or issue. Describe what would be required to implement a solution. Describe the potential consequences of ignoring the problem or issue. Provide the pros and cons of one of the solutions you are proposing.

Considering Options and Solutions

Here, we will discuss the options and their solutions.

List potential solutions, such as recruitment drives, specialized training programs, and flexible scheduling.
Consider innovative approaches that address the root causes of the problem.
Assess the practicality of implementing each solution.
Consider the short-term and long-term impacts on patient care and healthcare staff.

Example

Several choices stand out as crucial steps to reduce stress and improve the overall performance of healthcare professionals in the context of staffing issues in the industry. The essential strategy is distinguished by hiring initiatives intended to attract qualified professionals. Specialized training programs also aid in improving the abilities and knowledge required of professionals to handle the constantly evolving healthcare landscape.

Additionally, the approach allows for schedule flexibility for the workforce, which promotes work-life balance and lowers burnout. The practical implementation of these solutions necessitates collaboration amongst all parties involved. To create an atmosphere conducive to hiring training programs, all parties involved—especially healthcare organizations, legislators, and educational institutions—should work together (Perkins, 2021). For these solutions to work, they must be sufficiently expensive and technology-supported. Similarly, sufficient communication and technological infrastructures are necessary for seamless collaboration and adoption.

Ignoring the personnel issue will have grave consequences. The safety of patients might be readily jeopardized by overworked medical personnel since they cannot maintain a high level of care. In addition to negatively impacting patient care, an excessive workload that exceeds the capabilities of the current workforce exacerbates burnout issues in healthcare professionals, further impairing well-being and the standard of care provided. The potential negative consequences of such training and recruitment strategies should be assessed to enhance the workforce in the healthcare industry. Naturally, implementing such solutions is expensive and requires much work. Hospitals must thus devise a strategy to weigh the benefits and drawbacks of building more robust staff and teams.

Proposed Solution

Now, in this section of the NHS-FPX 4000 Assessment Four: Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue, we will propose a solution.

Formulate a detailed plan that incorporates the most effective solutions.
Ensure the plan addresses both immediate and long-term needs.
Use evidence from the literature to support the proposed solution.
Explain how the solution aligns with ethical principles and best practices.

Example

Introducing three essential elements into a comprehensive plan to address the widespread problem of workforce shortages in the healthcare industry is necessary: flextime, targeted training initiatives, and specialized recruiting drives. You might envision a complete solution to the complex problem of personnel scarcity with these numerous approaches. This depends on the hiring efforts to fill positions with qualified candidates who will improve the medical team. This includes planning off-site events or attending schools to educate the public about the satisfaction of working in medicine. To better meet the changing needs of the healthcare industry, both new and current personnel can benefit from specialized training that gives them new skills. Adaptable and skilled personnel must provide standard health care, which can only be achieved via ongoing training and lifetime learning.

The flexible scheduling problem is another important supporting one. It involves preventing burnout and keeping a good work-life balance while still experiencing some degree of job pleasure, as well as planning according to individual needs to foster a more committed and focused team. The holistic approach acknowledges the complexity of the staffing problems and their need for a comprehensive strategic solution. It produces a flexible healthcare workforce that can handle any issues or demands in the future rather than just providing band-aid fixes.

Explain the ethical principles (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if the potential solution were implemented. Describe what would be necessary to implement the proposed solution. Explain the ethical principles that must be considered (Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice) if the potential solution is implemented. Provide examples from the literature to support the points you are making.

Ethical Implications

Now, we will explore the ethical implications of current healthcare issues.

Identify ethical issues related to the proposed solutions.
Ensure the plan respects autonomy, non-maleficence, and justice principles.
Develop strategies to implement the solution ethically.
Consider the perspectives and rights of all stakeholders.

Example

Therefore, resolving the shortage of nurses morally guarantees that patients and medical professionals receive equitable treatment. It is ethically correct since the remedy preserves the beneficence principle of medicine by ensuring the patient’s security and well-being. Preventing damage acts proactively through planned interventions, incorporating the hazards associated with understaffing, and satisfying the ethical norm of non-maleficence. Furthermore, the proposed method encourages healthcare professionals to think independently (Perkins, 2021).

Their ability to provide higher-quality care is enhanced when they are equipped with the necessary resources for their training, have a flexible schedule, and have control over their surroundings. Thirdly, managing staffing shortages preserves justice by giving every patient an equal chance of receiving quality care despite a shortfall. This is the moral basis upon which a healthcare system should be built, with concerns for the people who give and receive treatment at its core.

Implementation Plan

Now, we will discuss the implementation of the plan.

Detail the steps required to put the solution into action.
Include timelines and responsible parties for each step.
Identify the resources needed, such as funding, personnel, and technology.
Engage stakeholders to ensure buy-in and collaboration.

Example

Successfully implementing the suggested all-inclusive approach depends on coordinated efforts by healthcare facilities, government agencies, and academic institutions. To adapt to the evolving needs of the healthcare workforce, healthcare companies should create a coordinated strategy that incorporates scheduling management, reskilling programs, and recruitment method adjustments.9. Allocating infrastructure and financial resources is critical to provide the necessary support for effective deployment. Investing in new hiring initiatives, educational resources, and flexible work technologies are a few of these.

Establishing continuous assessment processes is essential to regularly evaluating how adopted tactics impact patient care and staffing levels. Refinements that follow frequent feedback loops guarantee adaptive solutions. Monitoring key metrics and getting input from healthcare professionals will yield crucial data supporting response modifications and reinforcing the commitment to ongoing improvement (Perkins, 2021). A dynamic, contemporary evaluation approach with an eye toward ongoing improvements in the hospital staff and patient care is essential to the success of this intricate solution.

Closing

By following NHS-FPX 4000 Assessment Four: Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem or Issue How-To Owlisdom Guide, you can systematically analyze a healthcare problem, evaluate potential solutions, and develop a comprehensive plan that is both practical and ethically sound. This approach ensures a thorough understanding and effectively addresses the complexity of healthcare issues.