ENG 101 WEEK 10 DISCUSSION: Persuasive Passage Re-Write

Step-By-Step Guide ENG 101 WEEK 10 DISCUSSION: Persuasive Passage Re-Write

Recap

In the previous ENG 101 Week 9, we discussed Persuasive Passage. We wrote a persuasive passage for our discussion using strong logic and a clear claim. We had to choose a topic to help us develop an effective persuasive passage.

I chose “The Case for Mandatory Voting Laws.”

Introduction to ENG 101 Week 10 Discussion

This How-To ENG 101 Guide assists you in revising and reposting a persuasive passage based on feedback from peers. The ENG 101 WEEK 10 DISCUSSION: Persuasive Passage Re-Write aims to enhance the persuasiveness and clarity of your original passage using constructive criticism and engaging in meaningful dialogue with classmates by analyzing persuasive techniques in external readings.

Last week, you posted your first try at writing a persuasive passage. This week, based upon the feedback you received on that passage, re-write and then re-post your passage.

Revision Process

To start the ENG 101 WEEK 10 DISCUSSION: Persuasive Passage Re-Write, we will revise the essay we previously wrote. We will incorporate the feedback and rewrite the essay. I will provide the updated sample essay at the end of this How-To Guide.

• Reviewing Feedback: Carefully read the feedback provided by your peers and instructors. Identify common themes or suggestions that many reviewers have pointed out.
• Implementing Changes: Use feedback to make specific improvements to your persuasive passage. Focus on strengthening your argument, clarifying your points, and enhancing your rhetorical strategies such as pathos, ethos, and logos.

Reposting the Revised Passage

• Guidelines for Reposting: Repost your passage in the designated forum or submission area once revisions are complete. Make sure your revised passage is marked as such, and briefly mention the fundamental changes you made based on the feedback.
• Ensuring Clarity and Persuasiveness: Before reposting, read through your passage to ensure it is clear and effectively persuasive. Check that your argument flows logically and that your rhetorical techniques are appropriately applied.

Example

Updated Solution

In contemporary democracies, low voter turnout has become a pressing issue, challenging the foundations of representative governance. This trend not only undermines the principles of democracy but also risks distorting the political landscape, where the elected officials may not truly reflect the will of the majority. Implementing mandatory voting laws stands out as a proactive measure to combat this apathy and ensure that governments mirror the collective will of the populace. Observing the success of countries like Australia, where mandatory voting has consistently achieved turnouts exceeding 90%, highlights the effectiveness of such policies (Dassonneville et al., 2023).

Mandatory voting significantly enhances participation rates, ensuring that the election outcomes accurately represent societal preferences. This increased turnout ensures that elected officials represent a broader spectrum of the public, fostering the development of balanced and inclusive policies. Consequently, this reduces the chances of governance being disproportionately influenced by a vocal minority while the silent majority remains marginalized, enhancing the overall equity in political representation.

Opponents of mandatory voting often cite the encroachment on personal freedom—specifically, the freedom to abstain. However, repositioning voting as not merely a right but a civic obligation, akin to jury duty or the responsibility of paying taxes, underscores the importance of each citizen’s role in sculpting the future of their community. This perspective advocates for active participation in the democratic processes that have profound implications on daily life, enhancing communal decision-making.

Moreover, mandatory voting could lead to a better-informed electorate. If voting is obligatory, citizens will likely take a more active interest in understanding political issues and candidates, reducing the impact of deceptive or manipulative campaigns designed to exploit voter ignorance. This informed electorate is crucial for the health and sustainability of a democratic society.

Another significant advantage of mandatory voting is its potential to diminish socioeconomic disparities in voter turnout. Studies have shown that lower participation rates are disproportionately observed among minority and economically disadvantaged groups (Tuorto, 2022). A mandatory voting system could help level the playing field, ensuring that all demographic segments are equally represented, thereby enhancing the fairness and equality of the democratic process.

In summary, while mandatory voting might be perceived as an infringement on personal liberty by some, its benefits in enhancing democratic participation and ensuring more equitable representation are substantial. By transforming political participation into a more inclusive and informed endeavor, mandatory voting could significantly reflect a more genuine democratic ethos.

In addition to your original post, be sure to provide a meaningful response to at least two of your peers’ posts by the end of the week. In your response to your peers, how similar persuasive skills are used in something you read outside of school this week.

Peer Responses

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the ENG 101 discussion posts. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the below points in mind.

• Criteria for Meaningful Responses: When responding to at least two of your peers’ posts, focus on their persuasive techniques. Provide constructive feedback that is specific, respectful, and helpful.
• Incorporating Observations of Persuasive Skills: Relate their use of persuasive skills to something you have read outside of school this week. Highlight similarities in the techniques and discuss their effectiveness.

Example

Response 01

Hey Alex, nice post! Your discussion on mandatory voting highlights compelling points, similar to an article I read this week advocating for environmental policies. Both employ ethos effectively, emphasizing civic duty and responsibility to persuade readers. The strong use of statistical evidence and ethical appeals in your post reinforces the argument, much like the techniques used in the article to emphasize the urgency of action. Great work connecting these aspects!

Response 02

We are supposed to write two peer responses. I have addressed the given instructions in one response. Following these instructions, you can write your peer responses to the Week 10 Discussion without a hassle.

Closing

The ENG 101 WEEK 10 DISCUSSION: Persuasive Passage Re-Write explores that revising and interacting with peer feedback is crucial for developing practical, persuasive writing skills. By critically engaging with feedback and observing persuasive techniques in other contexts, you can significantly improve their ability to argue persuasively. This How-To Guide helps refine your work and enhances your understanding of what makes persuasive writing effective, promoting continuous improvement in your writing skills.