LSTD 510 2-2 RESEARCH PAPER PREPARATION

INTRODUCTION TO LSTD 2-2 RESEARCH PAPER PREPARATION

This Owlisdom, LSTD 510 2-2 Research Paper Preparation assignment requires you to prepare a formal research paper analyzing the jury selection process about constitutional law and an allied field such as psychology or technology. You will explore the Sixth Amendment, peremptory challenges, challenges for cause, racial or ethnic bias, and the implications of virtual jury trials. This guide provides step-by-step instructions to help you research, analyze, and synthesize information effectively for your paper.

Research existing case law to analyze how the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in an effort to achieve the Sixth Amendment’s chief goal. a.  Analyze at least four cases (three of which must be from 1990 to the present). Make sure that all of your cases are still good law.

Research and Case Law Analysis

• Research and analyze the LSTD 510 2-2 Research Paper Preparation four Supreme Court cases related to the jury selection process, ensuring that three of these cases are from 1990 to the present.

Example

To address the complexities of the jury selection process in relation to constitutional law and its intersection with psychology and technology, I will analyze key Supreme Court cases that illustrate the evolution and current state of jury selection practices. The following cases have been identified for their relevance and recency, ensuring they reflect the current legal landscape:

• Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986): Establishes that peremptory challenges cannot be used to exclude jurors based solely on race.
• J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994): Extends the principles of Batson to gender discrimination.
• Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado, 137 S. Ct. 855 (2017): Allows jury deliberations to be examined when evidence indicates racial bias influenced the verdict.
• Foster v. Chatman, 578 U.S. ___ (2016): Reaffirms Batson by demonstrating the continued relevance of race in jury selection decisions.

Research at least five law review or other academic quality journal articles regarding criminal jury selection and the Sixth Amendment.

Academic Sources and Journal Articles

• Find and review LSTD 510 2-2 Research Paper Preparation at least five law review or other academic journal articles regarding criminal jury selection and the Sixth Amendment.

Example

Research will also involve a detailed review of law review and other academic journal articles that focus on the intricacies of jury selection and its constitutional implications. The following five sources have been selected for their depth of analysis and academic rigour:

• A Fair and Impartial Trial Free from Racial Discrimination Will Require an across-the-Board Approach”: Systemic Reforms Still Needed in Light of the “Other” Racial Justice Jury Trial Rulings in State v. Veal & State v. Williams.
• Virtual Reality: Prospective Catalyst for Restorative Justice
• Implicit Bias and Antidiscrimination Policy
• Online Courts: Bridging the Gap between Access and Justice
• The Constitutional Right to Peremptory Challenges in Jury Selection

Explain in detail how you determined that the cases you will use are still good law and likely to be of value to you as you construct your research paper.

• Identify the LSTD 510 2-2 Research Paper Preparation four cases and five academic articles you will use. Confirm that these cases are still good law using legal research tools like LexisNexis.

Eample

To confirm that these cases remain authoritative, I utilized the legal research platform LexisNexis to check for any subsequent cases that might have overruled or critically modified the precedents set. Their frequent citation in recent law review articles confirms their continued applicability and importance in current legal discourse.

These articles were selected based on their recent publication dates, ensuring current information and perspectives. Their publication in reputable law reviews guarantees academic rigour and authority. Each article was vetted for its relevance to the key topics of peremptory challenges, racial and gender biases, and the impact of technology on the fairness of jury trials.

What is your thesis statement?  What do you plan to prove or illustrate in your research paper?

Developing a Thesis Statement

• Formulate a clear thesis statement that LSTD 510 2-2 Research Paper Preparation outlines what you plan to prove or illustrate in your research paper.

Example

The effectiveness of the jury selection process in safeguarding the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of a fair trial is significantly influenced by contemporary challenges, including peremptory challenges, challenges for cause, and the incorporation of technology in court proceedings. This research will explore how these elements interact with constitutional mandates and societal variables within the fields of psychology and technology to impact the integrity and impartiality of jury trials.

Outline your intended plan to research, analyze, and synthesize what you learn in order to build your research paper.  What tools do you expect to use?  What criteria will you use to assess relevance, currency, authority, accuracy, purpose, audience and/or ideological perspective, etc. for your research project?

Research Methodology and Tools

• Use legal databases such as LexisNexis and Westlaw for case law research and LSTD 510 2-2 Research Paper Preparation academic databases like JSTOR and Google Scholar for accessing peer-reviewed articles.

Example

The research will be conducted using a combination of legal databases such as LexisNexis and Westlaw for case law research, and academic databases including JSTOR and Google Scholar for accessing peer-reviewed articles. The criteria for assessing the sources will include relevance to the thesis, currency of the data, authority of the publication or author, accuracy of the information, and the ideological perspective to ensure a balanced view of the issues.

Synthesis and Analysis

• Synthesize findings from case law and academic articles to present a comprehensive analysis. Focus on LSTD 510 2-2 Research Paper Preparation how psychological and technological insights impact biases in jury selection and virtual trials.

Example

The research will synthesize findings from both case law and academic articles to present a comprehensive analysis of how the jury selection process meets the challenges posed by societal changes and technological advancements. The analysis will particularly focus on how psychological and technological insights can enhance understanding of biases in jury selection and the potential of virtual trials to uphold or undermine the goals of the Sixth Amendment.

Conclusion

• Summarize the LSTD 510 2-2 Research Paper Preparation  key takeaways from your research. Emphasize the importance of understanding the jury selection process in ensuring fair trials as mandated by the Constitution.In the next module of  LSTD 510 3-1 EQUAL PROTECTION

Example

By approaching this research objectively, the intention is to provide a thorough and balanced understanding of the current state of jury selection and its adequacy in ensuring a fair trial, as mandated by the Constitution. The ultimate goal is to identify areas where further legal reform may be necessary or where additional safeguards should be implemented to protect the integrity of the jury system.

References

Bloch, K. E. (2021). Virtual reality: Prospective catalyst for restorative justice. Am. Crim. L. Rev., 58, 285.

Gawronski, B., Ledgerwood, A., & Eastwick, P. W. (2020). Implicit Bias and Antidiscrimination Policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732220939128

Gras, I. O. (2021). Online courts: Bridging the gap between access and justice. UCLJLJ, 10, 24.

Jolly, R. L. (2024). The Constitutional Right to Peremptory Challenges in Jury Selection. Vanderbilt Law Review, 77. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4743424

Lovell, R. E. (2021). “ A Fair and Impartial Trial Free from Racial Discrimination Will Require an across-the-Board Approach”: Systemic Reforms Still Needed in Light of the” Other” Racial Justice Jury Trial Rulings in State v. Veal & State v. Williams. Drake L. Rev. Discourse, 71, 101.