LSTD 510 2-2 RESEARCH PAPER PREPARATION

I to LSTD 2-2 Research Paper Preparation

The assignment LSTD 510 2-2 Research Paper Preparation, you have to prepare a formal research paper on the analysis of the jury selection process as regards to constitutional law as well as an allied field for instance psychology or technology. You will examine peremptory and challenges for cause, racial or ethnic bias, and the Sixth Amendment, and the impact of virtual jury trials. This guide will walk you step by step through research, analysis and synthesis of information for your paper.

Research existing case law to analyze how the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in an effort to achieve the Sixth Amendment’s chief goal. a.  Analyze at least four cases (three of which must be from 1990 to the present). Make sure that all of your cases are still good law.

Research and Case Law Analysis

• In this research paper, we research and analyze the LSTD 510 2-2 Research Paper Preparation four Supreme Court cases that deal with jury selection process and make sure the three are dated from the year 1990 to present.

Example

In order to examine jury selection process in relation to constitutional law and its intersection with the psychology and technology, I will analyze of key Supreme Court cases which show how the jury selection practices have changed and what is the state they have now. The following cases have been identified for their relevance and recency, ensuring they reflect the current legal landscape:

• Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986): Establishes that peremptory challenges cannot be used to exclude jurors based solely on race.
• J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994): Extends the principles of Batson to gender discrimination.
• Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado, 137 S. Ct. 855 (2017): Allows jury deliberations to be examined when evidence indicates racial bias influenced the verdict.
• Foster v. Chatman, 578 U.S. ___ (2016): Reaffirms Batson by demonstrating the continued relevance of race in jury selection decisions.

Research at least five law review or other academic quality journal articles regarding criminal jury selection and the Sixth Amendment.

Academic Sources and Journal Articles

• Review at least five law review or other academic journal articles regarding criminal jury selection and the Sixth Amendment, and find and review LSTD 510 2-2 Research Paper Preparation.

Example

Detailed review of law review and other academic journals on the specific procedures and constitutional issues in the actual processes of jury selection is also part of the research. The following five sources have been selected for their depth of analysis and academic rigour:

• A Fair and Impartial Trial Free from Racial Discrimination Will Require an across-the-Board Approach”: Systemic Reforms Still Needed in Light of the “Other” Racial Justice Jury Trial Rulings in State v. Veal & State v. Williams.
• Virtual Reality: Prospective Catalyst for Restorative Justice
• Implicit Bias and Antidiscrimination Policy
• Online Courts: Bridging the Gap between Access and Justice
• The Constitutional Right to Peremptory Challenges in Jury Selection

Explain in detail how you determined that the cases you will use are still good law and likely to be of value to you as you construct your research paper.

• Select the LSTD 510 2-2 Research Paper Preparation four cases and five academic articles you will use. Check that these cases are still good law with a little help from legal research tools such as LexisNexis.

Eample

I then used the legal research platform LexisNexis to make certain that these cases still stood as good law, looking to see if any laws had conclusively overruled or drastically skewed them. Their continued (and frequent) citation in recent law review articles confirm that their applicability in today’s legal discourse remains strong.

The reason this list has been made is because articles have been chosen based on date of publication, meaning they are all very up to date and provide the latest perspectives. Academic rigour and authority are guaranteed by publication in reputable law reviews. Relevance of each article to the top key topics peremptory challenges, racial and gender bias, and the effect of technology on the fairness of jury trials was vetted.

What is your thesis statement?  What do you plan to prove or illustrate in your research paper?

Developing a Thesis Statement

• Construct a thesis statement for your project that LSTD 510 2-2 Research Paper Preparation will solve..

Example

The effect of contemporary challenges to the jury selection process, such as peremptory challenges, challenges for cause, and the integration of technology in court proceedings, on the ability of the jury selection process to protect the Sixth Amendment guarantee to a fair trial is discussed. The goal of this research is to investigate how these elements interact with the constitutional mandates and social variables in the fields of psychology and technology to effect the integrity and impartiality of jury trials.

Outline your intended plan to research, analyze, and synthesize what you learn in order to build your research paper.  What tools do you expect to use?  What criteria will you use to assess relevance, currency, authority, accuracy, purpose, audience and/or ideological perspective, etc. for your research project?

Research Methodology and Tools

• For law research, use legal databases LexisNexis and Westlaw, and for accessing peer reviewed articles, JSTOR and Google Scholar are good academic databases.

Example

Legal databases including LexisNexis and Westlaw will be used for case law research and academic bibliodatabases such as JSTOR, Google Scholar for peer reviewed articles. Criteria of relevance to the thesis, currency of the data, authority of the publication or author, accuracy of the information will be applied for the assessment of sources, to ensure a balanced view of the issues including the ideological perspective.

Synthesis and Analysis

• Combine case law findings with academic articles to provides an all encompassing analysis. Learn about LSTD 510 2-2 Research Paper Preparation on how psychological and technological insights affect jury selection biases and virtual trials.

Example

The research will synthesize findings made both in case law and in academic articles in order to reach a comprehensive picture of how jury selection addresses the challenges resulting from societal changes and technological advancements. In particular, analysis will consider the ways in which psychological and technological insights can project knowledge about biases in jury selection and what role virtual trials can play in maintaining or interfering with the goals of the Sixth Amendment.

Conclusion

• Summarize key points from your research on your LSTD 510 2-2 Research Paper Preparation. First, emphasize the idea that it is crucial to know how the jury selection system is working in order to have fair trials as required by the Constitution in the next part module of LSTD 510 3-1 EQUAL PROTECTION

Example

Approaching this research objectively offers the intent of offering a well rounded and balanced view of the status of jury selection and its effectiveness at providing a trial that complies with that commanded in the Constitution. The ultimate aim is to isolate points to which more legal reform may be needed, or where additional safeguards against integrity should be found to protect the integrity of the jury system.

References

Bloch, K. E. (2021). Virtual reality: Prospective catalyst for restorative justice. Am. Crim. L. Rev., 58, 285.

Gawronski, B., Ledgerwood, A., & Eastwick, P. W. (2020). Implicit Bias and Antidiscrimination Policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732220939128

Gras, I. O. (2021). Online courts: Bridging the gap between access and justice. UCLJLJ, 10, 24.

Jolly, R. L. (2024). The Constitutional Right to Peremptory Challenges in Jury Selection. Vanderbilt Law Review, 77. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4743424

Lovell, R. E. (2021). “ A Fair and Impartial Trial Free from Racial Discrimination Will Require an across-the-Board Approach”: Systemic Reforms Still Needed in Light of the” Other” Racial Justice Jury Trial Rulings in State v. Veal & State v. Williams. Drake L. Rev. Discourse, 71, 101.