Table of Contents

Share this article

IDS-100 – Perspectives in Liberal Arts and Human Expression: Exploring Interdisciplinary Learning, Culture, and Critical Thought

Published: 2025-10-08

Modified: 2025-10-08

Samples Solutions

Introduction:

IDS-100 – Perspectives in Liberal Arts and Human Expression examines how art, culture, science, and philosophy shape the human experience. The course helps students develop analytical, creative, and communication skills essential for academic and personal growth. For expert guidance with essays and interdisciplinary projects, visit Owlisdom’s Humanities Essay Help.

IDS-100 1-1 Discussion: Innovation and the Liberal Arts

Instructions of IDS-100

1-1 Discussion: Innovation and the Liberal Arts

Discussion Topic

In your first post, introduce yourself to your instructor and peers. Share who you are, where you are from, and what your goals are for taking this course. Then proceed to craft your response to the discussion questions below.

Create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts.

For your initial post, address the following:

After reading the module resources, discuss the importance of the liberal arts in your own words.
Considering what was mentioned in the articles, share one way that liberal arts fit into your life or your educational pursuits.
What impact do you think the liberal arts have on ensuring continued innovation?

For your response posts, address the following:

How does your view of the importance of the liberal arts compare with that of your peers?
What do you find of value in your peer’s understanding of the role of innovation in the liberal arts?

To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric.

Introduction to IDS 100 1-1 Discussion

Welcome to the IDS-100 1-1 Discussion: Innovation and the Liberal Arts! This first discussion post revolves around your understanding of innovation and liberal arts. I will provide brief and descriptive guidelines to solve the 1-1 Discussion post and a dummy solution for each section. This How-To IDS-100 Guide will equip you with guidelines to tackle all the queries related to the IDS-100 1-1 Discussion: Innovation and the Liberal Arts. Let us begin with the guide.

Introduce yourself to your instructor and peers. Share who you are, where you are from, and your goals for taking this course.

Introduction

For the first section of the IDS-100 1-1 Discussion: Innovation and the Liberal Arts, we must briefly introduce ourselves and our expectations from this course.

Personal Introduction: Start with a friendly greeting. Mention your name, where you are from, and a couple of interests or hobbies. This helps to make your introduction personable.
Goals for the Course: Briefly explain why you chose this course. Are you looking to broaden your understanding, fulfil a requirement, or something else? Be honest but optimistic about what you hope to gain.

Example

Hello everyone! My name is Alex, and I am from Austin, Texas. I enjoy reading historical novels and exploring local art galleries in my free time. I enrolled in this IDS 100 course out of a deep curiosity about the interconnectedness of various disciplines within the liberal arts. Understanding this integration will broaden my horizons and enhance my problem-solving and critical-thinking skills. My goal is to gain a holistic education that prepares me for the complexities of the modern world, and I am eager to see how this course will help me achieve that.

After reading the module resources, discuss the importance of the liberal arts in your own words. Considering what was mentioned in the articles, share one way that liberal arts fit into your life or your educational pursuits. What impact do you think the liberal arts have on ensuring continued innovation?

Main Discussion Response

For this 1-1 Discussion section, we need to discuss the importance of liberal arts by connecting it with our lives. Also, discuss the impact of liberal arts on innovation.

Understanding the Importance of Liberal Arts: In your own words, describe why liberal arts are vital. Think about how they contribute to a well-rounded education and foster critical thinking. You do not need to be overly formal; share your thoughts.
Personal Connection to Liberal Arts: Reflect on how the liberal arts have impacted your life or education. Maybe a history class sparked a love for learning about other cultures, or an art course inspired creativity. Share a specific example to make your point relatable.
Impact on Innovation: Discuss how the liberal arts contribute to innovation. Consider the role of diverse knowledge and thinking styles in developing new ideas. Again, personal insights or observations can make your argument stronger.

Example

The liberal arts embody the essence of a well-rounded education, cultivating a depth of understanding across diverse subjects and fostering the critical thinking skills vital today. They encourage us to question, analyse, and synthesise information from various perspectives, which is crucial for personal and professional growth. My journey with liberal arts began with a philosophy class that challenged me to think deeply about ethics, society, and the individual’s role within it. This experience ignited a passion for exploring complex questions and appreciating the interconnectedness of knowledge.

Moreover, liberal arts catalyse innovation. Exposing students to a broad spectrum of disciplines, from the humanities to the sciences, encourages the cross-pollination of ideas. This diversity of thought and interdisciplinary approach is essential for sparking creativity and leading to breakthroughs in various fields. I believe the liberal arts enrich our lives and lay the groundwork for continuous innovation, enabling us to address new challenges with insight and imagination.

How does your view of the importance of the liberal arts compare with that of your peers? What do you find of value in your peer’s understanding of the role of innovation in the liberal arts?

Peer Responses

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the IDS-100 1-1 Discussion: Innovation and the Liberal Arts. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the following points in mind.

Comparison of Liberal Arts’ Importance: First, acknowledge their perspective when replying to a classmate. Then, share whether you agree or disagree with their view on the importance of liberal arts and why. Keep it friendly and constructive.
Value in Peer’s View on Innovation: Identify something insightful or valuable in your peer’s discussion about innovation and liberal arts. Maybe they mentioned an aspect you had not considered. Acknowledge this point and briefly explain why it stood out to you.

Response 01

Your insights into the role of innovation within the liberal arts particularly stood out to me. The idea that liberal arts education fosters innovation by encouraging the cross-pollination of ideas across different disciplines was a compelling point. It highlighted an aspect of the liberal arts I had not fully considered: its potential to drive creative solutions and advancements in various fields. This has deepened my appreciation for the liberal arts as a foundation for personal development and societal progress.

Closing

Remember, being thoughtful and respectful is the key to success in these discussions. Everyone has unique perspectives, which is a chance to learn from each other. Good luck!

IDS 100 1-2 Short Answer: Information Literacy

Instructions for IDS 100

Overview

Information literacy guides us to locate and correctly evaluate information. In this assignment, we will be exploring information literacy and how it applies to your personal and professional life.

Prompt

The resources for this module discuss the various ways that the information age has changed the way we seek out and process information. The objective of this assignment is to reflect on information literacy and how it impacts your life.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

Explain the importance of developing information literacy skills.
How have your information literacy skills changed as a result of the resources in this module?
Choose the sources that were the most impactful to you from all the resources you covered in this module.
How might having strong information literacy skills impact your academic or professional career?

Guidelines for Submission

Your submission should be a Word document, one to two pages in length, with 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Any sources should be cited according to APA style. Consult the APA Style Guide available through the Shapiro Library for more information on citations.

Introduction to IDS 100 1-2 Short Answers

This assignment revolves around your understanding of information literacy. I will provide brief and descriptive guidelines to solve the IDS 100 1-2 Short Answer: Information Literacy and a dummy solution for each section. This How-To IDS 100 Guide will equip you with guidelines to tackle all the queries related to the IDS 100 1-2 Short Answer: Information Literacy. Let us begin with the guide.

Explain the importance of developing information literacy skills.

Introduction to Information Literacy

The first section of IDS 100 1-2 Short Answer: Information Literacy will discuss information literacy and its importance.

Definition and Importance: Start by defining information literacy as the ability to identify, locate, evaluate, and effectively use information for various purposes.
Emphasize its significance in navigating the vast amount of information available today, making informed decisions, and fostering lifelong learning and critical thinking.

Example

Information literacy is identifying, locating, evaluating, and effectively utilizing information. This skill set is crucial in today’s information-saturated world, enabling individuals to sift through abundant data to find what’s accurate, relevant, and reliable. Information literacy skills are essential for making informed decisions in academic research, professional tasks, or everyday life choices. It promotes lifelong learning and enhances critical thinking, empowering us to understand the world better and contribute meaningfully through well-informed perspectives and actions.

How have your information literacy skills changed due to the resources in this module?

Personal Reflection on Information Literacy Skills

Next, we will explore Information Literacy skills.

Before and After the Module: Reflect on your information literacy skills before engaging with the resources.
Consider aspects like source evaluation, research strategies, and critical thinking. After completing the module, identify any changes or improvements in these areas.
Use specific examples to illustrate your growth, such as increased skepticism of information without credible sources or enhanced ability to find relevant data for academic projects.

Example

Before this module, my approach to information needed to be more discerning, often accepting data at face value without rigorous evaluation. My skills in source evaluation, research strategies, and critical thinking must be improved. However, I’ve noticed a significant transformation after engaging with the module’s resources. I’ve become more skeptical of information needing more credible sources and have developed a structured approach to researching, prioritizing reliability and relevance. For instance, I applied these enhanced skills in a recent academic project to effectively identify and utilize peer-reviewed articles, resulting in a more robust and well-supported argument. This growth has fundamentally changed how I interact with information daily.

Choose the sources that impacted you most from all the resources you covered in this module.

Selection of Impactful Sources

In this section of IDS 100 1-2 Short Answer: Information Literacy, we will explain the selection of sources for this module.

Criteria for Selection: Discuss choosing the most impactful sources from the module.
Highlight your criteria, such as relevance to your interests, clarity in explaining information literacy, or the source’s credibility.
Mention one or two specific sources that stood out and explain why they were particularly meaningful or helpful in understanding information literacy.

Example

Among the resources explored in this module, the American Library Association (ALA) articles on information literacy standards profoundly impacted me. My criteria for selection were the source’s credibility, relevance to my academic interests, and clarity in explaining the complex facets of information literacy. The ALA’s guidelines illuminated the principles of evaluating and utilizing information ethically and effectively, enriching my understanding of the subject. These articles stood out because they provided a comprehensive framework that I could directly apply to my studies, enhancing my ability to critically discern and engage with information. Their authoritative and clear presentation made information literacy concepts accessible and actionable.

How might having strong information literacy skills impact your academic or professional career?

Impact of Information Literacy on Career

In this last section of the IDS 100 1-2 Short Answer: Information Literacy, we will explore the impact of Information Literacy on our careers.

Academic and Professional Benefits: Contemplate how enhanced information literacy skills can benefit your academic journey and professional career.
In academics, efficient research and critical analysis are considered in producing quality work.
Professionally, think about how the ability to sift through data, recognize biases, and present information clearly can improve decision-making, innovation, and leadership.

Example

Having strong information literacy skills profoundly impacts both academic and professional spheres. Academically, these skills enable me to conduct efficient research and critical analysis, producing high-quality, insightful, and evidence-based work. Professionally, navigating vast amounts of data, discerning biases, and communicating information succinctly are invaluable. It enhances decision-making processes, fosters innovation by creatively identifying and applying relevant knowledge, and bolsters leadership qualities through informed and confident direction. Information literacy equips me with a foundational competency for success in a rapidly evolving, information-rich world.

Closing

This How-To Owlisdom Guide allows you to understand Information Literacy. Following the guidelines, you can solve IDS 100 1-2. Short Answer: Information Literacy like a pro. Good luck!

IDS 100 Module Two Discussion: Academic Integrity

Instructions for IDS-100 Module Two Discussion

Discussion

Academic integrity is more than avoiding plagiarism. It means creating work that is ethical and true to you. Visit the Academic Integrity page before submitting your first assignment.

What does academic integrity mean to you?

Here’s the full Academic Integrity Policy if you want to check it out.

Is there something from the resources that is new to you or especially interesting? Share your thoughts on academic integrity in this friendly and ungraded discussion space.

Introduction to IDS 100 Module Two Discussion

The IDS 100 Module Two Discussion: Academic Integrity is ungraded and revolves around your understanding of Academic Integrity. I will provide brief and descriptive guidelines to solve the Module Two Discussion post and a dummy solution for each section. This How-To IDS 100 Guide will equip you with guidelines to tackle all the queries related to the Module Two Discussion post. Let us begin with the guide.

Introduction to Academic Integrity

To start the IDS 100 Module Two Discussion: Academic Integrity, we will briefly introduce Academic Integrity.

Start by explaining what academic integrity is, emphasising its importance in maintaining the quality and credibility of scholarly work.
Begin with a clear and engaging definition. Use examples to illustrate how academic integrity plays out in educational activities such as writing papers, conducting research, and taking exams.

Example

Academic integrity embodies the principle of honest and ethical scholarship, ensuring the trustworthiness of scholarly work. It is pivotal in upholding the quality of research, writing, and testing. For instance, citing sources correctly in papers prevents plagiarism, while adhering to honest practices during exams reflects personal integrity, collectively maintaining academia’s credibility.

What does Academic Integrity mean to you?

Personal Interpretation of Academic Integrity

Next, we will discuss what Academic Integrity means to us.

Reflect on what academic integrity means to you personally. Consider how your views align or differ from the standard definition. This section is about personalising the concept and making it relevant to your experiences and values.
Write a brief paragraph on your interpretation. It could start with, “To me, academic integrity…” Ensure to link your personal beliefs to the broader importance of academic integrity.

Example

Academic integrity means upholding a commitment to honesty and responsibility in my scholarly endeavors. It goes beyond avoiding plagiarism; it’s about contributing to a culture of trust and respect. This principle guides me to produce authentic work reflecting my effort and learning, thereby supporting the integrity of the educational community.

Is there something from the resources that was new to you or especially interesting?

Reflection on Learning from Resources

The next section of the IDS 100 Module Two Discussion, Academic Integrity, will reflect on our learning about academic integrity from resources.

Discuss any new insights or fascinating points you learned from academic resources. This could include articles, videos, lectures, or other educational materials you’ve encountered.
Pick one or two key learnings that stood out to you. Explain why these points were impactful or surprising. Make sure to articulate how this new knowledge has shaped or reinforced your understanding of academic integrity.

Example

From the resources I explored, the concept of self-plagiarism was particularly enlightening. The idea that reusing one’s previous work without proper citation violates academic integrity was a novel insight for me. This revelation underscored the importance of originality in all educational endeavours, not just in the context of using others’ works. It has significantly broadened my understanding of academic integrity, emphasising the depth of commitment required to maintain academic honesty and ethical standards. This knowledge has reinforced my dedication to producing genuinely original work and acknowledging all sources of inspiration, including my past works.

Closing

Following the IDS 100 Module Two Discussion: Academic Integrity How-To Owlisdom Guide for Module Two Discussion, you can write a coherent and insightful essay on academic integrity, reflecting your perspective and a deep understanding of the topic. Remember, academic integrity is the foundation upon which the credibility of the educational community is built; understanding and valuing it is essential for all students.

IDS 100 2-1 Assignment Short Answer: Bias

Instructions for IDS-100 2-1 Assignment

Overview

In this module, you learned about bias and how a person’s bias could compromise their ability to effectively research new ideas.

Prompt

In this short-answer assignment, reflect on a time when a bias that you had about a certain topic made it difficult for you to fully explore the topic. The objective here is to explore your own biases and understand them, not to overcome them.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

Reflect on a time when you were biased about a topic. These can be hard to identify, so think of a time when it was difficult for you to reason with evidence that you were presented or the ideas another person had about that topic.
Identify which type of bias it was. Make sure to identify one of the types of bias mentioned in the module resources (social, ingroup, confirmation, communal reinforcement).
Explain why being aware of biases is important to avoid making assumptions.
Explain why being aware of biases is necessary when doing research. This could include reviewing information or learning about the arguments of others.

Guidelines for Submission

Introduction to IDS 100 2-1 Assignment

In the IDS 100 2-1 Assignment Short Answer: Bias, we delve into personal biases and their impact on our ability to research and understand new ideas objectively. Everyone has biases; recognising and understanding these biases is crucial for academic and personal growth. The 2-1 Assignment focuses on reflecting upon a moment when personal bias hindered the exploration of a topic to foster awareness rather than overcoming these biases immediately. This How-To IDS 100 Guide will equip you with guidelines to tackle all the Answers to the Assignment.

Reflect on a time when you were biased about a topic. These can be hard to identify, so think of a time when it was difficult to reason with evidence that you were presented or another person’s ideas about that topic.

Reflect on a Time When You Were Biased About a Topic

To start the IDS 100 2-1 Assignment Short Answer: Bias, we will reflect on a time when we were biased about a topic.

Think deeply about past experiences where you found accepting evidence or viewpoints contradicting your preconceived notions challenging.
Focus on a specific instance, detailing the circumstances and your initial thoughts.

Example

Reflecting upon my academic journey, I encountered a significant challenge during a debate on renewable energy. Initially, I harboured a strong bias towards traditional energy sources, influenced by my community’s dependence on them. Faced with compelling evidence about renewable energy’s environmental and economic benefits, I struggled to reconcile these facts with my preconceived notions. This experience illuminated the importance of approaching discussions with an open mind and willingness to adjust my viewpoints based on evidence. It underscored the necessity of critical thinking and the value of diverse perspectives in enriching my understanding of complex issues.

Identify which type of bias it was. Identify one of the types of bias mentioned in the module resources (social, ingroup, confirmation, communal reinforcement).

Identify Which Type of Bias It Was

Next, we will identify the type of bias it was.

After reflecting on the instance, categorise your bias according to the types discussed in the module (social, ingroup, confirmation, communal reinforcement).
Provide a brief explanation of why this particular bias categorisation fits your experience.

Example

The bias I encountered aligns with the “ingroup bias,” which is the predisposition to favour the views and values of one’s group. This classification resonates with my experience because my community’s prevailing preferences and economic interests heavily influenced my initial resistance to renewable energy. Such ingroup bias limited my ability to evaluate contrasting evidence about the advantages of renewable energy impartially. Acknowledging this bias was crucial in fostering a more open-minded approach to proof and perspectives outside my immediate social circle, enhancing my critical thinking and analytical skills.

Explain why being aware of biases is essential to avoid making assumptions.

Explain Why Being Aware of Biases is Important to Avoid Making Assumptions

This section of IDS 100 2-1 Assignment Short Answer: Bias will explain why awareness of biases is essential to avoid making assumptions.

Discuss the significance of bias awareness in preventing the premature formation of assumptions.
Highlight how assumptions based on bias can limit understanding and the acceptance of new information.

Example

Awareness of biases is paramount in mitigating the premature formulation of assumptions, fostering a more nuanced understanding of complex issues. Bias-induced assumptions often obscure the comprehensive evaluation of evidence, constraining our capacity to assimilate new or contradictory information. Recognising inherent biases empowers individuals to critically scrutinise their viewpoints and the underlying reasons for their beliefs. This critical self-reflection facilitates the development of a more open-minded approach, enhancing the ability to engage constructively with diverse perspectives. Consequently, bias awareness is instrumental in elevating the quality of discourse and decision-making processes by ensuring that conclusions are evidence-based rather than assumption-driven.

Explain why being aware of biases is necessary when doing research. This could include reviewing information or learning about the arguments of others.

Explain Why Being Aware of Biases is Necessary When Doing Research

For the last section of IDS 100 2-1 Assignment Short Answer: Bias, we will explain the importance of being aware of biases during research.

Extend the discussion to the realm of research.
Explain how biases affect data interpretation, source evaluation, and openness to counterarguments.
Emphasise the importance of objectivity and critical thinking in scholarly work.

Example

In research, awareness of biases is essential for ensuring the integrity and validity of scholarly work. Biases can significantly affect data interpretation, the evaluation of sources, and the receptiveness to counterarguments, compromising the objectivity crucial for rigorous research. When researchers harbour unacknowledged biases, there is a propensity to selectively interpret data, favouring results that align with preconceived notions. Similarly, source evaluation may be skewed, with a preference for information from sources that confirm existing beliefs, overlooking or discrediting valuable counter perspectives. Moreover, a lack of bias awareness impedes the capacity to engage critically with opposing viewpoints, a fundamental aspect of scholarly discourse. Hence, cultivating an understanding of personal and methodological biases enhances critical thinking, enabling researchers to approach their work with the scrutiny and open-mindedness necessary for advancing knowledge.

Closing

The IDS 100 2-1 Assignment Short Answer: Bias is an introspective journey into identifying and understanding our biases. By acknowledging these biases, we can strive towards more open-minded and rigorous academic research, ensuring our work is as unbiased and objective as possible.

IDS 100 2-2 Assignment Short Answer: Scholarly Article

Instructions for IDS-100 2-2 Assignment

Overview

In this module, you learned that one of the strategies for reading and understanding scholarly articles is to read them more than once.

Prompt

Before you start this assignment:

Review the steps for reading scholarly articles in the module resources.
Read the article Space Mining and Exploration: Facing a Pivotal Moment from the module resources section.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

Explain which steps for reading the article you found to be the easiest.
Explain which steps you found most difficult in reading the article.
Identify concepts of the article that were a challenge to understand. Were there any that were harder to grasp than others?
Finally, in your own words, summarize the main idea of the article.

Guidelines for Submission

Introduction to IDS 100 2-2 Assignment

The IDS 100 2-2 Assignment Short Answer: Scholarly Article is crafted to deepen your understanding of scholarly articles, focusing on the nuanced strategy of reading materials multiple times to enhance comprehension. You will embark on an analytical journey with a specific scholarly Space Mining and Exploration (Skauge, 2019). By dissecting your reading process and critically engaging with the content, this exercise aims to refine your skills in parsing complex academic writings, identifying personal challenges in understanding, and summarizing pivotal ideas in your own voice.

Explain which steps for reading the article you found to be the easiest.

Most Manageable Steps in Reading the Article

To start the IDS 100 2-2 Assignment Short Answer: Scholarly Article, we will explain the steps we found easy for reading the article mentioned in the instructions.

Reflect on the reading process and identify which parts felt more accessible.
Was it the abstract, the conclusion, or perhaps the real-life applications mentioned?
Note why these sections were more manageable to understand.

Example

Analyzing the scholarly Space Mining and Exploration article, I found the abstract and conclusion accessible. The abstract introduced vital themes and objectives, while the conclusion effectively summarized findings and implications. These sections acted as critical bookends, simplifying navigation through the complex body of the article and enhancing understanding of its contributions to space exploration discourse.

Explain which steps you found most challenging in reading the article.

Most Difficult Steps in Reading the Article

The next section of IDS 100 2-2 Assignment will explain the problematic steps while reading the article.

Acknowledge the sections or processes that presented challenges.
Were you struggling with the technical jargon, the complex data analysis, or the theoretical framework?
Recognizing these difficulties is crucial for targeted improvement.

Example

As a student engaging with the scholarly article on Space Mining and Exploration (Skauge, 2019), I encountered challenges in deciphering the intricate technical jargon and complex data analysis presented within the text. Additionally, grasping the research’s theoretical framework posed difficulties, requiring a deeper understanding of specialized concepts and methodologies. Recognizing these hurdles is essential for targeted improvement, guiding further study, and refining analytical skills in navigating scholarly literature.

Identify concepts of the article that were a challenge to understand. Were there any that were harder to grasp than others?

Challenges in Understanding Specific Concepts

This section of the 2-2 Assignment identifies the article’s challenges.

Isolate and list the concepts that were hard to grasp.
Delve into why these stood out—was it due to insufficient background knowledge or the way they were presented?
This reflection aids in identifying areas for further study.

Example

The concept of “Space Mining and Exploration” presented challenges, particularly regarding the technical aspects of mining operations in extraterrestrial environments. Understanding the intricacies of resource extraction in space requires a comprehensive background in mining engineering and astrophysics. Additionally, interpreting the implications of space mining on terrestrial resource management demanded a nuanced understanding of environmental policy and economic theory. These complex concepts underscore the interdisciplinary nature of the article, highlighting the need for multifaceted knowledge in tackling contemporary challenges in space exploration.

Finally, in your own words, summarize the article’s main idea.

Summarizing the Main Idea

For the last section of IDS 100 2-2 Assignment Short Answer: Scholarly Article, we will summarize the fundamental idea of the article.

After fully engaging with the article, distill its main idea into a concise summary.
Focus on capturing the essence of the arguments, findings, and implications without resorting to jargon.
This exercise enhances your ability to communicate complex ideas.

Example

The article explores the burgeoning field of space mining and its implications for future exploration endeavors. It delves into the technical challenges and opportunities associated with extracting resources from celestial bodies, offering insights into the feasibility and sustainability of such ventures. Additionally, the article examines the legal and regulatory frameworks governing space mining activities, shedding light on the evolving landscape of international space law. Overall, it emphasizes the transformative potential of space mining while acknowledging the complexities inherent in its implementation.

Closing

The essence of the IDS 100 2-2 Assignment Short Answer: Scholarly Article is to foster a systematic approach to reading scholarly articles, emphasizing the importance of multiple readings to grasp complex academic discussions fully. You are encouraged to develop strategies for adequate comprehension by identifying personal reading strengths and challenges. Summarizing the article of IDS 100 in your own words serves as a capstone skill, essential not just for academic success but for lifelong learning. The 2-2 Assignment propels you toward becoming a more discerning, reflective, and articulate scholar, equipped to navigate the vast seas of academic literature with confidence and critical understanding.

References

Skauge, T. (2019). Space mining & exploration: Facing a pivotal moment. J. Corp. L., 45, 815.

IDS 100 3-1 Discussion: my view of space exploration

Instructions of IDS-100 3-1 Discussion

Discussion

In this discussion, you will think about space exploration through the four lenses. After reading the module overview, what are some of the ways that the lenses relate to space exploration? Can you find other examples that have played a role in space exploration?

Create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts.

For your initial post, address the following:

How has your view of space exploration changed or expanded after looking at it through the four lenses?
Consider a recent significant breakthrough in space exploration. Discuss the breakthrough by analyzing it with the four lenses.

For your response posts, address the following:

In reviewing other students’ posts, consider how you might apply the lens differently to explore the topic they discuss. For instance, if the post uses the social science lens to consider psychological factors, you might explore economic or sociological factors.

Remember, this assignment is graded on the quality of your initial post and at least two response posts to your classmates. If you refer to any module resources, be sure to include an attribution (or citation) for the resource.

To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric.

Introduction to IDS 100 3-1 Discussion

The IDS 100 3-1 Discussion: My view of space exploration revolves around analyzing space exploration through the interdisciplinary lenses of the liberal arts. By examining space exploration from different perspectives—societal, cultural, scientific, and ethical—students understand its multifaceted impact on society and humanity. This How-To IDS 100 Guide will allow you to understand, through critical reflection and engagement, how students explore how diverse lenses intersect and inform our understanding of space exploration.

How has your view of space exploration changed or expanded after looking at it through the four lenses?

Understanding the Four Lenses

To start the IDS 100 3-1 Discussion: my view of Space Exploration, we will discuss our understanding of the four lenses.

Familiarize yourself with the four lenses: societal, cultural, scientific, and ethical.
Understand how each lens offers unique perspectives on complex issues such as space exploration.

Example

Exploring space exploration through the four lenses has broadened my perspective significantly. The societal lens revealed how space endeavors impact global policies and economies, while the cultural lens highlighted diverse interpretations of space exploration across different societies. Scientifically, I gained insight into the technological advancements driving space exploration forward. Ethically, I grappled with the moral implications of our actions in the cosmos. Overall, examining space exploration through these lenses deepened my understanding of its multidimensional significance.

Reflecting on Space Exploration Through Each Lens

Next, we will reflect on Space Exploration through each lens.

Analyze space exploration through each lens individually.
Consider how societal norms, cultural beliefs, scientific advancements, and ethical considerations shape our understanding and engagement with space exploration.

Example

Space exploration through the societal lens reveals its profound impact on global politics, the economy, and international collaboration. Cultural analysis unveils diverse perspectives on space, shaped by historical narratives and societal values. Scientifically, space exploration drives technological innovation and expands our understanding of the universe. Ethically, it prompts discussions on responsibilities toward extraterrestrial environments and the potential consequences of space activities. By examining space exploration through these lenses, we comprehensively understand its multifaceted nature and implications.

Consider a recent significant breakthrough in space exploration. Discuss the breakthrough by analyzing it with the four lenses.

Analyzing Recent Breakthroughs

For this section of IDS 100 3-1 Discussion: My View of Space Exploration, we will analyze recent breakthroughs in Space Exploration.

Choose a recent significant breakthrough in space exploration.
Apply each lens to analyze the impact of this breakthrough from different angles.
Explore how societal attitudes, cultural values, scientific discoveries, and ethical dilemmas intersect in shaping perceptions and responses to the breakthrough.

Example

One recent breakthrough in space exploration is the discovery of exoplanets orbiting distant stars. This breakthrough fosters international collaboration through the societal lens in the quest to understand the universe. Culturally, it ignites fascination and curiosity about the possibility of extraterrestrial life. Scientifically, it expands our knowledge of planetary systems and the potential for habitable worlds. Ethically, questions arise about the responsibility to preserve these newfound environments and the implications of human presence beyond Earth.

In reviewing other students’ posts, consider how you might apply the lens differently to explore the topic they discuss. For instance, if the post uses the social science lens to consider psychological factors, you might explore economic or sociological factors.

Peer Response

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the IDS 100 3-1 Discussion: My View of Space Exploration. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the following points in mind.

When reviewing peers’ posts, consider alternative perspectives. If a peer discusses space exploration through the social science lens, consider how economic or sociological factors may influence the topic.
Offer insights that complement or challenge their analysis, fostering a rich exchange of ideas.

Response 01

Your analysis of space exploration through the social science lens is insightful. However, considering economic factors could provide additional depth. Exploring the financial implications of space missions, such as funding allocation and economic opportunities, could offer a comprehensive understanding of space exploration’s impact on society.

Closing

This assignment underscores the interdisciplinary nature of space exploration, highlighting the importance of examining complex issues through multiple lenses. By engaging with space exploration through the four lenses, students develop critical thinking skills and gain a deeper appreciation for space exploration’s societal, cultural, scientific, and ethical dimensions. Through dialogue with peers, students broaden their perspectives and cultivate a deeper understanding of the complexities surrounding space exploration.

IDS 100 3-2 Assignment: Introduction and Proposal

Instructions for IDS-100 3-2 Assignment

Overview

As you move forward in your academic and professional careers, you will encounter many different perspectives on topics you are engaged in. One of the hallmarks of an educated, open-minded person is the ability to recognize and appreciate the value of looking through these different “lenses” to arrive at informed views. In this course, you will begin to look through four of these lenses while you learn to find relevant information to support your views.

Prompt

To help guide your exploration of the four liberal arts lenses, you will answer questions based on the four lenses of the liberal arts and then you will pick a topic from the three topics listed below.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

Introduction

This is the introduction of your project for this course. Here you are asked to think generally about the lenses.

Using the resources from this course, identify the key characteristics of each of the four lenses: social science, natural science, history, and humanities.

Be sure to include relevant points that help explain the characteristics.

Identify the types of evidence used when looking through each lens. Determine similarities and differences among the lenses, based on the characteristics you have identified.

Topic Proposal

Last, in preparation for your project, select a topic to work on from among the following three topics. Document what you know about the topic you select and what you want to know more about.

Voting rights
Climate change
Justice

Guidelines for Submission

Submit your analysis of the questions above. Your submission should be a Word document, one to two pages in length, with 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Any sources should be cited according to APA style. Consult the APA Style Guide available through the Shapiro Library for more information on citations.

Introduction to IDS 100 3-2 Assignment

This assignment aims to cultivate your ability to view topics from diverse perspectives, a hallmark of an educated and open-minded individual. By examining topics through social science, natural science, history, and humanities lenses, you’ll develop a nuanced understanding enhanced by varied viewpoints. Through structured inquiry and analysis, you will explore the characteristics of each lens, the types of evidence employed, and the similarities and differences among them. Additionally, you’ll select a topic—such as climate change—and propose a plan to investigate it through these lenses.

Using the resources from this course, identify the critical characteristics of each of the four lenses: social science, natural science, history, and humanities. Be sure to include relevant points that help explain the characteristics.

Understanding the Four Lenses

To start the IDS 100 3-2 Assignment: Introduction and Proposal, we will understand the characteristics of all four lenses.

Utilize course resources to identify critical characteristics of each lens: social science, natural science, history, and humanities.
Highlight aspects that distinguish each lens and contribute to a comprehensive understanding of topics.

Example

In examining the four lenses, social science focuses on human behavior and societal structures, employing methodologies such as surveys and experiments. Natural science explores the physical world through empirical observation and experimentation, emphasizing quantifiable data and laws of nature. History uses archival research and critical analysis to investigate past events and their contexts. Humanities delve into human culture and expression, utilizing interpretive methods and exploring literature, art, and philosophy. These distinct characteristics facilitate diverse approaches to understanding complex phenomena.

Identify the types of evidence used when looking through each lens.

Exploring Types of Evidence

Next, we will explore evidence used when looking through lenses.

Determine the types of evidence commonly used when examining topics through each lens.
Consider how empirical data, historical records, cultural artifacts, and philosophical insights inform perspectives within each discipline.

Example

In social science, evidence often includes quantitative data from surveys, experiments, statistical analyses, and qualitative data from interviews and observations. Natural science relies on empirical evidence from controlled experiments, observations, and mathematical models. History utilizes primary sources such as documents, artifacts, and eyewitness accounts, supplemented by secondary sources and scholarly interpretations. Humanities draw upon diverse sources, including literary texts, artworks, philosophical treatises, and cultural artifacts, to illuminate human experiences and perspectives. Each lens employs specific types of evidence to construct and support its interpretations of phenomena.

Determine the lenses’ similarities and differences based on your identified characteristics.

Comparing and Contrasting Lenses

Next, we will compare and contrast each lens.

Evaluate the similarities and differences among the lenses based on their identified characteristics.
Consider how each lens approaches the topic from unique angles, contributing distinct insights and interpretations.

Example

While each lens offers a unique perspective, similarities exist in their pursuit of understanding complex phenomena. Social and natural sciences emphasize empirical evidence and systematic inquiry, albeit with different methodologies. History and humanities share a focus on human experiences and cultural contexts, although history tends to prioritize factual accuracy, whilethe humanities delve into interpretation and meaning. Despite these differences, all lenses contribute valuable insights to our understanding of topics, enriching interdisciplinary discourse and fostering holistic approaches to knowledge.

Last, in preparation for your project, select a topic to work on from among the following three topics. Document what you know about your chosen subject and what you want to learn more about. Voting rights, Climate change, and justice

Selecting and Documenting a Topic Proposal

To finish the IDS 100 3-2 Assignment: Introduction and Proposal, we will select a topic for the course project. I am choosing Climate Change.

Choose a topic of interest, such as climate change, from the provided options.
Document what you know about the topic and outline further areas you wish to explore.
Consider how each lens could offer valuable perspectives on your chosen topic.

Example

I have selected climate change as my topic for the course project. I understand that climate change refers to long-term shifts in temperature, precipitation patterns, and other climatic variables primarily attributed to human activities such as burning fossil fuels and deforestation. I aim to explore further the impacts of climate change on ecosystems, societies, and economies, as well as mitigation and adaptation strategies. Through social science, natural science, history, and humanities lenses, I seek to gain comprehensive insights into the multidimensional aspects of climate change and its implications for our world.

Closing

How-To IDS 100 Guide 3-2 Assignment will help you develop critical thinking skills and interdisciplinary perspectives essential for navigating complex issues in academia and beyond. By engaging with topics through multiple lenses, you’ll gain a deeper understanding of their nuances and implications, enriching your intellectual inquiry and fostering a more informed worldview.

IDS 100 5-1 Discussion: Attributions and Academic Integrity

Instructions of IDS 100 5-1 Discussion

Overview

In this discussion, we will explore attributions and academic integrity. These two topics are fundamental to this course and throughout your time at SNHU.

Create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts.

For your initial post, address the following:

Why is the attribution of works important?
How would you define plagiarism? How is it different from sharing someone else’s post, word for word, on social media?
Has anyone plagiarized your work? How did you react? If you have not experienced someone plagiarizing your work, how would you respond if someone had?

For your response posts, address the following:

How is your assessment of attribution different from that of your peers?
What contribution can you make to your peer’s post regarding plagiarism?

To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric.

Introduction to IDS 100 5-1 Discussion

In IDS 100 5-1 Discussion: Attributions and Academic Integrity, we delve into the critical concepts of attributions and academic integrity, which form the cornerstone of our liberal arts education. Understanding why attribution matters and recognizing the nuances of plagiarism are essential skills for academic and professional success.

Why is the attribution of works important?

Why is Attribution of Works Important?

To start the IDS 100 5-1 Discussion: Attributions and Academic Integrity, we will discuss why the attribution of work is important.

Start by understanding the significance of giving credit to the original creators of ideas, concepts, and works.
Consider the ethical implications of failing to attribute sources in academic and professional contexts.
Reflect on how proper attribution fosters a culture of respect for intellectual property and promotes academic honesty.
Provide examples of situations where accurate attribution enhances credibility and strengthens arguments.

Example

Understanding why attribution of works is important is crucial in academic and professional settings. It signifies giving credit to original creators, ensuring ethical conduct. Failing to attribute sources can have ethical implications, undermining the integrity of one’s work. Proper attribution cultivates a culture of respect for intellectual property, upholding academic honesty. Examples abound where accurate attribution enhances credibility and bolsters arguments, demonstrating the significance of acknowledging the contributions of others in scholarly discourse.

How would you define plagiarism? How is it different from sharing someone else’s post, word for word, on social media?

Defining Plagiarism

Next, we will define plagiarism and also discuss how plagiarism is different on social media.

Define plagiarism as presenting someone else’s work, ideas, or words as your own without proper attribution.
Emphasize the distinction between plagiarism and sharing someone else’s post verbatim on social media platforms, where the context and purpose differ.
Explore the implications of plagiarism in academic settings, including potential consequences such as academic penalties and damage to reputation.
Encourage critical thinking about the ethical considerations involved in both scenarios.

Example

Plagiarism is presenting someone else’s work, ideas, or words as your own without proper attribution. This academic misconduct undermines the integrity of scholarly discourse and can lead to severe consequences, such as academic penalties and damage to one’s reputation. It is crucial to differentiate plagiarism from sharing someone else’s post verbatim on social media platforms. While both involve using another’s work, plagiarism lacks proper attribution and violates ethical norms. Sharing on social media, however, often serves different purposes and contexts, such as spreading information or expressing solidarity, where attribution may not always be necessary. Understanding these distinctions fosters critical thinking about ethical considerations in academic and online environments.

Has anyone plagiarized your work? How did you react? If you have not experienced someone plagiarizing your work, how might you respond if someone had?

Personal Experience with Plagiarism

This section of IDS 100 5-1 Discussion: Attributions and Academic Integrity will discuss our personal experiences with plagiarism and how we reacted to it.

Reflect on personal experiences, if any, with encountering plagiarism in your work.
Consider your emotional and professional reactions to plagiarism, whether directed at you or observed by others.
Discuss strategies for addressing plagiarism constructively, including communication with the plagiarizer and seeking assistance from instructors or academic support services.
Explore hypothetical scenarios to prepare for future encounters with plagiarism and develop proactive responses.

Example

Reflecting on encounters with plagiarism is an integral aspect of academic growth. While fortunate to have not experienced direct plagiarism, I empathize with those who have. Witnessing such academic dishonesty elicits disappointment and undermines our scholarly community’s integrity. Communication with the plagiarizer is key to addressing plagiarism constructively, emphasizing the importance of academic honesty and providing guidance on proper citation practices. Additionally, seeking assistance from instructors or academic support services ensures fairness and upholds academic standards. Preparing for future encounters involves developing proactive responses, such as promoting awareness of plagiarism and fostering a culture of integrity within our academic circles.

How is your assessment of attribution different from that of your peers? What contribution can you make to your peer’s post regarding plagiarism?

Peer Response

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the IDS 100 5-1 Discussion: Attributions and Academic Integrity. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the below points in mind.

Compare and contrast your understanding of attribution with your peers, considering different perspectives and interpretations.
Provide constructive feedback on your peer’s post regarding their assessment of plagiarism, highlighting strengths and offering suggestions for improvement.
Engage in respectful dialogue by acknowledging differing viewpoints and offering insights based on personal experiences or additional research.
Foster a collaborative learning environment by encouraging further exploration of attribution and academic integrity through meaningful discussions and reflections.

Example

Response 01 In comparing our understanding of attribution, I’ve noticed slight differences in emphasis. While we both recognize the importance of crediting original creators, my focus leans towards the ethical implications and fostering a culture of respect. Regarding plagiarism assessment, your post effectively defines plagiarism and discusses its implications. To enhance it further, consider elaborating on strategies for addressing plagiarism constructively, such as promoting awareness and providing resources for proper citation practices. Engaging in respectful dialogue enriches our collective understanding of academic integrity.

Closing

The IDS 100 5-1 Discussion: Attributions and Academic Integrity guide provides a valuable opportunity to deepen our understanding of attributions and academic integrity. By recognizing the importance of giving credit to original creators, understanding the nuances of plagiarism, and engaging in thoughtful peer interactions, we cultivate essential skills for ethical scholarship and professional practice.

IDS 100 5-2 Project Draft: Researching Your Topic

Instructions of IDS-100 5-2 Project Draft

Overview

You have completed an analysis of the lenses as they relate to one of the three topics we are working on in this course: voting rights, climate change, and justice. Now, to help you apply the lenses to your chosen topic, you will work on a KWL analysis.

Prompt

For this assignment, you will complete a KWL analysis, which details what you know, what you want to know, and what you have learned about a topic, analyzing it through each of the lenses. Before you begin, read the library guide’s resources for your chosen topic.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

For the topic you selected (voting rights, climate change, or justice), determine the following:

Know (K): Draw on previous personal experiences to provide information about what you already know about your topic in relation to each lens.
Want to know (W): Determine what you want to know about your topic in relation to each lens. Be sure to phrase this information as questions. What keywords would be helpful in exploring your topic?
Learned (L): Answer the questions you posed about your topic using the provided resources in the library guide. If they are not answered by the resources, explain what steps you will take to answer them.

Guidelines for Submission

Supporting Materials

The following resources support your work on the project:

Shapiro Library Resource: IDS 100: Perspectives in Liberal Arts

Use this library guide to support your research on your topic.

Introduction to IDS 100 5-2 Assignment

In the IDS 100 5-2 Project Draft: Researching Your Topic, we will delve deeper into climate change by applying various lenses: historical, cultural, ethical, and social. Through a KWL analysis, we will explore what we know, want to know, and have learned about climate change within each lens. As we have already chosen the topic “Climate Change” in the 3-2 Project Draft: Introduction and Proposal, we will work on it further in the 5-2 Assignment.

Draw on previous personal experiences to provide information about what you already know about your topic for each lens.

KWL Analysis

Know (K)

To start the KWL Analysis, we will first explore what we know by discussing our past experiences related to the topic we choose.

Utilise previous personal experiences to provide insights into what you already know about climate change through each lens.
Consider how historical events, cultural perspectives, ethical considerations, and social dynamics intersect with climate change.
Identify key concepts, facts, and observations that inform your understanding of climate change through each lens.

Example

In exploring what I know about climate change through various lenses, I draw upon personal experiences that underscore its multifaceted nature. Historically, I recognise the increasing frequency of extreme weather events and shifts in global climate patterns (Huning et al., 2020). Culturally, I observe diverse perspectives on climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies across different communities. Ethically, I acknowledge the moral imperative to address climate injustice and ensure environmental stewardship for future generations (Sardo, 2023). Socially, I see the interconnectedness of climate change with issues such as poverty, migration, and human rights. These experiences inform my understanding of climate change, highlighting its complexities and the need for interdisciplinary approaches to address its impacts effectively.

Determine what you want to know about your topic for each lens. Be sure to phrase this information as questions. What keywords would help explore your topic?

Want to Know (W)

Next, we will explore what we know about our chosen topic. We will also discuss how the keywords we chose in the IDS 100 4-1 Discussion helped us understand the chosen topic.

Formulate questions about climate change within each lens to guide your exploration.
Use keywords relevant to each lens to facilitate research and investigation.
Consider gaps in your knowledge and areas where further understanding is desired to deepen your analysis of climate change.

Example

In formulating questions about climate change within each lens, I seek to effectively deepen my understanding and address knowledge gaps. Historically, I may ask how past climate events and human activities have contributed to current climate change trends. Culturally, I inquire about diverse cultural perspectives on climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies (Hosen et al., 2020). Ethically, I explore the moral implications of climate change policies and actions on vulnerable communities. Socially, I question how social dynamics influence climate change awareness and collective action. Utilising keywords such as “climate variability,” “adaptation strategies,” and “climate resilience” facilitates research and investigation within each lens, enabling a comprehensive exploration of the topic.

Answer the questions you posed about your topic using the provided resources in the library guide. If the resources do not answer them, explain what steps you will take to answer them.

Learned (L)

For the last section of the IDS 100 Project Draft, we will answer the questions we posed in the IDS 100 4-1 Discussion.

Answer the questions about climate change using the resources provided in the library guide.
If the resources do not fully address your questions, outline the steps you will take to find answers.
Reflect on how your understanding of climate change has evolved through the lens of history, culture, ethics, and society.

Example

Upon consulting the resources in the library guide, I found comprehensive information addressing several of my questions regarding climate change. Resources elucidated the mechanisms by which greenhouse gas emissions contribute to global warming and climate change, detailing their impact on Earth’s atmosphere and temperature regulation. Additionally, I gained insight into the primary impacts of climate change on ecosystems, biodiversity, and natural resources, including shifts in habitats and loss of biodiversity (Weiskopf et al., 2020). However, some questions, such as the socio-economic factors exacerbating climate change effects and detailed strategies at various governance levels, require further exploration. To address these gaps, I plan to conduct additional research using academic journals, governmental reports, and reputable websites, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of climate change and its implications. Through this process, my understanding of climate change has evolved, recognising its interdisciplinary nature and the imperative for collective action to mitigate its impacts.

Closing

Completing a KWL analysis of climate change through multiple lenses offers a comprehensive approach to understanding this complex issue. By examining what you know, what you want to know, and what you have learned, you gain valuable insights into the intersectionality of climate change with historical, cultural, ethical, and social factors. This assignment equips you with the tools to critically analyse climate change from various perspectives, fostering a deeper understanding of its complexities and implications.

References

Hosen, N., Nakamura, H., & Hamzah, A. (2020). Adaptation to Climate Change: Does Traditional Ecological Knowledge Hold the Key? Sustainability, 12(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020676

Huning, L. S., Love, C. A., Mallakpour, I., Mazdiyasni, O., Moftakhari, H., Papalexiou, S. M., Ragno, E., & Sadegh, M. (2020). Climate Extremes and Compound Hazards in a Warming World. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 48(Volume 48, 2020), pp. 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-071719-055228

Sardo, M. C. (2023). Responsibility for climate justice: Political, not moral. European Journal of Political Theory, 22(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885120955148

Weiskopf, S. R., Rubenstein, M. A., Crozier, L. G., Gaichas, S., Griffis, R., Halofsky, J. E., Hyde, K. J. W., Morelli, T. L., Morisette, J. T., Muñoz, R. C., Pershing, A. J., Peterson, D. L., Poudel, R., Staudinger, M. D., Sutton-Grier, A. E., Thompson, L., Vose, J., Weltzin, J. F., & Whyte, K. P. (2020). Climate change affects the United States’ biodiversity, ecosystems, ecosystem services, and natural resource management. Science of The Total Environment, 733, 137782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137782

IDS 100 6-1 Discussion: Your Topic and the Lenses

Instructions of IDS-100 6-1 Discussion

Discussion

In this discussion, you will be exploring your topic in relation to two of the lenses of the liberal arts we have evaluated. This will be an important exercise as you prepare for a more thorough analysis of the lenses in your project.

Create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts.

For your initial post, address the following:

Restate your topic. Describe the two lenses you have chosen for your analysis.
What connections can you draw from what you have learned about your topic in relation to two of the lenses?

For your response posts, address the following:

How do you think your peer’s post differs from yours?
What contribution can you make to your peer’s post, possibly adding a third lens to their analysis?
What similarities and differences can you note between your peer’s post and yours?

To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric.

Introduction to IDS 100 6-1 Discussion

In the IDS 100 6-1 Discussion: Your Topic and the Lenses, we will delve into the topic we chose for this course through the lens of the liberal arts. By selecting two lenses for analysis, we will explore connections between our topic and broader intellectual frameworks, preparing for a comprehensive project. As mentioned in IDS 100 3-2 Project Draft: Introduction and Proposal, I chose “Climate Change” for this project.

Restate your topic. Describe the two lenses you have chosen for your analysis.

Restate Your Topic and Describe the Chosen Lenses

To start the IDS 100 6-1 Discussion: Your Topic and the Lenses, we will discuss our selected topic and describe the two lenses we chose for analysis.

Clearly state your topic, climate change, to provide context for your analysis.
Describe the two lenses you have chosen from the liberal arts framework.
Explain how each lens offers a unique perspective on climate change, highlighting its relevance to your analysis.

Example

My selected topic is climate change. For analysis, I have chosen social and natural science lenses. Social science offers insights into human behavior, societal impacts, and policy responses to climate change (Shrivastava et al., 2020). Natural science provides an understanding of environmental processes, greenhouse gas emissions, and climate patterns (Oreggioni et al., 2021). Each lens brings a unique perspective: social science explores human interactions with climate change, while natural science delves into its ecological dimensions. Together, they offer a comprehensive understanding of climate change dynamics, encompassing human and environmental factors.

What connections can you draw from what you have learned about your topic about two of the lenses?

Draw Connections from Learned Material

Next, we will explore the connections between what we learned from the topic and the two chosen lenses.

Reflect on your knowledge of climate change concerning each chosen lens.
Identify connections between your topic’s lenses and key concepts, themes, or challenges.
Analyse how each lens enhances your understanding of climate change and its implications.

Example

Examining climate change through social and natural science lenses uncovers intertwined themes and profound insights. Social science elucidates the diverse societal responses, including policies and communal initiatives, that mould climate change discourse and mitigation endeavours (Shrivastava et al., 2020). Conversely, natural science deepens comprehension of the environmental mechanisms propelling climate change, encompassing greenhouse gas emissions and temperature fluctuations (Oreggioni et al., 2021). Integrating these lenses yields a comprehensive view of climate change dynamics, underscoring the symbiotic relationship between human behaviours and environmental influences. This interdisciplinary approach enriches understanding of climate change intricacies and informs the development of potential solutions and adaptive strategies to address its multifaceted challenges.

How do you think your peer’s post differs from yours? What contribution can you make to your peer’s post, possibly adding a third lens to their analysis? What similarities and differences can you note between your peer’s post and yours?

Peer Responses

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the IDS 100 discussion posts. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the following points in mind.

Compare and contrast your analysis with your peer’s post, noting differences in lens selection and perspectives.
Offer constructive feedback to your peer by suggesting a third lens to expand their analysis.
Highlight similarities and differences between your peer’s post and your own, fostering dialogue and mutual learning.

Example

Response 01 Your post offers a comprehensive analysis of climate change through social and natural science lenses, providing valuable insights into human and environmental dimensions. In contrast, my analysis explores climate change from social science and humanities perspectives, emphasising societal responses and cultural interpretations. To enrich your analysis, consider incorporating the lens of history, examining historical contexts and patterns of climate change discourse and policy. Despite our differing lens selection, both posts highlight the interdisciplinary nature of climate change analysis, fostering a holistic understanding.

Closing

By exploring climate change through multiple lenses of the liberal arts, you deepen your understanding of this complex issue. This How-To Owlisdom Guide encourages interdisciplinary thinking and collaboration, enriching your analytical skills and broadening your perspective on climate change and its societal impacts to solve IDS 100 6-1 Discussion: Your Topic and the Lenses.

Reference

Oreggioni, G. D., Monforti Ferraio, F., Crippa, M., Muntean, M., Schaaf, E., Guizzardi, D., Solazzo, E., Duerr, M., Perry, M., & Vignati, E. (2021). Climate change in a changing world: Socio-economic and technological transitions, regulatory frameworks and trends on global greenhouse gas emissions from EDGAR v.5.0. Global Environmental Change, 70, 102350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102350 Shrivastava, P., Stafford Smith, M., O’Brien, K., & Zsolnai, L. (2020). Transforming Sustainability Science to Generate Positive Social and Environmental Change Globally. One Earth, 2(4), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.04.010.

IDS 100 6-2 Short Answer: Similarities and Differences

Instructions of IDS 100 6-2 Short Answer

Overview

In this assignment, you will evaluate similarities and differences in your topic as analyzed through the two lenses you have selected, and you will describe the view you get when looking at your topic through both of the lenses together. Finally, you will consider how this type of research process can be beneficial.

For instance, when we look at space exploration through the lenses of history and social science, we notice that both lenses deal with how people react to the topic. A difference might be that a history perspective would look to past events to understand how space exploration has progressed, whereas a social science perspective might concentrate on the current lives of astronauts in space.

Prompt

In this assignment, you will describe the view you get when looking at your topic through the two lenses you’ve selected for your project.

Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:

Describe the two lenses you have selected for your analysis.
Compare the two lenses in relation to your topic. What are the similarities?
Explain how the two lenses contrast with each other in relation to your topic. What are the differences?
Reflect on the benefits of the research process. Consider the following:

What have you gained by looking at your topic through the lenses so far?
What might be some of the benefits of further research?

Guidelines for Submission

Introduction to IDS 100 6-2 Assignment

In the IDS 100 6-2 Short Answer: Similarities and Differences, we will analyse our chosen topic, climate change, through two lenses: social sciences and natural sciences. By examining similarities and differences between these lenses, we will gain insights into the multifaceted nature of our topic and its broader implications. Additionally, we will reflect on the benefits of this research process, considering how it enhances understanding and informs further investigation. The topic I chose for the IDS 100 project is Climate change.

Describe the two lenses you have selected for your analysis.

Describe Selected Lenses

To start the IDS 100 6-2 Short Answer: Similarities and Differences, we will describe the two lenses we chose for this course project. I have selected Social Sciences and Natural Sciences out of the four lenses.

Identify the two lenses chosen for analysis: social and natural sciences.
Explain the key characteristics and methodologies associated with each lens within the context of climate change.
Provide a brief overview of how each lens offers a unique perspective on climate change dynamics.

Example

For my course project, I have chosen to analyse climate change through social and natural science lenses. Social sciences focus on human behaviour, societal structures, and climate change mitigation and adaptation policies. Natural sciences explore environmental processes like greenhouse gas emissions and climate patterns. Each lens offers a distinct perspective: social sciences emphasise human interactions and responses to climate change, while natural sciences delve into the scientific mechanisms driving environmental changes (Mohajan, 2020). These lenses provide a comprehensive understanding of climate change dynamics, integrating human and environmental perspectives.

Compare the two lenses concerning your topic. What are the similarities?

Compare Lens Similarities

Next, we will compare the lenses we chose to explore their similarities.

Explore similarities between the social sciences and natural sciences with climate change.
Highlight common themes, concepts, or approaches shared by both lenses.
Discuss how these shared aspects contribute to comprehensively understanding the topic.

Example

Social and natural sciences converge on several key aspects when examining climate change. They both recognise the significance of human activities, such as industrialisation and deforestation, in driving environmental changes. Additionally, both lenses acknowledge the interconnectedness of various systems, such as ecosystems and economies, in shaping climate change dynamics. Furthermore, both disciplines emphasise the importance of data analysis and empirical evidence in understanding the complexities of climate change. By highlighting these shared aspects, a more comprehensive understanding of climate change emerges, integrating human and environmental perspectives for holistic analysis.

Explain how the two lenses contrast with each other about your topic. What are the differences?

Contrast Lens Differences

We will explore the differences between our chosen lenses for this section of the IDS 100 6-2 Short Answer: Similarities and Differences.

Identify differences between the social and natural sciences in their analysis of climate change.
Examine contrasting methodologies, perspectives, or focus areas within each lens.
Analyse how these differences contribute to distinct interpretations or insights regarding climate change.

Example

Social and natural sciences differ in their approaches to analysing climate change (Mohajan, 2020). Social sciences focus on understanding human behaviour, societal structures, and climate change mitigation and adaptation policies. They emphasise qualitative research methods, such as interviews and surveys, to explore human perceptions and responses. In contrast, natural sciences prioritise studying environmental processes and physical phenomena driving climate change, employing quantitative methods like modelling and experimentation. These differing methodologies and perspectives lead to distinct interpretations of climate change, with social sciences emphasising societal impacts and natural sciences emphasising environmental factors.

Reflect on the benefits of the research process. Consider the following: What have you gained by looking at your topic through the lenses so far? What might be some of the benefits of further research?

Reflect on Research Benefits

For the last section of the IDS 100 6-2 Short Answer: Similarities and Differences, we will discuss the benefits we gained from this research on our chosen topic.

Reflect on insights from analysing climate change through social and natural science lenses.
Consider how this interdisciplinary approach enhances understanding of the topic’s complexities and implications.
Discuss potential benefits of further research, such as deeper insights, broader perspectives, and informed decision-making regarding climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies.

Example

Analysing climate change through social and natural science lenses has enriched my understanding of its complexities. The interdisciplinary approach has provided insights into the issue’s human and environmental aspects, enhancing comprehension of its societal impacts and ecological implications. Further research offers the potential for deeper insights, broader perspectives, and informed decision-making regarding climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. By continuing to explore the topic from multiple disciplines, we can develop holistic solutions addressing the multifaceted challenges of climate change.

Closing

By evaluating climate change through social and natural sciences lenses, you gain a nuanced understanding of its multidimensional nature. This How-To Owlisdom Guide will help you compare and contrast these lenses to reveal commonalities and differences, enriching your perspective. Furthermore, reflecting on the research process underscores the value of interdisciplinary analysis in addressing complex societal challenges like climate change.

References

Mohajan, H. K. (2020). Quantitative Research: A Successful Investigation in Natural and Social Sciences. Journal of Economic Development, Environment, and People, 9(4), 50–79.

IDS 100 7-1 ASSIGNMENT: Project

Instructions of IDS-100 7-1 ASSIGNMENT

Overview

As you move forward in your academic and professional careers, you will encounter many different perspectives around topics you are engaged in. One of the hallmarks of an open-minded person is the ability to recognize and appreciate the value of looking through different lenses to arrive at informed views. In this course, you have begun examining the world through the four lenses of the liberal arts.

For this project, you will go through the process of finding information on a topic of interest to you and viewing this topic through different lenses to get a more complete picture of the topic and its impact on you. This project will be based on one of the following topics and its provided resources in the library guide, which you chose in Module Three:

Voting rights
Climate change
Justice

Directions

Read these directions and the rubric criteria. Check to make sure that you understand each requirement, and reach out to your instructor if you have any questions before you begin.

Note: Your grade will be based more on the quality of your responses than on the number of examples you provide.

Introduction: The Four Lenses

Using the resources from this course, identify the characteristics of each of the four liberal arts lenses, the types of evidence they use, and the similarities and differences among them.

Identify the key characteristics of each of the four lenses: social science, natural science, history, and the humanities.
- Be sure to include relevant points that help explain the characteristics.
Identify the types of evidence used when looking through each lens.
Determine similarities and differences among the lenses, based on the characteristics you have identified.

Researching Your Topic

For the topic you selected from the list above, determine what you know, what you want to know, and what you have learned about the topic from the provided resources in the library guide. You will need to use each of the four lenses in your responses.

Know (K): Draw on previous and personal experiences to provide information about what you already know about your topic in relation to each lens.
Want to know (W): Determine what you want to know about your topic in relation to the lenses.
- Be sure to phrase this information in the form of questions.
- What keywords would be helpful in exploring your topic?
Learned (L): Answer the questions you posed about your topic using the provided resources in the library guide. If they are not answered by the resources, explain what steps you will take to answer them.

Applying the Lenses to Your Topic

Choose two of the four lenses you applied when researching your topic, and examine the topic in greater detail.

Topic and first lens: Examine your topic through your first lens.
- Be sure to identify the lens you selected.
- Write about what you learned in your examination. Use details and examples relevant to that lens from the resources in the library guide and the course.
Topic and second lens: Examine your topic through your second lens.
- Be sure to identify the lens you selected.
- Write about what you learned in your examination. Use details and examples relevant to that lens from the resources in the library guide and the course.
Similarities and differences: Explain the similarities and differences in how the lenses relate to your topic.
- Focus on the view you get when looking at your topic through both lenses.
Further exploration: Determine the next steps for further exploration of the topic you have chosen.
- Determine questions to ask for further exploration of this topic. Would you continue to explore through the lenses you’ve chosen, or take another approach?

What to Submit

To complete this project, you must submit a three- to four-page Word document with 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Be sure to use and cite the articles provided for your topic. Consult the Shapiro Library Citing Your Sources Guide for more information on citations.

Supporting Materials

The following resources support your work on the project:

Library Guide: IDS 100: Perspectives in Liberal Arts
Use this library guide to support your research on your topic.

Step-By-Step Guide IDS 100 7-1 Assignment: Project

Introduction to IDS 100 7-1 Project

The IDS 100 7-1 Assignment: The project emphasises viewing topics through four liberal arts lenses to cultivate informed viewpoints. Examining the world through varied perspectives gives you a comprehensive understanding of complex issues like climate change. As I already mentioned in previous modules, I have chosen the topic “Climate Change” for the IDS 100 course project, along with “social sciences” and “natural sciences” as the lenses.

Using the resources from this course, identify the characteristics of each of the four liberal arts lenses, the types of evidence they use, and the similarities and differences among them. Identify the key characteristics of the four lenses: social science, natural science, history, and the humanities. Be sure to include relevant points that help explain the characteristics. Identify the types of evidence used when looking through each lens. Determine the lenses’ similarities and differences based on your identified characteristics.

Understanding the Four Lenses: Identify Lens Characteristics

To start the IDS 100 7-1 Assignment: Project, we will explain the characteristics of the lenses of the liberal arts.

Describe the key attributes of each liberal arts lens: social science, natural science, history, and humanities.
Discuss the types of evidence utilised within each lens to analyse topics effectively.
Analyse the similarities and differences among the lenses to comprehend their distinct approaches.

Example

In exploring the liberal arts lenses of social science, natural science, history, and humanities, distinct characteristics emerge, shaping their approaches to understanding various phenomena. Social Science The social science lens focuses on human behaviour, societal structures, and interactions. It employs qualitative research methods such as interviews, surveys, and ethnographic studies (Faulkner & Atkinson, 2023). Evidence includes social data, surveys, and policy analyses, emphasising societal dynamics and behavioural patterns. Natural Science The natural science lens investigates environmental processes, physical phenomena, and ecological systems (Sherren et al., 2024). It utilises quantitative research methods like experiments, modelling, and data analysis. Evidence comprises scientific data, empirical observations, and mathematical models, highlighting physical mechanisms and environmental consequences. History The history lens examines past events, developments, and societal changes. It employs archival research, document analysis, and historical narratives. Evidence includes primary sources, historical documents, and archaeological findings, providing insights into historical contexts and narratives. Humanities The Humanities lens explores cultural artifacts, languages, and philosophical ideas. It utilises interpretative methods, textual analysis, and critical theories (Servant-Miklos & Dewar, 2024). Evidence comprises literary texts, artistic creations, philosophical writings, and cultural artifacts, offering perspectives on human experiences and values. Similarities and Differences: While each lens has distinct methodologies and focuses, they intersect in their pursuit of understanding human experiences and societal phenomena. Social science and natural science share an empirical approach but diverge in their emphasis on human versus environmental factors. History and humanities delve into human culture and experience,s but differ in their methodologies and sources. Despite their differences, all lenses contribute to interdisciplinary perspectives and a holistic understanding of complex topics.

For the topic you selected from the list above, determine what you know, what you want to know, and what you have learned about the topic from the provided resources in the library guide. You will need to use each of the four lenses in your responses. Know (K): Draw on previous and personal experiences to provide information about what you already know about your topic, about each lens. Want to know (W): Determine what you want to know about your topic regarding the lenses. Be sure to phrase this information in the form of questions. What keywords would help explore your topic? Learned (L): Answer the questions you posed about your topic using the provided resources in the library guide. If the resources do not answer them, explain what steps you will take to answer them.

Researching Your Topic: Know, Want to Know, Learned (KWL)

The next section of the IDS 100 7-1 Assignment: Project focuses on the KWL analysis of our chosen topic.

Reflect on your prior knowledge about climate change through each lens.
Formulate questions to guide further exploration of climate change through the lenses.
Utilise provided resources to answer questions and expand understanding of climate change dynamics.

Example

Know (K) In exploring what we know about climate change through various lenses, we draw upon personal experiences that underscore its multifaceted nature. Historically, we recognise the increasing frequency of extreme weather events and shifts in global climate patterns (Huning et al., 2020). Culturally, we observe diverse perspectives on climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies across different communities. Ethically, we acknowledge the moral imperative to address climate injustice and ensure environmental stewardship for future generations (Sardo, 2023). Socially, we see the interconnectedness of climate change with issues such as poverty, migration, and human rights. These experiences inform our understanding of climate change, highlighting its complexities and the need for interdisciplinary approaches to address its impacts effectively. Want to know (W) In formulating questions about climate change within each lens, we seek to effectively deepen our understanding and address knowledge gaps. Historically, we may ask how past climate events and human activities have contributed to current climate change trends. Culturally, we inquire about diverse cultural perspectives on climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies (Hosen et al., 2020). Ethically, we explore the moral implications of climate change policies and actions on vulnerable communities. Socially, we question how social dynamics influence climate change awareness and collective action. Utilising keywords such as “climate variability,” “adaptation strategies,” and “climate resilience” facilitates research and investigation within each lens, enabling a comprehensive exploration of the topic. Learned (L) Upon consulting the resources in the library guide, we found comprehensive information addressing several of our questions regarding climate change. Resources elucidated the mechanisms by which greenhouse gas emissions contribute to global warming and climate change, detailing their impact on Earth’s atmosphere and temperature regulation. Additionally, we gained insight into the primary impacts of climate change on ecosystems, biodiversity, and natural resources, including shifts in habitats and loss of biodiversity (Weiskopf et al., 2020). However, some questions, such as the socio-economic factors exacerbating climate change effects and detailed strategies at various governance levels, require further exploration. To address these gaps, we plan to conduct additional research using academic journals, governmental reports, and reputable websites, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of climate change and its implications. Through this process, our understanding of climate change has evolved, recognising its interdisciplinary nature and the imperative for collective action to mitigate its impacts.

Choose two of the four lenses you applied when researching your topic and examine the topic in greater detail. Topic and first lens: Examine your topic through your first lens. Be sure to identify the lens you selected. Write about what you learned in your examination. Use details and examples relevant to that lens from the resources in the library guide and the course. Topic and second lens: Examine your topic through your second lens. Be sure to identify the lens you selected. Write about what you learned in your examination. Use details and examples relevant to that lens from the resources in the library guide and the course. Similarities and differences: Explain the similarities and differences in how the lenses relate to your topic. Focus on the view you get from your topic through both lenses. Further exploration: Determine the next steps for further exploring your chosen topic. Determine questions to ask for further exploration of this topic. Would you continue to explore through your chosen lenses or take another approach?

Applying the Lenses to Your Topic: Examine Through Lenses

Next, we will focus on applying the chosen lenses of the liberal arts to our topic.

Choose two lenses, social and natural sciences, to analyse climate change.
Provide insights from examining climate change through each lens, citing relevant resources.
Compare and contrast the perspectives from the selected lenses to gain a holistic view of climate change.
Determine future research directions, considering whether to continue exploring through current lenses or adopt alternative approaches.

Example

Upon examining climate change through the lens of social sciences, we uncover intricate social dynamics and human behaviours shaping both its causes and responses. Social science research highlights how socioeconomic factors, cultural beliefs, and political systems influence attitudes toward climate change mitigation and adaptation (Mohajan, 2020). For instance, studies reveal disparities in climate change vulnerability and resilience among different social groups, emphasising the need for socially just climate policies (Sardo, 2023). In contrast, exploring climate change through the lens of natural sciences reveals the underlying environmental processes driving its occurrence and impacts. Natural science research elucidates the mechanisms of climate change, such as greenhouse gas emissions and their effect on atmospheric composition and temperature (Hosen et al., 2020). Additionally, it provides insights into the physical manifestations of climate change, including changes in weather patterns, sea-level rise, and biodiversity loss (Weiskopf et al., 2020). When comparing these lenses, we find both similarities and differences. While social sciences emphasise human dimensions and societal responses to climate change, natural sciences focus on understanding the physical mechanisms and ecological impacts. However, both lenses converge on the urgency of addressing climate change through interdisciplinary collaboration and evidence-based policymaking. Further exploration of climate change may involve integrating additional lenses, such as humanities and history, to gain a more comprehensive understanding (Schipper et al., 2021). Questions for future research may include examining the historical contexts of climate change, analysing cultural narratives and representations, and assessing the ethical implications of climate action strategies. By embracing a multidisciplinary approach, we can enhance our insights into climate change complexities and inform more effective mitigation and adaptation efforts.

Closing

By following this How-To Owlisdom Guide, you will be able to acquire a nuanced understanding of climate change and its implications for solving the IDS 100 7-1 Assignment: Project. Comparing and contrasting social and natural science perspectives enriches your comprehension, guiding further inquiry and informed decision-making. Embrace the interdisciplinary nature of this assignment to foster holistic perspectives and deepen insights into complex global issues.

References

Faulkner, S. L., & Atkinson, J. D. (2023). Qualitative Methods in Communication and Media. Oxford University Press. Hosen, N., Nakamura, H., & Hamzah, A. (2020). Adaptation to Climate Change: Does Traditional Ecological Knowledge Hold the Key? Sustainability, 12(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020676 Huning, L. S., Love, C. A., Mallakpour, I., Mazdiyasni, O., Moftakhari, H., Papalexiou, S. M., Ragno, E., & Sadegh, M. (2020). Climate Extremes and Compound Hazards in a Warming World. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 48(Volume 48, 2020), pp. 519–548. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-071719-055228 Mohajan, H. K. (2020). Quantitative Research: A Successful Investigation in Natural and Social Sciences. Journal of Economic Development, Environment, and People, 9(4), 50–79. Sardo, M. C. (2023). Responsibility for climate justice: Political, not moral. European Journal of Political Theory, 22(1), 26–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885120955148 Schipper, E. L. F., Dubash, N. K., & Mulugetta, Y. (2021). Climate change research and the search for solutions: Rethinking interdisciplinarity. Climatic Change, 168(3), 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03237-3 Servant-Miklos, V. F. C., & Dewar, E. F. (2024). “What do I stand for?”—A phenomenological account of an identity crisis in the climate classroom. The Journal of Environmental Education, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2024.2326437 Sherren, K., Thondhlana, G., & Jackson-Smith, D. (2024). Opening Windows: Embracing New Perspectives and Practices in Natural Resource Social Sciences. University Press of Colorado. Weiskopf, S. R., Rubenstein, M. A., Crozier, L. G., Gaichas, S., Griffis, R., Halofsky, J. E., Hyde, K. J. W., Morelli, T. L., Morisette, J. T., Muñoz, R. C., Pershing, A. J., Peterson, D. L., Poudel, R., Staudinger, M. D., Sutton-Grier, A. E., Thompson, L., Vose, J., Weltzin, J. F., & Whyte, K. P. (2020). Climate change affects the United States’ biodiversity, ecosystems, ecosystem services, and natural resource management. Science of The Total Environment, 733, 137782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137782.

IDS 100 8-1 Discussion: Reflection

Instructions of IDS-100 8-1 Discussion

Discussion

Available on Feb 11, 2023, 11:59 PM. Submissions are restricted before availability starts.

For your final discussion, reflect on what you’ve learned about the four lenses, the liberal arts, and your topic. Think of what aspects of the knowledge acquired will be of most use as you move through your program at SNHU.

Create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts.

For your initial post, address the following:

What skills have you learned in this course?
How did learning about the lenses of the liberal arts change your perspective and/or outlook?
Going back to Module One, how have your definitions of liberal arts changed, given what you’ve learned in the course?

For your response posts, address the following:

What are the similarities and differences in your peers’ reflections and skills learned?
What insights can you offer your peers about their analysis of the usefulness of the lenses?

To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric.

Introduction to IDS 100 8-1 Discussion

This How-To Owlisdom Guide will assist you in effectively approaching the final discussion assignment for the course IDS 100. The task involves a reflective exercise on the four liberal arts lenses and how these perspectives have enriched your understanding of a specific topic. I will provide the guidelines that outline a structured approach to crafting your responses and engaging with peers, ensuring clarity and depth in your reflections.

What skills have you learned in this course?

Personal Reflection on Skills Learned

To start the IDS 100 8-1 Discussion: Reflection, we will first explore what skills we learned from this course.

Briefly identify the essential skills you have developed throughout this course. Think about critical thinking, analytical skills, or interdisciplinary approaches.
Connect these skills to specific assignments or discussions that helped foster them, providing a clear link between course activities and your skill development.

Example

Throughout this course, I have honed several pivotal skills, notably in critical thinking, analytical reasoning, and embracing interdisciplinary approaches. My ability to critically analyse texts was significantly enhanced through structured debates in our discussions on cultural impacts, requiring a synthesis of historical and sociological lenses. Furthermore, the interdisciplinary project on environmental policy broadened my understanding and improved my capability to integrate scientific data with ethical considerations, demonstrating the practical application of liberal arts in addressing complex real-world issues. These experiences vividly illustrate the direct impact of course activities on my skill development.

How did learning about the lenses of liberal arts change your perspective and outlook?

Impact of Liberal Arts Lenses on Perspectives

For the next section of the IDS 100 8-1 Discussion: Reflection, we will discuss our perspective and learn about the four lenses of liberal arts.

Explain how the four lenses (historical, humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences) have altered your viewpoint on the course’s central topic.
Provide examples to illustrate changes in your thought process or analytical approach due to these lenses.

Example

Learning about the four lenses of liberal arts—historical, humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences—has profoundly reshaped my perspective on climate change. Historically, understanding the evolution of environmental policies illuminated the challenges and progress made. The humanities lens exposed me to ethical considerations and human impacts, enriching my empathetic understanding. Through the social sciences, I analysed societal behaviours and policy effectiveness, while the natural sciences lens allowed me to appreciate the scientific underpinnings of climate phenomena. These integrated perspectives have transformed my analytical approach, enabling a more nuanced evaluation of solutions to environmental issues.

Going back to Module One, how have your definitions of liberal arts changed, given what you’ve learned in the course?

Evolution of Understanding of Liberal Arts

For the last section of the IDS 100 8-1 Discussion: Reflection, we will discuss how our understanding of the definition of the liberal arts has changed.

Reflect on your initial definition of liberal arts from the beginning of the course.
Discuss how your understanding has changed, expanded, or been challenged. Highlight any specific moments or teachings that were pivotal.

Example

Initially, I viewed the liberal arts primarily as a means to develop critical thinking through a broad educational spectrum. However, my understanding has deepened significantly. Interactions with the four lenses demonstrated that liberal arts are about acquiring knowledge from different fields and integrating these disciplines to tackle complex issues more effectively. A pivotal moment was during a project that merged ethical reasoning from the humanities with data analysis from the sciences, illustrating how these approaches coalesce to provide holistic solutions. This realisation has shifted my perception of liberal arts as a diverse educational toolkit to appreciating it as a synergistic framework essential for innovative problem-solving in real-world contexts.

What are the similarities and differences in your peers’ reflections and skills learned? What insights can you offer your peers about their analysis of the usefulness of the lenses?

Peer Responses

Responding to peers is one of the vital parts of the IDS 100 8-1 Discussion: Reflection. We need to provide at least two peer responses. I will provide one example post. You can write your peer responses by keeping the following points in mind.

Identify similarities and differences in the reflections and skills your peers have posted. Are there common themes or notable divergences in how skills are perceived?
Offer insights on the usefulness of the four lenses or how they could be further applied in your peers’ analyses. Ensure your feedback is constructive and supportive.

Example

Response 01 Many of us have recognised the value of critical thinking and interdisciplinary approaches as common themes in our skills development. However, I’ve noticed some variance in applying these skills across different disciplines. Reflecting on the usefulness of the four lenses, I suggest further integrating them to enhance our analytical capabilities. For instance, employing the natural sciences lens could strengthen empirical assessments in your projects, complementing the theoretical insights gained from humanities. This blend can provide a more robust approach to addressing complex issues.

Closing

This How-To guide helps you create a richer, more interconnected understanding of the liberal arts to solve the IDS 100 8-1 Discussion: Reflection. The skills and perspectives developed through this course are valuable academic and personal growth tools. By articulating these experiences clearly and thoughtfully, you solidify your learning and prepare for future intellectual challenges.